Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality & Quantity
Published in: Quality & Quantity 3/2018

05-06-2017

The scientific study of the qualities of individual human lives, rather than of their average quantities in aggregations of lives

Author: Merton S. Krause

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The full variety of how individual human lives are lived and why so is what matters for scientific human Psychology (SHP) theory and practice research purposes. How representative of the human population are the fractions of each such variety sampled matters for social science and policy purposes. What varieties are obtained and how representative their sample fractions are of those in the human population depends upon how the sampling was done. The exact number of persons in these samples matters only for statistical significance testing purposes. Univariate means and variances and bi- or multi-variate regressions and correlations of variables are the Linear Model statistics SHP presently predominantly depends upon. These statistics are averages in aggregations of persons so not descriptive of individual persons, and why persons in such aggregations deviate from the average is generally not explored. A description of how a human life is lived and a causal explanation of why so necessarily involve quantities in the form of gradations on dimensions. Each description and explanation is a conjunction of gradations, one from each of several dimensions, so the essential difference between qualitative and quantitative SHP research is between dealing with each individual case and dealing only with the statistics of aggregations of cases.
previous article Evaluating complementary currencies: from the assessment of multiple social qualities to the discovery of a unique monetary sociality
next article Measuring systemic diversity of Chinese universities: a clustering-method approach

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
It is not logically necessary, but merely presently fashionable, that SHP theory be Linear Model theory. Imperfect fits (i.e., R2 < 1) of Linear and so Structural Equation Models should all be considered either disconfirmations or inadequate tests of these models/theories (see, e.g., Bollen and Pearl 2012; Chin 2010; Krause 2013a; McDonald 2010; Roberts and Pashler 2000; Rozeboom 2009; Ullman and Bentler 2012, for their caveats about SEM).
 
2
There also are other very different ways in which qualitative as well as quantitative SHP research does not simply reveal the psychological nature of humanity. Being respectfully and empathically studied, interviewed, measured as a person (see, e.g., Denzin 2001; Yeo et al. 2014) cannot reasonably be supposed to always leave one unchanged. One cannot help learning more about what one’s life is and is not like, and about what one’s studiers-interviewers-measurers seem to find noteworthy and what not noteworthy in it. So SHP research properly cannot ignore its own impact on those studied, although it has so far failed to make reports of what this is easy to find (two are Kraut and McConahay 1973; Wallerstein and Duran 2006). SHP research must take account of how it itself influences the nature of those it studies and thereby to some extent the nature of the rest of humanity, because some of the rest learn truly or falsely about and are affected by the findings of SHP studies, react to not having been chosen for study, or are now differently affected by those who were chosen (Krause, M. S., manuscript: Psychological measuring and measurements: Their possible effects on persons measured and unmeasured).
 
Literature
Baker, S.E., Edwards, R., Doidge, M. How many qualitative interviews is enough?: Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. (2012). brighton.ac.uk visited 11/9/16
Bollen, K.A., Pearl, J.: Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In: Morgan, S. (ed.) Handbook of causal analysis for social research, pp. 1–42. Springer, New York (2012)
Bruscaglioni, L.: Theorizing in grounded theory and creative abduction. Qual. Quant. 50, 2009–2024 (2016)CrossRef
Carling, K.: Resistant outlier rules and the non-Gaussian case. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 33(3), 249–258 (2000)CrossRef
Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A.S.: Influential observations, high leverage points, and outliers in linear regression. Stat. Sci. 1, 379–393 (1986)CrossRef
Chin, W.W.: How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi, V.E., et al. (eds.) Handbook of partial least squares, pp. 655–690. Springer, Berlin (2010)CrossRef
Chow, S.L.: Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. Sage, Beverly Hills (1996)
Christianson, M.K., Farkas, M.T., Sutcliffe, K.M., Weick, K.E.: Learning through rare events: significant interruptions at the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Museum. Organ. Sci. 20(5), 846–860 (2009)CrossRef
Cleary, M., Horsfall, J., Hayter, M.: Data collection and sampling in qualitative research: Does size matter? J. Adv. Nurs. 70, 473–475 (2014)CrossRef
Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1(3), 98–101 (1992)CrossRef
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Sociologie 19(6), 418–427 (1990)
Coyne, I.T.: Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J. Adv. Nurs. 26(3), 623–630 (1997)CrossRef
DeGroot, M.H.: Optimal statistical decisions. Wiley, New York (2005)
Denzin, N.K.: The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qual. Res. 1(1), 23–46 (2001)CrossRef
Dourdouma, A., Mőrtl, K.: The creative journey of grounded theory analysis: a guide to its principles and applications. Ricerca in Psicoterapia/Res. Psychother. Psychopathol. Process Outcome 15, 96–106 (2012)
Eby, L.T., Hurst, C.S., Butts, M.M.: Qualitative research: The redheaded stepchild in organizational and social science research. In: Lance, C.E., Vandenberg, R.J. (eds.) More statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences, pp. 219–246. Routledge, New York (2014)
Fann, K.T.: Peirce’s theory of abduction. Springer, New York (2012). (originally 1970)
Feller, W.: An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol. I, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (1968)
Flach, P.A., Hadjiantonis, A.M. (eds.): Abduction and induction: Essays on their relation and integration, vol. 18. Springer, New York (2013)
Flick, U.: An introduction to qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Francis, J.J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M.P., Grimshaw, J.M.: What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol. Health 25(10), 1229–1245 (2010)CrossRef
Goodman, S.N.: Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: the P value fallacy. Ann. Intern. Med. 130(12), 995–1004 (1999)CrossRef
Goodman, S.N.: Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning: misunderstanding and misuse of statistical significance impede science. Science 352, 1180–1181 (2016)CrossRef
Iglewicz, B., Hoaglin, D. How to detect and handle outliers. In Mytkytka, E.F. (ed.), The ASQC basic references in quality control: Statistical techniques, vol. 16. American Society for Quality, Milwaukee (1993). Retrievable (for a fee) from http://​asq.​org
Kanji, G.: 100 statistical tests. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)
Kendall, M.G., Stuart, A.: The advanced theory of statistics: Inference and relationship, vol. 2. Charles Griffin, London (1966a)
Kendall, M.G., Stuart, A.: The advanced theory of statistics: Design and analysis, and time series, vol. 3. Charles Griffin, London (1966b)
Kline, R.B.: Principles and practice of structural equation modelling, 3rd edn. Guilford, New York (2011)
Koh, J.L.Y., Lee, M.L., Hsu, W., Lam, K.T.: Correlation-based detection of attribute outliers. In: Kotagiri, R., Krishna, P.R., Mohania, M., Nantajeewarawat, E. (eds.) Advances in Databases: Concepts, Systems and Applications, DASFAA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4443, pp. 164–175. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRef
Kraemer, H.C., Blasey, C.: How many subjects?: Statistical power analysis in research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2015)
Krause, M.S.: What are you doing? What am I doing? J. Theor. Philos. Psychol. 25, 257–279 (2005)CrossRef
Krause, M.S.: Trying to discover sufficient condition causes. Methodology 6, 59–70 (2010)CrossRef
Krause, M.S.: Significance testing and clinical trials. Psychotherapy 48, 217–222 & 234–236 (2011)
Krause, M.S.: Measurement validity is fundamentally a matter of definition, not correlation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 16, 391–400 (2012)CrossRef
Krause, M.S.: The incompatibility of achieving a fully specified linear model and assuming that residual dependent-variable variance is random. Qual. Quant. 47, 3201–3204 (2013a)CrossRef
Krause, M.S.: The data analytic implications of human psychology’s dimensions being ordinally scaled. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17, 318–325 (2013b)CrossRef
Krause, M.S.: Valid description of experiencings and thereby of behaviors and situations. J. Conscious. Explor. Res. 7, 1–20 (2016a)
Krause, M.S.: Case sampling for psychotherapy practice, theory, and policy guidance: qualities and quantities. Psychother. Res. 26, 530–544 (2016b)CrossRef
Krause, M.S.: Mathematical expression and sampling issues of treatment-contrasts: beyond significance testing and meta-analysis to clinically useful research synthesis. Psychother. Res. (2016c). doi:10.​1080/​10503307.​2016.​1222459.
Krause, M.S., Howard, K.I.: The linear model is a very special case: How to explore data for their full clinical implications. Psychother. Res. 12, 475–490 (2002)CrossRef
Krause, M.S., Lutz, W.: Process transforms inputs to determine outcomes: therapists are responsible for managing process. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 13, 73–81 (2009)CrossRef
Krause, M.S., Lutz, W., Bőhnke, J.R.: The role of sampling in clinical trial design. Psychother. Res. 21, 143–151 (2011)CrossRef
Krause, M.S., Lutz, W., Saunders, S.M.: Empirically certified treatments or therapists: the issue of separability. Psychotherapy 44, 347–353 (2007)CrossRef
Kraut, R.E., McConahay, J.B.: How being interviewed affects voting: an experiment. Public Opin. Q. 37(3), 398–406 (1973)CrossRef
Lamiell, J.T.: Toward a critically personalistic general psychology in consideration of its unifying potential. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 18, 1–6 (2014)CrossRef
McDonald, R.P.: Structural models and the art of approximation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 675–686 (2010)CrossRef
Michell, J.: Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)CrossRef
Michell, J.: Is Psychometrics pathological science? Measurement 6, 7–24 (2008)
Morse, J.M.: The significance of saturation. Qual. Health Res. 5, 147–149 (1995)CrossRef
Morse, J.M.: Developing grounded theory. The second generation. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2009)
Nesselroade, J.R.: On an emerging third discipline of scientific Psychology. In: Molenaar, P.C.M., Newell, K.M. (eds.) Individual pathways of change: Statistical models for analyzing learning and development, pp. 209–218. APA, Washington (2010)CrossRef
Nickerson, R.S.: Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2), 175–220 (1998)CrossRef
Nickerson, R.S.: Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol. Methods 5, 241–301 (2000)CrossRef
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L.: Sampling designs in qualitative research: making the sampling process more public. Qual. Rep. 12(2), 238–254 (2007)
Orlinsky, D.E., Rønnestad, M.H., Willutzki, U.: Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In: Lambert, M.J. (ed.) Bergin and Garfields’ Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 5th edn, pp. 307–389. Wiley, New York (2004)
Osborne, J.W., Overbay, A.: The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 9(6), 1–12 (2004)
Porter, T.M.: Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)CrossRef
Reichertz, J.: Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The Sage handbook of grounded theory, pp. 214–228. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)CrossRef
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Gillian, E.: Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (eds.) Qualitative research practice, pp. 77–108. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Roberts, S., Pashler, H.: How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychol. Rev. 107, 358–367 (2000)CrossRef
Robinson, O.C.: The idiographic/nomothetic dichotomy: tracing historical origins of contemporary confusions. Hist. Philos. Psychol. 13(2), 32–39 (2011)
Rozeboom, W.W.: Some esoteric aspects of SEM that its practitioners should want to know. Multivar. Behav. Res. 44, 553–587 (2009)CrossRef
Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J.: Between the general and the unique: overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theor. Psychol. 20(6), 817–833 (2010)CrossRef
Sandelowski, M.: One is the liveliest number: the case orientation of qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 19, 525–529 (1996)CrossRef
Stigler, S.M.: The seven pillars of statistical wisdom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2016)CrossRef
Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks. (1998) (There is a Corbin and Strauss, 2015, 4th edn)
Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R., DeVault, M.: Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Wiley, New York (2015)
Tietjen, G.L.: A topical dictionary of statistics. Chapman & Hall, New York (1986)
Turner, C.J., Campbell, M.I., Crawford, R.H. Generic sequential sampling for meta-model approximations. In: ASME 2003 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. 555–564). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2003, January). (go to www.​asme.​org and Search for this title). (visited 11/9/16)
Ullman, J.B., Bentler, P.M.: Structural equation modeling. In: Weiner, I.B. (ed.) Handbook of psychology, vol. 2, 2nd edn, pp. 661–690. Wiley, New York (2012)
Van Manen, M.: Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek (2015)
Walter, S.: Epiphenomenalism. In: Binder, M.D., Hirokawa, N., Windhorst, U. (eds.) Encyclopedia of neuroscience, pp. 1137–1139. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRef
Waterman, A.S.: The humanistic psychology—positive psychology divide: contrasts in philosophical foundations. Am. Psychol. 68, 124–133 (2013)CrossRef
Wax, M., Shapiro, L.J.: Repeated interviewing. Am. J. Sociol. 62(2), 215–217 (1956)CrossRef
Wallerstein, N.B., Duran, B.: Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot. Pract. 7(3), 312–323 (2006)CrossRef
Wertz, F.J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., McSpadden, E.: Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. Guilford, New York (2011)
Wood, M., Christy, R.: Sampling for possibilities. Qual. Quant. 33, 185–202 (1999)CrossRef
Yeo, A., Legard, R., Keegan, J., Ward, K., McNaughton-Nicholls, C., Lewis, J.: In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C.M., Ormston, R. (eds.) Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, pp. 177–210. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)
Yule, G.U., Kendall, M.G.: An introduction to the theory of statistics, 14th edn. Hafner, New York (1950)
Metadata
Title
The scientific study of the qualities of individual human lives, rather than of their average quantities in aggregations of lives
Author
Merton S. Krause
Publication date
05-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0523-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Quality & Quantity 3/2018 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Asymmetric causality between military expenditures and economic growth in top six defense spenders

OriginalPaper

Globalization and the welfare state

OriginalPaper

Religious pluralism and religious participation: a median-based approach to the non-substantive problem

OriginalPaper

Measuring systemic diversity of Chinese universities: a clustering-method approach

OriginalPaper

Is Spain benefiting from the Arab Spring? On the impact of terrorism on a tourist competitor country

OriginalPaper

Evaluating complementary currencies: from the assessment of multiple social qualities to the discovery of a unique monetary sociality