Top

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Published in:

18-11-2021 | Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

An Effective Controller Design Approach for Magnetic Levitation System Using Novel Improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization

Authors: Serdar Ekinci, Davut Izci, Murat Kayri

Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Issue 8/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the development of a novel metaheuristic algorithm which has an enhanced diversification and intensification features and aims to construct an efficient mechanism via the developed algorithm to control a magnetic object suspension. Manta ray foraging optimization (MRFO) algorithm together with generalized opposition-based learning (GOBL) technique and Nelder–Mead (NM) simplex search method is used to define the general frame of the developed algorithm. The developed novel algorithm (Ob-MRFONM) employs the NM method for better intensification whereas integrates the GOBL technique for better diversification. The constructed Ob-MRFONM algorithm is confirmed to have enhanced capabilities via evaluations against well-known unimodal and multimodal benchmark functions. The developed algorithm is also utilized to reach optimum values of a real PID plus second-order derivative (PIDD²) controller employed in a magnetic object suspension system to demonstrate the capability of the Ob-MRFONM algorithm for such a complex real-world engineering problem. It is worth noting that this paper is the first report in the literature that demonstrates the application of a real PIDD² controller in a magnetic object suspension system. To reach better capability, a new objective function is used for minimization. Then, the proposed approach is comparatively evaluated in terms of statistical and nonparametric statistical analysis, convergence, transient response, disturbance rejection, controller effort and effects of the noise signal. The demonstrated results also confirm the highly competitive capability of the proposed algorithm for the complex magnetic object suspension system. The nonlinear model of the system is also used in this study in order to validate the linearized model.

previous article Apply Ordinal Optimization to Optimize the Job-Shop Scheduling Under Uncertain Processing Times

next article Solving Graph Coloring Problem Using Divide and Conquer-Based Turbulent Particle Swarm Optimization

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Yadav, S.; Verma, S.K.; Nagar, S.K.: Optimized PID Controller for magnetic levitation system. IFAC-PapersOnline 49, 778–782 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.03.151CrossRef

García-Gutiérrez, G.; Arcos-Aviles, D.; Carrera, E.V.; Guinjoan, F.; Motoasca, E.; Ayala, P.; Ibarra, A.: Fuzzy logic controller parameter optimization using metaheuristic cuckoo search algorithm for a magnetic levitation system. Appl. Sci. 9, 2458 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122458CrossRef

Demirören, A.; Ekinci, S.; Hekimoğlu, B.; Izci, D.: Opposition-based artificial electric field algorithm and its application to FOPID controller design for unstable magnetic ball suspension system. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 24, 469–479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.08.001CrossRef

Sadek, U.; Sarjaš, A.; Chowdhury, A.; Svečko, R.: Improved adaptive fuzzy backstepping control of a magnetic levitation system based on symbiotic organism search. Appl. Soft Comput. 56, 19–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.02.032CrossRef

Yadav, S.; Verma, S.K.; Nagar, S.K.: Performance enhancement of magnetic levitation system using teaching learning based optimization. Alexandria Eng. J. 57, 2427–2433 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.08.016CrossRef

Mughees, A.; Mohsin, S.A.: Design and control of magnetic levitation system by optimizing fractional order pid controller using ant colony optimization algorithm. IEEE Access. 8, 116704–116723 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004025CrossRef

Verma, S.K.; Yadav, S.; Nagar, S.K.: Optimization of fractional order PID controller using grey wolf optimizer. J. Control Autom. Electr. Syst. 28, 314–322 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-017-0305-3CrossRef

Pradhan, R.; Majhi, S.K.; Pradhan, J.K.; Pati, B.B.: Optimal fractional order PID controller design using ant lion optimizer. Ain Shams Eng. J. 11, 281–291 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.10.005CrossRef

Sahib, M.A.: A novel optimal PID plus second order derivative controller for AVR system. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 18, 194–206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2014.11.006CrossRef

10.

Seul, J.; Dorf, R.C.: Analytic PIDA controller design technique for a third order system. In: Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. pp. 2513–2518. IEEE (1996)

11.

Kumar, M.; Hote, Y.V.: Real-time performance analysis of PIDD2 controller for nonlinear twin rotor TITO aerodynamical system. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 101, 55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01322-4CrossRef

12.

Raju, M.; Saikia, L.C.; Sinha, N.: Automatic generation control of a multi-area system using ant lion optimizer algorithm based PID plus second order derivative controller. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 80, 52–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.01.037CrossRef

13.

Kumar, M.; Hote, Y.V.: Robust PIDD2 controller design for perturbed load frequency control of an interconnected time-delayed power systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 29, 2662 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2020.3043447CrossRef

14.

Mokeddem, D.; Mirjalili, S.: Improved whale optimization algorithm applied to design PID plus second-order derivative controller for automatic voltage regulator system. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 43, 541–552 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2020.1771205CrossRef

15.

Kumar, M.; Hote, Y.V.: Maximum sensitivity-constrained coefficient diagram method-based PIDA controller design: application for load frequency control of an isolated microgrid. Electr. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01226-4CrossRef

16.

Jaradat, M.A.; Sawaqed, L.S.; Alzgool, M.M.: Optimization of PIDD2-FLC for blood glucose level using particle swarm optimization with linearly decreasing weight. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 59, 101922 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101922CrossRef

17.

Ahmad, I.; Shahzad, M.; Palensky, P.: Optimal PID control of magnetic levitation system using genetic algorithm. In: 2014 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON). pp. 1429–1433. IEEE (2014)

18.

Ozaydin, C.; Zeynelgil, H.L.; Ekinci, S.; Hekimoglu, B.: PID controller design based on sine cosine algorithm for magnetic ball suspension system. In: 2019 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium, IDAP 2019. pp. 1–7 (2019)

19.

Bauer, W.; Baranowski, J.: Fractional PIλD controller design for a magnetic levitation system. Electronics 9, 2135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122135CrossRef

20.

Ekinci, S.; Demiroren, A.; Hekimoglu, B.; Eker, E.: Performance enhancement of magnetic ball suspension system using hybrid whale optimization algorithm with simulated annealing. In: 3rd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies, ISMSIT 2019 - Proceedings. pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

21.

Ataşlar-Ayyıldız, B.; Karahan, O.: Design of a MAGLEV system with PID based fuzzy control using CS algorithm. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 20, 5–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2020-0037CrossRef

22.

Abbas, N.H.: Tuning of different controlling techniques for magnetic suspending system using an improved bat algorithm. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 10, 2402–2415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i3.pp2402-2415CrossRef

23.

Varshney, A., Bhushan, B.: Trajectory tracking and ball position control of magnetic levitation system using swarm intelligence technique. In: 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC). pp. 29–35 (2020)

24.

Roy, P.; Borah, M.; Majhi, L.; Singh, N.: Design and implementation of FOPID controllers by PSO, GSA and PSOGSA for MagLev system. In: 2015 International Symposium on Advanced Computing and Communication, ISACC 2015. pp. 10–15 (2016)

25.

Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.: Manta ray foraging optimization: an effective bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103300CrossRef

26.

El-Hameed, M.A.; Elkholy, M.M.; El-Fergany, A.A.: Three-diode model for characterization of industrial solar generating units using manta-rays foraging optimizer: analysis and validations. Energy Convers. Manag. 219, 113048 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113048CrossRef

27.

Shaheen, A.M.; Ginidi, A.R.; El-Sehiemy, R.A.; Ghoneim, S.S.M.: Economic power and heat dispatch in cogeneration energy systems using manta ray foraging optimizer. IEEE Access 8, 208281–208295 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038740CrossRef

28.

Fathy, A.; Rezk, H.; Yousri, D.: A robust global MPPT to mitigate partial shading of triple-junction solar cell-based system using manta ray foraging optimization algorithm. Sol. Energy 207, 305–316 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.108CrossRef

29.

Turgut, O.E.: A novel chaotic manta-ray foraging optimization algorithm for thermo-economic design optimization of an air-fin cooler. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04013-1CrossRef

30.

Ghosh, K.K.; Guha, R.; Bera, S.K.; Kumar, N.; Sarkar, R.: S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary Manta ray foraging optimization in feature selection problem. Neural Comput. Appl. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05560-9CrossRef

31.

Izci, D.; Ekinci, S.; Eker, E.; Kayri, M.: Improved manta ray foraging optimization using opposition-based learning for optimization problems. In: 2020 International Congress on Human–Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020)

32.

Nelder, J.A.; Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308–313 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

33.

Rajan, A.; Malakar, T.: Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder–Mead simplex based firefly algorithm. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 66, 9–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.041CrossRef

34.

Xu, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.: Parameter estimation for chaotic systems via a hybrid flower pollination algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 30, 2607–2623 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2890-2CrossRef

35.

Xu, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.: Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using eagle strategy based on JAYA algorithm and Nelder–Mead simplex method. Energy 173, 457–467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.106CrossRef

36.

Izci, D.; Ekinci, S.; Orenc, S.; Demiroren, A.: Improved artificial electric field algorithm using Nelder–Mead simplex method for optimization problems. In: 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT). pp. 1–5. IEEE (2020)

37.

Abdel-Basset, M.; Mohamed, R.; Mirjalili, S.: A novel whale optimization algorithm integrated with Nelder–Mead simplex for multi-objective optimization problems. Knowledge-Based Syst. 212, 106619 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106619CrossRef

38.

Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Rahnamayan, S.; Liu, Y.; Ventresca, M.: Enhancing particle swarm optimization using generalized opposition-based learning. Inf. Sci. (Ny) 181, 4699–4714 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.03.016MathSciNetCrossRef

39.

Tizhoosh, H.R.: Opposition-based learning: a new scheme for machine intelligence. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC’06). pp. 695–701. IEEE (2005)

40.

Yu, S.; Zhu, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, D.: Enhancing firefly algorithm using generalized opposition-based learning. Computing 97, 741–754 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-015-0456-7MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

41.

Jain, P.; Saxena, A.: An opposition theory enabled moth flame optimizer for strategic bidding in uniform spot energy market. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 22, 1047–1067 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.03.005CrossRef

42.

Hans, R.; Kaur, H.; Kaur, N.: Opposition-based Harris Hawks optimization algorithm for feature selection in breast mass classification. J. Interdiscip. Math. 23, 97–106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2020.1721670CrossRef

43.

Ekinci, S.; Hekimoğlu, B.; Izci, D.: Opposition based Henry gas solubility optimization as a novel algorithm for PID control of DC motor. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 24, 331–342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.08.011CrossRef

44.

Zhao, W.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.: Artificial ecosystem-based optimization: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 32, 9383–9425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04452-xCrossRef

45.

Houssein, E.H.; Saad, M.R.; Hashim, F.A.; Shaban, H.; Hassaballah, M.: Lévy flight distribution: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 94, 103731 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731CrossRef

46.

Abualigah, L.; Diabat, A.; Mirjalili, S.; Abd Elaziz, M.; Gandomi, A.H.: The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 376, 113609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113609MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

47.

Izci, D.; Ekinci, S.: Comparative performance analysis of slime mould algorithm for efficient design of proportional–integral–derivative controller. Electrica 21, 151–159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5152/electrica.2021.20077CrossRef

48.

Lagarias, J.C.; Reeds, J.A.; Wright, M.H.; Wright, P.E.: Convergence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. 9, 112–147 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496303470MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

49.

Xu, S.; Wang, Y.: Parameter estimation of photovoltaic modules using a hybrid flower pollination algorithm. Energy Convers. Manag. 144, 53–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.042CrossRef

50.

Golnaraghi, F.; Kuo, B.C.: Automatic Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education, London (2017)

51.

Kumar, M.; Hote, Y.V.: PIDD2 controller design based on internal model control approach for a non-ideal DC–DC boost converter. In: 2021 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2021)

52.

Izci, D.: Design and application of an optimally tuned PID controller for DC motor speed regulation via a novel hybrid Lévy flight distribution and Nelder–Mead algorithm. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control. 43, 3195–3211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312211019633CrossRef

Title: An Effective Controller Design Approach for Magnetic Levitation System Using Novel Improved Manta Ray Foraging Optimization
Authors: Serdar Ekinci
Davut Izci
Murat Kayri
Publication date: 18-11-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Electronic ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06321-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

A Distributed Cooperative Approach for Dynamic Target Search Using Particle Swarm Optimization with Limited Intercommunication

DRBF-DS: Double RBF Kernel-Based Deep Sampling with CNNs to Handle Complex Imbalanced Datasets

An Independent Constructive Multi-class Classification Algorithm for Predicting the Risk Level of Stress Using Multi-modal Data

Application of Mathematical Modeling in Prediction of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics

Learning Deep Pyramid-based Representations for Pansharpening

A Multi-level Correlation-Based Feature Selection for Intrusion Detection

Premium Partners