Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Computational Mechanics 1-2/2018

28-07-2017 | Original Paper

Uncertainty aggregation and reduction in structure–material performance prediction

Authors: Zhen Hu, Sankaran Mahadevan, Dan Ao

Published in: Computational Mechanics | Issue 1-2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An uncertainty aggregation and reduction framework is presented for structure–material performance prediction. Different types of uncertainty sources, structural analysis model, and material performance prediction model are connected through a Bayesian network for systematic uncertainty aggregation analysis. To reduce the uncertainty in the computational structure–material performance prediction model, Bayesian updating using experimental observation data is investigated based on the Bayesian network. It is observed that the Bayesian updating results will have large error if the model cannot accurately represent the actual physics, and that this error will be propagated to the predicted performance distribution. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel uncertainty reduction method by integrating Bayesian calibration with model validation adaptively. The observation domain of the quantity of interest is first discretized into multiple segments. An adaptive algorithm is then developed to perform model validation and Bayesian updating over these observation segments sequentially. Only information from observation segments where the model prediction is highly reliable is used for Bayesian updating; this is found to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of uncertainty reduction. A composite rotorcraft hub component fatigue life prediction model, which combines a finite element structural analysis model and a material damage model, is used to demonstrate the proposed method.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Fish J, Yu Q (2002) Computational mechanics of fatigue and life predictions for composite materials and structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(43):4827–4849CrossRefMATH Fish J, Yu Q (2002) Computational mechanics of fatigue and life predictions for composite materials and structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(43):4827–4849CrossRefMATH
2.
go back to reference Liu Y, Mahadevan S (2005) Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion and life prediction for metals. Int J Fatigue 27(7):790–800CrossRefMATH Liu Y, Mahadevan S (2005) Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion and life prediction for metals. Int J Fatigue 27(7):790–800CrossRefMATH
3.
go back to reference Ghosh S, Lee K, Raghavan P (2001) A multi-level computational model for multi-scale damage analysis in composite and porous materials. Int J Solids Struct 38(14):2335–2385CrossRefMATH Ghosh S, Lee K, Raghavan P (2001) A multi-level computational model for multi-scale damage analysis in composite and porous materials. Int J Solids Struct 38(14):2335–2385CrossRefMATH
4.
go back to reference Crouch R, Oskay C, Clay S (2012) Multiscale modeling of damage accumulation in carbon fiber reinforced polymers subjected to fatigue. In: Proceedings of 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA, p 1615 Crouch R, Oskay C, Clay S (2012) Multiscale modeling of damage accumulation in carbon fiber reinforced polymers subjected to fatigue. In: Proceedings of 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA, p 1615
5.
go back to reference Xia Z, Curtin W, Peters P (2001) Multiscale modeling of failure in metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 49(2):273–287CrossRef Xia Z, Curtin W, Peters P (2001) Multiscale modeling of failure in metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 49(2):273–287CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rannou J, Limodin N, Réthoré J, Gravouil A, Ludwig W, Baïetto-Dubourg M-C, Buffière J-Y, Combescure A, Hild F, Roux S (2010) Three dimensional experimental and numerical multiscale analysis of a fatigue crack. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(21):1307–1325CrossRefMATH Rannou J, Limodin N, Réthoré J, Gravouil A, Ludwig W, Baïetto-Dubourg M-C, Buffière J-Y, Combescure A, Hild F, Roux S (2010) Three dimensional experimental and numerical multiscale analysis of a fatigue crack. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(21):1307–1325CrossRefMATH
7.
go back to reference McDowell D, Dunne F (2010) Microstructure-sensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation. Int J Fatigue 32(9):1521–1542CrossRef McDowell D, Dunne F (2010) Microstructure-sensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation. Int J Fatigue 32(9):1521–1542CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bogdanor MJ, Oskay C, Clay SB (2015) Multiscale modeling of failure in composites under model parameter uncertainty. Comput Mech 56(3):389–404MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Bogdanor MJ, Oskay C, Clay SB (2015) Multiscale modeling of failure in composites under model parameter uncertainty. Comput Mech 56(3):389–404MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
9.
go back to reference Hu Z, Du X, Conrad D, Twohy R, Walmsley M (2014) Fatigue reliability analysis for structures with known loading trend. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50(1):9–23CrossRef Hu Z, Du X, Conrad D, Twohy R, Walmsley M (2014) Fatigue reliability analysis for structures with known loading trend. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50(1):9–23CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) Relative contributions of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty sources in time series prediction. Int J Fatigue 82:474–486CrossRef Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) Relative contributions of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty sources in time series prediction. Int J Fatigue 82:474–486CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hu Z, Mahadevan S, Du X (2016) Uncertainty quantification of time-dependent reliability analysis in the presence of parametric uncertainty. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part B Mech Eng 2(3):031005CrossRef Hu Z, Mahadevan S, Du X (2016) Uncertainty quantification of time-dependent reliability analysis in the presence of parametric uncertainty. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part B Mech Eng 2(3):031005CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nannapaneni S, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Uncertainty quantification in reliability estimation with limit state surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1509–1526MathSciNetCrossRef Nannapaneni S, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Uncertainty quantification in reliability estimation with limit state surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1509–1526MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Uncertainty quantification in prediction of material properties during additive manufacturing. Scr Mater 135:135–140CrossRef Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Uncertainty quantification in prediction of material properties during additive manufacturing. Scr Mater 135:135–140CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Hu Z, Ao D, Mahadevan S (2017) Calibration experimental design considering field response and model uncertainty. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:92–119MathSciNetCrossRef Hu Z, Ao D, Mahadevan S (2017) Calibration experimental design considering field response and model uncertainty. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:92–119MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhang R, Mahadevan S (2003) Bayesian methodology for reliability model acceptance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80(1):95–103CrossRef Zhang R, Mahadevan S (2003) Bayesian methodology for reliability model acceptance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80(1):95–103CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wheeler OE (1972) Spectrum loading and crack growth. J Basic Eng 94(1):181–186CrossRef Wheeler OE (1972) Spectrum loading and crack growth. J Basic Eng 94(1):181–186CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oskay C, Fish J (2004) Multiscale modeling of fatigue for ductile materials. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 2(3):329–353CrossRefMATH Oskay C, Fish J (2004) Multiscale modeling of fatigue for ductile materials. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 2(3):329–353CrossRefMATH
19.
go back to reference Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, New York Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, New York
20.
go back to reference Devathi H, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Snap-through buckling reliability analysis under spatiotemporal variability and epistemic uncertainty. AIAA J 54:3981–3993CrossRef Devathi H, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Snap-through buckling reliability analysis under spatiotemporal variability and epistemic uncertainty. AIAA J 54:3981–3993CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mahadevan S, Zhang R, Smith N (2001) Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Struct Saf 23(3):231–251CrossRef Mahadevan S, Zhang R, Smith N (2001) Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Struct Saf 23(3):231–251CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hu Z, Mahadevan S, Du X (2015) Uncertainty quantification in time-dependent reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V02BT03A062–V002BT003A062 Hu Z, Mahadevan S, Du X (2015) Uncertainty quantification in time-dependent reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V02BT03A062–V002BT003A062
23.
go back to reference Sankararaman S, Ling Y, Shantz C, Mahadevan S (2011) Uncertainty quantification in fatigue crack growth prognosis. Int J Progn Health Manag 2(1):15 Sankararaman S, Ling Y, Shantz C, Mahadevan S (2011) Uncertainty quantification in fatigue crack growth prognosis. Int J Progn Health Manag 2(1):15
24.
go back to reference Richardson LF (1911) The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 210:307–357CrossRefMATH Richardson LF (1911) The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 210:307–357CrossRefMATH
25.
go back to reference Celik I, Karatekin O (1997) Numerical experiments on application of Richardson extrapolation with nonuniform grids. J Fluids Eng 119(3):584–590CrossRef Celik I, Karatekin O (1997) Numerical experiments on application of Richardson extrapolation with nonuniform grids. J Fluids Eng 119(3):584–590CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liang B, Mahadevan S (2011) Error and uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in mechanics computational models. Int J Uncertain Quant 1(2):147–161MathSciNetCrossRef Liang B, Mahadevan S (2011) Error and uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in mechanics computational models. Int J Uncertain Quant 1(2):147–161MathSciNetCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2015) Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 138:194–209CrossRefMATH Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2015) Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 138:194–209CrossRefMATH
29.
go back to reference Hu Z, Du X (2015) Mixed efficient global optimization for time-dependent reliability analysis. J Mech Des 137(5):051401CrossRef Hu Z, Du X (2015) Mixed efficient global optimization for time-dependent reliability analysis. J Mech Des 137(5):051401CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24(2):619–644MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24(2):619–644MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
31.
go back to reference Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) An efficient modularized sample-based method to estimate the first-order Sobolx index. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 153:110–121CrossRef Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) An efficient modularized sample-based method to estimate the first-order Sobolx index. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 153:110–121CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) Global sensitivity analysis for a Bayesian network. In: Proceedings of ASME 2016 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V01AT02A023–V001AT002A023 Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) Global sensitivity analysis for a Bayesian network. In: Proceedings of ASME 2016 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V01AT02A023–V001AT002A023
33.
go back to reference Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) Robust test resource allocation using global sensitivity analysis. In: Proceedings of 18th AIAA non-deterministic approaches conference, p 0952 Li C, Mahadevan S (2016) Robust test resource allocation using global sensitivity analysis. In: Proceedings of 18th AIAA non-deterministic approaches conference, p 0952
34.
35.
go back to reference Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):174–188CrossRef Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):174–188CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Committee AS (1998) AIAA guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations (G-077-1998). AIAA Committee AS (1998) AIAA guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations (G-077-1998). AIAA
37.
go back to reference Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2013) Quantitative model validation techniques: new insights. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:217–231CrossRef Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2013) Quantitative model validation techniques: new insights. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:217–231CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Rebba R, Mahadevan S, Huang S (2006) Validation and error estimation of computational models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10):1390–1397CrossRef Rebba R, Mahadevan S, Huang S (2006) Validation and error estimation of computational models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10):1390–1397CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rebba R, Mahadevan S (2008) Computational methods for model reliability assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(8):1197–1207CrossRef Rebba R, Mahadevan S (2008) Computational methods for model reliability assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(8):1197–1207CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ferson S, Oberkampf WL, Ginzburg L (2008) Model validation and predictive capability for the thermal challenge problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(29):2408–2430CrossRefMATH Ferson S, Oberkampf WL, Ginzburg L (2008) Model validation and predictive capability for the thermal challenge problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(29):2408–2430CrossRefMATH
41.
go back to reference Sankararaman S, Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2011) Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction. Eng Fract Mech 78(7):1487–1504CrossRef Sankararaman S, Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2011) Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction. Eng Fract Mech 78(7):1487–1504CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Mahadevan S, Dey A, Tryon R, Wang Y, Rousseau C (2001) Reliability analysis of rotorcraft composite structures. J Aerosp Eng 14(4):140–146CrossRef Mahadevan S, Dey A, Tryon R, Wang Y, Rousseau C (2001) Reliability analysis of rotorcraft composite structures. J Aerosp Eng 14(4):140–146CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Ao D, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Validation of surrogate model-based life prediction for a composite rotorcraft hub component. In: Proceedings of the American Society for composites: thirty-first technical conference Ao D, Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Validation of surrogate model-based life prediction for a composite rotorcraft hub component. In: Proceedings of the American Society for composites: thirty-first technical conference
44.
go back to reference Murri GB, Salpekar SA, O’Brien TK (1991) Fatigue delamination onset prediction in unidirectional tapered laminates. In: Composite materials: fatigue and fracture (third volume). ASTM International, Philadelphia Murri GB, Salpekar SA, O’Brien TK (1991) Fatigue delamination onset prediction in unidirectional tapered laminates. In: Composite materials: fatigue and fracture (third volume). ASTM International, Philadelphia
45.
go back to reference Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):501–521MathSciNetCrossRef Hu Z, Mahadevan S (2016) Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):501–521MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Uncertainty aggregation and reduction in structure–material performance prediction
Authors
Zhen Hu
Sankaran Mahadevan
Dan Ao
Publication date
28-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Computational Mechanics / Issue 1-2/2018
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1448-6

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2018

Computational Mechanics 1-2/2018 Go to the issue

EditorialNotes

Foreword