Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experiments in Fluids 5/2012

01-11-2012 | Research Article

Three-dimensional features of a Mach 2.1 shock/boundary layer interaction

Authors: D. B. Helmer, L. M. Campo, J. K. Eaton

Published in: Experiments in Fluids | Issue 5/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

2D particle image velocimetry was used to study the three-dimensionality of the shock-boundary layer interaction generated by a small 20° compression ramp in a low aspect ratio continuously operated wind tunnel. High-resolution data were taken in four streamwise-wallnormal planes: three planes located in the sidewall boundary layer and one near the tunnel centerline. The incoming boundary layer was found to show three-dimensionality, with significant overshoot in the velocity profiles observed near the sidewall. The size of the wedge influenced the interaction, which was weaker than that observed in the case of a large compression wedge. The flow turning angle was ≈8° near the tunnel centerline and changed significantly across the span. Measurements behind the compression wedge in the centerline plane showed that both velocity and turbulence properties were nearly fully recovered ≈14δ behind the compression corner. The shock angle varied with spanwise position, and a multi-shock structure was observed in the sidewall planes. The size of the interaction decreased in the sidewall boundary layer. Non-monotonic variations in both velocity and turbulence profiles across the sidewall planes suggest the presence of significant spanwise flows, possibly corner vortices.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Beresh S, Comninos M, Clemens N, Dolling D (1998) The effects of the incoming turbulent boundary layer structure on a shock-induced separated flow. AIAA Paper 98-0629 Beresh S, Comninos M, Clemens N, Dolling D (1998) The effects of the incoming turbulent boundary layer structure on a shock-induced separated flow. AIAA Paper 98-0629
go back to reference Beresh S, Clemens N, Dolling D (2002) Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness. AIAA J 40:2412–2422CrossRef Beresh S, Clemens N, Dolling D (2002) Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness. AIAA J 40:2412–2422CrossRef
go back to reference Bogdonoff S, Kepler C (1955) Separation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J Aeronaut Sci 22:414–424 Bogdonoff S, Kepler C (1955) Separation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J Aeronaut Sci 22:414–424
go back to reference Bookey P, Wyckham C, Smits A, Martin M (2005) New experimental data of stbli at dns/les accessible reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper 2005-309 Bookey P, Wyckham C, Smits A, Martin M (2005) New experimental data of stbli at dns/les accessible reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper 2005-309
go back to reference Christensen K (2004) The influence of peak-locking errors on turbulence statistics computed from PIV ensembles. Exp Fluids 36:484–497CrossRef Christensen K (2004) The influence of peak-locking errors on turbulence statistics computed from PIV ensembles. Exp Fluids 36:484–497CrossRef
go back to reference Davis D, Gessner F (1989) Further experiments on supersonic turbulent flow development in a square duct. AIAA J 27:1023–1030CrossRef Davis D, Gessner F (1989) Further experiments on supersonic turbulent flow development in a square duct. AIAA J 27:1023–1030CrossRef
go back to reference Dolling D (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 39:1517–1531CrossRef Dolling D (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 39:1517–1531CrossRef
go back to reference Dolling D, Murphy M (1983) Unsteadiness of the separation shock wave structure in a supersonic compression ramp flowfield. AIAA J 21:1628–1634CrossRef Dolling D, Murphy M (1983) Unsteadiness of the separation shock wave structure in a supersonic compression ramp flowfield. AIAA J 21:1628–1634CrossRef
go back to reference Ganapathisubramani B, Clemens N, Dolling D (2007) Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation. J Fluid Mech 585:369–394MATHCrossRef Ganapathisubramani B, Clemens N, Dolling D (2007) Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation. J Fluid Mech 585:369–394MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Han D (2001) Study of turbulent nonpremixed jet flames using simultaneous measurements of velocity and CH distribution. PhD Thesis, Stanford University Han D (2001) Study of turbulent nonpremixed jet flames using simultaneous measurements of velocity and CH distribution. PhD Thesis, Stanford University
go back to reference Helmer D (2011) Measurements of a three-dimensional shock-boundary layer interaction. PhD Thesis, Stanford University Helmer D (2011) Measurements of a three-dimensional shock-boundary layer interaction. PhD Thesis, Stanford University
go back to reference Helmer D, Campo L, Eaton J (2011) Sensitivity of a shock-boundary layer interaction to geometric perturbations. TSFP7 Conference Paper 7B1P Helmer D, Campo L, Eaton J (2011) Sensitivity of a shock-boundary layer interaction to geometric perturbations. TSFP7 Conference Paper 7B1P
go back to reference Hou Y, Clemens N, Dolling D (2003) Wide-field PIV study of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation. AIAA Paper 2003-0441 Hou Y, Clemens N, Dolling D (2003) Wide-field PIV study of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation. AIAA Paper 2003-0441
go back to reference Humble R, Scarano F, van Oudheusden B (2007) Particle image velocimetry measurements of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. Exp Fluids 43:173–183CrossRef Humble R, Scarano F, van Oudheusden B (2007) Particle image velocimetry measurements of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. Exp Fluids 43:173–183CrossRef
go back to reference Humble R, Elsinga G, Scarano F, van Oudheusden B (2009) Three-dimensional instantaneous structure of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. J Fluid Mech 622:33–62MATHCrossRef Humble R, Elsinga G, Scarano F, van Oudheusden B (2009) Three-dimensional instantaneous structure of a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. J Fluid Mech 622:33–62MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Knight D, Degrez G (1998) Shock wave boundary layer interactions in high mach number flows. A critical survey of current numerical prediction capabilities. Advisory report 319. AGARD 2:1–35 Knight D, Degrez G (1998) Shock wave boundary layer interactions in high mach number flows. A critical survey of current numerical prediction capabilities. Advisory report 319. AGARD 2:1–35
go back to reference Piponniau S, Dussauge J, Debieve J, Dupont P (2009) A simple model for low-frequency unsteadiness in shock-induced separation. J Fluid Mech 629:87–108MATHCrossRef Piponniau S, Dussauge J, Debieve J, Dupont P (2009) A simple model for low-frequency unsteadiness in shock-induced separation. J Fluid Mech 629:87–108MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Pirozzoli S, Grasso F (2006) Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M = 2.25. Phys Fluids 18:065113-1–065113-17CrossRef Pirozzoli S, Grasso F (2006) Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M = 2.25. Phys Fluids 18:065113-1–065113-17CrossRef
go back to reference Selig M, Andreopoulos J, Muck K, Dussauge J, Smits A (1989) Turbulence structure in a shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J 27:862–869CrossRef Selig M, Andreopoulos J, Muck K, Dussauge J, Smits A (1989) Turbulence structure in a shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J 27:862–869CrossRef
go back to reference Settles G, Vas I, Bogdonoff S (1976) Details of a shock-separated turbulent boundary layer at a compression corner. AIAA J 14:1709–1715CrossRef Settles G, Vas I, Bogdonoff S (1976) Details of a shock-separated turbulent boundary layer at a compression corner. AIAA J 14:1709–1715CrossRef
go back to reference Smits A, Muck K (1987) Experimental study of three shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. J Fluid Mech 182:291–314CrossRef Smits A, Muck K (1987) Experimental study of three shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. J Fluid Mech 182:291–314CrossRef
go back to reference Souverein L (2010) On the scaling and unsteadiness of shock induced separation. Doctoral Thesis, L’Université de Provence Souverein L (2010) On the scaling and unsteadiness of shock induced separation. Doctoral Thesis, L’Université de Provence
go back to reference Souverein L, Dupont P, Debieve J, Dussauge J, van Oudheusden B, Scarano F (2010) Effect of interaction strength on unsteadiness in turbulent shock-wave-induced separations. AIAA J 48:1480–1493CrossRef Souverein L, Dupont P, Debieve J, Dussauge J, van Oudheusden B, Scarano F (2010) Effect of interaction strength on unsteadiness in turbulent shock-wave-induced separations. AIAA J 48:1480–1493CrossRef
go back to reference Touber E, Sandham N (2009) Comparison of three large-eddy simulations of shock-induced turbulent separation bubbles. Shock Waves 19:469–478CrossRef Touber E, Sandham N (2009) Comparison of three large-eddy simulations of shock-induced turbulent separation bubbles. Shock Waves 19:469–478CrossRef
go back to reference Wu M, Martin M (2008) Analysis of shock motion in shockwave and turbulent boundary layer interaction using direct numerical simulation data. J Fluid Mech 594:71–83MATHCrossRef Wu M, Martin M (2008) Analysis of shock motion in shockwave and turbulent boundary layer interaction using direct numerical simulation data. J Fluid Mech 594:71–83MATHCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Three-dimensional features of a Mach 2.1 shock/boundary layer interaction
Authors
D. B. Helmer
L. M. Campo
J. K. Eaton
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experiments in Fluids / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0723-4864
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1114
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-012-1363-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Experiments in Fluids 5/2012 Go to the issue

Premium Partners