Top

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability

Published in:

23-07-2021

To resist, or to align? The enactment of data-based school governance in Italy

Author: Paolo Landri

Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | Issue 3/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The diffusion of national standardized testing, large-scale survey assessments and the promotion of policies of self-evaluation are making large amounts of data on education systems available and transforming schools into collecting units for a notable range of educational, institutional and socioeconomic indicators. The datafication and related digital technologies for collecting, analysing, retrieving and displaying data activate, at least in principle, new spaces of visibility and forms of school data-based managerialism (Williamson, 2017). While the policy of transparency is oriented to the development and consolidation of data-based school governance (Selwyn in European Educational Research Journal, 15, 54–68, 2016), its implementation in practice remains an open question. It solicits the analysis of the enactment of school data infrastructures to understand their mobilization in the governance of schooling. Schools can align with digital technologies and data, or they can resist these in many ways. By drawing on a multi-sited ethnography on the development and consolidation of the digital governance of education in Italy (Landri, 2018), I will display how schools can align, imitate, and fabricate their data, use them partially and instrumentally, gaming, or opting-out from the current regime of accountability. These findings complexify a typology of resistance to the digitalization proposed by Souto-Otero and Beneito-Montagut (European Educational Research Journal, 15, 14–33, 2016). They trouble the either/or logic that presents ‘alignment’ and ‘resistance’ as they were different alternatives to underline the subtleties of the policy enactment of the data-based school governance. The investigation illustrates that the space of the school agency is not entirely lost: the destiny of the digital governance of education; in other words, is not inevitable. It draws attention to the singularity of the schools concerning the policies of digital accountabilities. The singularity is a capacity to react that depends ultimately on the sedimented circuits of knowledge. These latter ones orient in different ways how noticing, interpreting and drawing conclusions from data.

previous article Enacting performance-based accountability in a Southern European school system: between administrative and market logics

next article Performance-based accountability systems cross-nationally: learning by comparing

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

From now on, we will use the following fictional Latin names to talk about these schools: ‘Equitas', 'Migrantes', 'Astra', and 'Spartacus.'.

Ball, S. J., & Maroy, C. (2009). School’s logics of action as mediation and compromise between internal dynamics and external constraints and pressures. Compare, 39(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920701825544CrossRef

Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: Some necessary but insufficient analyses. Discourse, 32(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601564CrossRef

Ball, S. J., Junemann, C., & Santori, D. (2017). Edu.net: Globalisation and Education Policy Mobility. Routledge.CrossRef

Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147CrossRef

Braun, A., Ball, S. J., & Maguire, M. (2011a). Introduction to semi-special issue: Theorising and researching policy enactment in schools: Policy enactments in schools introduction: Towards a toolbox for theory and research. Discourse, 32(4), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601554CrossRef

Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011b). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555.

Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(4), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.626729CrossRef

Couldry, N., & Powell, A. (2014). Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data and Society, 1(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277CrossRef

Decuypere, M. (2016). Diagrams of Europeanization: European education governance in the digital age. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1212099CrossRef

Decuypere, M. (2019). Open education platforms: Theoretical ideas, digital operations and the figure of the open learner. European Educational Research Journal, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118814141.

Decuypere, M., Landri, P., & Decuypere, M. (2020). Critical studies in education governing by visual shapes : University rankings, digital education platforms and cosmologies of higher education platforms and cosmologies of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1720760CrossRef

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

Dunleavy, P. (2005). New public management is dead–long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057CrossRef

Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network Theory and Education. Routledge.CrossRef

Gorur, R. (2018). Escaping numbers? Intimate accounting, informed publics and the uncertain assemblages of authority and non-authority. Science and Technology Studies, XX(X), 1–20. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/tacruz/Dropbox (CSU Fullerton)/READ/Gorur2018.pdf.

Grimaldi, E., & Serpieri, R. (2016). Scuole a “prova” di Invalsi: la valutazione tra riflessività e fabbricazione. In P. Landri & A. M. Maccarini (Eds.), Uno specchio per la valutazione della scuola. Paradossi, controversie, vie d’uscita (pp. 65–91). Milano: Franco Angeli.

Grimaldi, E., Landri, P., & Serpieri, R. (2016). NPM and the reculturing of the Italian Education System. The making of new fields of visibility. In New Public Management and the Reform of education. European Lessons for policy and practice (pp. 96–110). London: Routledge.

Gurova, G., & Camphuijsen, M. K. (2019). School actors’ enactment of a performative accountability scheme in Russia: Tensions, dilemmas and strategies. European Educational Research Journal, 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119856261

Hartong, S., & Förschler, A. (2019). Opening the black box of data-based school monitoring: Data infrastructures, flows and practices in state education agencies. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 205395171985331. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719853311CrossRef

INVALSI. (2018). Rapporto prove INVALSI 2018, 1–75. https://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/doc_evidenza/2018/Rapporto_prove_INVALSI_2018.pdf

Kitchin, R. (2014). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. SSRN Electronic Journal, 4462(October), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2515786CrossRef

Landri, P. (2018). Digital Governance of Education. Technologies, Standards and Europeanization of Education. Bloomsbury.

Landri, P. (2019). Cartographies of the digital governance of education. In S. Sellar, R. Gorur, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education Comparative Methodology in an Era of Big Data and Global Networks. Routledge.

Landri, P. & Vatrella, S. (2019). Assembling digital platforms in education policy. Scuola Democratica, 3, Settembre-Dicembre, 529–550. https://doi.org/10.12828/95947.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Harvard University Press.

Letizia, G., Poliandri, D., Quadrelli, I., & Romiti, S. (2016). L ’ autovalutazione in Italia. Istanza di rendicontazione o sfida per migliorarsi? Scuola Democratica, 2, 467–479.

Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2015). ‘Where you stand depends on where you sit’: The social construction of policy enactments in the (English) secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.977022CrossRef

Muzzioli, P., Perazzolo, M., Poliandri, D., & Quadrelli, I. (2016). La qualità del percorso di autovalutazione. Scuola Democratica, 2, 421–438.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-yCrossRef

Selwyn, N. (2016). ‘There’s so much data’: Exploring the realities of data-based school governance. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115602909CrossRef

Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. (2016). Toward a digital sociology of school. In J. Daniels, K. Gregory, & T. McMillan Cottom (Eds.) Digital sociologies (pp. 143–158). Policy Press.

Souto-Otero, M., & Beneito-Montagut, R. (2016). From governing through data to governmentality through data: Artefacts, strategies and the digital turn. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115617768CrossRef

Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045CrossRef

West, J. (2017). Data, democracy and school accountability: Controversy over school evaluation in the case of DeVasco High School. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 205395171770240. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717702408CrossRef

Williamson, B. (2016a). Digital education governance: An introduction. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115616630CrossRef

Williamson, B. (2016b). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758CrossRef

Williamson, B. (2017). Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. Sage.CrossRef

Title: To resist, or to align? The enactment of data-based school governance in Italy
Author: Paolo Landri
Publication date: 23-07-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1874-8597
Electronic ISSN: 1874-8600
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09367-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Side effects and the enactment of accountability: results of a comparative study in two German federal states

Numbers and their contexts: how quantified actors narrate numbers and decontextualization

To align or not to align: the enactment of accountability and data-use in disadvantaged school contexts

Coping with performance expectations: towards a deeper understanding of variation in school principals’ responses to accountability demands

Performance-based accountability systems cross-nationally: learning by comparing

Enacting accountabilities in education: exploring new policy contexts and theoretical elaborations