nach oben

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Erschienen in:

23.05.2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A conceptual framework to evaluate human-robot collaboration

verfasst von: Riccardo Gervasi, Luca Mastrogiacomo, Fiorenzo Franceschini

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) is a form of direct interaction between humans and robots. The objective of this type of interaction is to perform a task by combining the skills of both humans and robots. HRC is characterized by several aspects, related both to robots and humans. Many works have focused on the study of specific aspects related to HRC, e.g., safety, task organization. However, a major issue is to find a general framework to evaluate the collaboration between humans and robots considering all the aspects of the interaction. The goals of this paper are the following: (i) highlighting the different latent dimensions that characterize the HRC problem and (ii) constructing a conceptual framework to evaluate and compare different HRC configuration profiles. The description of the methodology is supported by some practical examples.

Vorheriger Artikel Laser direct metal deposition of variable width thin-walled structures in Inconel 718 alloy by coaxial powder feeding

Nächster Artikel Electrolytic removal of recast layers on micro-EDM microstructure surfaces

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

ABB: (2020). https://new.abb.com/

Ahmad M, Mubin O, Orlando J (2017) A systematic review of adaptivity in human-robot interaction. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1(3):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1030014 CrossRef

Aliev K, Antonelli D (2019) Analysis of cooperative industrial task execution by mobile and manipulator robots. In: Trojanowska J, Ciszak O, Machado JM, Pavlenko I (eds) Advances in manufacturing II. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 248–260

Arai T, Kato R, Fujita M (2010) Assessment of operator stress induced by robot collaboration in assembly. CIRP Ann 59(1):5–8CrossRef

Argall B, Chernova S, Veloso M, Browning B (2009) A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot Auton Syst 57(5):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024 CrossRef

Astrom KJ, Wittenmark B (1994) Adaptive control, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., BostonMATH

Bandari YK, Williams SW, Ding J, Martina F (2015) Additive manufacture of large structures: robotic or cnc systems?. In: Proceedings of the 26th international solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX, USA, pp 12–14

Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 24(6):574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776 CrossRef

Bauer A, Wollherr D, Buss M (2008) Human–robot collaboration: a survey. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 05:47–66. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843608001303 CrossRef

10.

Beer JM, Fisk AD, Rogers WA (2014) Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(2):74–99. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer CrossRef

11.

Biggs G, MacDonald B (2003) A survey of robot programming systems. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on robotics and automation, pp 1–3

12.

Bluethmann W, Ambrose R, Diftler M, Askew S, Huber E, Goza M, Rehnmark F, Lovchik C, Magruder D (2003) Robonaut: a robot designed to work with humans in space. Auton Robot 14(2):179–197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022231703061 CrossRefMATH

13.

Bradshaw JM, Feltovich PJ, Jung H, Kulkarni S, Taysom W, Uszok A (2004) Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction. In: Nickles M, Rovatsos M, Weiss G (eds) Agents and computational autonomy, lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin , pp 17–39

14.

Bröhl C, Nelles J, Brandl C, Mertens A, Schlick CM (2016) TAM reloaded: a technology acceptance model for human-robot cooperation in production systems. In: Stephanidis C (ed) HCI international 2016 – Posters’ Extended Abstracts, vol 617. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 97–103

15.

Brooke J (1996) SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan P, Thomas B, Weerdmeester B, McClelland I (eds) Usability evaluation in industry, chap. 21. CRC Press, London, pp 189–194

16.

Bruno G, Antonelli D (2018) Dynamic task classification and assignment for the management of human-robot collaborative teams in workcells. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 98(9-12):2415–2427CrossRef

17.

BS 4778-3.1:1991: Quality vocabulary. availability, reliability and maintainability terms. Guide to concepts and related definitions. Standard BS 4778-3.1:1991, British Standards Institution, London, UK (1991)

18.

BS 8611:2016: Robots and robotic devices. guide to the ethical design and application of robots and robotic systems. Standard BS 8611:2016, British Standards Institution, London, UK (2016)

19.

Campana JR, Quaresma M (2017) The importance of specific usability guidelines for robot user interfaces. In: Marcus A, Wang W (eds) Design, user experience, and usability: designing pleasurable experiences, lecture notes in computer science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58637-3_37

20.

Charalambous G, Fletcher S, Webb P (2015) Identifying the key organisational human factors for introducing human-robot collaboration in industry: an exploratory study. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 81(9-12):2143–2155CrossRef

21.

Charalambous G, Fletcher S, Webb P (2016) The development of a scale to evaluate trust in industrial human-robot collaboration. International Journal of Social Robotics 8(2):193–209CrossRef

22.

Charalambous G, Fletcher SR, Webb P (2017) The development of a human factors readiness level tool for implementing industrial human-robot collaboration. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 91(5-8):2465–2475CrossRef

23.

Colgate JE, Wannasuphoprasit W, Peshkin MA (1996) Cobots: robots for collaboration with human operators. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ASME dynamic systems and control division, DSC, 1996-8, vol 58. ASME, New York, pp 433–439

24.

Corrales JA, Candelas FA, Torres F (2011) Safe human–robot interaction based on dynamic sphere-swept line bounding volumes. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(1):177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.07.005 CrossRef

25.

Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 CrossRef

26.

De Santis A, Siciliano B, De Luca A, Bicchi A (2008) An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mech Mach Theory 43(3):253–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.003 CrossRefMATH

27.

Dedeke A (2017) Cybersecurity framework adoption: using capability levels for implementation tiers and profiles. IEEE Security Privacy 15(5):47–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.3681063 CrossRef

28.

Dubowsky S, Genot F, Godding S, Kozono H, Skwersky A, Yu H, Yu LS (2000) PAMM- a robotic aid to the elderly for mobility assistance and monitoring: a helping-hand for the elderly. In: Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International conference on robotics and automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), vol 1. IEEE, pp 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2000.844114

29.

Eimontaite I, Gwilt I, Cameron D, Aitken JM, Rolph J, Mokaram S, Law J (2019) Language-free graphical signage improves human performance and reduces anxiety when working collaboratively with robots. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 100(1-4):55–73CrossRef

30.

Endsley MR, Kaber DB (1999) Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42(3):462–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185595 CrossRef

31.

Fondazione Ergo: EAWS website (2019). http://www.eaws.it

32.

Franceschini F, Galetto M, Maisano D (2019) Designing performance measurement systems: theory and practice of key performance indicators. Management for professionals. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01192-5 CrossRef

33.

Gervasi R, Mastrogiacomo L, Franceschini F (2019) Towards the definition of a human-robot collaboration scale. In: Bini M, Amenta P, D’Ambra A, Camminatiello I (eds) Statistical methods for service quality evaluation - book of short papers of IES 2019, Rome, Italy, July 4-5. Cuzzolin, Italy, pp 75–80

34.

Goodrich MA, Schultz AC (2007) Human-robot interaction: a survey Foundations and trends in human-computer interaction, vol 1. Now, BostonCrossRef

35.

Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Advances in psychology, human mental workload, vol 52, pp 139–183, North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

36.

Huang HM, Messina E, Wade R, English R, Novak B, Albus J (2004) Autonomy measures for robots. In: Proceedings of the international mechanical engineering congress. ASME, Anaheim, pp 1241–1247. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2004-61812

37.

Ikuta K, Ishii H, Nokata M (2003) Safety evaluation method of design and control for human-care robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research 22(5):281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364903022005001 CrossRef

38.

ISO 10218-2:2011: robots and robotic devices – safety requirements for industrial robots – Part 2: robot systems and integration. Standard ISO 10218-2:2011, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2011). https://www.iso.org/standard/41571.html

39.

ISO 12100:2010: Safety of machinery – general principles for design – risk assessment and risk reduction. Standard ISO 12100:2010, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2010). https://www.iso.org/standard/51528.html

40.

ISO 26800:2011: Ergonomics - general approach, principles and concepts. Standard ISO 26800:2011, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2011). https://www.iso.org/standard/42885.html

41.

ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 11: usability: definitions and concepts. Standard ISO 9241-11:2018, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html

42.

ISO/TR 14121-2:2012: Safety of machinery – risk assessment – part 2: practical guidance and examples of methods. Standard ISO/TR 14121-2:2012, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2012). https://www.iso.org/standard/57180.html

43.

ISO/TS 15066:2016: Robots and robotic devices – collaborative robots. Standard ISO/TS 15066:2016, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2016). https://www.iso.org/standard/62996.html

44.

Kozar O (2010) Towards better group work: seeing the difference between cooperation and collaboration. In: English teaching forum. ERIC, vol 48, pp 16–23

45.

Kragic D, Gustafson J, Karaoguz H, Jensfelt P, Krug R (2018) Interactive, collaborative robots: challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh international joint conference on artificial intelligence. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Stockholm, pp 18–25

46.

Krüger J, Lien TK, Verl A (2009) Cooperation of human and machines in assembly lines. CIRP Ann 58(2):628–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.009 CrossRef

47.

Krüger J, Nickolay B, Heyer P, Seliger G (2005) Image based 3d surveillance for flexible man-robot-cooperation. CIRP Ann 54(1):19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60040-7 CrossRef

48.

Krüger M, Wiebel CB, Wersing H (2017) From tools towards cooperative assistants. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on human agent interaction - HAI ’17. ACM Press, Bielefeld, pp 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125753

49.

KUKA: (2020). https://www.kuka.com/

50.

Kurose JF, Ross KW (2013) Computer networking: a top-down approach, 6th edn. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River

51.

Lindblom J, Wang W (2018) Towards an evaluation framework of safety, trust, and operator experience in different demonstrators of human-robot collaboration. In: Case K, Thorvald P (eds) Advances in manufacturing technology XXXII, No 8. IOS Press, pp 145–150. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-902-7-145

52.

Mastrogiacomo L, Barravecchia F, Franceschini F (2018) Definition of a conceptual scale of servitization: proposal and preliminary results CIRP. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.11.003

53.

Mateus JC, Claeys D, Limère V, Cottyn J, Aghezzaf EH (2019) A structured methodology for the design of a human-robot collaborative assembly workplace. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102(5-8):2663–2681CrossRef

54.

Maurtua I, Ibarguren A, Kildal J, Susperregi L, Sierra B (2017) Human-robot collaboration in industrial applications: safety, interaction and trust. Int J Adv Robot Syst 14(4):1–10. 10.1177/1729881417716010CrossRef

55.

McInnerney JM, Roberts TS (2004) Collaborative or cooperative learning? In: Roberts TS (ed) Online collaborative learning: theory and practice, chap. 10. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, pp 203–214

56.

Nelles J, Kwee-Meier ST, Mertens A (2019) Evaluation metrics regarding human well-being and system performance in human-robot interaction – a literature review. In: Bagnara S, Tartaglia R, Albolino S, Alexander T, Fujita Y (eds) Proceedings of the 20th congress of the international ergonomics association (IEA 2018), vol. 825. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 124–135

57.

Neto P, Simão M, Mendes N, Safeea M (2019) Gesture-based human-robot interaction for human assistance in manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 101(1-4):119–135CrossRef

58.

NIST: Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity. Tech. rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.04162018

59.

Papanastasiou S, Kousi N, Karagiannis P, Gkournelos C, Papavasileiou A, Dimoulas K, Baris K, Koukas S, Michalos G, Makris S (2019) Towards seamless human robot collaboration: integrating multimodal interaction. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

60.

Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, Roy N, Thrun S (2003) Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: challenges and results. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00381-0 CrossRefMATH

61.

Priyadarshini I (2018) Cyber security risks in robotics. In: USA IRMA (ed) Cyber security and threats: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, chap. 61. Hershey, IGI Global, pp 1235–1250. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5634-3.ch061

62.

Raibulet C (2008) Facets of Adaptivity. In: Morrison R., Balasubramaniam D., Falkner K. (eds) Software architecture, lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88030-1_33

63.

Rethink Robotics: (2020). urlhttps://www.rethinkrobotics.com/

64.

Roschelle J, Teasley SD (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley C (ed) Computer supported collaborative learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–97

65.

Rozo L, Calinon S, Caldwell DG, Jimenez P, Torras C (2016) Learning physical collaborative robot behaviors from human demonstrations. IEEE Trans Robot 32(3):513–527CrossRef

66.

Sauppè A, Mutlu B (2015) The social impact of a robot co-worker in industrial settings. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’15. ACM Press, Seoul, pp 3613–3622

67.

Schaub K, Caragnano G, Britzke B, Bruder R (2013) The European assembly worksheet. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 14(6):616–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2012.678283 CrossRef

68.

Schmidtler J, Körber M, Bengler K (2016) A trouble shared is a trouble halved — usability measures for human-robot collaboration. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), pp 000217–000222. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844244

69.

Scholtz J (2003) Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174284

70.

Sheridan TB, Verplank WL (1978) Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Tech. rep. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Man-Machine Systems Lab

71.

Smith KA (1995) Cooperative learning: effective teamwork for engineering classrooms. In: Proceedings frontiers in education 1995 25th annual conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century, vol 1. IEEE, pp 2b5.13–2b5.18

72.

Spenko M, Yu H, Dubowsky S (2006) Robotic personal aids for mobility and monitoring for the elderly. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14(3):344–351. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881534 CrossRef

73.

Stanton NA (2006) Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics 37(1):55–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003 CrossRef

74.

Tan JTC, Duan F, Zhang Y, Watanabe K, Kato R, Arai T (2009) Human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: design and development. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, St. Louis, pp 29–34

75.

Thrun S (2004) Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 19(1):9–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_2 CrossRef

76.

Tsarouchi P, Makris S, Chryssolouris G (2016) Human-robot interaction review and challenges on task planning and programming. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(8):916–931CrossRef

77.

Universal Robots: Collaborative robotic automation | Cobots from Universal Robots (2020). https://www.universal-robots.com/

78.

Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39(2):273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x CrossRef

79.

Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 CrossRef

80.

Veruggio G (2006) The EURON roboethics roadmap. In: 2006 6Th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots. IEEE, University of Genova, Genova, pp 612–617

81.

Wang L (2015) Collaborative robot monitoring and control for enhanced sustainability. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 81(9):1433–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4864-6 CrossRef

82.

Wang P, Zhang S, Bai X, Billinghurst M, He W, Sun M, Chen Y, Lv H, Ji H (2019) 2.5DHANDS: a gesture-based MR remote collaborative platform. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102(5-8):1339–1353CrossRef

83.

Wang Y, Zhang F (eds) (2017) Trends in control and decision-making for human–robot collaboration systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham

84.

Yanco HA, Drury J (2004) Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 3, pp 2841–2846. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400763

85.

Yu H, Spenko M, Dubowsky S (2003) An adaptive shared control system for an intelligent mobility aid for the elderly. Auton Robot 15(1):53–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024488717009 CrossRef

Titel: A conceptual framework to evaluate human-robot collaboration
verfasst von: Riccardo Gervasi
Luca Mastrogiacomo
Fiorenzo Franceschini
Publikationsdatum: 23.05.2020
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05363-1

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Simulation of micro-milling Inconel 718 considering scale effect

Tensile and flexural properties of polymer composites reinforced by flax, jute and sisal fibres

Effect of temperature and friction on necking and thickening for 5A02 aluminum alloy thin-walled tube in differential temperature extrusion

Effect of additive manufactured lattice defects on mechanical properties: an automated method for the enhancement of lattice geometry

Microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel processed by different SLM devices

Investigation of the microstructure evolution and properties of A1050 aluminum alloy during radial-shear rolling using FEM analysis

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten