Top

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Published in:

26-04-2019 | Original research

3D Multiuser Virtual Environments and Environmental Education: The Virtual Island of the Mediterranean Monk Seal

Authors: Emmanuel Fokides, Foteini Chachlaki

Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Issue 1/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The study presents the results from a project in which a 3D multi-user virtual environment was used for informing students on issues related to the protection of the Mediterranean monk seal. The target group was 326, 10–12-years old students divided into three groups. The first one was taught using printed material, the second used a web-based application, and the third used the virtual environment. Data were collected by means of evaluation sheets and three questionnaires for recording students' views and attitudes. The third group of students had better learning outcomes compared to the first, but the results were inconclusive compared to the second. Then again, the MUVE had a notable impact on students' attitudes toward seals compared to the other tools. As for attitudes toward eco problems, the outcomes were better only compared to the first group. Moreover, fun and an increased motivation for learning were evident in the third group but co-existed with significant problems related to the use of the virtual environment. The findings point to the need for further examination of the use of multi-user virtual environments for raising the awareness of environmental issues.

next article Analysis of Relationship Between Five Domains of TPACK Framework: TK, PK, CK Math, CK Science, and TPACK of Pre-service Special Education Teachers

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (AGEDI). (2016). Eye on environmental education. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/education-environment/why-does-educationand-environment-matter/eye-environmental. Accessed 25 April 2019.

Ahn, S. J., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K. L., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173.CrossRef

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef

Allison, D., & Hodges, L. F. (2000). Virtual reality for education. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology, 60–165. NY: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/502390.502420

Anderson, M. W. (2012). New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale. The Berskshire encyclopedia of sustainability: Measurements, indicators, and research methods for sustainability (pp. 260–262).

Apps, K., Dimmock, K., & Lloyd, D. (2015). Scuba divers and the grey nurse shark: Beliefs, knowledge and behavior. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2015.1037028.CrossRef

Bailey, J. O., Bailenson, J. N., & Casasanto, D. (2016). When does virtual embodiment change our minds? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00263 CrossRef

Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604.CrossRef

Ballouard, J. M., Brischoux, F., & Bonnet, X. (2011). Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023152.CrossRef

Barney, E. C., Mintzes, J. J., & Yen, C.-F. (2005). Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward charismatic megafauna: the case of dolphins. Journal of Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.36.2.41-55 CrossRef

Beaumont, N. (2001). Ecotourism and the conservation ethic: Recruiting the uninitiated or preaching to the converted? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9, 317–341.CrossRef

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032.CrossRef

Buckler, C., & Creech, H. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN decade of education for sustainable development; final report. Paris: UNESCO.

Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.024.CrossRef

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness (Vol. 5, pp. 88–98). Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Cai, Y., Chia, N. K., Thalmann, D., Kee, N. K., Zheng, J., & Thalmann, N. M. (2013). Design and development of a virtual dolphinarium for children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 21(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2240700.CrossRef

Castronovo, F., Yilmaz, S., Rao, A., Condori, W., Jr., Monga, K., & Gooranorimi, H. (2018). Board 63: development of a virtual reality educational game for waste management: Attack of the recyclops. In Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE annual conference & exposition.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage

Crudge, B., O’Connor, D., Hunt, M., Davis, E. O., & Browne-Nunez, C. (2016). Groundwork for effective conservation education: An example of in situ and ex situ collaboration in South East Asia. International Zoo Sourcebook, 50, 34–48.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.CrossRef

Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.CrossRef

DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13, 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.CrossRef

Dillahunt, T., Becker, G., Mankoff, J., & Kraut, R. (2008). Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. Proceedings of the Pervasive 2008 Workshop, 8, 58–62.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176.CrossRef

Eckelman, M. J., Lifset, R. J., Yessios, I., & Panko, K. (2011). Teaching industrial ecology and environmental management in second life. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.008.CrossRef

Ehrhardt, N. M., & Witham, R. (1992). Analysis of growth of the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) in the western central Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science, 50(2), 275–281.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143.CrossRef

Faiola, A., Newlon, C., Pfaff, M., & Smyslova, O. (2013). Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.003.CrossRef

Fauville, G., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Säljö, R. (2014). ICT tools in environmental education: Reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 248–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.775220.CrossRef

Flogaiti, Ε. (2005). Εκπαίδευση για το περιβάλλον και τηναειφορία [Education for the environment and sustainable development]. Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα.

Fokides, E., & Atsikpasi, P. (2018). Development of a model for explaining the learning outcomes when using 3D virtual environments in informal learning settings. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2265–2287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9719-1.CrossRef

Fokides, E., Chachlaki, F., & Liarakou, G. (2017). MUVES and Environmental Education. The paradigm of the Mediterranean monk seal's island. In Proceedings of the 5th Panhellenic Conference for the Integration and Use of ICT in the Educational Process (pp. 492–503). Athens, Greece: School of Pedagogical and Technological Education.

Fokides, E., Kaimara, P., Deliyiannis, I., & Atsikpasi, P. (2019). Development of a scale for measuring the learning experience in serious games. Preliminary results. In Proceedings of the digital culture & audiovisual challenges international conference. Corfu, Greece: Ionian University.

Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 1, p. 133). Carol I, National Defence University.

Gehlbach, H., Marietta, G., King, A. M., Karutz, C., Bailenson, J. N., & Dede, C. (2015). Many ways to walk a mile in another’s moccasins: Type of social perspective taking and its effect on negotiation outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.035.CrossRef

Grotzer, T. A., Kamarainen, A., Tutwiler, M. S., Metcalf, S., & Dede, C. (2013). Learning to reason about ecosystems dynamics over time: The challenges of an event-based causal focus. BioScience, 63(4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.9.CrossRef

Ham, S. (2007). Can interpretation really make a difference? Answers to four questions from cognitive and behavioral psychology. In Proceedings of the interpreting world heritage conference (pp. 25–29), Vancouver, Canada.

Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2014). The teaching of science in primary schools (6th ed.). London: Routledge.

Harrington, M. C. (2012). The virtual trillium trail and the empirical effects of freedom and fidelity on discovery-based learning. Virtual Reality, 16(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-011-0189-7.CrossRef

Hill, A. (2013). The place of experience and the experience of place: Intersections between sustainability education and outdoor learning. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2013.13.CrossRef

Hsu, W. C., Tseng, C. M., & Kang, S. C. (2018). Using exaggerated feedback in a virtual reality environment to enhance behavior intention of water-conservation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 187–203.

Hughes, K. (2013). Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: Do positive intentions equate to longterm changes in conservation behavior? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21, 42–59.CrossRef

Jacobson, A. R., Militello, R., & Baveye, P. C. (2009). Development of computer-assisted virtual field trips to support multidisciplinary learning. Computers & Education, 52(3), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.007.CrossRef

Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Conservation education and outreach techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716686.001.0001.

Kamarainen, A., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. J. (2015). Exploring ecosystems from the inside: How immersion in a multi-user virtual environment supports epistemologically grounded practices in ecosystem science instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9531-7.CrossRef

Karamanlidis, A., & Dendrinos, P. (2015). Monachus monachus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2015, e.T13653A45227543. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T13653A45227543.en.

Kellert, S. R. (1985). Attitudes toward animals: Age-related development among children. Advances in Animal Welfare Science,1984, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4998-0_3.CrossRef

Kim, A.-K., Airey, D., & Szivas, E. (2011). The multiple assessment of interpretation effectiveness: Promoting visitors’ environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 50, 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362786.CrossRef

Kozlov, M. D., & Johansen, M. K. (2010). Real behavior in virtual environments: Psychology experiments in a simple virtual-reality paradigm using video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0310.CrossRef

Kuo, I.-L. (2002). The effectiveness of environmental interpretation at resource-sensitive tourism destinations. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.362.CrossRef

Kwan, B. K., Cheung, J. H., Law, A. C., Cheung, S. G., & Shin, P. K. (2017). Conservation education program for threatened Asian horseshoe crabs: A step towards reducing community apathy to environmental conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 35, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2016.12.002.CrossRef

Larson, K. L., & Redman, E. N. (2014). Water education for sustainability: Criteria and recommendations. Society & Natural Resources, 27(11), 1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.933932.CrossRef

Lee, E. A. L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006.CrossRef

Markowitz, D. M., Laha, R., Perone, B. P., Pea, R. D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364

McLellan, H. (2004). Virtual realites. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033.CrossRef

Metcalf, S. J., Kamarainen, A. M., Torres, E., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). EcoMUVE: A case study on the affordances of MUVEs in ecosystem science education. In J. Y. Qian (Ed.), Integrating Multi-User Virtual Environments in Modern Classrooms (pp. 1–25). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020.CrossRef

Miller, L. J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Mellen, J., Koeppel, J., Greer, T., & Kuczaj, S. (2013). Dolphin shows and interaction programs: Benefits for conservation education? Zoo Biology, 32(1), 45–53.CrossRef

Murphy, S., Spradlin, T. R., Mackey, B., McVee, J., Androukaki, E., Tounta, E., et al. (2012). Age estimation, growth and age-related mortality of Mediterranean monk seals Monachus monachus. Endangered Species Research, 16(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00392.CrossRef

Neulight, N., Kafai, Y. B., Kao, L., Foley, B., & Galas, C. (2007). Children’s participation in a virtual epidemic in the science classroom: Making connections to natural infectious diseases. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9029-z.CrossRef

Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Adamantopoulou, S., Androukaki, E., Dendrinos, P., Karamanlidis, A. A., Paravas, V., et al. (2009). National strategy and action plan for the conservation of the Mediterranean monk seal in Greece, 2009–2015. Report on evaluating the past and structuring the future. Paper prepared as part of the LIFE-Nature Project: MOFI:Monk Seal and Fisheries: Mitigating the conflict in Greek Seas. Athens, Greece: Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection of the Mediterranean monk seal (MOm).

Pan, Z., Cheok, A. D., Yang, H., Zhu, J., & Shi, J. (2006). Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Computers & Graphics, 30(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2005.10.004.CrossRef

Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). “Disgusting” animals: Primary school children's attitudes and myths of bats and spiders. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75309 CrossRef

Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2013). Does colour matter? The influence of animal warning coloration on human emotions and willingness to protect them. Animal Conservation, 16(4), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12014.CrossRef

Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010). Effects of having pets at home on children’s attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoös, 23, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303710X12627079939107.CrossRef

Quinn, F., & Lyons, T. (2013). Educating for sustainability in virtual worlds: Does the virtual have value? Strand 9 Environmental, Health andOutdoor Science Education, 118.

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017.CrossRef

Schaller, D. T., Goldman, K. H., Spickelmier, G., Allison-Bunnell, S., & Koepfler, J. (2009). Learning in the wild: What Wolfquest taught developers and game players. Museums and the Web, 2009.

Schott, C. (2017). Virtual fieldtrips and climate change education for tourism students. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 21, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2017.05.002.CrossRef

Skolverket,. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen ochfritidshemmet [Curriculum for elementary school, preschool class and recreation center]. Stockholm: Skolverket.

Stevenson, R. B. (2007). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701295726.CrossRef

Tarng, W., Change, M. Y., Ou, K. L., Chang, Y. W., & Liou, H. H. (2008). The development of a virtual marine museum for educational applications. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.37.1.d.CrossRef

Tisdell, C. (2013). Ecotourism experiences promoting conservation and changing economic values: the case of Mon Repos turtles. In R. Ballantyne & J. Packer (Eds.), International handbook on ecotourism (pp. 382–393). Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.CrossRef

Tomažič, I. (2011). Reported experiences enhance favourable attitudes toward toads. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(4), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75207.CrossRef

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1978). Intergovernmental conference on environmental education, final report. Paris: UNESCO.

Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science,344(6184), 583–584.CrossRef

Zheng, D., & Newgarden, K. (2011). Rethinking language learning: Virtual worlds as a catalyst for change. International Journal of Learning and Media, 3(2), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm_a_00067.CrossRef

Title: 3D Multiuser Virtual Environments and Environmental Education: The Virtual Island of the Mediterranean Monk Seal
Authors: Emmanuel Fokides
Foteini Chachlaki
Publication date: 26-04-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Electronic ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09409-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Changing Classroom Practice: Elementary Teacher Experiences of a Professional Development Program

An Emerging Technology Report on Computational Toys in Early Childhood

Assembling iPads and Mobility in Two Classroom Settings

Predictors of K-12 Teachers’ Instructional Strategies with ICTs

Literature Review on the Factors Affecting Primary Teachers’ Use of Digital Technology

Evolution and Identification from a Bibliometric Perspective of the Use of Robots in the Intervention of Children with ASD

Premium Partners