Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Service Business 1/2009

01-03-2009 | Original Paper

Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains

Authors: Luis M. De Castro, João Mota, Sandra Marnoto

Published in: Service Business | Issue 1/2009

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In many professional and services industries, firms try to scale up their operations by reproducing practices in new locations through franchising arrangements, especially business format franchising. The classic but still prevailing explanations for franchising related phenomena, especially the initiative of franchising, the propensity to franchise, and the franchise performance, are mostly based on two orders of reasons (or a combination of them): franchising is either explained as a means to deal with resource scarcity or (and) as a mechanism for franchisor and franchisee to align incentives between themselves. However, empirical studies have shown limited support for both such claims, especially in face of the so called plural form, where proprietary and franchised units of the same franchisor co-exist. It may also be argued that the traditional literature on franchising has assumed a high level of homogeneity within and between franchising “networks,” possibly due to the perception that they tend to be “dominated” by a high level of standardization and replication of practices, both operative and relational. However, learning processes in such “networks” have recently been brought in as an attempt to capture other mechanisms that may underlie their operation and sustainability. This article seeks to explore a third perspective to look at franchising “networks,” by drawing from the literatures on capabilities and industrial networks. Seen from this perspective, business format franchising may involve more than the mere replication or exploitation of a recipe, especially if we take into consideration the partly idiosyncratic nature of both the relationships between actors and their capabilities and intentions. Within this perspective, variety preservation, and not only uniformity, may be recognized by participants as relevant for the performance of the franchise chain. In other words, variety may reflect the need for the refinement of the “package” throughout time, in more than one ways, together with the gradual development of the network and the learning experiences that take place in that context.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Langlois and Foss (1999, pp. 207–208) define capabilities as “team-embodied and partly tacit production and organizational knowledge that can be employed by team-members for a strategic purpose.” Dosi et al. (2000, pp. 207–208) describe them as “the know-how that enables organisations to perform (…) [their] activities.”
 
2
As noted above, the plural form is the combination of company-owned and franchised units in the same network. The traditional theory has mainly focused on the option between franchising or vertically integrating a particular unit (e.g., Brickley and Dark 1987). More recent studies have tried to uncover the advantages of mixing both (e.g., Bradach 1998).
 
3
For example, Luciano Benetton in Benetton (1990), especially in Chaps. 5 and 8, concerning the launching of franchised shops in Europe and the USA, respectively, is quite emphatic on the need for empathy and trust between both parties to a franchise agreement, deemed more important than formal contracts.
 
Literature
go back to reference Araújo L, Dubois A, Gadde L-E (2003) The multiple boundaries of the firm. J Manag Stud 40(8) Araújo L, Dubois A, Gadde L-E (2003) The multiple boundaries of the firm. J Manag Stud 40(8)
go back to reference Argote L, Darr E (2000) Repositories of knowledge in franchise organisations: individual structural and technological. In: Dosi G et al (eds) The nature and dynamics of organisational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51–68 Argote L, Darr E (2000) Repositories of knowledge in franchise organisations: individual structural and technological. In: Dosi G et al (eds) The nature and dynamics of organisational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51–68
go back to reference Axelsson B, Easton G (1992) Industrial networks: a new view of reality. Routledge, London Axelsson B, Easton G (1992) Industrial networks: a new view of reality. Routledge, London
go back to reference Benetton L, Andrea L (1990) Io e Miei Fratelli—La Storia del Nostro Sucesso. Sperling & Kupfer, Milano Benetton L, Andrea L (1990) Io e Miei Fratelli—La Storia del Nostro Sucesso. Sperling & Kupfer, Milano
go back to reference Bradach J (1997) Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Adm Sci Q 42:276–303CrossRef Bradach J (1997) Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Adm Sci Q 42:276–303CrossRef
go back to reference Bradach J (1998) Franchise organisation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Bradach J (1998) Franchise organisation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
go back to reference Brickley J, Dark F (1987) The choice of the organisational form: the case of franchising. J Financ Econ 18:401–420CrossRef Brickley J, Dark F (1987) The choice of the organisational form: the case of franchising. J Financ Econ 18:401–420CrossRef
go back to reference Brickley J, Dark F, Weisbach M (1991) An agency perspective on franchising. Financ Manag 20:27–35CrossRef Brickley J, Dark F, Weisbach M (1991) An agency perspective on franchising. Financ Manag 20:27–35CrossRef
go back to reference Carney M, Gedaglovic E (1991) Vertical integration in franchise systems: agency theory and resource explanations. Strateg Manag J 12:607–629CrossRef Carney M, Gedaglovic E (1991) Vertical integration in franchise systems: agency theory and resource explanations. Strateg Manag J 12:607–629CrossRef
go back to reference Castrogiovanni G, Combs J, Justis R (2006) Resource scarcity and agency theory predictions concerning the continued use of franchising in multi-outlet networks. J Small Bus Manag 44(1):27–44CrossRef Castrogiovanni G, Combs J, Justis R (2006) Resource scarcity and agency theory predictions concerning the continued use of franchising in multi-outlet networks. J Small Bus Manag 44(1):27–44CrossRef
go back to reference Caves R, Murphy WII (1976) Franchising: firms, markets, and intangible assets. South Econ J 42:572–586CrossRef Caves R, Murphy WII (1976) Franchising: firms, markets, and intangible assets. South Econ J 42:572–586CrossRef
go back to reference Clarkin J, Rosa P (2005) Entrepreneurial teams within franchise firms. Int Small Bus J 23(3):303–334CrossRef Clarkin J, Rosa P (2005) Entrepreneurial teams within franchise firms. Int Small Bus J 23(3):303–334CrossRef
go back to reference Cochet O, Dormann J, Ehrmann T (2008) Capitalizing on franchise autonomy: relational forms of governance as controls in idiosyncratic franchise dyads. J Small Bus Manag 46(1):50–72CrossRef Cochet O, Dormann J, Ehrmann T (2008) Capitalizing on franchise autonomy: relational forms of governance as controls in idiosyncratic franchise dyads. J Small Bus Manag 46(1):50–72CrossRef
go back to reference Combs J, Ketchen D Jr (2003) Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy? A meta-analysis. J Manag 29(3):443–465 Combs J, Ketchen D Jr (2003) Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy? A meta-analysis. J Manag 29(3):443–465
go back to reference Combs J, Michael S, Castrogiovanni G (2004) Franchising: a review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. J Manag 30:907–931CrossRef Combs J, Michael S, Castrogiovanni G (2004) Franchising: a review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. J Manag 30:907–931CrossRef
go back to reference Cox J, Mason C (2007) Standardisation versus adaptation: geographical pressures to deviate from franchise formats. Serv Ind J 27(8):1053–1072CrossRef Cox J, Mason C (2007) Standardisation versus adaptation: geographical pressures to deviate from franchise formats. Serv Ind J 27(8):1053–1072CrossRef
go back to reference Dant R, Gundlach G (1999) The challenge of autonomy and dependence in franchised channels of distribution. J Bus Ventur 14:35–67CrossRef Dant R, Gundlach G (1999) The challenge of autonomy and dependence in franchised channels of distribution. J Bus Ventur 14:35–67CrossRef
go back to reference Dant R, Perrigot R, Cliquet G (2008) A cross-cultural comparison of the plural forms in franchising networks United States France and Brazil. J Small Bus Manag 46(2):286–311CrossRef Dant R, Perrigot R, Cliquet G (2008) A cross-cultural comparison of the plural forms in franchising networks United States France and Brazil. J Small Bus Manag 46(2):286–311CrossRef
go back to reference Darr E, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Manag Sci 41:1750–1762CrossRef Darr E, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Manag Sci 41:1750–1762CrossRef
go back to reference Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. In: Langlois RN et al (eds) Alternative theories of the firm, vol I. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 280–300 Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. In: Langlois RN et al (eds) Alternative theories of the firm, vol I. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 280–300
go back to reference Dnes A (1996) The economic analysis of franchise contracts. J Inst Theor Econ 152(2):297–324 Dnes A (1996) The economic analysis of franchise contracts. J Inst Theor Econ 152(2):297–324
go back to reference Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S (2000) Introduction: the nature and dynamics of organisational capabilities. In: Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S (eds) The nature and dynamics of organisational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–23 Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S (2000) Introduction: the nature and dynamics of organisational capabilities. In: Dosi G, Nelson R, Winter S (eds) The nature and dynamics of organisational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–23
go back to reference Dyer J, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679CrossRef Dyer J, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679CrossRef
go back to reference Elango B, Fried V (1997) Franchising research: a literature review and synthesis. J Small Bus Manag July:68–81 Elango B, Fried V (1997) Franchising research: a literature review and synthesis. J Small Bus Manag July:68–81
go back to reference Ford D, Gadde L-E, Hakansson H, Snehota I (2003) Managing business relationships. Wiley, West Sussex Ford D, Gadde L-E, Hakansson H, Snehota I (2003) Managing business relationships. Wiley, West Sussex
go back to reference Grabher G (1993) Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. In: Grabher G (ed) The embeddded firm. Routledge, London, pp 1–31 Grabher G (1993) Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. In: Grabher G (ed) The embeddded firm. Routledge, London, pp 1–31
go back to reference Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure—the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510CrossRef Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure—the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510CrossRef
go back to reference Hakansson H, Snehota I (1995) Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge, London Hakansson H, Snehota I (1995) Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge, London
go back to reference Hunt S (1973) The trend toward company-operated units in franchise chains. J Retail 49(2):3–12 Hunt S (1973) The trend toward company-operated units in franchise chains. J Retail 49(2):3–12
go back to reference Lafontaine F (1992) Agency theory and franchising: some empirical results. Rand J Econ 23(2):263–283CrossRef Lafontaine F (1992) Agency theory and franchising: some empirical results. Rand J Econ 23(2):263–283CrossRef
go back to reference Lafontaine F, Kaufmann P (1994) The evolution of ownership patterns in franchise systems. J Retail 70(2):97–113CrossRef Lafontaine F, Kaufmann P (1994) The evolution of ownership patterns in franchise systems. J Retail 70(2):97–113CrossRef
go back to reference Langlois R, Foss N (1999) Capabilities and governance: the rebirth of production in the theory of economic organisation. In: Langlois R, Yu T, Robertson P (eds) Alternative theories of the firm, vol I. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham Langlois R, Foss N (1999) Capabilities and governance: the rebirth of production in the theory of economic organisation. In: Langlois R, Yu T, Robertson P (eds) Alternative theories of the firm, vol I. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham
go back to reference Langlois R, Robertson P (1993) Business organisation as a coordination problem: toward a dynamic theory of the boundaries of the firm. In: Langlois RN et al (eds) Alternative theories of the firm, vol III. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 31–41 Langlois R, Robertson P (1993) Business organisation as a coordination problem: toward a dynamic theory of the boundaries of the firm. In: Langlois RN et al (eds) Alternative theories of the firm, vol III. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 31–41
go back to reference Loasby B (1998) The organisation of capabilities. J Econ Behav Organ 35(2):139–160CrossRef Loasby B (1998) The organisation of capabilities. J Econ Behav Organ 35(2):139–160CrossRef
go back to reference Loasby B (2001) Industrial dynamics: why connections matter? Druid academy winter conference, Klarskovgaard, 18–20 January 2001 Loasby B (2001) Industrial dynamics: why connections matter? Druid academy winter conference, Klarskovgaard, 18–20 January 2001
go back to reference Love J (1986) McDonald’s: behind the arches. Bantam Books, New York Love J (1986) McDonald’s: behind the arches. Bantam Books, New York
go back to reference March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87CrossRef March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87CrossRef
go back to reference Marnoto S (2000) Os Factores Determinantes do franchising: O Caso das Empresas Franqueadoras Nacionais. MSc Dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, Portugal Marnoto S (2000) Os Factores Determinantes do franchising: O Caso das Empresas Franqueadoras Nacionais. MSc Dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, Portugal
go back to reference Martin R (1988) Franchising and risk management. Am Econ Rev 78:954–968 Martin R (1988) Franchising and risk management. Am Econ Rev 78:954–968
go back to reference Martin R, Justis R (1993) Franchising, liquidity constraints and entry. Appl Econ 25:1269–1277CrossRef Martin R, Justis R (1993) Franchising, liquidity constraints and entry. Appl Econ 25:1269–1277CrossRef
go back to reference Mathewson GF, Winter R (1985) The economics of franchise contracts. J Law Econ 28:503–526CrossRef Mathewson GF, Winter R (1985) The economics of franchise contracts. J Law Econ 28:503–526CrossRef
go back to reference Minkler A (1990) An empirical analysis of a firm’s decision to franchise. Econ Lett 34:77–82CrossRef Minkler A (1990) An empirical analysis of a firm’s decision to franchise. Econ Lett 34:77–82CrossRef
go back to reference Minkler A (1992) Why firms franchise: a search cost theory. J Inst Theor Econ 148:240–259 Minkler A (1992) Why firms franchise: a search cost theory. J Inst Theor Econ 148:240–259
go back to reference Mota J, de Castro L (2004) A capabilities perspective on the evolution of firm boundaries: a comparative case example from the Portuguese moulds industry. J Manag Stud 41(2):295–316CrossRef Mota J, de Castro L (2004) A capabilities perspective on the evolution of firm boundaries: a comparative case example from the Portuguese moulds industry. J Manag Stud 41(2):295–316CrossRef
go back to reference Norton S (1988) An empirical look at franchising as an organizational form. J Bus 61:187–218CrossRef Norton S (1988) An empirical look at franchising as an organizational form. J Bus 61:187–218CrossRef
go back to reference Oxenfeldt A, Kelly A (1969) Will successful franchise systems ultimately become wholly-owned chains? J Retail 44:69–87 Oxenfeldt A, Kelly A (1969) Will successful franchise systems ultimately become wholly-owned chains? J Retail 44:69–87
go back to reference Pinzanti I, Lerner M (2003) Examining control and autonomy in the franchisor–franchisee relationship. Int Small Bus J 21(2):131–159CrossRef Pinzanti I, Lerner M (2003) Examining control and autonomy in the franchisor–franchisee relationship. Int Small Bus J 21(2):131–159CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin P (1978) The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract. J Law Econ 21:223–233CrossRef Rubin P (1978) The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract. J Law Econ 21:223–233CrossRef
go back to reference Scott F Jr (1995) Franchising vs. company ownership as a decision variable of the firm. Rev Ind Organ 10(1):69–81CrossRef Scott F Jr (1995) Franchising vs. company ownership as a decision variable of the firm. Rev Ind Organ 10(1):69–81CrossRef
go back to reference Sorenson O, Sørensen J (2001) Research note. Finding the right mix: franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance. Strateg Manag J 22:713–724CrossRef Sorenson O, Sørensen J (2001) Research note. Finding the right mix: franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance. Strateg Manag J 22:713–724CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson R (1994) The franchise life cycle and the Penrose effect. J Econ Behav Organ 24:207–218CrossRef Thompson R (1994) The franchise life cycle and the Penrose effect. J Econ Behav Organ 24:207–218CrossRef
go back to reference Winter S, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ Sci 12(6):730–743CrossRef Winter S, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ Sci 12(6):730–743CrossRef
go back to reference Yin X, Zajac E (2004) The strategy/governance structure fit relationship: theory and evidence in franchising arrangements. Strateg Manag J 25:365–383CrossRef Yin X, Zajac E (2004) The strategy/governance structure fit relationship: theory and evidence in franchising arrangements. Strateg Manag J 25:365–383CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains
Authors
Luis M. De Castro
João Mota
Sandra Marnoto
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Service Business / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1862-8516
Electronic ISSN: 1862-8508
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008-0050-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Service Business 1/2009 Go to the issue