Top

Quality & Quantity

Published in:

26-02-2018

1971–2017: Evolution, exploration and test of time of conjoint analysis

Authors: Kushagra Kulshreshtha, Vikas Tripathi, Naval Bajpai

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 6/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to have epistemological and systematic in-depth review about ‘conjoint analysis’, a multivariate data analysis technique. Moreover, an attempt is made to provide the past and current status of research done along with its contribution, relevance and future research agenda in the field of research. To study manifold aspects about conjoint analysis, systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-synthesis techniques were used in combination for qualitative assessment that ensured a rigorous review. In total, 119 peer-reviewed articles were included in the review. The current study depicted the development and expansion of conjoint analysis in marketing research and beyond it in other associate fields. Through the combined application of systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-synthesis, the various commercial and industrial applications of this technique were explored. Moreover, the process of implementation of conjoint analysis with the help of an example and limitations of previous and current studies were discussed. Based on our robust search through relevant papers of reputed databases and best of our knowledge, this is the first literature review paper in the last decade providing the background, evolution, application, limitation and future research avenues of ‘conjoint analysis’ technique, which no other study has done so far.

previous article Satisfied surgeon–patient matching: a model-based method

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aguilar, F.X.: Conjoint analysis of industry location preferences: evidence from the softwood lumber industry in the US. Appl. Econ. 43(24), 3265–3274 (2011)

Aleksandar, G., Nenad, D.: Organic food consumer profile in the Republic of Serbia. Br. Food J. 118(1), 164–182 (2016)

Allison, N.: Conjoint analysis across the business system. In: Sawtooth Software (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Gaining a Competitive Advantage Through PC-Based Interviewing and Analysis. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software 1 (pp. 197–239) 1 (1989)

Aramyan, L., Ingenbleek, P., Roest, G.B.K.D., Tranter, R.: Evaluating the likelihood of the adoption of an animal welfare assessment system in European agri-food supply chains. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 30(1), 59–79 (2013)

Arora, R.: Assessing the influence of key variables in the choice of a physician using conjoint analysis. Services Mark. Q. 24(1), 45–60 (2002)

Arora, R.: Product positioning based on search, experience and credence attributes using conjoint analysis. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 15(5), 285–292 (2006)

Aspinall, P.A., Hill, A.R., Nelson, P., O’Brien, C., O’Connell, E.O., McCloughan, L., Azuara-Blanco, A., Brice, R., Green, S., Steeds, C.: Quality of life in patients with glaucoma: a conjoint analysis approach. Vis Impair Res 7, 13–26 (2005)

Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A. Volmink, J.: Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8(21) (2008)

Baum, M., Kabst, R.: Conjoint implications on job preferences: the moderating role of involvement. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24(7), 1393–1417 (2013)

Bennett, R., Kane, S.: Students’ interpretations of the meanings of questionnaire items in the National Student Survey. Qual. High. Educ. 20(2), 129–164 (2014)

Biong, H., Silkoset, R.: Buying CSR with employees’ pensions? The effect of social responsible investments on Norwegian SMEs’ choice of pension fund management: a conjoint survey. Int. J. Bank Mark. 35(1), 56–74 (2017)

Boivin, C., Parissier, C., Alle, A., Forcier, P.A., Langlois, S.: Healthy breakfast cereals: What do consumers want? J. Foodservice Bus. Res. 17(1), 48–55 (2014)

Bond, S.: The use of conjoint analysis to assess the impact of environmental stigma. Pac. Rim Prop. Res. J. 7(3), 182–194 (2001)

Simpson, B.J.K., Radford, S.K.: Situational variables and sustainability in multi-attribute decision-making. Eur. J. Mark. 48(5/6), 1046–1069 (2014)

Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C.: Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard (2002)

Boughanmi, H., Al-Musalami, J., Al-Oufi, H., Zaibet, L.: Estimating consumer preferences for value-added fish products in Oman. J. Food Prod. Mark. 13(2), 47–68 (2007)

Briner, R.B., Denyer, D., Rousseau, D.M.: Evidence-based management: construct clean-up time? Acad. Manag. Perspect. 23(4), 19–32 (2009)

Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., Pill, R.: Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 7(4), 209–215 (2002)

Busse, M., Siebert, R.: The role of consumers in food innovation processes. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 21(1), 20–43 (2017)

Campbell, N.R.: An Account of the Principles of Measurement and Calculation. Longmans, Green, London (1928)

Campbell, N.R.: Physics: the Elements. Cambridge University Press, London (1920)

Campbell, N.: What is Science. Methuen & Co., Ltd., London (1921)

Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M.: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc. Sci. Med. 56(4), 671–684 (2003)

Carroll, J.D.: Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In: Shepard, R.N., Romney, A.K., Nerlove, S. (eds.) Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences. I: Theory, pp. 105–155. Seminar Press, Inc, New York (1972)

Carroll, J.D.: Categorical Conjoint Measurement. Meeting of Mathematical Psychology, Ann Arbor, MI (1969)

Cattin, P., Wittink, D.R.: A Survey. J. Mark. 46, 44–53 (1982)

Chamorro, A., Rubio, S., Miranda, F.J.: The region-of-origin (ROO) effect on purchasing preferences. Br. Food J. 117(2), 820–839 (2015)

Codini, A., Saccani, N., Sicco, A.: The relationship between customer value and pricing strategies: an empirical test. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 21(7), 538–546 (2012)

Coffey, A.J., Wurst, J.C.: Audience as product: identifying advertiser preferences. J. Media Bus. Stud. 9(4), 21–39 (2012)

Constantinescu, M., Onur, E., Durmus, Y., Nikou, S., Reuver, M.D., Bouwman, H., Djurica, M. Glatz, P.M.: Mobile tethering: overview, perspectives and challenges. 16(3), 40–53 (2014)

Cook, D.J., Mulrow, C.D., Haynes, R.B.: Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann. Intern. Med. 126(5), 376–380 (1997)

Crossan, M.M., Apaydin, M.: A multi-dimensional framework or organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J. Manage. Stud. 47(6), 1154–1191 (2010)

Darian, J.C., Tucci, L.: Perceived health benefits and food purchasing decisions. J. Consum. Mark. 28(6), 421–428 (2011)

Dauda, S.Y., Lee, J.: Quality of service and customer satisfaction: a conjoint analysis for the Nigerian bank customers. Int. J. Bank Mark. 34(6), 841–867 (2016)

Dean, D.H.: Evaluating potential brand associations through conjoint analysis and market simulation. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 13(7), 506–513 (2004)

Dekhili, S., Achabou, M.K.: Eco-labelling brand strategy: independent certification versus self-declaration. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(4), 305–329 (2014)

Dekker, R., Bekkers, V.: The contingency of governments’ responsiveness to the virtual public sphere: a systematic literature review and meta-synthesis. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 496–505 (2015)

Denstadli, J.M., Lines, R., Ortuzar, J.D.D.: Information processing in choice based conjoint experiments: a process-tracing study. Eur. J. Mark. 46(3/4), 422–446 (2012)

Dixon, W.M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A. Harvey, J.: Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 6(35) (2006)

Duarte, C.M., Lineros, M.R.: Using choice-based-experiments to support real estate design decisions. J. Eur. Real Estate Res. 6(1), 63–89 (2013)

Dunnett, A., Moorhouse, J., Walsh, C., Barry, C.: Choosing a university: a conjoint analysis of the impact of higher fees on students applying for university in 2012. Tert. Educ. Manag. 18(3), 199–220 (2012)

Ferrarezi, A., Minim, V.P., Santos, K.M.D., Monteiro, M.: Consumer attitude towards purchasing intent for ready to drink orange juice and nectar. Nutr. Food Sci. 43(4), 304–312 (2013)

Fink, A.: Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From Paper to the internet. Sage Publications, London (1998)

Fink, A.: Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)

Flemming, K.: The use of morphine to treat cancer-related pain: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 39(1), 139–154 (2010)

Fotiadis, A., Vassiliadis, C., Yeh, S.P.: Participant’s preferences for small-scale sporting events: a comparative analysis of a Greek and a Taiwanese cycling event. EuroMed. J. Bus. 11(2), 232–247 (2016)

Gallego, J.M.G., Mera, A.C.: COO vs ROO: importance of the origin in customer preferences towards financial entities. Int. Mark. Rev. 34(2), 206–223 (2017)

Gallego, J.M.G., Mera, A.C., Mendez, M.J.B.: Financial firms’ social activities and how they influence their customers’ preference structure. Soc. Responsib. J. 12(1), 69–84 (2016)

Garcia, R.H., Abad, J.C.G., Coll, S.F.: A design strategy for improving adaptive conjoint analysis. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 31(3), 328–338 (2016)

Garver, M.S., Divine, R.L., Spralls, S.A.: Choice-based conjoint analysis of the local coupon preferences of millennials. J. Promot. Manag. 20(2), 240–249 (2014)

Garver, M.S., Williams, Z., Wynne, W.R.: Modelling choice in logistics: a managerial guide and application. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 42(2), 128–151 (2012)

Giancristofaro, R.A.: A new conjoint analysis procedure with application to marketing research. Commun. Stat.—Theory Methods. 32(11), 2271–2283 (2003)

Gillis, K.S., Ditton, R.B.: A conjoint analysis of U.S. Atlantic billfish fishery management alternatives. North Am. J. Fish. Manag. 22(4), 1218–1228 (2002)

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M.: Recent contributions to optimal product positioning and buyer segmentation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 41(2), 127–141 (1989)

Green, P.E., Srinivasan, V.: Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J. Mark. 54(4), 3–19 (1990)

Green, P., Srinivasan, V.: Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J. Consum. Res. 5(2), 103–123 (1978)

Green, P.E., Rao, V.R.: Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. J. Mark. Res. 8(3), 355–363 (1971)

Green, P.E., Wind, Y.: New way to measure consumer judgments. Harvard Bus. Rev. 53(4), 107–117 (1973)

Green, P.E., Wind, Y.: New way to measure consumer’ judgments. Havard Bus. Rev. 53, 107–117 (1975)

Guillet, B.D., Kucukusta, D.: Spa market segmentation according to customer preference. Int. J. Contemp Hosp. Manag. 28(2), 418–434 (2016)

Gursoy, D., Chiappa, G.D., Zhang, Y.: Preferences regarding external information sources: a conjoint analysis of visitors to Sardinia, Italy. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 34(6), 806–820 (2016)

Gustafsson, A., Ekdahl, F., Bergman, B.: Conjoint analysis: a useful tool in the design process. Total Qual. Manag. 10(3), 327–343 (1999)

Hackett, S., Dilts, D.: A systematic review of business incubation research. J. Technol. Transfer 29(1), 55–82 (2004)

Hart, C.: Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Sage Publications, London (1998)

Helm, R., Manthey, L., Scholl, A., Steiner, M.: Preference measurement with conjoint analysis and AHP: an empirical comparison. In: Leopold-Wildburger, U., Rendl, F., Wascher, G. (eds.) Operations Research Proceedings 2002, pp. 517–524. Springer, Berlin (2003)

Hobbs, J.E.: A transaction cost analysis of quality, traceability and animal welfare issues in UK beef retailing. Br. Food J. 98(6), 16–26 (1996)

Ida, T., Kinoshita, S., Sato, M.: Conjoint analysis of demand for IP telephony: the case of Japan. Appl. Econ. 40(10), 1279–1287 (2008)

Ishizaki, A., Teel, L., Yamaguchi, M.: Contextual factors influencing support for sea turtle management actions in Ogasawara Islands, Japan: an application of conjoint analysis, human dimensions of wildlife. J. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. Int. J. 16(5), 287–298 (2011)

Jansson, C., Bointon, B., Marlow, N.: An exploratory conjoint analysis study of consumers’ aesthetic responses of point-of-purchase materials. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 13(1), 59–76 (2003)

Jegethesan, K., Sneddon, J.N., Soutar, G.N.: Young Australian consumers’ preferences for fashion apparel attributes. J. Fashion Mark. Manag. Int. J. 16(3), 275–289 (2012)

Jin, B., Park, J.Y., Ryu, J.S.: Comparison of Chinese and Indian consumers’ evaluative criteria when selecting denim jeans: a conjoint analysis. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 14(1), 180–194 (2010)

Jones, R.A.: Enhancing marketing decisions using conjoint analysis: an application in public leisure services. Soc. Leis. 14(1), 69–84 (1991)

Junior, H.S.D.F., Meuwissen, M.P.M., Lans, I.A.V.D., Alfons, G.J.M., Lansink, O.: Identifying successful strategies for honey value chains in Brazil: a conjoint study. Br. Food J. 118(7), 1800–1820 (2016)

Kalantari, H.D., Johnson, L.: Australian customer willingness to pay and wait for mass-customised products. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 30(1), 106–120 (2018)

Kamp, B., Apodaca, I.R.D.: Are KIBS beneficial to international business performance: evidence from the Basque Country. Compet. Rev. Int. Bus. J. 27(1), 80–95 (2017)

Kara, A., Kaynak, E., Kucukemiroglu, O.: Credit card development strategies for the youth market: the use of conjoint analysis. Int. J. Bank Mark. 12(6), 30–36 (1994)

Kelley, K., Hyde, J., Bruwer, J.: U.S. wine consumer preferences for bottle characteristics, back label extrinsic cues and wine composition: a conjoint analysis. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 27(4), 516–534 (2015)

Knocke, J., Schuster, T.: Repatriation of international assignees: Where are we and where do we go from here? A systematic literature review. J. Glob. Mobil. 5(3), 275–303 (2017)

Kobayashi, M., Mano, T., Yamauchi, K.: Patients’ preference on selecting a medical institution. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 26(4), 341–352 (2013)

Krantz, D.H.: Conjoint measurement: the Luce- Tukey axiomatization and some extensions. J. Math. Psychol. 1, 1–27 (1964)

Krieger, B., Moskowitz, H., Rabino, S.: What customers want from a cruise vacation: using internet-enabled conjoint analysis to understand the customer’s mind. J. Hosp. Leis. Mark. 13(1), 83–111 (2005)

Kruskal, J.B.: Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 27, 251–263 (1965)

Krystallis, A., Grunert, K.G., Barcellos, M.D.D., Perrea, T., Verbeke, W.: Consumer attitudes towards sustainability aspects of food production: insights from three continents. J. Mark. Manag. 28(3–4), 334–372 (2012)

Kulshreshtha, K., Bajpai, N., Tripathi, V.: Consumer preference for electronic consumer durable goods in India: a conjoint analysis approach. Int. J. Bus. Forecast. Mark. Intell. 3(1), 13–37 (2017a)

Kulshreshtha, K., Tripathi, V., Bajpai, N., Dubey, P.: Discriminating market segments using preferential green shift: a conjoint approach. Foresight 19(4), 386–408 (2017b)

Kulshreshtha, K., Tripathi, V., Bjpai, N.: Impact of brand cues on young consumers’ preference for mobile phones: a conjoint analysis and simulation modelling. J. Creat. Commun. 12(3), 1–18 (2017c)

Lee, E., Rhim, H.: An application of conjoint analysis to explore user perceptions on management information systems: a case study. Manag. Res. Rev. 37(1), 69–88 (2014)

Lee, R.: Social capital and business management: setting a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11(3), 247–273 (2009)

Lee, S.J., Cranage, D.A.: The relative importance of menu attributes at point of menu selection through conjoint analysis. J. Foodservice Bus. Res. 10(2), 3–18 (2007)

Lee, S.J., Brooks, R., Bolan, R.K., Flynn, R.: Assessing willingness to test for HIV among men who have sex with men using conjoint analysis, evidence for uptake of the FDA-approved at-home HIV test. AIDS Care Psychol. Soc.-Med. Aspects AIDS/HIV 25(12), 1592–1598 (2013)

Lee, Y.H., Kang, J.H.: Designing ticket price strategies for professional sports teams using conjoint analysis. Int. J. Sports Mark. Spons. 12(2), 23–36 (2011)

Leister, J., Stausberg, J.: Why do patients select a hospital? J. Hosp. Mark. Public Relations 17(2), 13–31 (2007)

Lewis, D.J., Gillespie, J.M.: Crawfish processor preferences for the adoption of a potential crawfish peeling machine: a conjoint analysis. Aquac. Econ. Manag. 11(4), 355–369 (2007)

Little, C., Aqueveque, C., Aguilera, J.M.: Producer-consumer misalignment as a possible cause for new food failure: empirical evidence from Chile. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 27(3), 228–253 (2015)

Luce, R.D., Tuckey, J.W.: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 1, 1–27 (1964)

Lucian, R.: How Brazilians shop? An investigation of Brazilians’ consumer values, lifestyles and mindset. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 12(2), 238–262 (2017)

Mann, S., Ferjani, A., Reissig, L.: What matters to consumers of organic wine? Br. Food J. 114(2), 272–284 (2012)

Marshall, P., Bradlow, E.T.: A unified approach to conjoint analysis models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97(459), 674–682 (2002)

McInnes, R.J., Chambers, J.A.: Supporting breastfeeding mothers: qualitative synthesis. J. Adv. Nurs. 62(4), 407–427 (2008)

Mehta, R., Bhanja, N.: Consumer preferences for wine attributes in an emerging market. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 46(1), 34–48 (2018)

Meulenaer, S.D., Dens, N., Pelsmacker, P.D.: Which cues cause consumers to perceive brands as more global? A conjoint analysis. Int. Mark. Rev. 32(6), 606–626 (2015)

Miguel, F.S., Ryan, M., McIntosh, E.: Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: an application to menorrhagia. Appl. Econ. 32(7), 823–833 (2000)

Mohammed, M.A., Moles, R.J., Chen, T.F.: Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 38(3), 695–704 (2016)

Monness, K., Pearce, K., Coleman, S.: Comparing a survey and a conjoint study: the future vision of water intermediaries. J. Appl. Stat. 35(1), 19–30 (2008)

Moosmayer, D.C., Fuljahn, A.: Corporate motive and fit in cause related marketing. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 22(3), 200–207 (2013)

Munro, S.A., Lewin, S.A., Smith, H.J., Engel, M.E., Fretheim, A., Volmink, J.: Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med. 4(7), 238 (2007)

Naude, P., Ashnai, B., Chaharsooghi, K., Perzon, H.: An analysis of B2B relationship quality among Iranian managers: a comparison between Iranian and English managers. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 18(8), 861–874 (2007)

Nordh, H.: Quantitative methods of measuring restorative components in urban public parks. J. Landsc. Archit. 7(1), 46–53 (2012)

Oenning, E.J., Junior, D.G., Medeiros, D.D.: Brazilian consumer preferences for processed tomato packaging using conjoint analysis. J. Food Prod. Mark. 1–21 (2017)

Okechuku, C.: The importance of product country of origin: a conjoint analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and The Netherlands. Eur. J. Mark. 28(4), 5–19 (1994)

Ong, F.S., Kitchen, P.J., Chew, S.S.: Marketing a consumer durable brand in Malaysia: a conjoint analysis and market simulation. J. Consum. Mark. 27(6), 507–515 (2010)

Orsingher, C., Hogreve, J., Ordanini, A.: Building on the past: advancing theory in services through meta-analysis. J. Serv. Manag. 27(1), 37–42 (2016)

Pai, S., Ananthakumar, U.: Understanding tourist preferences for travel packages: a conjoint analysis approach. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 22(12), 1238–1249 (2017)

Pathak, V., Dikshit, O.: A new approach for finding an appropriate combination of texture parameters for classification. Geocarto Int. 25(4), 295–313 (2010)

Phelps, R., Adams, R., Bessant, J.: Life cycles of growing organizations: a review with implications for knowledge and learning. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 1–30 (2007)

Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., Neely, A.: Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 5(3/4), 137–168 (2004)

Pound, P., Britten, N., Morgan, M., Yardley, L., Pope, C., Daker, W.G.: Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Soc. Sci. Med. 61(1), 133–155 (2005)

Pullman, M.E., Moore, W.L.: Optimal service design: integrating marketing and operations perspectives. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 10(2), 239–261 (1999)

Rahman, M., Lorica, B.G.: Attribute relative importance computation in conjoint analysis. J. Inf. Optim. Sci. 20(1), 113–120 (1999)

Reese, T.W.: The application of the theory of physic measurement to the measurement of psychological magnitudes, with three experimental examples. Psychol. Monogr. 55, 1–89 (1943)

Rosenthal, D.A., Chan, F., Livneh, H.: Rehabilitation students’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities in high-and low-stakes social contexts: a conjoint analysis. Disabil. Rehabil. 28(24), 1517–1527 (2006)

Rothenberg, L., Matthews, D.: Consumer decision making when purchasing eco-friendly apparel. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 45(4), 404–418 (2017)

Rowley, J., Slack, F.: Conducting a literature review. Manag. Res. News. 27(6), 31–39 (2004)

Ruas, T., Pereira, L.: Como construir indicadores de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovaçao usando Web of Science, Derwent World Patent Index, Bibexcel e Pajek? Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informaçao. 19(3), 52–81 (2014)

Saha, G., Roy, D.: Designing office shirt: an integrated approach. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 16(3), 327–341 (2012)

Salamin, X., Hanappi, D.: Women and international assignments: a systematic literature review exploring textual data by correspondence analysis. J. Glob. Mobil. 2(3), 343–374 (2014)

Sanchez, M., Gil, J.M.: A conjoint analysis of quality wine. J. Food Prod. Mark. 4(2), 63–78 (1997)

Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., Emden, C.: Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res. Nurs. Health 20(4), 365–371 (1997)

Sawtoothsoftware. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/products/conjoint-choice-analysis/conjoint-analysis-software. Accessed 12 August 2017

Schnettler, B., Vinuela, J., Sepulveda, N.: Attitude and willingness to pay for national and store brands of milk in the South of Chile. J. Food Prod. Mark. 14(4), 76–94 (2008)

Sichtmann, C., Stingel, S.: Limit conjoint analysis and Vickrey auction as methods to elicit consumers’ willingness-to-pay: an empirical comparison. Eur. J. Mark. 41(11/12), 1359–1374 (2007)

Silayoi, P., Speece, M.: The importance of packaging attributes: a conjoint analysis approach. Eur. J. Mark. 41(11/12), 1495–1517 (2007)

Silveira, F.F., Zilber, S.N.: Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 21(6), 459–484 (2017)

Smaoui, F., Kilani, F.A., Touzani, M.: Country-of-origin versus brand: consumers’ dilemma when choosing between generic and branded drugs in emerging countries. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 25(2), 148–159 (2016)

Smith, L.K., Pope, C., Botha, J.L.: Patients’ help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet 366(9488), 825–831 (2005)

Sorenson, D., Bogue, J.: Concept optimisation in innovation through conjoint analysis. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 19(2–3), 53–75 (2007)

Soulez, C.G., Soulez, S.: On the heterogeneity of Generation Y job preferences. Empl. Relat. 36(4), 319–332 (2014)

Soutar, G.N., Ridley, S.: Looking at leaders: a conjoint analysis. Leadersh. Org. Dev. J. 29(5), 461–472 (2008)

Srinivasan, V., Flachsbart, P.G., Dajani, J.S., Hartley, R.G.: Forecasting the effectiveness of work- trip gasoline conservation policies through conjoint analysis. J. Mark. 45(3), 157–172 (1981)

Srinivasan, V., Jain, A.K., Malhotra, N.K.: Improving predictive power of conjoint analysis by constrained parameter estimation. J. Mark. Res. 20(4), 433–438 (1983)

Sriram, V., Forman, A.M.: The relative importance of products’ environmental attributes: a cross cultural comparison. Int. Mark. Rev. 10(3) (1993)

Su, J.W., Sohn, S.Y.: Adaptive conjoint analysis for the vitalisation of angel investments by entrepreneurs. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 28(6), 677–690 (2016)

Talaga, J.A., Buch, J.: Consumer trade-offs among mortgage instrument variables. Int. J. Bank Mark. 16(6), 264–270 (1998)

Teichert, T., Shehu, E.: Investigating research streams of conjoint analysis: a bibliometric study. Bus. Res. Off. Open Access J. VHB. 3(1), 49–68 (2010)

Teisl, M.F., Boyle, K.J., Roe, B.: Conjoint analysis of angler evaluations of Atlantic salmon restoration on the Penobscot River. North Am. J. Fish. Manag. 16(4), 861–871 (1996)

Thienhirun, S., Chung, S.: Consumer attitudes and preferences toward cross-cultural ready-to-eat (RTE) food. J. Food Prod. Mark. 24(1), 56–79 (2017)

Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., Pittaway, L.: Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: a systematic review of the evidence. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 7(4), 257–281 (2005)

Tomas, J., Arias, G.: Conjoint-based preferential segmentation in the design of a new financial service. Int. J. Bank Mark. 14(3), 30–32 (1996)

Townend, M., Shackley, P.: Establishing and quantifying the preferences of mental health service users for day hospital care: a pilot study using conjoint analysis. J. Ment. Health 11(1), 85–96 (2002)

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P.: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14(3), 207–222 (2003)

Trettin, L., Welter, F.: Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Region. Dev. 23(7/8), 575–602 (2011)

Tucci, L.A., Talaga, J.: Service guarantees and consumers’ evaluation of services. J. Serv. Mark. 11(1), 10–18 (1997)

Tversky, A.: A general theory of polynomial conjoint measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 4(1), 1–20 (1967)

Ugurlu, S., Coşgun, O., Ekinci, Y.: A dynamic pricing model for a maritime transportation service provider. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 5(6), 1109–1119 (2012)

Ulengin, B.: Using hierarchical information integration to examine customer preferences in banking. Int. J. Bank Mark. 16(5), 202–210 (1998)

Vriens, M., Hiek, R., Scheer, V.D., Hoekstra, J.C., Bult, J.R.: Conjoint experiments for direct mail response optimization. Eur. J. Mark. 32(3/4), 323–339 (1998)

Vriens, M.: Solving marketing problems with conjoint analysis. J. Mark. Manag. 10(1–3), 37–55 (1994)

Walsh, D., Downe, S.: Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J. Adv. Nurs. 50(2), 204–211 (2005)

Wang, C.H., Wu, C.W.: Combining conjoint analysis with Kano model to optimize product varieties of smart phones: a VIKOR perspective. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 31(4), 177–186 (2014)

Wei, S., Ruys, H., Muller, T.E.: A gap analysis of perceptions of hotel attributes by marketing managers and older people in Australia. J. Mark. Pract. Appl. Mark. Sci. 5(6/7/8), 200–212 (1999)

Wiklund, W.P., Wiklund, H.: Student focused design and improvement of university courses. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 9(6), 434–443 (1999)

Wirth, F.F.: Consumers’ shrimp purchasing preferences: an application of conjoint analysis. J. Food Prod. Mark. 20(2), 182–195 (2014)

Wittink, D.R., Cattin, P.: Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update. J. Mark. 53(3), 91–96 (1989)

Won, D., Bravo, G., Lee, C.: Careers in collegiate athletic administration: hiring criteria and skills needed for success. Manag. Leis. 18(1), 71–91 (2013)

Xin, L., Jiwu, W., Lucheng, H., Jiang, L., Jian, L.: Empirical research on the technology opportunities analysis based on morphology analysis and conjoint analysis. Foresight 12(2), 66–76 (2010)

Young, F.W.: Polynomial conjoint analysis of similarities: definitions for a specific algorithm. Report no. 76, Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina (1969)

Zimmer, L.: Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialogue with texts. J. Adv. Nurs. 53(3), 311–318 (2006)

Title: 1971–2017: Evolution, exploration and test of time of conjoint analysis
Authors: Kushagra Kulshreshtha
Vikas Tripathi
Naval Bajpai
Publication date: 26-02-2018
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Quality & Quantity / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0717-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Investigation of the level of consciousness of citizens about the climate change

Two-side face of knowledge building using scientometric analysis

The impact of women’s education and employment on their empowerment: an empirical evidence from household level survey

DNA test to assess criminal responsibility: a Bayesian approach

The effectiveness of technology-assisted history teaching based on peace training: The case of history of Cyprus

Assessment of the role of household empowerment in alleviating participatory poverty among rural household of Pakistan

Premium Partner