Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Education and Information Technologies 1/2014

01-03-2014

The role of feedback in e-assessments for engineering education

Authors: Maria Limniou, Michael Smith

Published in: Education and Information Technologies | Issue 1/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare two differently designed e-assessments (formative assessments) which supported the same engineering courses for two academic years. In this investigation two group of students participated (Control Group: CG and Experimental Group: EG). The teachers followed exactly the same teaching approach using the same learning tools (apart from the e-assessments) in the same learning environment. The first group of students (CG) had the opportunity to timely receive grades along with the correct answers, when they submitted the e-assessments on-line. The teachers themselves designed these e-assessments in BlackBoard Vista© learning environment. The second group of students (EG) had the opportunity to receive feedback each on their own individual responses having unlimited attempts to participate in the e-assessments designed by PhD students. We will demonstrate that the addition of individual feedback and the unlimited attempts increased the EG group performance at the end of the courses (summative assessment) in comparison to the CG group of students.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & CTGV. (1998). Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271–312. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & CTGV. (1998). Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271–312.
go back to reference Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRef Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.CrossRef Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Bloom, B. S. (1956). The taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David Mackay Company Inc. Bloom, B. S. (1956). The taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David Mackay Company Inc.
go back to reference Bloxham, S., & Boyd, S. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education-a practical guide. Maidenhead. McGraw Hill: Open University Press. Bloxham, S., & Boyd, S. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education-a practical guide. Maidenhead. McGraw Hill: Open University Press.
go back to reference Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page. Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.
go back to reference Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). On-line engineering education: learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 131–146.CrossRef Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). On-line engineering education: learning anywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 9(1), 131–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school (expandedth ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school (expandedth ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
go back to reference Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2011). Queensland teachers’ conceptions of assessment: the impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 210–220.CrossRef Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2011). Queensland teachers’ conceptions of assessment: the impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 210–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193–200.CrossRef Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 193–200.CrossRef
go back to reference Burrow, M., Evdorides, H., Hallam, B., & Freer-Hewish, R. (2005). Developing formative assessments for postgraduate students in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 255–263.CrossRef Burrow, M., Evdorides, H., Hallam, B., & Freer-Hewish, R. (2005). Developing formative assessments for postgraduate students in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 255–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Dermo, J. (2009). E-assessment and the student learning experience: a survey of students perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203–214.CrossRef Dermo, J. (2009). E-assessment and the student learning experience: a survey of students perceptions of e-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Dopper, S. M., & Sjoer, E. (2004). Implementing formative assessment in engineering education: the use of the on-line assessment system Etude. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 259–266.CrossRef Dopper, S. M., & Sjoer, E. (2004). Implementing formative assessment in engineering education: the use of the on-line assessment system Etude. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 259–266.CrossRef
go back to reference Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285–293.CrossRef Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285–293.CrossRef
go back to reference Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11. Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11.
go back to reference Elgamal, A. E., Abas, H. A., & Baladoh, E.-S. M. (2011). An interactive e-learning system for improving web programming skills. Educational and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s1063901191757. Elgamal, A. E., Abas, H. A., & Baladoh, E.-S. M. (2011). An interactive e-learning system for improving web programming skills. Educational and Information Technologies. doi:10.​1007/​s1063901191757.
go back to reference Farrell, G., & Leung, Y. K. (2004). Innovative on-line assessment using confidence measurement. education and information technologies, 9(1), 5–19.CrossRef Farrell, G., & Leung, Y. K. (2004). Innovative on-line assessment using confidence measurement. education and information technologies, 9(1), 5–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
go back to reference Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). On-line formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.CrossRef Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). On-line formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.CrossRef
go back to reference Gipps, C. V. (2005). What is the role of ICT-bases assessment in universities? Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 171–180.CrossRef Gipps, C. V. (2005). What is the role of ICT-bases assessment in universities? Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 171–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen, S. (2004). A constructivist approach to project assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 211–220.CrossRef Hansen, S. (2004). A constructivist approach to project assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 211–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Hassan, O. A. B. (2011). Learning theories and assessment methodologies-an engineering educational perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 327–339.CrossRef Hassan, O. A. B. (2011). Learning theories and assessment methodologies-an engineering educational perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 327–339.CrossRef
go back to reference Heap, N. W., Kear, K. L., & Bissell, C. C. (2004). An overview of ICT-based assessment for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 241–250.CrossRef Heap, N. W., Kear, K. L., & Bissell, C. C. (2004). An overview of ICT-based assessment for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 241–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Heaton-Shrestha, C., Edirisingha, P., Burke, L., & Linsey, T. (2005). Introducing a VLE into campus-based undergraduate teaching: staff perspectives on its impact on teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), 370–386.CrossRef Heaton-Shrestha, C., Edirisingha, P., Burke, L., & Linsey, T. (2005). Introducing a VLE into campus-based undergraduate teaching: staff perspectives on its impact on teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), 370–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Heaton-Shrestha, C., Gripps, C., Edirisingha, P., & Linsey, T. (2007). Learning and e-learning in HE: the relationship between student learning and VLE use. Research Papers in Education, 22(4), 443–464.CrossRef Heaton-Shrestha, C., Gripps, C., Edirisingha, P., & Linsey, T. (2007). Learning and e-learning in HE: the relationship between student learning and VLE use. Research Papers in Education, 22(4), 443–464.CrossRef
go back to reference Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.CrossRefMathSciNet Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.CrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Limniou, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on teaching and learning through Virtual Learning Environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 645–653.CrossRef Limniou, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on teaching and learning through Virtual Learning Environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 645–653.CrossRef
go back to reference McDowell, L., White, S., & Davis, H. C. (2004). Changing assessments practice in engineering: how can understanding lecturer perspectives help? European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 173–181.CrossRef McDowell, L., White, S., & Davis, H. C. (2004). Changing assessments practice in engineering: how can understanding lecturer perspectives help? European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 173–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53–64.CrossRefMathSciNet Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53–64.CrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRef Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(3), 715–721.CrossRef Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(3), 715–721.CrossRef
go back to reference Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 325–333.CrossRef Roselli, R. J., & Brophy, S. P. (2006). Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 325–333.CrossRef
go back to reference Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (2002). Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, 43(2), 173–201.CrossRef Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. (2002). Identifying academics’ orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, 43(2), 173–201.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, G. (2007). How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exam? Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(7), 28–34. Smith, G. (2007). How does student performance on formative assessments relate to learning assessed by exam? Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(7), 28–34.
go back to reference Vogel, J. J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Cannon-Brower, J., & Bowers, C. A. (2006). Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 105–118. Vogel, J. J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Cannon-Brower, J., & Bowers, C. A. (2006). Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 105–118.
go back to reference Wang, T. H. (2008). Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1247–1263.CrossRef Wang, T. H. (2008). Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1247–1263.CrossRef
go back to reference Wanous, M., Procter, B., & Murshid, K. (2009). Assessment for learning and skills development: the case of large classes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 77–85.CrossRef Wanous, M., Procter, B., & Murshid, K. (2009). Assessment for learning and skills development: the case of large classes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 77–85.CrossRef
go back to reference William, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah: Erlbaum. William, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 115–126.CrossRef Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 115–126.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The role of feedback in e-assessments for engineering education
Authors
Maria Limniou
Michael Smith
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Education and Information Technologies / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9200-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Education and Information Technologies 1/2014 Go to the issue

Premium Partner