Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Workload Functions Distribution Method: A Workload Measurement Based on Pilot’s Behaviors

Authors : Yiyuan Zheng, Yuwen Jie, Tong Zhang, Shan Fu

Published in: Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

According to the airworthiness regulation, FAR25.1523 published by Federal Aviation Administration, the minimum flight crew must be established so that it is sufficient for safe operation considering the workload on individual crew members. Considering workload evaluation, typically, the measurements classified into three types: performance measures, subjective rating scale measures and psychophysiological measures. However, although these measurements are widely used in various fields, they could not reflect the behavior of flight crew during flight tasks comprehensively, especially their workload functions. Normally, the basic workload functions based on the flight crew behaviors consist of six aspects: flight path control, collision avoidance, navigation, communication, operation and monitoring of aircraft engines and systems and command decisions. In this study, upon the above six aspects, a measurement named Workload Function Distribution Method was developed, considering flight crew behaviors including fixations, actions and communications in flight tasks. In order to verify the Workload Function Distribution Method, three flight tasks with different complexity were carried out among 6 flight crews in a CRJ200 flight simulator. The three flight tasks were standard instrument approach, non-precision approach with normal weather condition and non-precision approach with turbulence. Furthermore, one of the subjective rating scale measures, NASA-TLX, was used as a verification method which collected after each task. The experiment results indicated that Workload Function Distribution Method could distinguish the different complexity of flight tasks, and related to the NASA-TLX Scale.
In conclude, Workload Function Distribution Method was built up in this study. This measurement could effectively represent the flight crew workload based on their behaviors in flight tasks.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference EASA, Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes CS-25 (2009) EASA, Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes CS-25 (2009)
2.
go back to reference EASA, CS-25 BOOK2 Acceptable Means of Compliance (2009) EASA, CS-25 BOOK2 Acceptable Means of Compliance (2009)
3.
go back to reference Stassen, H., et al.: Final Report of Control Engineering Group on Mental Load, in Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement, pp. 235–252. Plenum Press, New York (1979) Stassen, H., et al.: Final Report of Control Engineering Group on Mental Load, in Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement, pp. 235–252. Plenum Press, New York (1979)
4.
go back to reference Eggemeier, F.T., et al.: Workload Assessment in Multi-Task Environments Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 207–216. Taylor and Francis, London (1991) Eggemeier, F.T., et al.: Workload Assessment in Multi-Task Environments Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 207–216. Taylor and Francis, London (1991)
5.
go back to reference Kramer, A.F., Sirevaag, E.J., Braune, R.: A psychophysiological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. 29(2), 145–160 (1987) Kramer, A.F., Sirevaag, E.J., Braune, R.: A psychophysiological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. 29(2), 145–160 (1987)
6.
go back to reference Corwin, W.H., et al.: Assessment of Crew Workload Measurement Methods, Techniques and Procedures, vol. 1. Process, Methods and Results (1989). DTIC Document Corwin, W.H., et al.: Assessment of Crew Workload Measurement Methods, Techniques and Procedures, vol. 1. Process, Methods and Results (1989). DTIC Document
7.
go back to reference Gawron, V.J.: Human Performance, Workload, and Situational Awareness Measures Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRef Gawron, V.J.: Human Performance, Workload, and Situational Awareness Measures Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Di Nocera, F., Camilli, M., Terenzi, M.: A random glance at the flight deck: pilots’ scanning strategies and the real-time assessment of mental workload. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 1(3), 271–285 (2007)CrossRef Di Nocera, F., Camilli, M., Terenzi, M.: A random glance at the flight deck: pilots’ scanning strategies and the real-time assessment of mental workload. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 1(3), 271–285 (2007)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Farmer, E., Brownson, A.: Review of workload measurement, analysis and interpretation methods. Eur. Organ. Safety Air Navig. 33 (2003) Farmer, E., Brownson, A.: Review of workload measurement, analysis and interpretation methods. Eur. Organ. Safety Air Navig. 33 (2003)
10.
go back to reference Cain, B.: A Review of the Mental Workload Literature (2007). DTIC Document Cain, B.: A Review of the Mental Workload Literature (2007). DTIC Document
11.
go back to reference Wickens, C.D., Huey, B.M.: Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance. National Academies Press, Washington DC (1993) Wickens, C.D., Huey, B.M.: Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance. National Academies Press, Washington DC (1993)
12.
go back to reference Annett, J.: Subjective rating scales: science or art? Ergonomics 45(14), 966–987 (2002)CrossRef Annett, J.: Subjective rating scales: science or art? Ergonomics 45(14), 966–987 (2002)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ramaekers, D., et al.: Heart rate variability and heart rate in healthy volunteers. Eur. Heart J. 19, 1334–1341 (1998)CrossRef Ramaekers, D., et al.: Heart rate variability and heart rate in healthy volunteers. Eur. Heart J. 19, 1334–1341 (1998)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference FAA, A.C., Airplane Simulator Qualification (AC 120–40B), F.A. Adminstration, (ed.), Washington, DC (1991) FAA, A.C., Airplane Simulator Qualification (AC 120–40B), F.A. Adminstration, (ed.), Washington, DC (1991)
15.
go back to reference Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. 50(3), 449–455 (2008)CrossRef Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergonomics Soc. 50(3), 449–455 (2008)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: Applied Attention Theory. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2007)CrossRef Wickens, C.D., McCarley, J.S.: Applied Attention Theory. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (2007)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Buhusi, C.V., Meck, W.H.: Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364(1525), 1875–1885 (2009)CrossRef Buhusi, C.V., Meck, W.H.: Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364(1525), 1875–1885 (2009)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zheng, Y., et al.: Developing a measurement for task complexity in flight. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 86(8), 698–704 (2015)CrossRef Zheng, Y., et al.: Developing a measurement for task complexity in flight. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 86(8), 698–704 (2015)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kasarskis, P., et al.: Comparison of expert and novice scan behaviors during VFR flight. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2001) Kasarskis, P., et al.: Comparison of expert and novice scan behaviors during VFR flight. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2001)
20.
go back to reference Mumaw, R., Sarter, N., Wickens, C.: Analysis of pilot’s monitoring and perfomance on an automated flight deck. In: International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2001) Mumaw, R., Sarter, N., Wickens, C.: Analysis of pilot’s monitoring and perfomance on an automated flight deck. In: International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2001)
Metadata
Title
Workload Functions Distribution Method: A Workload Measurement Based on Pilot’s Behaviors
Authors
Yiyuan Zheng
Yuwen Jie
Tong Zhang
Shan Fu
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40030-3_6

Premium Partner