Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Technology
Published in: Health and Technology 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Paper

What patients want: relevant health information technology for diabetes self-management

Authors: Diane K. King, Deborah J. Toobert, Jennifer Dickman Portz, Lisa A. Strycker, Alyssa Doty, Carmen Martin, Jennifer M. Boggs, Andrew J. Faber, Cristy R. Geno, Russell E. Glasgow

Published in: Health and Technology | Issue 3/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Health information technology has great potential to promote efficiency in patient care and increase patient-provider communication, and patient engagement in their treatment. This paper explored qualitatively what patients with type 2 diabetes want from electronic resources that are designed to support their diabetes self-management. Data were collected via interviews and focus groups from managed care patients who had completed participation in either a web-based (MyPath) or in-person group-based (¡Viva Bien!) longitudinal diabetes self-management study. Content analysis identified common themes that highlighted participant interest in virtual and electronic programs to support diabetes self-management goals, and their desired content and features. Eighteen ¡Viva Bien! participants completed telephone interviews and 30 MyPath participants attended seven focus groups in 2010-2011. All participants expressed a preference for face-to-face contact; however, most participants were also interested in using technology as a tool to support daily diabetes self-management decisions and to receive tailored information. Choice of technology, personalized instruction on how to use program features, and the ability to exchange information with their healthcare team were desired by all participants. Participants were divided on whether virtual social support networks should be closed to friends and family, should include other program members (peers), or should be open to anyone with diabetes. Participants aged 65 and older stressed the desire for technical support. What patients wanted from technology is real-time assistance with daily behavioral decision-making, ability to share information with their healthcare team, connections with others for support, and choice.
next article What electronic health records don’t know just yet. A privacy analysis for patient communities and health records interaction

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Boucher JL. Technology and patient-provider interactions: improving quality of care, but is it improving communication and collaboration? Diabetes Spectrum. 2010;23(3):142–4.MathSciNetCrossRef
2.
Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40.CrossRef
3.
4.
Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–e209.CrossRef
5.
Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917–32.CrossRef
6.
Chin MH, Cook S, Jin L, Drum ML, Harrison JF, Koppert J, et al. Barriers to providing diabetes care in community health centers. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):268–74.CrossRef
7.
Powell MP, Glover SH, Probst JC, Laditka SB. Barriers associated with the delivery of Medicare-reimbursed diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(6):890–9.CrossRef
8.
Piette J. Interactive behavior change technology to support diabetes self-management. Where do we stand? Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2425–32.MathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Wagner J. Behavioral interventions to promote diabetes self-management. Diabetes Spectrum. 2011;24:61–2.CrossRef
10.
Jansink R, Braspenning J, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G, Grol R. Primary care nurses struggle with lifestyle counseling in diabetes care: a qualitative analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:41.CrossRef
11.
Kolasa KM, Rickett K. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling cited by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(5):502–9.CrossRef
12.
Silberman A, Banthia R, Estay IS, Kemp C, Studley J, Hareras D, et al. The effectiveness and efficacy of an intensive cardiac rehabilitation program in 24 sites. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24(4):260–6.CrossRef
13.
Lorig KR, Hurwicz ML, Sobel D, Hobbs M, Ritter PL. A national dissemination of an evidence-based self-management program: a process evaluation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;59(1):69–79.CrossRef
14.
Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Barrera Jr M, Osuna D, King DK, Glasgow RE. Outcomes from a multiple-risk-factor diabetes self-management trial for Latinas: ¡Viva Bien! Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(3):310–23.CrossRef
15.
Toobert DJ, Glasgow R, Strycker LA, Barrera Jr M, Radcliffe JL, Wander RC, et al. Biologic and quality-of-life outcomes from the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2288–93.CrossRef
16.
Finkelstein J, Barr MS, Kothari PP, Nace DK, Quinn M. Patient-centered medical home cyberinfrastructure current and future landscape. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S225–33.CrossRef
17.
Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, Ross TR, Tufano JT, Soman MP, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(9):e71–87.
18.
Seidman J, Eytan T. Helping patients plug in: lessons in the adoptions of online consumer tools. Oakland: California Health Care Foundation; 2008.
19.
Schillinger D, Handley M, Wang F, Hammer H. Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-arm practical clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(4):559–66.CrossRef
20.
U.S.Census Bureau. Reported Internet usage for households by selected householder characteristics. http://​www.​census gov/hhes/computer/publications/2009.html. Accessed 8-17-11(October).
21.
Ahern DK, Woods SS, Lightowler MC, Finley SW, Houston TK. Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S162–72.CrossRef
22.
Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273–92.CrossRef
23.
Strecher V. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth). Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:53–76.CrossRef
24.
Bonander J, Gates S. Public health in an era of personal health records: opportunities for innovation and new partnerships. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e33.CrossRef
25.
Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the Internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10.CrossRef
26.
Chua HF, Polk T, Welsh R, Liberzon I, Strecher V. Neural responses to elements of a web-based smoking cessation program. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;144:174–8.
27.
Oenema A, Brug J, Dijkstra A, de Weerdt I, De Vries H. Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):125–35.CrossRef
28.
Vandelanotte C, DeBourdeaudhuij I, Brug J. Two-year follow-up of sequential and simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing fat intake. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(2):213–9.CrossRef
29.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Redding C, Rossi JS, Goldstein M, DePue J, et al. Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):406–16.CrossRef
30.
Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King DK, Dickman JM, Faber AJ, Halterman E, et al. Outcomes of a minimal versus moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1315–22.CrossRef
31.
Glasgow RE, Edwards LL, Whitesides H, Carroll N, Sanders TJ, McCray BL. Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education. Chronic Illn. 2009;5:243–9.CrossRef
32.
Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):202–8.CrossRef
33.
National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Standards for Patient-centered Medical Home (PCMH). Accessed 8-17-11. Washington, D.C.: 2011.
34.
Okoro CA, Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Vinicor F, Giles WH. Are persons with diabetes practicing healthier behaviors in the year 2001? Results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):203–8.CrossRef
35.
Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–93.CrossRef
36.
Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, Carnethon M, Daniels S, Franch HA, et al. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation. 2006;114(1):82–96.CrossRef
37.
Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Sacks FM, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications. Circulation. 2006;114(2):160–7.CrossRef
38.
Richardson CR, Kriska AM, Lantz PM, Hayward RA. Physical activity and mortality across cardiovascular disease risk groups. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11):1923–9.CrossRef
39.
Krishna S, Boren SA. Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(3):509–17.
40.
Murray E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD004274.
41.
Gibbons M, Wilson R, Samal L, Lehmann CU, Dickersin K, Lehmann HP, et al. Consumer health informatics: results of a systematic evidence review and evidence based recommendations. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:72–82.CrossRef
42.
Biem HJ, Turnell RW, D’Arcy C. Computer telephony: automated calls for medical care. Clin Invest Med. 2003;26(5):259–68.
43.
Piette JD. Satisfaction with automated telephone disease management calls and its relationship to their use. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26:1003–10.CrossRef
44.
Balas EA, Jaffrey F, Kuperman GJ, Boren SA, Brown GD, Pinciroli F, et al. Electronic communication with patients: evaluation of distance medicine technology. JAMA. 1997;278(2):152–9.CrossRef
45.
McBride CM, Rimer BK. Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:3–18.CrossRef
46.
Morris ME, Kathawala Q, Leen TK, Gorenstein EE, Guilak F, Labhard M, et al. Mobile therapy: case study evaluations of a cell phone application for emotional self-awareness. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e10.CrossRef
47.
Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, et al. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;175:1–1422.
48.
Pare G, Moqadem K, Pineau G, St-Hilaire C. Clinical effects of home telemonitoring in the context of diabetes, asthma, heart failure and hypertension: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e21.CrossRef
49.
Kim HS, Kim NC, Ahn SH. Impact of a nurse short message service intervention for patients with diabetes. J Nurs Care Qual. 2006;21(3):266–71.CrossRef
50.
Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, et al. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e7.CrossRef
51.
van den Berg MH, Schoones JW, Vliet Vlieland TP. Internet-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e26.CrossRef
52.
Durso SC, Wendel I, Letzt AM, Lefkowitz J, Kaseman DF, Seifert RF. Older adults using cellular telephones for diabetes management: a pilot study. Medsurg Nurs. 2003;12(5):313–7.
53.
Walker EA, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Blanco E, Scollan-Koliopoulus M, Cohen HW. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):2–7.CrossRef
54.
Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, Mah CA, Kraemer FB, Crapo LM. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med. 2000;108(1):20–7.CrossRef
55.
van Bastelaar KM, Pouwer F, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Snoek FJ. Web-based depression treatment for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):320–5.CrossRef
56.
57.
Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care. 2006;44(11):964–71.CrossRef
58.
Fukuoka Y, Kamitani E, Bonnet K, Lindgren T. Real-time social support through a mobile virtual community to improve healthy behavior in overweight and sedentary adults: a focus group analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e49.CrossRef
59.
Chapman LS, Rowe D, Witte K. eHealth portals: who uses them and why? Am J Health Promot. 2010; 24(5):TAHP1-7, iii.
60.
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRef
61.
Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Dissemination of interactive health communication programs. In: Noar SM, Harrington NG, editors. Interactive health communication technologies: promising strategies for health behavior change. First Edition ed. Routledge; 2012. p. In press.
62.
Carroll M, Cullen T, Ferguson S, Hogge N, Horton M, Kokesh J. Innovation in Indian healthcare: using health information technology to achieve health equity for American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8:1d.
63.
64.
65.
Chou WY, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e48.CrossRef
66.
Crilly JF, Keefe RH, Volpe F. Use of electronic technologies to promote community and personal health for individuals unconnected to health care systems. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1163–7.CrossRef
67.
Gracia E, Herrero J. Internet use and self-rated health among older people: a national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e49.CrossRef
68.
Van’t RJ, Crutzen R, de VH. Investigating predictors of visiting, using, and revisiting an online health-communication program: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e37.CrossRef
69.
Albright CL, Pruitt L, Castro C, Gonzalez A, Woo S, King AC. Modifying physical activity in a multiethnic sample of low-income women: one-year results from the IMPACT (Increasing Motivation for Physical ACTivity) project. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(3):191–200.CrossRef
70.
71.
Tirado M. Role of mobile health in the care of culturally and linguistically diverse US populations. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011;8:1e.
72.
Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VB, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275–81.CrossRef
73.
Jernigan VBB, Lorig K. The Internet diabetes self-management workshop for American Indians and Alaska natives. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(2):261–70.
74.
Piette J. Enhancing support via interactive technologies. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2:160–5.CrossRef
75.
Piette JD. Patient education via automated calls: a study of English and Spanish speakers with diabetes. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17(2):138–41.CrossRef
76.
Piette JD, Heisler M. The relationship between older adults’ knowledge of their drug coverage and medication cost problems. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(1):91–6.CrossRef
77.
Piette JD, Mendoza-Avelares MO, Ganser M, Mohamed M, Marinec N, Krishnan S. A preliminary study of a cloud-computing model for chronic illness self-care support in an underdeveloped country. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):629–32.CrossRef
78.
Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Desmond SM, Gold RS, Billing AS, Tian J. Rural eHealth nutrition education for limited-income families: an iterative and user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e21.CrossRef
79.
Jensen JD, King AJ, Davis LA, Guntzviller LM. Utilization of internet technology by low-income adults: the role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. J Aging Health. 2010;22(6):804–26.CrossRef
80.
Jensen JD, King AJ, Guntzviller LM, Davis LA. Patient-provider communication and low-income adults: age, race, literacy, and optimism predict communication satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(1):30–5.CrossRef
81.
Robroek SJ, Brouwer W, Lindeboom D, Oenema A, Burdorf A. Demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial correlates of using the website component of a worksite physical activity and healthy nutrition promotion program: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(3):e44.CrossRef
82.
Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):361–8.CrossRef
83.
Stevenson FA, Kerr C, Murray E, Nazareth I. Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective–a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:47.CrossRef
84.
Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(4):336–45.CrossRef
85.
Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Kearney KA, Reid R, Ritzwoller DP, Strecher VJ, et al. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e11.CrossRef
86.
Verheijden MW, Jans MP, Hildebrandt VH, Hopman-Rock M. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(1):e1.CrossRef
87.
Danaher BG, Seeley JR. Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):28–39.CrossRef
88.
Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de NJ, de Vries NK, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2.CrossRef
89.
Glasgow RE, Christiansen S, Kurz D, King D, Woolley T, Faber A, et al. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: Usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Internet Med Res. 2011;13(1):e9.CrossRef
90.
Fisher L, Glasgow RE. A call for more effectively integrating behavioral and social science principles into comprehensive diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2746–9.CrossRef
91.
Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1833–6.CrossRef
92.
Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost-effectiveness of Internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):40–5.CrossRef
93.
Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e4.CrossRef
94.
King DK, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D, et al. Self-efficacy, problem solving, and social-environmental support are associated with diabetes self-management behaviors. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):751–3.CrossRef
95.
Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Osuna D, Doty AT, Barrera M, et al. Viva bien!: Overcoming recruitment challenges in a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34(4):432–41.CrossRef
96.
Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, King DK, Barrera M Jr., Osuna D, Glasgow RE. Long-term outcomes from a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial for Latinas: ¡Viva Bien! Transl Behav Med. 2011;Published online January 12, 2011(doi:10.​1007/​s13142-010-0011-1).
97.
Ritzwoller DP, Sukhanova A, Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Costing behavioral interventions: a practical guide to enhance translation. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(2):218–27.CrossRef
98.
Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009.
99.
Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.
100.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1994.
101.
Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef
102.
Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice. 2000;39(3):124–31.CrossRef
103.
Padgett DK. Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008.
Metadata
Title
What patients want: relevant health information technology for diabetes self-management
Authors
Diane K. King
Deborah J. Toobert
Jennifer Dickman Portz
Lisa A. Strycker
Alyssa Doty
Carmen Martin
Jennifer M. Boggs
Andrew J. Faber
Cristy R. Geno
Russell E. Glasgow
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Health and Technology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 2190-7188
Electronic ISSN: 2190-7196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-012-0022-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Health and Technology 3/2012 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires

Original Paper

What electronic health records don’t know just yet. A privacy analysis for patient communities and health records interaction

Original Paper

Local knowing and the use of electronic patient records: categories and continuity of health care

Erratum

Erratum to: Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires

Premium Partner

    Image Credits