Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Model for Digital Innovation Assessment and Selection

Authors : Tatiana Lisienkova, Lyudmila Nosova, Rimma Karimova, Lyudmila Komarova

Published in: XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021"

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, companies can acquire and sustain competitive advantage only through implementation of different innovations. In the majority of cases innovation is connected somehow with digital and information technologies. New digital technologies and products emerge with a very high speed, and companies usually implement them without justified selection and prioritization. Only 10% of them are completed successfully. Still the most commonly used approach for digital innovation projects assessment use financial metrics without due attention to the influence on company’s strategic goals and product development. This research suggests a model for assessment and selection the innovative projects. Over several decades, a class of innovation adoption models that help to evaluate whether a certain innovation will be accepted by a company, its structure and employees, has been formed. However, they do not fully meet the needs of “digital” realities and need modification. The approach entails comprehensive evaluation of project’s expected results in four areas: environmental, organizational, strategic and technological contexts. Suggested method is based on the modified Fleischer-Tornatzky innovation adoption model.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Pogodina, T.V., Aleksakhina, V.G., Burenin, V.A., Polianova, T.N., Yunusov, L.A.: Towards the innovation-focused industry development in a climate of digitalization: the case of Russia. Entrep. Sustain Issues 6(4), 1897 (2019)CrossRef Pogodina, T.V., Aleksakhina, V.G., Burenin, V.A., Polianova, T.N., Yunusov, L.A.: Towards the innovation-focused industry development in a climate of digitalization: the case of Russia. Entrep. Sustain Issues 6(4), 1897 (2019)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fedosova, R., Pimenov, S.: Modern tools for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative projects. Bull. Financ. Univ. 5, 78–93 (2009) Fedosova, R., Pimenov, S.: Modern tools for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative projects. Bull. Financ. Univ. 5, 78–93 (2009)
5.
go back to reference Perrin, B.: How to—and how not to—evaluate innovation. Evaluation 8(1), 13–28 (2002)CrossRef Perrin, B.: How to—and how not to—evaluate innovation. Evaluation 8(1), 13–28 (2002)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lisienkova, T., Lisienkova, L., Baranova, E., Nosova, L., Tursukova, I.: Development of methodology for evaluation of innovative IT-projects. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 110, p. 2092 (2019) Lisienkova, T., Lisienkova, L., Baranova, E., Nosova, L., Tursukova, I.: Development of methodology for evaluation of innovative IT-projects. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 110, p. 2092 (2019)
7.
go back to reference Shukla, S., Mishra, P.K., Jain, R., Yadav, H.C.: An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection using SWARA and PROMETHEE method. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. 3(2), 120–147 (2016)CrossRef Shukla, S., Mishra, P.K., Jain, R., Yadav, H.C.: An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection using SWARA and PROMETHEE method. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. 3(2), 120–147 (2016)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mumford, M.D., Bedell-Avers, K.E., Hunter, S.T.: Planning for innovation: a multi-level perspective. Res. Multi-Level Issues 7, 107–154 (2008) Mumford, M.D., Bedell-Avers, K.E., Hunter, S.T.: Planning for innovation: a multi-level perspective. Res. Multi-Level Issues 7, 107–154 (2008)
9.
go back to reference Renkema, T.J.W., Berghout, E.W.: Methodologies for innovation evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review. Innov. Technol. 39(1), 1–13 (1997) Renkema, T.J.W., Berghout, E.W.: Methodologies for innovation evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review. Innov. Technol. 39(1), 1–13 (1997)
10.
go back to reference Lisienkova, T.S., Grekul, V.I., Isaev, E.A., Korovkina, N.L.: Developing an approach to ranking innovative IT projects. Bus. Inform. 13(2), 43–58 (2019)CrossRef Lisienkova, T.S., Grekul, V.I., Isaev, E.A., Korovkina, N.L.: Developing an approach to ranking innovative IT projects. Bus. Inform. 13(2), 43–58 (2019)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zelenkov, Y.: A simple decision-making approach for information technology solution selection. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 14(1), 56–79 (2019)CrossRef Zelenkov, Y.: A simple decision-making approach for information technology solution selection. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 14(1), 56–79 (2019)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1987)CrossRef Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1987)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRef Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New-York (2010) Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New-York (2010)
15.
go back to reference Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRef Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A.K.: Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lanham (1996) Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A.K.: Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lanham (1996)
17.
go back to reference Manual, O.: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (2005) Manual, O.: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (2005)
Metadata
Title
A Model for Digital Innovation Assessment and Selection
Authors
Tatiana Lisienkova
Lyudmila Nosova
Rimma Karimova
Lyudmila Komarova
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81619-3_93

Premium Partners