Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Constitutional Political Economy 1/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Paper

Veto players and foreign aid provision

Authors: Yu Wang, Shuai Jin

Published in: Constitutional Political Economy | Issue 1/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study investigates how the political institutions of developed economies influence their foreign assistance. Specifically, we argue that the number of effective veto players has a negative effect on the volume of aid provision. To provide foreign assistance, the incumbent government in a donor country must have unanimous support from all effective veto players in policy making. Thus, it has more barriers to overcome when the polity is characterized by many and preference-wise heterogeneous veto players. By examining the official development assistance outflows of 27 OECD countries for the period of 1977–2006, we find empirical patterns that corroborate our argument.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In fact, many apparently idealistic foreign aid programs can be explained as the result of rational calculus intended to boost the domestic popularity of the incumbent government. For instance, the impression of pursuing global equality associated with such programs could be an instrument used by an extreme left-wing government to satisfy the ideological demands of its domestic base.
 
2
To facilitate cross-national and over-time comparisons, currency-related variables are PPP- and inflation-adjusted in the present study. The corresponding convertor and deflator are from the Penn World Table Version 7.0 (Heston et al. 2011).
 
3
Henisz (2000, 2002) elaborates on all the technical nuances involved in gauging the constraining effect of veto players on policy outcome. In particular, Table 2 of Henisz (2000) lists every five-year average value of veto players for 157 countries for the period 1960–1994. Table A2 of Henisz (2002) further lists every 10-year average value of veto players for the same pool of nations back to 1800. Thus, readers might take a look at these articles for how the measure varies both across and within nations.
 
4
It is calculated based on the countries’ iron and steel production, military expenditure, military personnel, primary energy consumption, total population and urban population, which is measured as the population living in cities of more than 100,000 people.
 
5
It is important to note that veto players, regime type, and FDI outflows are all significant for the post-Cold War subsample but not for the Cold War subsample. This is a piece of evidence in support of our argument.
 
Literature
go back to reference Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 22–63.CrossRef Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 22–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Smith, A. (2007). Foreign aid and policy concessions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(2), 251–284.CrossRef Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Smith, A. (2007). Foreign aid and policy concessions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(2), 251–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid. Policies and Growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847–868.CrossRef Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid. Policies and Growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847–868.CrossRef
go back to reference Chong, A., & Gradstein, M. (2008). What Determines Foreign Aid? The Donors’ Perspective. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 1–13.CrossRef Chong, A., & Gradstein, M. (2008). What Determines Foreign Aid? The Donors’ Perspective. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Collier, P., & Dollar, D. (2002). Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1457–1500.CrossRef Collier, P., & Dollar, D. (2002). Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1457–1500.CrossRef
go back to reference Dalgaard, C.-J., Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2004). On the Empirics of Foreign Aid and Growth. The Economic Journal, 114, 191–216.CrossRef Dalgaard, C.-J., Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. (2004). On the Empirics of Foreign Aid and Growth. The Economic Journal, 114, 191–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Derbyshire, J. D., & Derbyshire, I. (1996). Political systems of the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Derbyshire, J. D., & Derbyshire, I. (1996). Political systems of the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Djankov, S., Montalvo, J., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2008). The curse of aid. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(3), 169–194.CrossRef Djankov, S., Montalvo, J., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2008). The curse of aid. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(3), 169–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Easterly, W. (2003). Can foreign aid buy growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 23–48.CrossRef Easterly, W. (2003). Can foreign aid buy growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 23–48.CrossRef
go back to reference Easterly, W., Levine, R., & Roodman, D. (2004). Aid, policies, and growth: a comment. American Economic Review, 94(3), 774–780.CrossRef Easterly, W., Levine, R., & Roodman, D. (2004). Aid, policies, and growth: a comment. American Economic Review, 94(3), 774–780.CrossRef
go back to reference Ganghof, S. (2003). Promises and Pitfalls of Veto Player Analysis. Swiss Political Science Review, 9(2), 1–25.CrossRef Ganghof, S. (2003). Promises and Pitfalls of Veto Player Analysis. Swiss Political Science Review, 9(2), 1–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffin, K. (1991). Foreign aid after the Cold War. Development and Change, 22(4), 645–685.CrossRef Griffin, K. (1991). Foreign aid after the Cold War. Development and Change, 22(4), 645–685.CrossRef
go back to reference Gurr, T. (1996). Polity III: Political structures and regime change. Boulder, CO: Center for Comparative Politics. Gurr, T. (1996). Polity III: Political structures and regime change. Boulder, CO: Center for Comparative Politics.
go back to reference Harms, P., & Lutz, M. (2006). Aid, governance and private foreign investment. The Economic Journal, 116(513), 773–790.CrossRef Harms, P., & Lutz, M. (2006). Aid, governance and private foreign investment. The Economic Journal, 116(513), 773–790.CrossRef
go back to reference Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1272.CrossRef Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1272.CrossRef
go back to reference Headey, D. (2008). Geopolitics and the effect of foreign aid on economic growth: 1970–2001. Journal of International Development, 20(2), 161–180.CrossRef Headey, D. (2008). Geopolitics and the effect of foreign aid on economic growth: 1970–2001. Journal of International Development, 20(2), 161–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Henisz, W. (2000). The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.CrossRef Henisz, W. (2000). The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Henisz, W. (2002). The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 355–389.CrossRef Henisz, W. (2002). The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 355–389.CrossRef
go back to reference Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2011). Penn world table version 7.0. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/. Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2011). Penn world table version 7.0. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania. https://​pwt.​sas.​upenn.​edu/​.
go back to reference Hook, S., & Guang, Z. (1998). Japan’s aid policy since the Cold War: Rhetoric and reality. Asian Survey, 38(11), 1051–1066.CrossRef Hook, S., & Guang, Z. (1998). Japan’s aid policy since the Cold War: Rhetoric and reality. Asian Survey, 38(11), 1051–1066.CrossRef
go back to reference Kang, S. J., Lee, H., & Park, B. (2011). Does Korea Follow Japan in Foreign Aid? Relationships between Aid and Foreign Investment. Japan and the World Economy, 23(1), 19–27.CrossRef Kang, S. J., Lee, H., & Park, B. (2011). Does Korea Follow Japan in Foreign Aid? Relationships between Aid and Foreign Investment. Japan and the World Economy, 23(1), 19–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Kimura, H., & Todo, Y. (2010). Is Foreign Aid a Vanguard of Foreign Direct Investment? World Development, 38(4), 482–497.CrossRef Kimura, H., & Todo, Y. (2010). Is Foreign Aid a Vanguard of Foreign Direct Investment? World Development, 38(4), 482–497.CrossRef
go back to reference Knack, S. (2004). Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 251–266.CrossRef Knack, S. (2004). Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 251–266.CrossRef
go back to reference Lundborg, P. (1998). Foreign Aid and International Supports as a Gift Exchange. Economics and Politics, 10(2), 127–142.CrossRef Lundborg, P. (1998). Foreign Aid and International Supports as a Gift Exchange. Economics and Politics, 10(2), 127–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Maizels, A., & Nissanke, M. (1984). Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Development, 12(9), 879–900.CrossRef Maizels, A., & Nissanke, M. (1984). Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Development, 12(9), 879–900.CrossRef
go back to reference Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Pevehouse, J. (2007). Vetoing Cooperation: the Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 403–432.CrossRef Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Pevehouse, J. (2007). Vetoing Cooperation: the Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 403–432.CrossRef
go back to reference Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Pevehouse, J. (2008). Democracy, Veto players and the Depth of Regional Integration. World Economy, 31(1), 67–96.CrossRef Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Pevehouse, J. (2008). Democracy, Veto players and the Depth of Regional Integration. World Economy, 31(1), 67–96.CrossRef
go back to reference McGillivray, M., Feeny, S., Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2006). Controversies over the impact of development aid. Journal of International Development, 18(7), 1031–1050.CrossRef McGillivray, M., Feeny, S., Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2006). Controversies over the impact of development aid. Journal of International Development, 18(7), 1031–1050.CrossRef
go back to reference McKinlay, R., & Little, R. (1979). The US aid relationship: A test of the recipient need and the donor interest models. Political Studies, 27(2), 236–250.CrossRef McKinlay, R., & Little, R. (1979). The US aid relationship: A test of the recipient need and the donor interest models. Political Studies, 27(2), 236–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Meernik, J., Krueger, E., & Poe, S. (1998). Testing models of US foreign policy: Foreign aid during and after the Cold War. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 63–85.CrossRef Meernik, J., Krueger, E., & Poe, S. (1998). Testing models of US foreign policy: Foreign aid during and after the Cold War. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 63–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Rae, D., & Taylor, M. (1970). The analysis of political cleavages. New Haven: Yale University Press. Rae, D., & Taylor, M. (1970). The analysis of political cleavages. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Raffer, K., & Singer, H. (1996). The foreign aid business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Raffer, K., & Singer, H. (1996). The foreign aid business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Roodman, D. (2007). Anarchy of numbers: Aid, development, and cross-country empirics. The World Bank Economic Review, 21(2), 255–277.CrossRef Roodman, D. (2007). Anarchy of numbers: Aid, development, and cross-country empirics. The World Bank Economic Review, 21(2), 255–277.CrossRef
go back to reference Schraeder, P., Hook, S., & Taylor, B. (1998). Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle. World Politics, 50(2), 294–323.CrossRef Schraeder, P., Hook, S., & Taylor, B. (1998). Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle. World Politics, 50(2), 294–323.CrossRef
go back to reference Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–326.CrossRef Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–326.CrossRef
go back to reference Tsebelis, G. (1999). Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 591–608.CrossRef Tsebelis, G. (1999). Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 591–608.CrossRef
go back to reference Tsebelis, G. (2000). Veto players and institutional analysis. Governance, 13(4), 441–474.CrossRef Tsebelis, G. (2000). Veto players and institutional analysis. Governance, 13(4), 441–474.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Veto players and foreign aid provision
Authors
Yu Wang
Shuai Jin
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Constitutional Political Economy / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1043-4062
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9966
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-012-9131-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Constitutional Political Economy 1/2013 Go to the issue

Premium Partner