Top

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Published in:

02-08-2023 | LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Torrefied plastic-fiber fuel pellets as a replacement for fossil fuels — a case study life cycle assessment for Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA

Authors: Robert Zupko, Shreyas S. Kolapkar, Stas Zinchik

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 10/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

The commercial-scale production of torrefied plastic-fiber fuel pellets from waste plastics and waste fibers may offer a viable alternative to fossil fuel–based energy. In this study, the environmental impact of fuel pellets produced and consumed in Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA is evaluated and compared to the status quo of grid energy production from fossil fuels (i.e., coal or natural gas).

Methods

A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was conducted using a functional unit of 1 kWh of energy produced using torrefied plastic-fiber fuel pellets versus production of energy from coal or natural gas. Regional data along with relevant manufacturing data was used to inform the inventory of the production of the torrefied fuel pellets, which are manufactured using waste fibers and waste plastics sourced from within 5 km of the torrefaction facility and consumed within 50 km of the facility. Since fuel pellets are produced from waste inputs and contain biogenic carbon sources, impacts were assessed with/without credit for biogenic carbon and with/without the burden of the torrefaction inputs.

Results and discussion

The production of 1 kWh of energy using torrefied plastic-fiber fuel pellets was determined to produce between 0.303 and 0.757 kg CO₂ eq emissions due to combustion and between 0.062 and 1.105 kg CO₂ eq additional emissions as a result of the manufacturing process, with the ranges dependent upon the allocation method selected. Under a burden-free allocation due to waste materials used as inputs, along with a credit for biogenic carbon emissions, the system produces 0.365 kg CO₂ eq per 1 kWh of energy; however, under a full-burden allocation with no credit for biogenic carbon emissions, 1.862 kg CO₂ eq per 1 kWh of energy is produced. This highlights the differences between allocation scenarios and role of credits for biogenic carbon emissions when evaluating systems.

Conclusions

The usage of torrefied plastic-fiber fuel pellets produced using waste plastics and fibers is a reasonable alternative to the status quo of waste disposal coupled with the production of grid energy from fossil fuels. In addition to the reduction in GHG emissions, the use of the process would also help to alleviate the environmental burden of waste plastics.

previous article Correlation analysis of life cycle impact assessment methods and their impact categories in the food sector: representativeness and predictability of impact indicators

next article A proposed framework to develop nutrient profiling algorithms for assessments of sustainable food: the metrics and their assumptions matter

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

American Chemistry Council (2022) US resin production and sales 2021 vs 2020. American Chemistry Council

Bare J, Young D, Hopton M (2012) Tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts (TRACI) TRACI version 2.1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. OH, Cincinnati

Batidzirai B, Mignot APR, Schakel WB et al (2013) Biomass torrefaction technology: techno-economic status and future prospects. Energy 62:196–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.035CrossRef

Brown TR (2015) A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways. Bioresour Technol 178:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.053CrossRef

Cabernard L, Pfister S, Oberschelp C, Hellweg S (2022) Growing environmental footprint of plastics driven by coal combustion. Nat Sustain 5:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00807-2CrossRef

Cahyanti MN, Doddapaneni TRKC, Kikas T (2020) Biomass torrefaction: an overview on process parameters, economic and environmental aspects and recent advancements. Bioresour Technol 301:122737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122737

Chen W-H, Lin B-J, Lin Y-Y et al (2021) Progress in biomass torrefaction: principles, applications and challenges. Prog Energy Combust Sci 82:100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100887

Cooney G, Skone TJ, Jamieson M, Zaimes GG (2019) Open-source life cycle baseline for electricity consumption in the United States - LCI public release (pp A41D-04)

Demetrious A, Crossin E (2019) Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic packaging waste in landfill, incineration, and gasification-pyrolysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:850–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-019-00842-4CrossRef

Edelen A, Hottle T, Cashman S, Ingwersen W (2019) The federal LCA commons elementary flow list: background, approach, description and recommendations for use. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC

Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Measuring recycling: a guide for state and local governments. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Regulatory Impact Analysis: Renewable Fuel Standard Program (Regulatory Impact Analysis No. EPA420-R-07–004). Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/420r07004.pdf

Filiciotto L, Rothenberg G (2021) Biodegradable plastics: standards, policies, and impacts. Chemsuschem 14:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002044CrossRef

Frey HC, Rasdorf W, Lewis P (2010) Comprehensive field study of fuel use and emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment. Transp Res Rec 2158:69–76. https://doi.org/10.3141/2158-09CrossRef

GreenDelta (2022) openLCA

Gug J, Cacciola D, Sobkowicz MJ (2015) Processing and properties of a solid energy fuel from municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycled plastics. Waste Manag 35:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.031CrossRef

Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2007) Allocation and ‘what-if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manag 27(8):997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.013CrossRef

Hemmer G, Kasper G, Wang J, Schaub G (2002) Removal of particles and acid gases (SO2 or HCl) with a ceramic filter by addition of dry sorbents. Morgantown, WV, p 12

ISO (2006) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. ISO, Geneva

Kahn E, Antognoli E, Arbuckle P (2022) The LCA commons—how an open-source repository for US federal life cycle assessment (LCA) data products advances inter-agency coordination. Appl Sci 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020865

Klinger J, Bar-Ziv E, Shonnard D (2015) Predicting properties of torrefied biomass by intrinsic kinetics. Energy Fuels 29:171–176. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef501456pCrossRef

Kolapkar SS, Zinchik S, Burli P et al (2022) Integrated torrefaction-extrusion system for solid fuel pellet production from mixed fiber-plastic wastes: techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment. Fuel Process Technol 226:107094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.107094

Lako P, Koyama M, Nakada S (2015) Biomass for heat and power: technology brief. IEA-ETSAP and IRENA

Lee U, Han J, Wang M (2017) Evaluation of landfill gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills for the life-cycle analysis of waste-to-energy pathways. J Clean Prod 166:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.016CrossRef

Liamsanguan C, Gheewala SH (2007) Environmental assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste incineration. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.10.278CrossRef

MacLeod M, Arp HPH, Tekman MB, Jahnke A (2021) The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 373:61–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5433CrossRef

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2012) U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database

Niu Y, Lv Y, Lei Y et al (2019) Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 115:109395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109395

Nunes LJR (2020) A case study about biomass torrefaction on an industrial scale: solutions to problems related to self-heating, difficulties in pelletizing, and excessive wear of production equipment. Appl Sci 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072546

OECD (2022) Global plastics outlook. OECD Publishing, ParisCrossRef

Olofsson J, Börjesson P (2018) Residual biomass as resource – life-cycle environmental impact of wastes in circular resource systems. J Clean Prod 196:997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.115CrossRef

Pelton REO, Smith TM (2015) Hotspot Scenario Analysis J Ind Eco 19(3):427–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12191CrossRef

Pryshlakivsky J, Searcy C (2021) Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: Practitioner and managerial considerations. J Clean Prod 309:127344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127344

Rajagopal D, Plevin RJ (2013) Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies. Energy Policy 56:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.076CrossRef

Sharma S, Basu S, Shetti NP et al (2020) Waste-to-energy nexus: a sustainable development. Environ Pollut 267:115501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115501

Solomon BD, Krishna K (2011) The coming sustainable energy transition: history, strategies, and outlook. Asian Energy Secur 39:7422–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009CrossRef

Sun X, Xie M, Mai L, Zeng EY (2022) Biobased plastic: a plausible solution toward carbon neutrality in plastic industry? J Hazard Mater 435:129037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129037

Tejaswini MSSR, Pathak P, Ramkrishna S, Ganesh PS (2022) A comprehensive review on integrative approach for sustainable management of plastic waste and its associated externalities. Sci Total Environ 825:153973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153973

U.S. Energy Information Administration (2022) Wisconsin state energy profile. In: US Energy Inf. Adm. https://www.eia.gov/state/print.php?sid=WI. Accessed 15 Jun 2022

Wilson IAG, Staffell I (2018) Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing. Nat Energy 3:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0109-0CrossRef

Xu Z, Albrecht JW, Kolapkar SS et al (2020) Chlorine removal from U.S. solid waste blends through torrefaction. Appl Sci 10:. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093337

Xu Z, Kolapkar SS, Zinchik S et al (2021) Kinetic study of paper waste thermal degradation. Polym Degrad Stab 191:109681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109681

Xu Z, Zinchik S, Kolapkar SS et al (2018) Properties of torrefied U.S. waste blends. Front Energy Res 6:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00065

Yang Y (2016) Two sides of the same coin: Consequential life cycle assessment based on the attributional framework. J Clean Prod 127:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.089CrossRef

Zinchik S, Klinger JL, Westover TL et al (2018) Evaluation of fast pyrolysis feedstock conversion with a mixing paddle reactor. Fuel Process Technol 171:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.012CrossRef

Zinchik S, Xu Z, Kolapkar SS et al (2020) Properties of pellets of torrefied U.S. waste blends. Waste Manag 104:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.009CrossRef

Zink T, Geyer R, Startz R (2016) A market-based framework for quantifying displaced production from recycling or reuse. J Ind Ecol 20(4):719–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12317CrossRef

Title: Torrefied plastic-fiber fuel pellets as a replacement for fossil fuels — a case study life cycle assessment for Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
Authors: Robert Zupko
Shreyas S. Kolapkar
Stas Zinchik
Publication date: 02-08-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 10/2023
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02198-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 10/2023

Economic value dissipation potential (EVDP): an improved method to estimate the potential economic value loss due to resource dissipation in life cycle assessment

Sustainable management in the slow fashion industry: carbon footprint of an Italian brand

Exploring alternative normalization approaches for life cycle assessment

Analysis of human well-being as the area of protection in social life cycle assessment

A proposed framework to develop nutrient profiling algorithms for assessments of sustainable food: the metrics and their assumptions matter

LCA in Saudi Arabia: a critical review