Top

International Journal of Social Robotics

Published in:

19-10-2021

A Multidimensional Analysis of Robotic Deployment in Thai Hotels

Author: Pornrat Sadangharn

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 4/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Several hotel businesses are interested in robotic deployment to improve customer service, enhance hotel productivity, and gain a competitive advantage. In this study, I deployed a robot in a real working environment to explore stakeholders’ perceptions and investigate factors involved in robotic deployment in Thai hotels. A qualitative research method, interpretative phenomenological analysis, was utilized. As there was no robotic deployment in Thai hotels, Peanut, a navigation service robot, was temporarily assigned to work in the hotels to allow key informants—hotel executives, human resource managers, reception managers, hotel staff, and hotel guests—to understand the phenomenon and experience robotic deployment. The findings revealed that stakeholders in Thai hotels accepted the robot; however, this acceptance was contingent on various robot, human, and organizational dimensions. Greater user acceptance can promote more widespread robotic deployment. This study has important implications for human–robot interactions in the hotel industry, especially in Thailand where this technology has not yet been applied.

next article Children’s Intention to Adopt Social Robots: A Model of its Distal and Proximal Predictors

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Pan Y, Okada H, Uchiyama T, Suzuki K (2013) Direct and indirect social robot interactions in a hotel public space. In: International conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), Shenzhen, China

Zalama E, Garcia-Bermego JG, Marcos S, Dominguez S, Feliz R, Pinillos R, Lopez J (2014) Sacarino, a service robot in a hotel environment. Adv Intell Syst 253:3–14

Ivanov S, Webster C, Berezina K (2017) Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies. Revista Turismo and Desenvolvimento 27(28):1501–1517

Murphy J, Hofacker C, Gretzel U (2016) Dawning of the age of robots in hospitality and tourism. Eur J Tour Res 15:104–111CrossRef

Savela N, Turja T, Oksanen A (2018) Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: A systematic literature review. Int J Soc Robotics 10:493–502CrossRef

Turja T, Oksanen A (2019) Robot acceptance at work: A multilevel analysis based on 27 EU countries. Int J Soc Robot 1:679–689CrossRef

Xu S, Stienmetz J, Ashton M (2020) How will service robots redefine leadership in hotel management? A Delphi approach. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 32:2217–2237CrossRef

Hannola L, Richter A, Richter S, Stocker A (2018) Empowering production workers with digitally facilitated knowledge processes. Int J of Production Research 56:4729–4743CrossRef

Osawa H, Ema A, Hattori H, Akiya N, Kanzaki N, Kubo A, Koyama T, Ichise R (2017) Analysis of robot hotel: Reconstruction of works with robots. In: 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), Lisbon, Portugal

10.

Kim S (2020) Robots ramp up room service at these hotels in Singapore. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/travel-food/article/2119123/room-service-now-delivered-robotssingapores-hotel-jen. Accessed 5 April 2020.

11.

Shin HH, Jeong M (2020) Guests’ perceptions of robot concierge and their adoption intentions. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 32:2613–2633CrossRef

12.

Kim J, Christodoulidou N, Brewer P (2012) Impact of individual difference and consumers’ readiness on likelihood of using self-service technologies at hospitality settings. J Hosp Tour Res 36:85–114CrossRef

13.

Melian-Gonzalez S, Bulchand-Gidumal J (2016) A model that connects information technology and hotel performance. Tour Manag 53:30–37CrossRef

14.

Bhatt GD, Grover V (2005) Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: an empirical study. J Manag Inf Syst 22:253–277CrossRef

15.

den Hertog P, van der Aa WW, de Jong M (2010) Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. J Serv Manag 21:490–514CrossRef

16.

Gronroos C, Ravald A (2011) Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. J Serv Manag 22:5–22CrossRef

17.

Pinillos R, Marcos S, Feliz R, Zalama E, Gomez-García-Bermejo J (2016) Long-term assessment of a service robot in a hotel environment. Rob Auton Syst 79:40–57CrossRef

18.

Gryszkiewicz L, Giannopoulou E, Barlatier PJ (2013) Service innovation capabilities: What are they? Int J Serv Econ Manag 5:125–147

19.

Lusch RF, Vargo SL, Wessels G (2008) Towards a conceptual foundation for service science: contributions from service dominant logic. IBM Syst J 47:5–14CrossRef

20.

Kuo CM, Chen LC, Tseng CY (2016) Investigating an innovative service with hospitality robots. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 29:1305–1321CrossRef

21.

Cain LN, Thomas JH (2019) From sci-fi to sci-fact: the state of robotics and AI in the hospitality industry. J Hosp Tour Technol 10:624–650

22.

Larivière B, Bowen D, Andreassen TW, Kunz W, Sirianni NJ, Wünderlich VC, NV, DeKeyser A, (2017) Service encounter 2.0: An investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers. J Bus Res 79:238–246CrossRef

23.

Gervasi R, Mastrogiacomo L, Franceschini FA (2020) conceptual framework to evaluate human-robot collaboration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:841–865CrossRef

24.

Bröhl C, Nelles J, Brandl C, Mertens A, Nitsch V (2019) Human-robot collaboration acceptance model: development and comparison for Germany, Japan, China and the USA. Int J Soc Robot 11:709–726CrossRef

25.

Manyika J, Chui M, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Bisson P, Marrs A (2013) Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute, San Francisco

26.

Weng Y, Chen C, Sun C (2009) Toward the human-robot co-existence society: on safety intelligence for next generation robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:267–282CrossRef

27.

Tung VWS, Au N (2018) Exploring customer experiences with robotics in hospitality. Int J of Contemp Hosp Manag 30:2680–2697CrossRef

28.

Wirtz J, Patterson PG, Kunz WH, Gruber T, Lu VN, Paluch S, Martins A (2018) Brave new world: service robots in the frontline. J Serv Manag 29:907–931CrossRef

29.

Belanche D, Casalo LV, Flavian C (2020) Robots or frontline employees? Exploring customers’ attributions of responsibility and stability after service failure or success 2020. J Serv Manag 31(2):267–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2019-0156CrossRef

30.

Bagdasarov Z, Martin AA, Buckley MR (2018) Working with robots: Organizational consideration. Org Dyn 49:100679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.09.002CrossRef

31.

Dahlin E (2019) Are robots stealing our jobs? Socius 5:1–14CrossRef

32.

Złotowski J, Khalil A, Abdallah S (2019) One robot doesn’t fit all: aligning social robot appearance and job suitability from a Middle Eastern perspective. AI Soc 35:485–500CrossRef

33.

Johansson-Pajala RM, Thommes K, Hoppe JA, Tuisku O, Hennala L, Pekkarinen S, Melkas H, Gustafsson C (2020) Care robot orientation: What, who and how? Potential users’ perceptions. Int J Soc Robot 12:1103–1117CrossRef

34.

Shove E, Southerton D (2000) Defrosting the Freezer: From Novelty to Convenience. J Mater Cult 5(3):301–319CrossRef

35.

Sung JY, Christensen HI, Grinter RE (2009). 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 11–13 March 2009, La Jolla, CA, USA

36.

Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):962–971CrossRef

37.

Tanaka F, Movellan JR, Fortenberry B, Aisaka K (2006) Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments. HRI '06: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, pp. 3–9

38.

Irfan B, Ramachandran A, Spaulding S, Glas DF, Leite I, Koay KL (2019) Personalization in Long-Term Human-Robot Interaction. In: 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South), pp. 685–686. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673076

39.

Bhagya SM, Samarakoon P, Viraj MA, Muthugal J, Buddhika AG, Jayasekara P, Elara MR (2019) An Exploratory Study on Proxemics Preferences of Humans in Accordance with Attributes of Service Robots. In: 28th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN)

40.

Hall ET (1966) The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday, Garden City

41.

Mutlu B, Forlizzi J (2008) Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In: 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 287–294. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349860

42.

Ivanov S, Webster C (2017) Designing robot-friendly hospitality facilities. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference Tourism, Innovations, Strategies, Bourgas, Bulgaria, pp. 74–81

43.

Berenz V, Tanaka F, Suzuki K (2011) Autonomous battery management for mobile robots based on risk and gain assessment. Artif Intell Rev (2012) 37:217–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9227-9CrossRef

44.

Schulz T, Soma R, Holthaus P (2021) Learning lessons from breakdowns -participants’ opinions on a breakdown situation with a robot Paladyn. Int J Soc Behav Robot Spec Issue Trust. Acceptance and Social Cues in Robot Interaction (in preparation)

45.

Ullman D, Malle B (2016) The effect of perceived involvement on trust in human-robot interaction. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 641–642. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451896.

46.

Go H, Kang M, Suh SC (2019) Machine learning of robots in tourism and hospitality: interactive technology acceptance model (iTAM) – cutting edge. Tour Rev 75:625–636CrossRef

47.

Ullma D, Malle B (2019) The effect of perceived involvement on trust in human-robot interaction. IEEE Xplore 641–642

48.

Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35:982–1003CrossRef

49.

Dickson DR, Nusair K (2010) An HR perspective: the global hunt for talent in the digital age. Worldw Hosp Tour Themes 2:86–93

50.

Haidegger T, Barreto M, Goncalves P, Habib MK, Ragavan SKV, Li H, Vaccarella A, Perrone R, Prestes E (2013) Applied ontologies and standards for service robots. Rob Auton Syst 61:1215–1223CrossRef

51.

Nørskov M (2016) Social robots: boundaries, potential, challenges. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham

52.

Royakkers L, van Est R (2016) Just ordinary robots: Automation from love to war. CRC Press, Florida

53.

Bernotat J, Schiffhauer B, Eyssel F et al (2016) Welcome to the future–How naïve users intuitively address an intelligent robotics apartment. In: Agah A, Cabibihan JJ, Howard AM, Salichs MA, He H (eds) International conference on social robotics (ICSR 2016), vol 9979. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 982–992

54.

Salem M, Ziadee M, Sakr M (2013) Effects of politeness and interaction context on perception and experience of HRI. In: Herrmann G, Pearson M, Lenz A, Bremner P, Spiers A, Leonards U (eds) Social robotics, vol 8239. lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 531–541CrossRef

55.

Yousuf MA, Kobayashi Y, Kuno Y, Yamazaki A, Yamazaki K (2013). How to move towards visitors: a model for museum guide robots to initiate conversation. 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 587–592

56.

Holthaus P, Wachsmuth S (2021). It was a pleasure meeting you: towards a holistic model of human–robot encounters. Int J Soc Robotics (In Press)

57.

Holthaus P, Pitsch K, Wachsmuth S (2012) How Can I Help? Spatial Attention Strategies for a Receptionist Robot. Int J Soc Robotics 3(4):383–393CrossRef

58.

Pitsch K, Gehle R., Wrede S (2013). Addressing multiple participants. A museum guide robot's gaze shapes visitor participation, ICSR 2013, Bristol, UK, pp. 587–588

59.

Baxter P, Lemaignan S, Trafton JG (2020) Cognitive architectures for social human-robot interaction. IEEE Xplore, pp. 579–580

60.

Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Rob Auton Syst 42:143–166MATHCrossRef

61.

Barakova E, De Haas M, Kuijpers W, Irigoyen N, Betancourt A (2018) Socially grounded game strategy enhances bonding and perceived smartness of a humanoid robot. Connect Sci 30:81–98CrossRef

62.

Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2007) Observing conversational expressiveness of elderly users interacting with a robot and screen agent. In: 2007 IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR 2007), pp. 751–756.

63.

Moyle W, Cooke M, Jones C, O’Dwyer S, Sung B (2013) Assistive technologies as a means of connecting people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 25:S21-22

64.

Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B (2013) Older people’s involvement in the development of a social assistive robot. In: Herrmann G, Pearson MJ, Lenz A, Bremner P, Spiers A, Leonards U (eds) Social robotics: 5th international conference ICSR 2013, Bristol, UK

65.

Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional intelligence. Imagin Cogn Personal 9:185–211CrossRef

66.

Lu L, Cai R, Gursoy D (2019) Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale. Int J Hosp Manag 80:36–51CrossRef

67.

Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC, Hoffmann L, Sobieraj S, Eimler SC (2013) An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. Int J Soc Robot 5:17–34CrossRef

68.

Mann JA, Macdonald BA, Kuo I, Li X (2015) Broadbent, E. People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput Hum Behav 43:112–117CrossRef

69.

Chtourou MS, Souiden N (2010) Rethinking the TAM model: Time to consider fun. J Consum Mark 27:336–344CrossRef

70.

Wood LJ, Dautenhahn K, Rainer A, Robins B, Lehmann H, Syrdal DS (2013) Robot–Mediated interviews– How effective is a humanoid robot as a tool for interviewing young children? PLoS ONE 8:e59448.

71.

Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human–robot cooperation. The 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. ROMAN 2003:55–60

72.

Li D, Rau PP, Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2:175–186CrossRef

73.

Blow M, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A, Nehaniv CL, Lee D (2006). The art of designing robotfaces: dimensions for human-robot interaction. In: 1st ACMSIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 331–332

74.

Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley [from the field]. Robot Automat Mag 19:98–100CrossRef

75.

Whelan S, Murphy K, Barrett E, Krusche C, Santorell A, Casey D (2018) Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by Older Adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a literature review. Int J Soc Robot 10:643–668CrossRef

76.

Khosla R, Khanh N, Chu MT (2014) Assistive robot enabled service architecture to support home-based dementia care. 2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications, pp 73–80

77.

Scopelliti M, Giuliani MV, Fornara F (2004) Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Univ Access Inf Soc 4:146–155CrossRef

78.

Hu Y, Benallegue M, Venture G, Yoshida E (2020) Interact with me: an exploratory study on interaction factors for active physical Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5:6764–6771CrossRef

79.

Armenakis AA, Bedeian AG (1999) Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990s. J Manage 25:293–315

80.

Battilana J, Gilmartin M, Sengul M, Pache AC, Alexander JA (2010) Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. Leadersh Q 21:422–438CrossRef

81.

Choi M, Ruona WE (2011) Individual readiness for organizational change and its implications for HR and organization development. Hum Resour Dev Rev 10:46–73CrossRef

82.

Anckar B, Walden P (2001) Introducing web technology in a small peripheral hospitality organization. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 13:241–250CrossRef

83.

Cobos LM, Mejia C, Ozturk AB, Wang YA (2016) Technology adoption and implementation process in an independent hotel chain. Int J Hosp Manag 57:93–105CrossRef

84.

Dietz T, Pott A, Hägele M, Verl A (2013) A new, uncertainty-aware cost-model for cost-benefit assessment of robot systems, IEEE ISR 2013, Seoul, Korea (South), pp 1–6. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ISR.2013.6695670.

85.

McCartney G, McCartney A (2020) Rise of the machines: towards a conceptual service-robot research framework for the hospitality and tourism industry. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 32:3835–3851CrossRef

86.

Bataev AV, Dedyukhina N, Nasrutdinov MN (2020) Innovations in the financial sphere: performance evaluation of introducing service robots with Artificial Intelligence. In: 9th international conference on industrial technology and management (ICITM), Oxford, UK, 2020, pp 256–260. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITM48982.2020.9080379.

87.

Smith JA (1996) Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychol Health 11:261–271CrossRef

88.

Alase A (2017) The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): a guide to a good qualitative research approach. Int J Edu Literacy Stud 5:9–19CrossRef

89.

Aspers P (2009) Empirical phenomenology: a qualitative research approach. IPJP 9:1–12

90.

Finlay L (2012) Debating Phenomenological Methods. In: Friesen N, Henriksson C, Saevi T (eds) Hermeneutic Phenomenology in Education: method and Practice 3. Springer, Switzerland, pp 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-834-6_2.

91.

Ponterotto JG (2005) Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Couns Psychol 52(2):126–136CrossRef

92.

Urquhart C (2013) Grounded theory for qualitative research. SAGE Publications, California, USA

93.

Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research method, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, California, USA

94.

Joungtrakul J (2020) Qualitative research: a tool for knowledge creation for national development. Business Law Centre International Company Limited, Bangkok, Thailand

95.

Downe-Wamboldt B (1992) Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int 13:313–321CrossRef

96.

Erlingssona C, Brysiewiczb P (2017) A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African J Emergency Med 7:93–99CrossRef

97.

Weber RP (1990) Basic content analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills, CACrossRef

98.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687CrossRef

99.

Gibbs GR (2007) Thematic coding and categorizing. In: Gibbs GR (ed) Qualitative research kit: analyzing qualitative data. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 38–55CrossRef

100.

Tesch R (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Falmer, Bristol

101.

Morgan DL (1993) Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res 3:112–121CrossRef

102.

Morse JM, Field PA (1995) Qualitative research methods for health professionals, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

103.

Coffey A, Atkinson P (1996) Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

104.

Payne G, Williams M (2005) Generalization in qualitative research. Sociology 39:295–314CrossRef

Title: A Multidimensional Analysis of Robotic Deployment in Thai Hotels
Author: Pornrat Sadangharn
Publication date: 19-10-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00833-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Positive Turn in Elder-Care Workers’ Views Toward Telecare Robots

The Zoomorphic Miro Robot’s Affective Expression Design and Perceived Appearance

Crowd-Comfort Robot Navigation Among Dynamic Environment Based on Social-Stressed Deep Reinforcement Learning

Is a Wizard-of-Oz Required for Robot-Led Conversation Practice in a Second Language?

Children’s Intention to Adopt Social Robots: A Model of its Distal and Proximal Predictors

“I Have to Praise You Like I Should?” The Effects of Implicit Self-Theories and Robot-Delivered Praise on Evaluations of a Social Robot

Premium Partners