Top

Journal of Business Ethics

Published in:

24-07-2015

Will Corporate Political Connection Influence the Environmental Information Disclosure Level? Based on the Panel Data of A-Shares from Listed Companies in Shanghai Stock Market

Authors: Zhihua Cheng, Feng Wang, Christine Keung, Yongxiu Bai

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 1/2017

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The purpose of the Chinese Environmental Information Disclosure System is to protect the environment through public participation and public opinion. This paper uses data from listed Chinese companies in heavily polluted industries from 2008 to 2013 to examine the influence that corporate political connection has on corporate environmental information disclosure (CEID) level. The results show that firstly, while environmental disclosure level has improved over time, negative information that reflects the real status of environmental management has also been concealed. Secondly, although corporate political connection can influence companies to more actively disclose environmental information, it can also mask political rent-seeking in the guise of protecting the environment. This is especially prevalent in state-owned enterprises where political connection has a significant positive impact on CEID in the eastern and western parts of China. If political connections influence CEID, it will be difficult to improve the quality of environmental disclosure and provide useful information for decision makers. There is an urgent need to standardize and strictly regulate listed companies’ system for environmental information disclosure.

previous article Do Lenders Applaud Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from Chinese Private-Owned Firms

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Data resource: http://news.eastday.com/chyauto/2013-10-15/870091.html.

Data resource: http://news.china.com/jiedu/1104-1/.

Data resource: http://www.cnpc.com.cn/.

Data resource: http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20150625/13796925_0.shtml.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2011-12/17/c_122439284.htm.

The Guideline of Environmental Information Disclosure for Listed Companies (Draft) was circulated by Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) in 2010. It proposes that listed companies are liable to disclose environmental information to the public accurately, timely and completely. It first identified the object as “Listed companies at Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange A-share market.” Second, it requires sixteen types of heavily polluted industries, including steam supply and power generation, iron and steel, cement, and electrolytic aluminum, to publish annual environmental reports and disclose environmental information such as pollutant emission/disclose status, environmental regulation compliance as well as environmental management information. Third, listed firms in non-heavily polluted industries are encouraged to publish annual environmental reports.

Take per capita GDP as an example, according to “Chinese Statistical Yearbook 2013,” per capita GDP was 57,722 RMB (about 9000 US dollars) in Eastern region, which is higher than the Central region (per capita is 32,427 RM, about 5200 US dollars) and the Western region(per capita is 31,357 RM, about 5000 US dollars).

ST is the abbreviation of “special treatment.” Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen stock Exchange announced in 1998 that, if the financial status or other status of listed company appeared abnormal such as consecutive losses in two years or natural disasters or major accident, the stock of these companies would be special treatment. Policy of special treatment includes: offering day of the stock price limits 5 %, “ST” must be added before the name of stock, and the medium-term report must be audited. PT is the abbreviation of “particular transfer.” If the company has consecutive losses in 3 years, the stock would be tentative listing base on the “Company Law” and “Security Law.” Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen stock Exchange implemented particular transfer on these stocks and put “PT” before the name of stock since 1999.

Coming from International Institute for Sustainable Development and Sustainability. http://www.iisd.org.

Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: an international perspective. Ecological Economics, 64, 643–659.CrossRef

Agrawal, A., & Koneber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 180–198.CrossRef

Al-ruwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E, I. I. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.CrossRef

Ane, P. (2012). An assessment of the quality of environmental information disclosure of corporate in China. Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, 420–426.CrossRef

Barbu, E. M., et al. (2014). Mandatory environmental disclosures by companies complying with IASs/IFRSs: The cases of France, Germany, and the UK. The International Journal of Accounting, 49(2), 231–247.CrossRef

Bliss, M. A., & Gul, F. A. (2012). Political connection and cost of debt: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(5), 1520–1527.CrossRef

Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., & Saffar, W. (2008). Political connections of newly private firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 654–673.CrossRef

Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.CrossRef

Capron, L., & Chatain, O. (2008). Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 97–121.CrossRef

Charl, D. V., & Charis, J. V. S. (2010). Shareholders’ requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison. The British Accounting Review, 42, 227–240.CrossRef

Cho, C., & Pattern, D. (2007). The role environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 639–647.CrossRef

Clarkson, P. M., et al. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(3), 303–327.CrossRef

Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Vothoven, B. V. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39.CrossRef

Faccio, M. (2002). Politically-connected firms: Can they squeeze the state? University of Notre dame, Working Paper.

Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 3, 369–386.CrossRef

Faccio, M. (2007). The characteristics of politically connected firms. Purdue CIBER working papers, paper 51.

Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2011). China’s marketization index—report of regional market relative process. Beijing: Economic Science Press.

Fan, J., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 330–357.CrossRef

Gisbert, A., & Navallas, B. (2013). The association between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in the presence of severe agency conflicts. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances In International Accounting, 29, 285–298.

Hassan, A., & Ibrahim, E. (2012). Corporate environmental information disclosure: Factors influencing companies’ success in attaining environmental awards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 32–46.CrossRef

Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2003). The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organization, 1(4), 451–460.CrossRef

Hillman, A., Keim, G., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857.CrossRef

Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility Environment Management, 14(5), 274–288.CrossRef

Huang, J., & Zhou, C. N. (2012). Empirical research of ownership structure and management behavior affecting the disclosure of environmental information—evidence from heavily polluted industries in shanghai stock exchange. Chinese Soft Science, 1, 133–143.

Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Does political connection of executives influence corporate charitable behaviors? Management World, 4, 99–113.

Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G. S. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from India. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 30, 217–229.

Khwaja, I. A., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent-provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1391–1411.CrossRef

Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.

Latridis, G. E. (2013). Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review, 14, 55–75.CrossRef

Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. S. (2013). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 712–722.CrossRef

Li, H. B. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 559–578.CrossRef

Li, H. B., & Meng, L. S. (2008). Political connection, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87, 283–299.CrossRef

Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics ? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 559–578.CrossRef

Liu, X. B., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: An empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 593–600.CrossRef

Liu, Z. G., & Liu, T. T. (2011). Empirical analysis on environmental disclosure and environmental performance level of listed steel companies. Energy Procedia, 5, 2211–2218.CrossRef

Lu, X., & Li, J. M. (2010). A research on the environment information disclosure of China listed companies: A case study of the listed manufacturing industry of a-shares firms during the period from 2007 to 2008 in shanghai exchange stock market. Journal of Audit and Economics, 25(3), 62–69.

Meng, X. H., Li, D., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Towards environmental disclosure of Chinese listed companies: A paper making & printing industry perspective. International Conference on Information, Business and Education Technology.

Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., & Tam, C. M. (2013b). From voluntarism to regulation: A study on ownership, economic performance and corporate environmental information disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 217–232.CrossRef

Okhmatovskiy, I. (2010). Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1020–1047.CrossRef

Patten, D. M. (2002a). Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: An examination of the impact of tri data availability. Accounting Forum, 26, 152–171.CrossRef

Patten, D. M. (2002b). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.CrossRef

Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. D. (2002). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.CrossRef

Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Discretionary compliance with mandatory environmental disclosure: Evidence from SEC filings. Journal of Account and Public Policy, 32, 213–236.CrossRef

Prencipe, A. (2004). Proprietary costs and determinants of voluntary segment disclosure: evidence from Italian listed companies. European Accounting Review, 13(2), 319–340.CrossRef

Rajwani, T., & Liedong, T. A. (2015). Political activity and firm performance within nonmarket research: A review and international comparative assessment. Journal of World Business, 50, 273–283.CrossRef

Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organization through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 176–194.CrossRef

Scott, R. W. (2002). The changing world of Chinese enterprise: An institutional perspective. In T. Tsui & C. Lau (Eds.), The management of enterprises in the people’s republic of china (pp. 59–78). Norwell: Kluwer Academic.CrossRef

Shen, H. T., & Feng, J. (2012). Media monitoring, government supervision and corporate environment disclosure. Accounting Research, 2, 72–78.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politician and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 995–1025.CrossRef

Staden, C. J. A., & Hooks, J. A. (2007). Comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. The British Accounting Review, 39, 197–210.CrossRef

Tang, J. F., & Li, P. F. (2008). Environmental disclosure of chemical industry: Evidence from Chinese A-share market. China Population, Resource and Environment, 18(5), 112–117.

Wang, X., Xu, X. D., & Wang, C. (2013). Public pressure, social reputation, inside governance and firm environmental information disclosure: The evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing firms. Nankai Business Review, 16(2), 82–91.

Wang, S. Y., et al. (2014). Invisible hand: The impact of political gene has on corporate merger control. Management World, 8, 102–114.

Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 255–277.CrossRef

Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting Organization and Society, 7(10), 553–563.

Wu, A. Q., & Jin, B. M. (2008). Personal status, enterprise development, social responsibility and the system risk: Research of the motives of China’s private entrepreneurs’ political participation. China’s Industrial Economy, 7, 141–150.

Yang, H. H., et al. (2014). A review of Chinese and English language studies on corporate environmental reporting in China. Critical Perspective on Accounting,. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.001.

Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., & Yin, H. T. (2012). Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 309–321.CrossRef

Zeng, S. X., et al. (2010). Towards corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1142–1148.CrossRef

Zhang, C., Lou, Z. K., & Zhan, D. B. (2014). Political connection, financial performance and corporate social responsibility—evidence from Chinese listed companies in chemical industry. Management Review, 26(1), 130–139.

Zhang, X. G., & Zhong, M. C. (2011). Game analysis and countermeasures of government environmental regulation and corporate pollution. Journal of Chinese Population, Resource and Environment, 2, 31–35.

Zhao, F., & Ma, G. M. (2011). Literature review and prospects on political connection. Economic Review, 3, 151–160.

Zhou, Q. X. (2009). Government intervention, common agency and corporate pollution abatement incentives—empirical test on panel data sulfur dioxide emissions from province. Nankai Economic Studies, 4, 109–129.

Title: Will Corporate Political Connection Influence the Environmental Information Disclosure Level? Based on the Panel Data of A-Shares from Listed Companies in Shanghai Stock Market
Authors: Zhihua Cheng
Feng Wang
Christine Keung
Yongxiu Bai
Publication date: 24-07-2015
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2776-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

The Governance of Global Value Chains: Unresolved Human Rights, Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas in the Apple Supply Chain

How Does It Fit? Exploring the Congruence Between Organizations and Their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities

Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Directors: An Integrated Framework of Director Role-Identity and Boardroom Structure

Isolated Environmental Cues and Product Efficacy Penalties: The Color Green and Eco-labels

Is Quantitative Research Ethical? Tools for Ethically Practicing, Evaluating, and Using Quantitative Research

Do Lenders Applaud Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from Chinese Private-Owned Firms