Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction

Author : Antonia L. Krummheuer

Published in: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Human-agent interaction (HAI), especially in the field of embodied conversational agents (ECA), is mainly construed as dyadic communication between a human user and a virtual agent. This is despite the fact that many application scenarios for future ECAs involve the presence of others. This paper critiques the view of an ‘isolated user’ and proposes a micro-sociological perspective on the participation roles in HAI. Two examples of an HAI in a public setting point out (1) the ways a variety of participants take part in the interaction, (2) how the construction of the participation roles influences the construction of the agent’s identity, and (3) how HAI, as a mediated interaction, is framed by an asymmetric participation framework. The paper concludes by suggesting various participation roles, which may inform development of ECAs.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The transcripts are simplified and translated form German [16]. Pauses are shown in brackets. Double brackets indicate nonverbal communication. Square brackets mark overlapping actions. Capital letters indicate stress and text within ** is the message sent to the agent.
 
2
The pause in line 9–10 indicates that Dave still might not have understood Max. However, Dave produces the relevant answer to Max’s question (line 12), which gives the communicative basis for continuing the game. On an interactional level, the problem is solved.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agre, P.E.: Conceptions of the user in computer system design. In: Thomas, P.J. (ed.) The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, pp. 67–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) Agre, P.E.: Conceptions of the user in computer system design. In: Thomas, P.J. (ed.) The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, pp. 67–106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
2.
go back to reference Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.): Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, Berlin (2013) Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.): Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, Berlin (2013)
3.
go back to reference Blomberg, J.L.: Social interaction and office communication: effects on user’s evaluation of new technologies. In: Kraut, R.E. (ed.) Technology and the Transformation of White-Collar Work, pp. 195–210. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987) Blomberg, J.L.: Social interaction and office communication: effects on user’s evaluation of new technologies. In: Kraut, R.E. (ed.) Technology and the Transformation of White-Collar Work, pp. 195–210. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)
4.
go back to reference Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Campbell, L., Vilhjálmsson, H., Yan, H.: Human conversation as a system framework: designing embodied conversational agents. In: Cassell, J., et al. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 29–63. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (2000) Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Campbell, L., Vilhjálmsson, H., Yan, H.: Human conversation as a system framework: designing embodied conversational agents. In: Cassell, J., et al. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 29–63. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (2000)
5.
go back to reference Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
6.
go back to reference Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P.: Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. Sage, London (2010) Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P.: Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. Sage, London (2010)
7.
go back to reference Goffman, E.: Footing. In: Goffman, E. (ed.) Forms of Talk, pp. 124–159. Blackwell, Oxford (1981) Goffman, E.: Footing. In: Goffman, E. (ed.) Forms of Talk, pp. 124–159. Blackwell, Oxford (1981)
8.
9.
go back to reference Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M.H.: Participation. In: Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, pp. 222–244. Blackwell, Malden (2004) Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M.H.: Participation. In: Duranti, A. (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, pp. 222–244. Blackwell, Malden (2004)
10.
go back to reference Grudin, J.: Interface: an evolving concept. Commun. ACM 36(4), 110–119 (1993)CrossRef Grudin, J.: Interface: an evolving concept. Commun. ACM 36(4), 110–119 (1993)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haase, J.: Computer aus Nutzerperspektive von der Nutzeranalyse zum Interface-Design. DUV, Wiesbaden (2005)CrossRef Haase, J.: Computer aus Nutzerperspektive von der Nutzeranalyse zum Interface-Design. DUV, Wiesbaden (2005)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hyysalo, S., Johnson, M.: The user as relational entity. Options that deeper insight into user representations opens for human-centered design. Inf. Technol. People 28(1), 72–89 (2015)CrossRef Hyysalo, S., Johnson, M.: The user as relational entity. Options that deeper insight into user representations opens for human-centered design. Inf. Technol. People 28(1), 72–89 (2015)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N.C., Wachsmuth, I.: A conversational agent as museum guide – design and evaluation of a real-world application. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRef Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N.C., Wachsmuth, I.: A conversational agent as museum guide – design and evaluation of a real-world application. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kopp, S., Jung, B., Lemann, N., Wachsmuth, I.: Max – a multimodal assistant in virtual reality construction. Künstliche Intelligenz 4, 11–17 (2003) Kopp, S., Jung, B., Lemann, N., Wachsmuth, I.: Max – a multimodal assistant in virtual reality construction. Künstliche Intelligenz 4, 11–17 (2003)
15.
go back to reference Krummheuer, A.: Conversation analysis, video recordings, and human-computer interchanges. In: Kissmann, U.T. (ed.) Video Interaction Analysis. Methods and Methodology, pp. 59–83. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (2009) Krummheuer, A.: Conversation analysis, video recordings, and human-computer interchanges. In: Kissmann, U.T. (ed.) Video Interaction Analysis. Methods and Methodology, pp. 59–83. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (2009)
16.
go back to reference Krummheuer, A.: Interaktion mit virtuellen Agenten? Zur Aneignung eines ungewohnten Artefakts. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart (2010) Krummheuer, A.: Interaktion mit virtuellen Agenten? Zur Aneignung eines ungewohnten Artefakts. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart (2010)
17.
go back to reference Levinson, S.C.: Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In: Drew, P., Wootton, A. (eds.) Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 161–227. Polity Press, Cambridge (1988) Levinson, S.C.: Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In: Drew, P., Wootton, A. (eds.) Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 161–227. Polity Press, Cambridge (1988)
18.
go back to reference Moosaei, M., Gonzales, M.J., Riek, L.D.: Naturalistic pain synthesis for virtual patients. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) IVA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8637, pp. 295–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Moosaei, M., Gonzales, M.J., Riek, L.D.: Naturalistic pain synthesis for virtual patients. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) IVA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8637, pp. 295–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
19.
go back to reference Mutlu, B., Shiwa,T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Footing in Human-Robot conversation: how robots might shape participant role using gaze cues. In: HRI 2009, March 11–13, La Jolla California, USA (2009) Mutlu, B., Shiwa,T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Footing in Human-Robot conversation: how robots might shape participant role using gaze cues. In: HRI 2009, March 11–13, La Jolla California, USA (2009)
20.
go back to reference Rehm, M.: ‘She is just stupid’ – analyzing user-agent interactions in emotional game situations. Interact. Comput. 20, 311–325 (2008)CrossRef Rehm, M.: ‘She is just stupid’ – analyzing user-agent interactions in emotional game situations. Interact. Comput. 20, 311–325 (2008)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., Sacks, H.: The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2), 361–382 (1977)CrossRef Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., Sacks, H.: The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2), 361–382 (1977)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007) Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
23.
go back to reference Vannini, N., Enz, S., Sapouna, M., Wolke, D., Watson, S., Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Hall, L., Paiva, A., André, E.: “Fearnot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 26(1), 21–44 (2011)CrossRef Vannini, N., Enz, S., Sapouna, M., Wolke, D., Watson, S., Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K., Hall, L., Paiva, A., André, E.: “Fearnot!”: a computer-based anti-bullying-programme designed to foster peer intervention. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 26(1), 21–44 (2011)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Woolgar, S.: Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In: Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 58–99. Routledge, London (1991) Woolgar, S.: Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In: Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 58–99. Routledge, London (1991)
Metadata
Title
Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction
Author
Antonia L. Krummheuer
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_19