Top

Education and Information Technologies

Published in:

23-08-2021

A meta-analysis and bibliographic review of the effect of nine factors on online learning outcomes across the world

Author: Zhonggen Yu

Published in: Education and Information Technologies | Issue 2/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The unpredictable pandemic has drastically altered learning approaches, where online learning has been booming. Through VOSviewer, this study visualizes the network of top authors, organizations, sources, and countries that have been devoted to online learning. Through meta-analyses via Stata/MP 14.0, this study identifies nine variables that may exert a significant effect on online learning outcomes during this special pandemic time in various countries and areas. The findings may be generalizable to America, Asia, and Europe. Although relatively fewer publications in Africa have been included, the findings could provide a meaningful reference for African researchers and practitioners. Future research could include more publications from more diversified backgrounds. Online learning design could also keep pace with the development of information technologies.

previous article The effects of graphic organizer completeness and note-taking medium on computer-based learning

next article Designing and validating an assessment inventory for online language teacher education accountability

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010CrossRef

Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2185.

Anderson, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 3, pp. 543–559). Transaction Books.

Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Beyond grades in online learning: Adaptive profiles of academic self-regulation among naval academy undergraduates. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 568–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000402CrossRef

Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.006CrossRef

Barnard-Brak, L., Lan, W. Y., & Paton, V. O. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769CrossRef

Barton, E. A., Whittaker, J. V., Kinzie, M. B., DeCoster, J., & Furnari, E. (2017). Understanding the relationship between Teachers' use of online demonstration videos and Fidelity of implementation in "MyTeachingPartner-math/science". Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.011CrossRef

Bartsch, A., & Schneider, F. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64, 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095CrossRef

Basal, A., & Eryilmaz, A. (2020). Engagement and affection of pre-service teachers in online learning in the context of COVID 19: Engagement-based instruction with web 2.0 technologies vs. direct transmission instruction. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(1), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1841555CrossRef

Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446CrossRefMATH

Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002CrossRef

Blizak, D., Blizak, S., Bouchenak, O., & Yahiaoui, K. (2020). Students’ perceptions regarding the abrupt transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case of faculty of chemistry and hydrocarbons at the University of Boumerdes-Algeria. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2466–2471. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00668CrossRef

Bradford, G. R. (2011). A relationship study of student satisfaction with learning online and cognitive load: Initial results. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.001CrossRef

Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184CrossRef

Chen, X., & Hu, J. (2020). ICT-related behavioral factors mediate the relationship between adolescents’ ICT interest and their ICT self-efficacy: Evidence from 30 countries. Computers & Education, 159, 104004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104004CrossRef

Chen, N. S., Ko, H. C., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500062599CrossRef

Cohen, E. L. (2014). What makes good games go viral? The role of technology use, efficacy, emotion and enjoyment in players’ decision to share a prosocial digital game. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.013CrossRef

Cutumisu, M., & Lou, N. M. (2020). The moderating effect of mindset on the relationship between university students’ critical feedback-seeking and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106445CrossRef

Den Brok, P., van Eerde, D., & Hajer, M. (2010). Classroom interaction studies as a source for teacher competencies: The use of case studies with multiple instruments for studying teacher competencies in multicultural classes. Teachers and Teaching., 16(6), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2010.517689CrossRef

Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ Clinical Research, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629CrossRef

Gallego Sánchez, M. C., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., Medina-Merodio, J. A., Robina-Ramírez, R., & Fernandez-Sanz, L. (2021). Relationships among relational coordination dimensions: Impact on the quality of education online with a structural equations model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120608CrossRef

Gittell, J.H., 2009. High performance healthcare, using the power of relationships to achieve quality, efficiency and resilience. McGraw Hill, EEUU.

Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050174545CrossRef

Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010CrossRef

Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. April 13, 2021 Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org

Houston, S. L., II, Brady, K., Narasimham, G., & Fisher, D. (2017). Pass the idea please: The relationship between network position, direct engagement, and course performance in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the fourth (2017) ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 295-298). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3054008.

Huang, J. (2020). Successes and challenges: Online teaching and learning of chemistry in higher education in China in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2810–2814. https://doi.org/10.1021/j.jchemed.0c00671CrossRef

Istenic, A. (2021). Online learning under COVID-19: Re-examining the prominence of video-based and text-based feedback. ETR&D-Educational technology research and development, 69(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09955-wCrossRef

Jia, C. Y., Hew, K. F., Bai, S. R., & Huang, W. J. (2020). Adaptation of a conventional flipped course to an online flipped format during the Covid-19 pandemic: Student learning performance and engagement. Journal of research on technology in education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1847220

Jiang, S., Fitzhugh, S. M., & Warschauer, M. (2014). Social positioning and performance in MOOCs. In Workshop on graph-based educational data mining (Vol.14).http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.662.8773&rep=rep1&type=pdf retrieved 10 April 2021.

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008CrossRef

Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013CrossRef

Kamble, A., Gauba, R., Desai, S., & Golhar, D. (2021). Learners’ perception of the transition to instructor-led online learning environments: Facilitators and barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 22(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.4971CrossRef

Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: How teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480CrossRef

Kim, D., Jung, E., Yoon, M., Chang, Y., Park, S., Kim, D., & Demir, F. (2021). Exploring the structural relationships between course design factors, learner commitment, self-directed learning, and intentions for further learning in a self-paced MOOC. Computers & Education, 166, 104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104171

Kinzie, M. B., Whittaker, J. V., McGuire, P., Lee, Y., & Kilday, C. R. (2015). Research on curricular development for pre-kindergarten mathematics & science. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 070304.

Klein, P., Ivanjek, L., Dahlkemper, M. N., Jelicic, K., Geyer, M. A., Kuchemann, S., & Susac, A. (2021). Studying physics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Student assessments of learning achievement, perceived effectiveness of online recitations, and online laboratories. Physical review physics education research, 17(1), 010117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010117CrossRef

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989CrossRef

Lin, T. J. (2021). Exploring the differences in Taiwanese university students’ online learning task value, goal orientation, and self-efficacy before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Asia-pacific education researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00553-1

Literat, I. (2021). "teachers act like We're robots": TikTok as a window into youth experiences of online learning during COVID-19. AERA open, 7, 2332858421995537. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421995537CrossRef

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6CrossRef

McNamara, C. L. (2010). K-12 teacher participation in online professional development (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC, Educational Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego and California State University, San Marcos.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.624566CrossRef

Mehrabian, A. (1967). Orientation behaviors and nonverbal attitude communication. Journal of Communication, 16, 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1967.tb01190.xCrossRef

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.18.3.114CrossRef

Moule, P. Pontin, D. Gilchrist, M. & Ingram, R. (2003). Critical appraisal framework. Retrieved Feb. 8, 2021, http://learntech.uwe.ac.uk/da/Default.aspx?pageid=1445

Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005CrossRef

Paxton, C. L. C., Wanless, S. B., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2013). Coaching support, context, and fidelity of implementation in responsive classroom® schools. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, D.C. Abstract retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563070 on August 21, 2021.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.), upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill prentice hall.

Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024CrossRef

Rahman, M. H. A., Uddin, M. S., & Dey, A. (2021). Investigating the mediating role of online learning motivation in the COVID-19 pandemic situation in Bangladesh. Journal of computer assisted learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12535

Roth, F. S., Weinmann, C., Schneider, F. M., Hopp, F., & Vorderer, P. (2014). Seriously entertained: Antecedents and consequences of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences with political talk shows on TV. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.891135CrossRef

Sanchez, R. J., Bauer, T. N., & Paronto, M. E. (2006). Peer-mentoring freshman: Implications for satisfaction, commitment, and retention to graduation. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2006.20388382CrossRef

Schlenz, M. A., Schmidt, A., Wostmann, B., Kramer, N., & Schulz-Weidner, N. (2020). Students' and lecturers' perspective on the implementation of online learning in dental education due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02266-3CrossRef

Scott, R. A., Swan, J. E., Wilson, M. E., & Roberts, J. J. (1986). Organizational behavior modification: A general motivational tool for sales management. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 6(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.1986.10754427CrossRef

Shrader, S., Wu, M., & Owens, D. (2016). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Participant activity, demographics, and satisfaction. Online learning, 20(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.596CrossRef

Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past--a systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 19, 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002CrossRef

Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258440MathSciNetCrossRef

Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017CrossRef

Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 472–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12274CrossRef

Thweatt, K. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Teacher nonimmediacy and misbehavior: Unintentional negative communication. Communication Research Reports, 13(2), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099609362087CrossRef

Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2010). Unterhaltung online e motive, Erleben, Effekte [entertainment online e motives, experiences, effects]. In W. Schweiger & K. Beck (Eds.), Handbuch online-Kommunikation [handbook of online communication] (pp. 211–233). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef

Tseng, H. H. (2018). Use of e-learning and course assignments to improve learning effectiveness in construction project planning. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 1361–1375. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.13611375CrossRef

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3CrossRef

Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.11. Universiteit Leiden.

Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational Psychology (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028CrossRef

Yang, C. C., Tsai, I. C., Kim, B., Cho, M. H., & Laffey, J. M. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.002CrossRef

Yates, A., Starkey, L., Ben, E., & Flueggen, F. (2020). High school students' experience of online learning during Covid-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology pedagogy and education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337

Zhang, S., & Liu, Q. (2019). Investigating the relationships among teachers’ motivational beliefs, motivational regulation, and their learning engagement in online professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 134, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.013CrossRef

Title: A meta-analysis and bibliographic review of the effect of nine factors on online learning outcomes across the world
Author: Zhonggen Yu
Publication date: 23-08-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Education and Information Technologies / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10720-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Systemic model for technology integration in teaching

A systematic literature review of web-based student response systems: Advantages and challenges

What to do and what to avoid on the use of gamified intelligent tutor system for low-income students

A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education

The effectiveness of video prompts created with animations in teaching car wash skills

A novel prediction model for educational planning of human resources with data mining approach: a national tax administration case study

Premium Partner