Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Paper

Using data from online social networks in conservation science: which species engage people the most on Twitter?

Author: Jean-Michel Roberge

Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Issue 3/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Knowledge about the level of public attention toward different species is crucial to successful conservation. The evolution of online social networks offers new possibilities for collecting data about public interest. Building on an analysis of text messages on Twitter, this study aimed to quantify the level of public attention toward different mammal and bird species listed (at the full species or subspecies/population level) under the United States’ Endangered Species Act (ESA). Once a month during 1 year, I searched recently posted messages (‘tweets’) for the common names of every listed species. The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) was by far the most tweeted species. The other most tweeted mammals were the American bison (Bison bison), brown bear (U. arctos), cougar (Puma concolor), killer whale (Orcinus orca), black bear (U. americanus) and West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), respectively. The three most frequently tweeted birds were the sandhill crane (Grus canadensis), whooping crane (G. americana) and spotted owl (Strix occidentalis). Some species, such as the manatee, right whale (Eubalaena glacialis), and gray wolf (Canis lupus) ranked higher when restricting the search to conservation contexts. The results suggest that Twitter users interact about a biased sample of ESA-listed species: mammals were better represented than birds among the most tweeted species and larger-sized species received more tweets. The findings can be used for prioritizing conservation education and marketing campaigns aiming to raise the profile of lesser-known listed species. Data from online social networks open the door for a range of novel applications in conservation science.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Barua M, Root-Bernstein M, Ladle RJ, Jepson P (2011) Defining flagship uses is critical for flagship selection: a critique of the IUCN climate change flagship fleet. Ambio 40:431–435PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Barua M, Root-Bernstein M, Ladle RJ, Jepson P (2011) Defining flagship uses is critical for flagship selection: a critique of the IUCN climate change flagship fleet. Ambio 40:431–435PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Caro T (2010) Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship and other surrogate species. Island Press, Washington, DC Caro T (2010) Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship and other surrogate species. Island Press, Washington, DC
go back to reference Clucas B, McHugh K, Caro T (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodivers Conserv 17:1517–1528CrossRef Clucas B, McHugh K, Caro T (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodivers Conserv 17:1517–1528CrossRef
go back to reference Czech B, Krausman PR, Borkhataria R (1998) Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conserv Biol 12:1103–1112CrossRef Czech B, Krausman PR, Borkhataria R (1998) Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conserv Biol 12:1103–1112CrossRef
go back to reference Gavin MC, Solomon JN, Blank SG (2010) Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conserv Biol 24:89–100PubMedCrossRef Gavin MC, Solomon JN, Blank SG (2010) Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conserv Biol 24:89–100PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Golbeck J, Grimes JM, Rogers A (2010) Twitter use by the US congress. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61:1612–1621 Golbeck J, Grimes JM, Rogers A (2010) Twitter use by the US congress. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61:1612–1621
go back to reference Kalland A (1993) Management by totemization: whale symbolism and the anti-whaling campaign. Arctic 46:124–133 Kalland A (1993) Management by totemization: whale symbolism and the anti-whaling campaign. Arctic 46:124–133
go back to reference Kareiva P, Marvier M (2012) What is conservation science? Bioscience 62:962–969CrossRef Kareiva P, Marvier M (2012) What is conservation science? Bioscience 62:962–969CrossRef
go back to reference Kellert SR (1985) Social and perceptual factors in endangered species management. J Wildlife Manag 49:528–536CrossRef Kellert SR (1985) Social and perceptual factors in endangered species management. J Wildlife Manag 49:528–536CrossRef
go back to reference Kellert SR (1996) The value of life: biological diversity and human society. Island Press, Washington, DC Kellert SR (1996) The value of life: biological diversity and human society. Island Press, Washington, DC
go back to reference Knegtering E, Hendrickx L, van der Windt HJ, Schoot Uiterkamp AJM (2002) Effect of species’ characteristics on nongovernmental organizations’ attitudes toward species conservation policy. Environ Behav 34:378–400CrossRef Knegtering E, Hendrickx L, van der Windt HJ, Schoot Uiterkamp AJM (2002) Effect of species’ characteristics on nongovernmental organizations’ attitudes toward species conservation policy. Environ Behav 34:378–400CrossRef
go back to reference Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Székely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605CrossRef Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Székely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605CrossRef
go back to reference McCallum ML, Bury GW (2013) Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodivers Conserv 22:1355–1367CrossRef McCallum ML, Bury GW (2013) Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodivers Conserv 22:1355–1367CrossRef
go back to reference McNeil K, Brna PM, Gordon KE (2012) Epilepsy in the Twitter era: a need to re-tweet the way we think about seizures. Epilepsy Behav 23:127–130PubMedCrossRef McNeil K, Brna PM, Gordon KE (2012) Epilepsy in the Twitter era: a need to re-tweet the way we think about seizures. Epilepsy Behav 23:127–130PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Metrick A, Weitzman ML (1996) Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Econ 72:1–16CrossRef Metrick A, Weitzman ML (1996) Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Econ 72:1–16CrossRef
go back to reference R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
go back to reference Richardson L, Loomis J (2009) The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: an updated meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 68:1535–1548CrossRef Richardson L, Loomis J (2009) The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: an updated meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 68:1535–1548CrossRef
go back to reference Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76PubMedCrossRef Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL (2010) Dissemination of health information through social networks: Twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control 38:182–188PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL (2010) Dissemination of health information through social networks: Twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control 38:182–188PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM (2011) The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19467PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM (2011) The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19467PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SKM, Jones KE, Kauffman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84:3403CrossRef Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SKM, Jones KE, Kauffman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84:3403CrossRef
go back to reference Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC (2010) Marketing and conservation: how to lose friends and influence people. In: Leader-Williams N, Adams W, Smith RJ (eds) Trade-offs in conservation: deciding what to save. Blackwell, Oxford Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC (2010) Marketing and conservation: how to lose friends and influence people. In: Leader-Williams N, Adams W, Smith RJ (eds) Trade-offs in conservation: deciding what to save. Blackwell, Oxford
go back to reference Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, Isaac NJB, Jones KE (2012) Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal. Conserv Lett 5:205–212CrossRef Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, Isaac NJB, Jones KE (2012) Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal. Conserv Lett 5:205–212CrossRef
go back to reference Stokes DL (2007) Things we like: human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Hum Ecol 25:361–369CrossRef Stokes DL (2007) Things we like: human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Hum Ecol 25:361–369CrossRef
go back to reference Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC, Smith RJ (2011) Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships. Conserv Lett 4:1–8CrossRef Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC, Smith RJ (2011) Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships. Conserv Lett 4:1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC, Smith RJ, Barua M, Jepson P (2012) Selecting marine invertebrate flagship species: widening the net. Biol Conserv 145:4CrossRef Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC, Smith RJ, Barua M, Jepson P (2012) Selecting marine invertebrate flagship species: widening the net. Biol Conserv 145:4CrossRef
go back to reference Walpole MJ, Leader-Williams N (2002) Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 11:543–547CrossRef Walpole MJ, Leader-Williams N (2002) Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 11:543–547CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using data from online social networks in conservation science: which species engage people the most on Twitter?
Author
Jean-Michel Roberge
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0629-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Biodiversity and Conservation 3/2014 Go to the issue