Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 2/2022

01-08-2022 | Original Research

An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Comparative Female Disadvantage

Authors: Satya R. Chakravarty, Nachiketa Chattopadhyay, Conchita D’Ambrosio

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Female comparative disadvantage refers to the mismatch of the female with respect to achievements in different dimensions of human well-being in comparison with the corresponding achievements of the male. This paper axiomatically derives a general family of female comparative disadvantage indicators which has very important policy implications. The axioms employed are shown to be ‘independent’. An empirical illustration of the general index is provided using the UNDP data on mean years of schooling, life expectancy at birth and gross national income per capita in 2018. Results show that female comparative disadvantage is not necessarily related to standard measures of human development, such as the HDI, and is present even in countries reaching very high human development. The factor where policy intervention is needed the most is income.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The strong version of the poverty axiom was considered also by Tsui (2002).
 
2
Ravallion (2012) made an excellent discussion along this line.
 
Literature
go back to reference Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487.CrossRef Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487.CrossRef
go back to reference Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Anand, S. (2018). Recasting human development measures. Discussion Paper, UNDP. Anand, S. (2018). Recasting human development measures. Discussion Paper, UNDP.
go back to reference Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1995). Gender inequality in human development: Theories and measurement. In UNDP, Background papers: Human Development Report1995, United Nations Development Programme, New York, 1996, pp. 1–19. [Previously published in August 1995 as HDRO Occasional Paper 19 for Human Development Report 1995.] Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1995). Gender inequality in human development: Theories and measurement. In UNDP, Background papers: Human Development Report1995, United Nations Development Programme, New York, 1996, pp. 1–19. [Previously published in August 1995 as HDRO Occasional Paper 19 for Human Development Report 1995.]
go back to reference Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.CrossRef Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Chakravarty, S. R. (1983). A new index of poverty. Mathematical Social Sciences, 6, 307–313.CrossRef Chakravarty, S. R. (1983). A new index of poverty. Mathematical Social Sciences, 6, 307–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). A generalized human development index. Review of Development Economics, 7, 99–114.CrossRef Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). A generalized human development index. Review of Development Economics, 7, 99–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Chakravarty, S. R. (2011). A reconsideration of the tradeoffs in the new human development index. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 471–474.CrossRef Chakravarty, S. R. (2011). A reconsideration of the tradeoffs in the new human development index. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 471–474.CrossRef
go back to reference Chakravarty, S. R. (2018). Analyzing multidimensional wellbeing: A quantitative approach. Wiley. Chakravarty, S. R. (2018). Analyzing multidimensional wellbeing: A quantitative approach. Wiley.
go back to reference Decancq, K., & Lugo, M. A. (2012). Inequality of well-being: A multidimensional approach. Economica, 79, 721–746. Decancq, K., & Lugo, M. A. (2012). Inequality of well-being: A multidimensional approach. Economica, 79, 721–746.
go back to reference Dijkstra, A. G., & Hanmer, L. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender inequality: Toward an alternative to the UNDP gender-related development index. Feminist Economics, 6, 41–75.CrossRef Dijkstra, A. G., & Hanmer, L. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender inequality: Toward an alternative to the UNDP gender-related development index. Feminist Economics, 6, 41–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Foster, J. E., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 42, 761–766.CrossRef Foster, J. E., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 42, 761–766.CrossRef
go back to reference Gajdos, T., & Weymark, J. A. (2005). Multidimensional generalized Gini indices. Economic Theory, 26, 471–496.CrossRef Gajdos, T., & Weymark, J. A. (2005). Multidimensional generalized Gini indices. Economic Theory, 26, 471–496.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, J. L. W. V. (1906). Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes. Acta Mathematica, 30, 175–193.CrossRef Jensen, J. L. W. V. (1906). Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes. Acta Mathematica, 30, 175–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Kakwani, N. C. (1980). On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica, 48, 437–444.CrossRef Kakwani, N. C. (1980). On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica, 48, 437–444.CrossRef
go back to reference Klasen, S., & Schüler, D. (2011). Reforming the gender-related index and the gender empowerment measure: Implementing some specific proposals. Feminist Economics, 17, 1–30.CrossRef Klasen, S., & Schüler, D. (2011). Reforming the gender-related index and the gender empowerment measure: Implementing some specific proposals. Feminist Economics, 17, 1–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Kolm, S. C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1–13.CrossRef Kolm, S. C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Lasso de la Vega, M. C., & Urrutia, A. M. (2012). A note on multidimensional distribution-sensitive poverty axioms. Research on Economic Inequality, 20, 161–173.CrossRef Lasso de la Vega, M. C., & Urrutia, A. M. (2012). A note on multidimensional distribution-sensitive poverty axioms. Research on Economic Inequality, 20, 161–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Niculescu, C. P., & Persson, L.-E. (2006). Convex functions on intervals. In Convex functions and their applications: A contemporary approach, CMSBM (pp. 7–64). Springer. Niculescu, C. P., & Persson, L.-E. (2006). Convex functions on intervals. In Convex functions and their applications: A contemporary approach, CMSBM (pp. 7–64). Springer.
go back to reference Permanyer, I. (2010). The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: Continuing the debate. Social Indicators Research, 95, 181–198.CrossRef Permanyer, I. (2010). The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: Continuing the debate. Social Indicators Research, 95, 181–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Permanyer, I. (2013). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s gender inequality index. Feminist Economics, 19, 1–32.CrossRef Permanyer, I. (2013). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s gender inequality index. Feminist Economics, 19, 1–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Ponthieux, S., & Meurs, D. (2015). Gender inequality. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 981–1146). Elsevier. Ponthieux, S., & Meurs, D. (2015). Gender inequality. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 981–1146). Elsevier.
go back to reference Ravallion, M. (2012). Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Journal of Development Economics, 99, 201–209.CrossRef Ravallion, M. (2012). Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Journal of Development Economics, 99, 201–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Schüler, D. (2006). The uses and misuses of the gender-related development index and gender empowerment measure: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Development, 7, 161–181.CrossRef Schüler, D. (2006). The uses and misuses of the gender-related development index and gender empowerment measure: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Development, 7, 161–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44, 219–231.CrossRef Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44, 219–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP.
go back to reference Tsui, K.-Y. (1998). Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalized entropy measures: An axiomatic derivation. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 145–157.CrossRef Tsui, K.-Y. (1998). Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalized entropy measures: An axiomatic derivation. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 145–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Tsui, K.-Y. (2002). Multidimensional poverty indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 69–93.CrossRef Tsui, K.-Y. (2002). Multidimensional poverty indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 69–93.CrossRef
go back to reference UNDP. (2010). Human development report 2010—20th anniversary edition. The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. (2010). Human development report 2010—20th anniversary edition. The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. United Nations Development Programme.
go back to reference UNDP. (2015). Human development report. United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. (2015). Human development report. United Nations Development Programme.
Metadata
Title
An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Comparative Female Disadvantage
Authors
Satya R. Chakravarty
Nachiketa Chattopadhyay
Conchita D’Ambrosio
Publication date
01-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02970-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Social Indicators Research 2/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner