Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Public Value and Shared Value Approaches

A Comparative Analysis and Lessons from the Shared Value Theory

Authors : Kaisa Sorsa, Mikko Sihvonen

Published in: Der öffentliche (Mehr-)Wert von Medien

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As public service media organisations are key actors in providing services that are vital for the health of a democratic society, public value has become a media policy term ‘du jour’ in Europe, which is embraced and integrated to internal policy processes of key European broadcasting organisations, including the British BBC and Austria’s ORF. Originally developed as a conceptual model with tools for developing management competence in the public sector, the public value notion is now used as an analysis tool in the context of media industry to identify outcomes that improve the welfare of the individuals, the society as a whole and the wider commercial market.
In parallel to the public value approach, another approach has been developed to quantify organisational outcomes in more broad terms. This Creating Shared Value (CSV) approach, mainly utilised in the context of private enterprise, is similar to the public value approach in that it seeks to steer the organisational strategies and behaviour towards the creation of economic value in a way that also creates value for society. Shared value is not corporate social responsibility or philanthropy, on the contrary, creating shared value is at the core of the business strategy. It is important to understand that if the organisation’s strategic objectives are supported by social investments, those investments will end up in its strategic plan and also become part of company’s DNA. And if the social investments are aligned with company strategy and integrated into its strategic plan, the organisation cannot eliminate them during economic downturns. The CSV approach argues that it gives companies competitive benefits over their competitors (Porter and Kramer in Harv Bus Rev 89(1), 62–77, 2011).
This chapter undertakes a critical comparison of the public value and shared value approaches. It analyses the origins of these approaches, their key characteristics and provides details about their current utilisation. The chapter will then proceed to critically analysing the current implementation of the public value approach in public service media organisations by detailing problematic issues in this respect, while it also seeks to explain how these issues stem from the origins of the approach and institutional culture within public service media organisations. The chapter then proceeds to a discussion about the contribution of the shared value approach, and proposes directions for a theoretical convergence between the public value and shared value approaches.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aslama Horowitz, M., & Clark, J. (2014). Multi-stakeholderism. Value for public service media. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.) The value of public service media (pp. 165–181). Gothenburg: Nordicom. Aslama Horowitz, M., & Clark, J. (2014). Multi-stakeholderism. Value for public service media. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.) The value of public service media (pp. 165–181). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
go back to reference Benington, J., & Moore, M. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In J. Benington & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (S. 1–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Benington, J., & Moore, M. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In J. Benington & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (S. 1–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Benson, R., & Powers, M. (2011). Public media and political independence: Lessons for the future of journalism from around the world. New York: Department of Media, Culture and Communication University. Benson, R., & Powers, M. (2011). Public media and political independence: Lessons for the future of journalism from around the world. New York: Department of Media, Culture and Communication University.
go back to reference Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (1997). Theorizing multichannel media economics: An exploration of a group-industry strategic competition model. The Journal of Media Economics, 10(1), 39–49.CrossRef Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (1997). Theorizing multichannel media economics: An exploration of a group-industry strategic competition model. The Journal of Media Economics, 10(1), 39–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Goodwin, P. (2014). The price of everything and the value of nothing? Economic arguments and the politics of public service media. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.), The value of public service media (S. 77–86). Gothenburg: Nordicom. Goodwin, P. (2014). The price of everything and the value of nothing? Economic arguments and the politics of public service media. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.), The value of public service media (S. 77–86). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
go back to reference Hammer, M., & Lloyd, R. (2011). Pathways to accountability II. The 2011 revised global accountability framework report on the stakeholder consultation and the new indicator framework. London: OneWorldTrust. Hammer, M., & Lloyd, R. (2011). Pathways to accountability II. The 2011 revised global accountability framework report on the stakeholder consultation and the new indicator framework. London: OneWorldTrust.
go back to reference Martin, F., & Lowe, G. F. (2014). The value and values of public service media. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.), The value of public service media (S. 19–42). Gothenburg: Nordicom. Martin, F., & Lowe, G. F. (2014). The value and values of public service media. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.), The value of public service media (S. 19–42). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
go back to reference Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 62–77. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 62–77.
go back to reference Roome, N. (2004). Innovation, global change and new capitalism: A fuzzy context for business and the environment. Human Ecology Review, 11(3), 277–279. Roome, N. (2004). Innovation, global change and new capitalism: A fuzzy context for business and the environment. Human Ecology Review, 11(3), 277–279.
go back to reference Sorsa, K. (2010). Itsesääntely ja yhteiskuntavastuu. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja. Kilpailukyky 45/2010. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen verkkokatsauksia 45/2010. [Self-regulation and corporate social responsibility. Ministry of Employment and the Economy Publications. Competitiveness 45/2010. National Research Institute of Legal Policy Publications 45/2010]. http://www.tem.fi/files/27364/TEM_45_2010_netti.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2017. Sorsa, K. (2010). Itsesääntely ja yhteiskuntavastuu. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja. Kilpailukyky 45/2010. Oikeuspoliittisen tutkimuslaitoksen verkkokatsauksia 45/2010. [Self-regulation and corporate social responsibility. Ministry of Employment and the Economy Publications. Competitiveness 45/2010. National Research Institute of Legal Policy Publications 45/2010]. http://​www.​tem.​fi/​files/​27364/​TEM_​45_​2010_​netti.​pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2017.
go back to reference Sorsa, K. (2016). The role of multinational enterprises in promoting system-level innovations in the Finnish food industry. In J. R. McIntyre, S. Ivanaj, V. Ivanaj, & R. Narayan Kar (Eds.), Emerging dynamics of sustainability in multinational enterprises (pp. 17–36). Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing. Sorsa, K. (2016). The role of multinational enterprises in promoting system-level innovations in the Finnish food industry. In J. R. McIntyre, S. Ivanaj, V. Ivanaj, & R. Narayan Kar (Eds.), Emerging dynamics of sustainability in multinational enterprises (pp. 17–36). Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Sorsa, K., & Kettunen, J. (2015). Transnational private regulation: Evidence from the coffee industry. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 6(4), 209–219.CrossRef Sorsa, K., & Kettunen, J. (2015). Transnational private regulation: Evidence from the coffee industry. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 6(4), 209–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Tracey, M. (2014). The concept of public value & Triumph of materialist modernity. “…this strange disease of modern life…”. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.), The value of public service media (pp. 87–102). Gothenburg: Nordicom. Tracey, M. (2014). The concept of public value & Triumph of materialist modernity. “…this strange disease of modern life…”. In G. F. Lowe & F. Martin (Eds.), The value of public service media (pp. 87–102). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
go back to reference Wirth, M. O., & Bloch, H. (1995). Industrial organization theory and media industry analysis. The Journal of Media Economics, 8(2), 15–26.CrossRef Wirth, M. O., & Bloch, H. (1995). Industrial organization theory and media industry analysis. The Journal of Media Economics, 8(2), 15–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Public Value and Shared Value Approaches
Authors
Kaisa Sorsa
Mikko Sihvonen
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20498-3_2