Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2012

01-02-2012

The Politics of Shareholder Activism in Nigeria

Authors: Emmanuel Adegbite, Kenneth Amaeshi, Olufemi Amao

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 3/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Shareholder activism has become a force for good in the extant corporate governance literature. In this article, we present a case study of Nigeria to show how shareholder activism, as a corporate governance mechanism, can constitute a space for unhealthy politics and turbulent politicking, which is a reflection of the country’s brand of politics. As a result, we point out some translational challenges, and suggest more caution, in the diffusion of corporate governance practices across different institutional environments. We contribute to the literature on corporate governance in Africa, whilst creating an understanding of the political embeddedness of shareholder activism in different institutional contexts—i.e. a step closer to a political theorising of shareholder activism.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Abdel, S., & Shahira, F. (2002). Corporate governance is becoming a global pursuit: What could be done in Egypt? International Journal of Finance, 14(1), 2138–2172. Abdel, S., & Shahira, F. (2002). Corporate governance is becoming a global pursuit: What could be done in Egypt? International Journal of Finance, 14(1), 2138–2172.
go back to reference Adegbite, E. ( 2010). The determinants of good corporate governance: The case of Nigeria. Doctoral thesis, Cass Business School, City University, London. Adegbite, E. ( 2010). The determinants of good corporate governance: The case of Nigeria. Doctoral thesis, Cass Business School, City University, London.
go back to reference Adegbite, E. (2012). Corporate governance regulation in Nigeria. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Forthcoming. Adegbite, E. (2012). Corporate governance regulation in Nigeria. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Forthcoming.
go back to reference Adegbite, E., & Nakajima, C. (2011). Corporate governance and responsibility in Nigeria. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 0(0), 1–20. Adegbite, E., & Nakajima, C. (2011). Corporate governance and responsibility in Nigeria. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 0(0), 1–20.
go back to reference Aguilera, R. V. (2005). Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective. British Journal of Management, 16, S39–S53.CrossRef Aguilera, R. V. (2005). Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective. British Journal of Management, 16, S39–S53.CrossRef
go back to reference Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.CrossRef Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.CrossRef
go back to reference Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.
go back to reference Ahunwan, B. (2002). Corporate governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 269–287.CrossRef Ahunwan, B. (2002). Corporate governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 269–287.CrossRef
go back to reference Akanki, E. O. (1994). Company directors’ responsibility. In Ahunwan, B. (2002). Corporate governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 269–287. Akanki, E. O. (1994). Company directors’ responsibility. In Ahunwan, B. (2002). Corporate governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 269–287.
go back to reference Akpotaire, V. (2005). The Nigerian indigenization laws as disincentives to foreign investments: The end of an era. Business Law Review, 3, 62–68. Akpotaire, V. (2005). The Nigerian indigenization laws as disincentives to foreign investments: The end of an era. Business Law Review, 3, 62–68.
go back to reference Amaeshi, K. M., Adi, B. C., Ogbechie, C., & Amao, O. O. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Nigeria: Western mimicry or indigenous influences? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24(Winter), 83–99. Amaeshi, K. M., Adi, B. C., Ogbechie, C., & Amao, O. O. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Nigeria: Western mimicry or indigenous influences? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24(Winter), 83–99.
go back to reference Amao, O., & Amaeshi, K. (2008). Galvanising shareholder activism: A prerequisite for effective corporate governance and accountability in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 119–130.CrossRef Amao, O., & Amaeshi, K. (2008). Galvanising shareholder activism: A prerequisite for effective corporate governance and accountability in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 119–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, K., Ramsay, I., Marshall, S., & Mitchell, R. (2007). Union shareholder activism in the context of declining labour law protection: Four Australian case studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(1), 45–56.CrossRef Anderson, K., Ramsay, I., Marshall, S., & Mitchell, R. (2007). Union shareholder activism in the context of declining labour law protection: Four Australian case studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(1), 45–56.CrossRef
go back to reference Aoki, M. (2001). Towards a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Aoki, M. (2001). Towards a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Bainbridge, S. M. (1995). The politics of corporate governance. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18(3), 671–735. Bainbridge, S. M. (1995). The politics of corporate governance. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18(3), 671–735.
go back to reference Bartunek, J. M., Bobko, P., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Toward innovation and diversity in management research methods. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1362–1373.CrossRef Bartunek, J. M., Bobko, P., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Toward innovation and diversity in management research methods. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1362–1373.CrossRef
go back to reference Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2009). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes U.K. focus fund. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3093–3129.CrossRef Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2009). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes U.K. focus fund. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3093–3129.CrossRef
go back to reference Belloc, M., & Pagano, U. (2009). Co-evolution of politics and corporate governance. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(2), 106–114.CrossRef Belloc, M., & Pagano, U. (2009). Co-evolution of politics and corporate governance. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(2), 106–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Black, B. S. (1992). Agents watching agents: The promise of institutional investor voice. In Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2009). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes U.K. focus fund. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3093–3129. Black, B. S. (1992). Agents watching agents: The promise of institutional investor voice. In Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2009). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes U.K. focus fund. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3093–3129.
go back to reference Bradley, M., Schipani, C., Sundaram, A., & Walsh, J. (2000). The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at cross roads. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(3), 9–86.CrossRef Bradley, M., Schipani, C., Sundaram, A., & Walsh, J. (2000). The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at cross roads. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(3), 9–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Charkham, J. P. (1994). Keeping good company: A study of corporate governance in five countries. In Okike, E. N. M. (2007). Corporate governance in Nigeria: The status quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 173–193. Charkham, J. P. (1994). Keeping good company: A study of corporate governance in five countries. In Okike, E. N. M. (2007). Corporate governance in Nigeria: The status quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 173–193.
go back to reference Child, J. (2002). A configuration analysis of international joint ventures. Organisation Studies, 23(5), 781–815.CrossRef Child, J. (2002). A configuration analysis of international joint ventures. Organisation Studies, 23(5), 781–815.CrossRef
go back to reference Choi, W., & Cho, S. (2003). Shareholder activism in Korea: An analysis of PSPD’s activities. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(3), 349–364.CrossRef Choi, W., & Cho, S. (2003). Shareholder activism in Korea: An analysis of PSPD’s activities. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11(3), 349–364.CrossRef
go back to reference Coglianese, C. (2007). Legitimacy and corporate governance. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 32(1), 159–167. Coglianese, C. (2007). Legitimacy and corporate governance. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 32(1), 159–167.
go back to reference Crespi, R., & Renneboog, L. (2010). Is (institutional) shareholder activism new? Evidence from UK shareholder coalitions in the pre-Cadbury era. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 274–295.CrossRef Crespi, R., & Renneboog, L. (2010). Is (institutional) shareholder activism new? Evidence from UK shareholder coalitions in the pre-Cadbury era. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 274–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Ewings, P., Powell, R., Barton, A., & Pritchard, C. (2008). Qualitative research methods. Plymouth: Peninsula Research and Development Support Unit. Ewings, P., Powell, R., Barton, A., & Pritchard, C. (2008). Qualitative research methods. Plymouth: Peninsula Research and Development Support Unit.
go back to reference Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., Gospel, H., & Allcock, D. (2007). Key drivers of ‘good’ corporate governance and the appropriateness of UK policy responses. London: The Department of Trade and Industry. Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., Gospel, H., & Allcock, D. (2007). Key drivers of ‘good’ corporate governance and the appropriateness of UK policy responses. London: The Department of Trade and Industry.
go back to reference Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175–197.CrossRef Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175–197.CrossRef
go back to reference Frynas, J. G., Beck, M. P., & Mellahi, K. (2000). Maintaining corporate dominance after decolonization: The “first mover advantage” of shell-BP in Nigeria. Review of African Political Economy, 27(85), 407–425.CrossRef Frynas, J. G., Beck, M. P., & Mellahi, K. (2000). Maintaining corporate dominance after decolonization: The “first mover advantage” of shell-BP in Nigeria. Review of African Political Economy, 27(85), 407–425.CrossRef
go back to reference Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (1998). A survey of shareholder activism: Motivation and empirical evidence. In Gillan, S. L. (2006). Recent developments in corporate governance: An overview. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 381–402. Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (1998). A survey of shareholder activism: Motivation and empirical evidence. In Gillan, S. L. (2006). Recent developments in corporate governance: An overview. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 381–402.
go back to reference Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305.CrossRef Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1), 55–73.CrossRef Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(1), 55–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. In Ratcliff, D. E. (1994). Analytic induction as a qualitative research method of analysis. The University of Georgia. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. In Ratcliff, D. E. (1994). Analytic induction as a qualitative research method of analysis. The University of Georgia.
go back to reference Gourevitch, P., & Shinn, J. (2005). Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Gourevitch, P., & Shinn, J. (2005). Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Grienenberger, W. F. (1995). Institutional shareholders and corporate governance. In Brossman, M. E., & Cinque, J. F. (1996). Proxy voting and shareholder activism: The emerging issues. Employee Benefits Journal, 21(2), 5–15. Grienenberger, W. F. (1995). Institutional shareholders and corporate governance. In Brossman, M. E., & Cinque, J. F. (1996). Proxy voting and shareholder activism: The emerging issues. Employee Benefits Journal, 21(2), 5–15.
go back to reference Harrington, B. (2002). Obtrusiveness as strategy in ethnographic research. Qualitative Sociology, 25(1), 49–61.CrossRef Harrington, B. (2002). Obtrusiveness as strategy in ethnographic research. Qualitative Sociology, 25(1), 49–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Hendry, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Roberts, J. (2006). Owners or traders? Conceptualizations of institutional investors and their relationship with corporate managers. Human Relations, 59, 1101–1132.CrossRef Hendry, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Roberts, J. (2006). Owners or traders? Conceptualizations of institutional investors and their relationship with corporate managers. Human Relations, 59, 1101–1132.CrossRef
go back to reference Hendry, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Roberts, J. (2007). Responsible ownership, shareholder value and the new shareholder activism. Competition and Change, 11(3), 223–240.CrossRef Hendry, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Roberts, J. (2007). Responsible ownership, shareholder value and the new shareholder activism. Competition and Change, 11(3), 223–240.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure? Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure? Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Judge, W. Q., Douglas, T. J., & Kutan, A. M. (2008). Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34, 765–785.CrossRef Judge, W. Q., Douglas, T. J., & Kutan, A. M. (2008). Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34, 765–785.CrossRef
go back to reference Lubatkin, M., Lane, P. J., Collin, S., & Very, P. (2007). An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 43–58.CrossRef Lubatkin, M., Lane, P. J., Collin, S., & Very, P. (2007). An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 43–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Lynn, P., Turner, R., & Smith, P. (1998). Assessing the effects of an advance letter for a personal interview survey. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40(3), 265–272. Lynn, P., Turner, R., & Smith, P. (1998). Assessing the effects of an advance letter for a personal interview survey. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40(3), 265–272.
go back to reference Okike, E. N. M. (2007). Corporate governance in Nigeria: The status quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 173–193.CrossRef Okike, E. N. M. (2007). Corporate governance in Nigeria: The status quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 173–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. In Das, T. H. (1983). Qualitative research in organisational behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 301–314. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. In Das, T. H. (1983). Qualitative research in organisational behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 301–314.
go back to reference Roe, M. J. (1994). Strong managers, weak owners: The political roots of American Corporate Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Roe, M. J. (1994). Strong managers, weak owners: The political roots of American Corporate Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Roe, M. J. (2003). Political determinants of corporate governance: Political context, corporate impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Roe, M. J. (2003). Political determinants of corporate governance: Political context, corporate impact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Rossouw, G. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business and Society, 44(1), 94–106.CrossRef Rossouw, G. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business and Society, 44(1), 94–106.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubach, M. J., & Sebora, T. C. (2009). Determinants of institutional investor activism: A test of the Ryan-Schneider Model (2002). Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(2), 245–261. Rubach, M. J., & Sebora, T. C. (2009). Determinants of institutional investor activism: A test of the Ryan-Schneider Model (2002). Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(2), 245–261.
go back to reference Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Large shareholder activism in corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Review of Finance, 1(3), 161–194.CrossRef Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Large shareholder activism in corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from India. International Review of Finance, 1(3), 161–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Schacht, K. N. (1995). Institutional investors and shareholder activism: Dealing with demanding shareholders. Directorship, 21(5), 8–12. Schacht, K. N. (1995). Institutional investors and shareholder activism: Dealing with demanding shareholders. Directorship, 21(5), 8–12.
go back to reference Seki, T. (2005). Legal reform and shareholder activism by institutional investors in Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(3), 377–385.CrossRef Seki, T. (2005). Legal reform and shareholder activism by institutional investors in Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(3), 377–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Sewell, M. (2008). The use of qualitative interviews in evaluation. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona. Sewell, M. (2008). The use of qualitative interviews in evaluation. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, M. P. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 227–252.CrossRef Smith, M. P. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 227–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson, T., & Davis, G. (1997). The politics of corporate control and the future of shareholder activism in the United States. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(3), 152–159.CrossRef Thompson, T., & Davis, G. (1997). The politics of corporate control and the future of shareholder activism in the United States. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(3), 152–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organisational research: A preface. In Das, T. H. (1983). Qualitative research in organisational behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 301–314. Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming qualitative methods for organisational research: A preface. In Das, T. H. (1983). Qualitative research in organisational behaviour. Journal of Management Studies, 20(3), 301–314.
go back to reference Wang, Y. (2006). Methodologies for impact evaluation: Quantitative vs qualitative methods. Paper presented the conference for evaluating the impact of projects and programmes, Beijing, China, April 10–14. Wang, Y. (2006). Methodologies for impact evaluation: Quantitative vs qualitative methods. Paper presented the conference for evaluating the impact of projects and programmes, Beijing, China, April 10–14.
go back to reference Wärneryd, K. (2005). Special issue on the politics of corporate governance: Introduction. Economics of Governance, 6(2), 91–92.CrossRef Wärneryd, K. (2005). Special issue on the politics of corporate governance: Introduction. Economics of Governance, 6(2), 91–92.CrossRef
go back to reference Wells, W. D., & Lo Sciuto, L. A. (1966). Direct observation of purchasing behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(3), 227–233.CrossRef Wells, W. D., & Lo Sciuto, L. A. (1966). Direct observation of purchasing behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(3), 227–233.CrossRef
go back to reference West, A. (2009). The ethics of corporate governance: A (South) African perspective. International Journal of Law and Management, 51(1), 10–16.CrossRef West, A. (2009). The ethics of corporate governance: A (South) African perspective. International Journal of Law and Management, 51(1), 10–16.CrossRef
go back to reference William, M. K. (2006). Social research methods. Trochim, UK. William, M. K. (2006). Social research methods. Trochim, UK.
go back to reference Yakasai, G. A. (2001). Corporate governance in a third world country with particular reference to Nigeria. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 239–240.CrossRef Yakasai, G. A. (2001). Corporate governance in a third world country with particular reference to Nigeria. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 239–240.CrossRef
go back to reference Yerokun, O. (1992). The changing investment climate through law and policy in Nigeria. In Ahunwan, B. (2002). Corporate governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 269–287. Yerokun, O. (1992). The changing investment climate through law and policy in Nigeria. In Ahunwan, B. (2002). Corporate governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 269–287.
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Metadata
Title
The Politics of Shareholder Activism in Nigeria
Authors
Emmanuel Adegbite
Kenneth Amaeshi
Olufemi Amao
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0974-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2012 Go to the issue