Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Studies 2-3/2010

01-12-2010 | Research Paper

What is Special About Body Based Reference Frame?

Author: Neha Khetrapal

Published in: Human Studies | Issue 2-3/2010

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Classifying spatial frames of references have placed egocentric/body-based representations on muddy grounds. The traditional taxonomy places it under the deictic distinction while the Levinson’s terminology does not provide a special status for it but classifies it along with the relative frame of reference. Research from other areas of cognition has come up with other implied classifications that are motivated by the special role played by these egocentric representation(s). Tangled among such issues is the fuzzy distinction between egocentric and body based representations. The current paper takes up exactly this issue and proposes to sub classify egocentric representations into two different subtypes namely the first- and the second-order representations. The proposed distinction serves an essential purpose for understanding important cognitive processes like spatial transformation, mental perspective taking, and so on.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
For the present concerns, such representations will be treated separately from any reference to the human body including the viewer’s perspective.
 
2
Personal communication by Kessler .
 
Literature
go back to reference Amorim, M.-A., Michel-Ange, Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “Body-Analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 327–347. Amorim, M.-A., Michel-Ange, Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “Body-Analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 327–347.
go back to reference Amorim, M.-A., & Stucchi, N. (1997). Viewer–and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 229–239.CrossRef Amorim, M.-A., & Stucchi, N. (1997). Viewer–and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 229–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., & Blanke, O. (2006). Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8074–8081.CrossRef Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., & Blanke, O. (2006). Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8074–8081.CrossRef
go back to reference Blanke, O., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Brugger, P., Seeck, M., et al. (2005). Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 550–557.CrossRef Blanke, O., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Brugger, P., Seeck, M., et al. (2005). Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 550–557.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition, 46, 223–244.CrossRef Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition, 46, 223–244.CrossRef
go back to reference Creem, S. H., Downs, T. H., Wraga, M., Proffitt, D. R., & Downs, J. H., I. I. I. (2001). An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 239–249.CrossRef Creem, S. H., Downs, T. H., Wraga, M., Proffitt, D. R., & Downs, J. H., I. I. I. (2001). An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 239–249.CrossRef
go back to reference Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., & Zangas, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory & Cognition, 23(4), 397–407. Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., & Zangas, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory & Cognition, 23(4), 397–407.
go back to reference Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63–76.CrossRef Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Graf, M. (1994). Coordinate transformation in object recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 214–221.CrossRef Graf, M. (1994). Coordinate transformation in object recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 214–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.CrossRef Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.CrossRef
go back to reference Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: A hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 501–507.CrossRef Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: A hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 501–507.CrossRef
go back to reference Khetrapal, N. (2010). Achieving Common Grounds in Communication via Interfaces: A Role of Spatial Frames for Reference. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science. doi:10.1007/s10202-010-0084-4. Khetrapal, N. (2010). Achieving Common Grounds in Communication via Interfaces: A Role of Spatial Frames for Reference. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science. doi:10.​1007/​s10202-010-0084-4.
go back to reference Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745–756. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745–756.
go back to reference Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., Rasch, B., & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 397–417.CrossRef Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., Rasch, B., & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 397–417.CrossRef
go back to reference Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s questions: Cross linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s questions: Cross linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 162–170.CrossRef Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 162–170.CrossRef
go back to reference Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 142–157.CrossRef Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 142–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRef Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRef
go back to reference Thakkar, K. N., Brugger, P., & Park, S. (2009). Exploring empathic space: Correlates of perspective transformation ability and biases in spatial attention. PLoS One, 4, e5864.CrossRef Thakkar, K. N., Brugger, P., & Park, S. (2009). Exploring empathic space: Correlates of perspective transformation ability and biases in spatial attention. PLoS One, 4, e5864.CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129.CrossRef Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77, 215–250.CrossRef Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77, 215–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Wohlschlager, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 358, 501–515.CrossRef Wohlschlager, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 358, 501–515.CrossRef
go back to reference Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 151–168.CrossRef Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 151–168.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What is Special About Body Based Reference Frame?
Author
Neha Khetrapal
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Human Studies / Issue 2-3/2010
Print ISSN: 0163-8548
Electronic ISSN: 1572-851X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-010-9161-x

Other articles of this Issue 2-3/2010

Human Studies 2-3/2010 Go to the issue

Premium Partner