Skip to main content

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Model for Digital Innovation Assessment and Selection

verfasst von : Tatiana Lisienkova, Lyudmila Nosova, Rimma Karimova, Lyudmila Komarova

Erschienen in: XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021"

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, companies can acquire and sustain competitive advantage only through implementation of different innovations. In the majority of cases innovation is connected somehow with digital and information technologies. New digital technologies and products emerge with a very high speed, and companies usually implement them without justified selection and prioritization. Only 10% of them are completed successfully. Still the most commonly used approach for digital innovation projects assessment use financial metrics without due attention to the influence on company’s strategic goals and product development. This research suggests a model for assessment and selection the innovative projects. Over several decades, a class of innovation adoption models that help to evaluate whether a certain innovation will be accepted by a company, its structure and employees, has been formed. However, they do not fully meet the needs of “digital” realities and need modification. The approach entails comprehensive evaluation of project’s expected results in four areas: environmental, organizational, strategic and technological contexts. Suggested method is based on the modified Fleischer-Tornatzky innovation adoption model.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pogodina, T.V., Aleksakhina, V.G., Burenin, V.A., Polianova, T.N., Yunusov, L.A.: Towards the innovation-focused industry development in a climate of digitalization: the case of Russia. Entrep. Sustain Issues 6(4), 1897 (2019)CrossRef Pogodina, T.V., Aleksakhina, V.G., Burenin, V.A., Polianova, T.N., Yunusov, L.A.: Towards the innovation-focused industry development in a climate of digitalization: the case of Russia. Entrep. Sustain Issues 6(4), 1897 (2019)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedosova, R., Pimenov, S.: Modern tools for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative projects. Bull. Financ. Univ. 5, 78–93 (2009) Fedosova, R., Pimenov, S.: Modern tools for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative projects. Bull. Financ. Univ. 5, 78–93 (2009)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrin, B.: How to—and how not to—evaluate innovation. Evaluation 8(1), 13–28 (2002)CrossRef Perrin, B.: How to—and how not to—evaluate innovation. Evaluation 8(1), 13–28 (2002)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lisienkova, T., Lisienkova, L., Baranova, E., Nosova, L., Tursukova, I.: Development of methodology for evaluation of innovative IT-projects. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 110, p. 2092 (2019) Lisienkova, T., Lisienkova, L., Baranova, E., Nosova, L., Tursukova, I.: Development of methodology for evaluation of innovative IT-projects. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 110, p. 2092 (2019)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shukla, S., Mishra, P.K., Jain, R., Yadav, H.C.: An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection using SWARA and PROMETHEE method. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. 3(2), 120–147 (2016)CrossRef Shukla, S., Mishra, P.K., Jain, R., Yadav, H.C.: An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection using SWARA and PROMETHEE method. Int. J. Intell. Enterp. 3(2), 120–147 (2016)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mumford, M.D., Bedell-Avers, K.E., Hunter, S.T.: Planning for innovation: a multi-level perspective. Res. Multi-Level Issues 7, 107–154 (2008) Mumford, M.D., Bedell-Avers, K.E., Hunter, S.T.: Planning for innovation: a multi-level perspective. Res. Multi-Level Issues 7, 107–154 (2008)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Renkema, T.J.W., Berghout, E.W.: Methodologies for innovation evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review. Innov. Technol. 39(1), 1–13 (1997) Renkema, T.J.W., Berghout, E.W.: Methodologies for innovation evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review. Innov. Technol. 39(1), 1–13 (1997)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lisienkova, T.S., Grekul, V.I., Isaev, E.A., Korovkina, N.L.: Developing an approach to ranking innovative IT projects. Bus. Inform. 13(2), 43–58 (2019)CrossRef Lisienkova, T.S., Grekul, V.I., Isaev, E.A., Korovkina, N.L.: Developing an approach to ranking innovative IT projects. Bus. Inform. 13(2), 43–58 (2019)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelenkov, Y.: A simple decision-making approach for information technology solution selection. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 14(1), 56–79 (2019)CrossRef Zelenkov, Y.: A simple decision-making approach for information technology solution selection. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 14(1), 56–79 (2019)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1987)CrossRef Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1987)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRef Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New-York (2010) Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New-York (2010)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRef Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A.K.: Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lanham (1996) Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A.K.: Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lanham (1996)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Manual, O.: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (2005) Manual, O.: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (2005)
Metadaten
Titel
A Model for Digital Innovation Assessment and Selection
verfasst von
Tatiana Lisienkova
Lyudmila Nosova
Rimma Karimova
Lyudmila Komarova
Copyright-Jahr
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81619-3_93

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.