Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Political Behavior
Published in: Political Behavior 4/2023

28-06-2022 | Original Paper

Timing Matters: How Adolescent Police Contact Shapes Political Lives

Authors: Aaron Rosenthal, Christina Farhart

Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 4/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Aggressive policing policies and practices have led to frequent interactions between the police and America’s youth, particularly for young people of color. Research has demonstrated the negative effect of adolescent police contact on economic, educational, and health outcomes, yet we lack a systematic account of how these interactions shape American democracy and political engagement. To address this issue, we bring together theories from policy feedback and political socialization to argue that experiences with government will be more politically impactful when they take place during one’s youth. We test this framework using two nationally representative longitudinal datasets, finding that police contact has a greater impact on political interest and political trust in adulthood when that contact first takes place during early adolescence. This analysis underscores the importance of changing the relationship between the police and America’s youth by revealing the political power of preadult experiences with the state.
previous article Knowledge of Social Rights as Political Knowledge
next article Do Voters Care about the Age of their Elected Representatives?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Following the example of other scholars (e.g. Terwiel, 2020), we use the term “criminal legal system” in place of the more commonly used “criminal justice system” to unsettle the assumption that the current system provides justice. In the remainder of the manuscript, we use CLS as an acronym when referring to the criminal legal system. Notably, our analysis here is largely focused on policing, so we only refer to the CLS in those instances where we are implicating the whole of the vast and decentralized system, including actors and institutions beyond the police (e.g. prisons, jails, courts, etc.).
 
2
Though as Barnes and Hope (2017) show, young people’s political behavior may be shaped by their parents’ policy experiences. Tied to policing, this finding suggests that preadult political attitudes and actions could be influenced by proximal contact with the CLS, such as having an incarcerated parent, a hypothesis that has received some empirical support (Lee et al., 2014).
 
3
Work from Hannah Walker and colleagues (Walker, 2020; Walker & García-Castañon, 2017) is a notable exception to this trend, providing strong evidence of pathways through which experiences with CLS actors can lead to increased participation. That this mobilization tends to take place outside of the electoral arena suggests an important limitation to the analysis we offer here, which is more focused on electoral politics. We discuss this limitation in greater detail in the concluding section.
 
4
Replication data and code are available on the Harvard Dataverse at https://​doi.​org/​10.​7910/​DVN/​BHVINR.
 
5
The Cronbach’s alpha for the three items is .93.
 
6
There are no direct questions about the parent’s voting behavior, so we use these group membership variables as proxies for parental political engagement.
 
7
Urbanization is measured with a dichotomous variable indicating if the neighborhood was “completely urban” or “not completely urban”. Racial composition is coded using a dichotomous variable that indicates if the modal racial group in one’s childhood neighborhood was Black or not.
 
8
While these neighborhood and parental context variables are helpful, the data do not allow us to directly capture the level of police contact within one’s community or social network. This is an important missing element given findings from the extant literature that use theories of cultural transmission, direct observation, demobilization, resource deprivation, and social disorganization to suggest that these policing context variables are influential in shaping feedback effects (e.g. Burch, 2013; Lerman, 2013). Thus, we believe our neighborhood and parental control variables limit the potential that our age of first police contact variables are merely capturing one’s social environment, but our data do not allow us to completely rule out these alternative explanations.
 
9
Table A1 in the supplemental appendix provides a detailed demographic breakdown of our samples, including the number of people falling into each cell for our age of first contact categories.
 
10
As political interest uses a five-point scale, we also analyze it using ordinal logistic regression. The results are substantively identical under this specification, as seen in Table A2 in the supplemental appendix.
 
11
Tables A3 and A4 in the supplemental appendix show that the pertinent results for the age of first contact variables remain substantively identical when the survey weights are removed.
 
12
Finding that liberals are less politically trusting is likely driven by the timing of the Add Health survey. This survey took place not long after President George W. Bush’s controversial victory in the 2000 election and was in the field during September 11, 2001. Each of these events likely had an impact on inflating conservative trust in government and depressing trust among liberals (Anderson & LoTempio, 2002; Citrin, 1974; Hetherington, 2005; Hetherington & Rudolph, 2015).
 
13
Again, because of the timing of these questions in the respondent’s lives, we cannot include a measure for people whose first police contact occurred after the age of 25. We discuss this limitation in greater detail in the conclusion.
 
14
A potential explanation for the significance of the age variables is that they are actually just measuring frequency of contact. Table A5 in the supplemental appendix provides some support for this notion, showing that those first stopped in adolescence are likely to be stopped more frequently, as compared to those first stopped in young adulthood. However, this relationship holds for those stopped before the age of 15 and those stopped between 15 and 18, suggesting that this increased frequency is not unique to those stopped in early adolescence. In addition, Table A6 shows that the interaction between number of times stopped and being stopped in early adolescence is not significant in relation to political trust and political interest, indicating that the impact of the age of first contact is not contingent on how often one is stopped after that. Taken together, these results suggest that the findings presented here are capturing the effect of the age of first police contact and not the frequency of that contact.
 
15
While we are clearly focused on policing in this paper, we do hope scholars will consider how age of contact with other government programs may shape policy feedback effects. To ensure that our results really were capturing the impact of police stops and not other policies that have been shown to alter political behavior, we ran models controlling for the childhood and adult receipt of direct-cash assistance (often referred to as welfare) (Bruch et al., 2010; Soss, 1999). These results can be seen in Table A7 in the supplemental appendix and show that the impact of our age of police contact variables remain identical under this specification.
 
16
Recent research into the policy feedback effects of carceral contact has also focused more intently on the mechanisms connecting this contact to downstream political attitudes and behaviors, showing this contact can exercise indirect effects through feelings of well-being, political trust, and levels of civic duty (Davis, 2020, 2021). Our analysis similarly suggests that age of contact could work in this indirect manner, serving as a mechanism that sits between contact with the police and subsequent political understandings. Space constraints prevent us from pursuing an analysis of this possibility, but we hope that future scholars will explore this avenue.
 
Literature
Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 169–195.
Anderson, C. J., & LoTempio, A. J. (2002). Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 335–351.
Barnes, C. Y., & Hope, E. C. (2017). Means-Tested Public Assistance Programs and Adolescent Political Socialization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1611–1621.
Beckett, K., & Herbert, S. (2009). Banished: The New Social Control In Urban America. Oxford University Press.
Brame, R., Turner, M. G., Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2012). Cumulative prevalence of arrest from ages 8 to 23 in a national sample. Pediatrics, 129(1), 21–27.
Bruch, S. K., Ferree, M. M., & Soss, J. (2010). From policy to polity: Democracy, paternalism, and the incorporation of disadvantaged citizens. American Sociological Review, 75(2), 205–226.
Brunson, R. K., & Weitzer, R. (2009). Police relations with black and white youths in different urban neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 44(6), 858–885.
Burch, T. (2013). Trading democracy for justice: Criminal convictions and the decline of neighborhood political participation. University Of Chicago Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, A. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton University Press.
Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 333–351.
Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 973–988.
Davis, B. R. (2021). Feeling politics: Carceral contact, well-being, and participation. Policy Studies Journal, 49(2), 591–615.
Dennis, J., Chafee, S. H., & Choe, S. Y. (1979). Impact on partisan, image, and issue voting. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford 1976. Indiana University Press.
Dilulio, J. (1996). My black crime problem, and ours. City Journal, 6(2), 14–28.
Erickson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. Norton.
Fairchild, E. S. (1977). Politicization of the criminal offender. Criminology, 15(3), 287–318.
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. Yale University Press.
Firebaugh, G., & Davis, K. E. (1988). Trends in antiblack prejudice, 1972–1984: Region and cohort effects. American Journal of Sociology, 94(2), 251–272.
Geller, A. (2018). The mental health consequences of police contact. [Paper presented to the American Sociological Association].
Geller, A. (2019). Policing America’s children: Police contact among urban teens [Unpublished Manuscript].
Geller, A., & Fagan, J. (2019). Police contact and the legal socialization of urban teens. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 26–49.
Gingrich, J. (2019). Schools and attitudes toward economic equality. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 324–352.
Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M., & DiTomasso, N. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526.
Hagan, J., Shedd, C., & Payne, M. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of criminal injustice: American Sociological Review 70(3), 381–407.
Hess, R. D., & Torney, J. V. (1970). The development of political attitudes in children. Political Socialization (2nd ed., pp. 64–82). Routledge.
Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press.
Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. University of Chicago Press.
Human Impact Partners. (2017). Reducing youth arrests keeps kids healthy and successful: A health analysis of youth arrest in Michigan. Human Impact Partners.
Jennings, M. K., & Markus, G. B. (1984). Partisan orientations over the long haul: Results from the three-wave political socialization panel study. The American Political Science Review, 78(4), 1000–1018.
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton University Press.
Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.
Kirk, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (2013). Juvenile arrest and collateral educational damage in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 36–62.
Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 416–425.
Legewie, J., & Fagan, J. (2019). Aggressive policing and the educational performance of minority youth. American Sociological Review, 84(2), 220–247.
Lerman, A. E. (2013). The modern prison paradox: Politics, punishment, and social community. Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, A. E., & McCabe, K. T. (2017). Personal experience and public opinion: A theory and test of conditional policy feedback. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 624–641.
Lerman, A. E., & Weaver, V. (2014). Arresting citizenship: The democratic consequences of American crime control. University of Chicago Press.
McFarland, M. J., Geller, A., & McFarland, C. (2019). Police contact and health among urban adolescents: The role of perceived injustice. Social Science & Medicine, 238, 112487.
Mettler, S. (2002). Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G.I. Bill for World War II Veterans. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 351–365.
Mettler, S. (2018). The government-citizen disconnect. Russell Sage Foundation.
Michener, J. (2013). Neighborhood disorder and local participation: Examining the political relevance of “broken windows.” Political Behavior, 35(4), 777–806.
Michener, J. (2018). Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. Cambridge University Press.
Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Rosenthal, A. (2019). Conflicting messages: Multiple policy experiences and political participation. Policy Studies Journal, 49, 616–639.
Rosenthal, A. (2020). Submerged for some? Government visibility, race, and American political trust. Perspectives on Politics, 19, 1098–1114.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, Pressures and the Tarriff. Prentice-Hall.
Searing, D. D., Schwartz, J. J., & Lind, A. E. (1973). The structuring principle: Political socialization and belief systems. The American Political Science Review, 67(2), 415–432.
Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults’ political predispositions. The Journal of Politics, 61(1), 1–28.
Sears, D. O., & Valentino, N. A. (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 45–65.
Shedd, C. (2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. Russell Sage Foundation.
Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. The American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380.
Soss, J., & Weaver, V. (2017). Police are our government: Politics, political science, and the policing of race-class subjugated communities. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 565–591.
Sugie, N. F., & Turney, K. (2017). Beyond incarceration: Criminal justice contact and mental health. American Sociological Review, 82(4), 719–743.
Terwiel, A. (2020). What is Carceral feminism? Political Theory, 48(4), 421–442.
Thurston, C. N. (2015). Policy feedback in the public-private welfare state: Advocacy groups and access to government homeownership programs, 1934–1954. Studies in American Political Development, 29(2), 250–267.
Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (2003). Unequal at the starting line: Creating participatory inequalities across generations and among groups. The American Sociologist, 34(1), 45–69.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
Walker, H. L. (2020). Mobilized by injustice: Criminal justice contact, political participation, and race. Oxford University Press.
Weaver, V. (2007). Frontlash: Race and the development of punitive crime policy. Studies in American Political Development, 21(2), 230–265.
Weaver, V., & Lerman, A. E. (2010). Political consequences of the Carceral State. The American Political Science Review, 104(4), 817–833.
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 127(2), 29–38.
Metadata
Title
Timing Matters: How Adolescent Police Contact Shapes Political Lives
Authors
Aaron Rosenthal
Christina Farhart
Publication date
28-06-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09806-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Political Behavior 4/2023 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Now or Later?: The Inter-temporal Decision-Making of Electoral Participation

Original Paper

When Do Voters Respond to Campaign Finance Disclosure? Evidence from Multiple Election Types

Original Paper

Typecast: A Routine Mental Shortcut Causes Party Stereotyping

Original Paper

Racial Spillover in Political Attitudes: Generalizing to a New Leader and Context

Original Paper

Neural Bases of Sector Bias in Perceptions of Public Versus Private-Sector Service Performance

Original Paper

Partisanship and Support for Restricting the Civil Liberties of Suspected Terrorists