Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Published in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4/2012

01-12-2012

Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum

Authors: Susan A. Yoon, Karen Elinich, Joyce Wang, Christopher Steinmeier, Sean Tucker

Published in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning | Issue 4/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although learning science in informal non-school environments has shown great promise in terms of increasing interest and engagement, few studies have systematically investigated and produced evidence of improved conceptual knowledge and cognitive skills. Furthermore, little is known about how digital technologies that are increasingly being used in these informal environments can enhance learning. Through a quasi-experimental design, this study compared four conditions for learning science in a science museum using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds known to be successful in formal classrooms. Results indicated that students demonstrated greater cognitive gains when scaffolds were used. Through the use of digital augmentations, the study also provided information about how such technologies impact learning in informal environments.
previous article Interactive visual tools as triggers of collaborative reasoning in entry-level pathology
next article Participatory learning through behavioral and cognitive engagements in an online collective information searching activity

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
In the written discourse account, gestures and descriptions of on-going dynamics are encased in double parentheses, e.g., (()), direct utterances are written in normal text, instances where utterances are overlapping are encased in square brackets, e.g., [ ], and time elapses are marked in single parenthesis with the number of seconds that have gone by, e.g., (5).
 
Literature
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34–47.CrossRef
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Unraveling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 55–68). Oxford: Elsevier.
Borun, M., Kelly, B. M., & Rudy, L. J. (2011). In their own voices: Museums and communities changing lives. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute.
Cress, U. (2008). The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research–An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 69–84.CrossRef
Damala, A., Cubaud, P., Bationo, A., Houlier, P., & Marchal, I. (2008). Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: Design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit. In 3rd ACM International Conference on Digital and Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, (pp. 120–128). New York: ACM Press.
DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2010). Recollections of exhibits: Stimulated-recall interviews with primary school children about science centre visits. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1365–1388.CrossRef
Dierking, L., Falk, J., & Scott, C. (2004). Interactives and visitor learning. Curator, 47(2), 171–198.CrossRef
Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Mediating the mechanisms which make collaborative learning sometimes effective. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 131–146.
Council, D. P. (2006). American competitiveness initiative. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific: How children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68.CrossRef
Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Foutz, S. (Eds.). (2007). In principle-in practice: museums as learning institutions. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Fender, J. G., & Crowley, K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 189–210.CrossRef
Hall, T., & Bannon, L. (2006). Designing ubiquitous computing to enhance children’s learning in museums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 231–243.CrossRef
Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (Eds.). (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Hughes, C. E., Smith, E., Stapleton, C. B., & Hughes, D. E. (2004). Augmenting museum experiences with mixed reality, Proceedings of KSCE 2004, St. Thomas, V.I., November 22–24.
John, N., & Lim, I. (2007). Cybermedicine tools for communication and learning. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 30(1), 4–9.CrossRef
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives–the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Education Technology Research and Development, 56, 203–228.CrossRef
Marek, E., Boram, R., Laubach, T., & Gerber, B. (2002). Conceptual understandings resulting from interactive science exhibits. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 39–50.CrossRef
McManus, P. (1994). Families in museums. In L. Miks & A. Zavala (Eds.), Towards the museum of the future (pp. 81–118). London: Routledge.
Foundation, N. S. (2006). America’s pressing challenge: Building a stronger foundation, a companion to science and engineering indicators. Arlington: Author.
Council, N. R. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
O’Donnell, A. M., & O’Kelly, J. B. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321–349.CrossRef
Palmquist, S. D., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: Parents’ role in child expertise development in informal settings. Science Education, 91(5), 712–732.CrossRef
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Tucson, AZ 1–24.
Perry, D., & Tisdal, C. (2004). Going APE! at the exploratorium: Interim summative evaluation report. Available from the Exploratorium, 3601 Lyon St., San Francisco, CA 94123.
Rennie, L., & Williams, G. (2002). Science centers and scientific literacy: Promoting a relationship with science. Science Education, 86, 706–726.CrossRef
Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Towards an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 112–120.CrossRef
Sanford, C., Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2007). We always spend time together on Sundays: Grandparents and informal learning. Visitor Studies, 10(2), 136–151.CrossRef
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Serrell, B., & Adams, R. (1998). Paying attention: Visitors and museum exhibitions. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Stavrova, O., & Urhahne, D. (2010). Modification of a school programme in the deutsches museum to enhance students’ attitudes and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2291–2310.CrossRef
Sylaiou, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A., & White, M. (2010). Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 68, 243–253.CrossRef
Szymanski, M., Aoki, P., Grinter, R., Hurst, A., Thornton, J., & Woodruff, A. (2008). Sotto Voce: Facilitating social learning in a historic house. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 5–34.CrossRef
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Report of the academic competitiveness council. Washington, DC: Author.
van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.CrossRef
Waite, T., Kirkley, J., Pendleton, R., & Turner, L. (2004). MUSEpad: Supporting information accessibility through mobile location-based technology. TechTrends, 49(3), 76–82.CrossRef
Yoon, S. (2008). An evolutionary approach to harnessing complex systems thinking in the science and technology classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 1–32.CrossRef
Yoon, S., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Van Schooneveld, J. (2011). Fostering critical thinking in science museums through digital augmentations. In The Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Hong Kong, China.
Yoon, S., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Van Schooneveld, J. (in press). Learning impacts of a digital augmentation in a science museum. To appear in Visitor Studies.
Metadata
Title
Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum
Authors
Susan A. Yoon
Karen Elinich
Joyce Wang
Christopher Steinmeier
Sean Tucker
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Electronic ISSN: 1556-1615
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4/2012 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Computational analysis and mapping of ijCSCL content

OriginalPaper

Participatory learning through behavioral and cognitive engagements in an online collective information searching activity

EditorialNotes

Traversing planes of learning

OriginalPaper

A model for flexibly editing CSCL scripts

OriginalPaper

Interactive visual tools as triggers of collaborative reasoning in entry-level pathology

Premium Partner

    Image Credits