Top

Social Indicators Research

Published in:

01-07-2008

Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators

Authors: Amery D. Wu, Bruno D. Zumbo

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 3/2008

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Mediation and moderation are two theories for refining and understanding a causal relationship. Empirical investigation of mediators and moderators requires an integrated research design rather than the data analyses driven approach often seen in the literature. This paper described the conceptual foundation, research design, data analysis, as well as inferences involved in a mediation and/or moderation investigation in both experimental and non-experimental (i.e., correlational) contexts. The essential distinctions between the investigation of mediators and moderators were summarized and juxtaposed in an example of a causal relationship between test difficulty and test anxiety. In addition, the more elaborate models, moderated mediation and mediated moderation, the use of structural equation models, and the problems with model misspecification were discussed conceptually.

previous article Education, Happiness and Wellbeing

next article Is the Study of Happiness a Worthy Scientific Pursuit?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Path analysis and factor analysis are special cases of SEM. A path analysis is a type of SEM in which each variable has only one indicator and the relationship among the variables are specified. Hence, a path analysis approach to mediation and moderation does not deal with the problem of measurement errors, however, it, can deal with multiple univariate regression analyses in one model. A factor analysis is a type of SEM in which each latent variable has multiple indicators hence deals with the measurement error problem, but there are no relationship specified among the latent variables. A full SEM incorporates and integrates path analysis and factor analysis; the latent variables have multiple indicators and their relationships are modeled.

Aguinis, H., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2001). A generalized solution for approximating the power to detect effect of categorical moderator variables using multiple regression. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 291–323.CrossRef

Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). Note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 40–52.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRef

Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.CrossRef

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (1998). Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 267–293.

Brown, R. L. (1997). Assessing specific mediational effect in complex theoretical models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 142–156.CrossRef

Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation in moderation research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen, J. P., Cohen, S. G., West, L. S., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 4, 558–577.CrossRef

Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., & Flaherty, B. P. (1998). An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 295–313.CrossRef

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.CrossRef

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Baron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 51, 115–134.CrossRef

Hershberger, S. L. (2006). The problem of equivalent structural models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Muller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 13–41). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2003). The importance of indirect effects in media effects research: testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 556–572.CrossRef

Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960.CrossRef

Holmbeck G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.CrossRef

Holmbeck, G. N. (2002). Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 87–96.CrossRef

Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Statistical power and tests of mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Newbury Park: Sage.

Hoyle, R. H., & Robinson, J. I. (2003). Mediated and moderated effects in social psychological research: measurement, design, analysis issues. In C. Sansone, C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), Handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 213–233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypothesis as structural models: a conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429–440.CrossRef

Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357.CrossRef

Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and test for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321.CrossRef

Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: estimating mediation in treatment evaluation. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.CrossRef

Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.

Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the linear and interative effects of latent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 361–373.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233–265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models, Psychological Methods, 8, 115–128.CrossRef

Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A, Offord, D., & Kupfer, D. (2001). How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 848–856.

Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRef

MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199.CrossRef

MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40.CrossRef

MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Sciences, 1, 173–181.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparisons of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62.CrossRef

Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 53, 372–378.CrossRef

Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–299.CrossRef

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: American Council of Education & Macmillan.

Mogan-Lopes, A. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2006). Demonstration and evaluation of methods for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 77–87.

Moulder, B. B., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 1–19.CrossRef

Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.CrossRef

Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: models reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ping, R. A. Jr. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: a two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166–175.CrossRef

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (in press). Addressing moderated mediation hypothesis: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research.

Rogosa, D. (1987). Causal models do not support scientific conclusions: a comment in support of Freedman. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 185–195.CrossRef

Rose, B. M., Holmbeck, G. N., Coakley, R. M., & Franks, E. A. (2004). Mediator and moderator effects in developmental and behavioral pediatric research. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 58–67.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). From association to causation on observational studies: the role of tests of strongly ignorable treatment assignment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 41–48.CrossRef

Rozeboom, W. W. (1956). Mediation variable in scientific theory. Psychological Review, 63, 249–264.CrossRef

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef

Rubin, D. (1986). “Comment: which ifs have causal answers?” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961–962.CrossRef

Saunders, D. R. (1956). Moderator variables in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 209–222.CrossRef

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a Latent Moderated Structural Equations Approach. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203–238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 40–54.CrossRef

Schumacker, R., & Marcoulides, G. (Eds.) (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 4, 422–445.CrossRef

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

Sobel, M. E. (1988) Direct and indirect effects in structural equation models. In J. S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: avoiding error in quantitative research (pp. 46–64). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.

Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 55, 495–515.CrossRef

Sobel, M. E. (1995). Causal inference in social and behavioral sciences. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clog, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–32). New York: Plenum Press.

Sobel, M. E. (2005) Discussion: the scientific model of causality. Sociological Methodology, 35, 99–133.CrossRef

Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analysis in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.CrossRef

Wegener, D., & Fabrigar, L. (2000). Analysis and design for nonexperimental data addressing causal and noncausal hypothesis. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 412–450). New York: Cambridge University Press.

West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality design: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1–49.CrossRef

Woodworth, R. S. (1928). Dynamic psychology. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychology of 1925. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

Title: Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators
Authors: Amery D. Wu
Bruno D. Zumbo
Publication date: 01-07-2008
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Social Indicators Research / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Policy Preceding Possibility? Examining Headline Composite Sustainability Indicators in the United Kingdom

India’s Social Development in a Decade of Reforms: 1990–91/1999–2000

Human Well Being: A Decile Group Analysis on Indian Household Data

Assessing Subjective Well-being in Chinese Older Adults: The Chinese Aging Well Profile

Pet Dogs Benefit Owners’ Health: A ‘Natural Experiment’ in China

Ryff’s Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being, A Spanish Exploration

Premium Partner