Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Political Behavior 4/2023

22-07-2022 | Original Paper

Are Republicans and Conservatives More Likely to Believe Conspiracy Theories?

Authors: Adam Enders, Christina Farhart, Joanne Miller, Joseph Uscinski, Kyle Saunders, Hugo Drochon

Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 4/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A sizable literature tracing back to Richard Hofstadter’s The Paranoid Style (1964) argues that Republicans and conservatives are more likely to believe conspiracy theories than Democrats and liberals. However, the evidence for this proposition is mixed. Since conspiracy theory beliefs are associated with dangerous orientations and behaviors, it is imperative that social scientists better understand the connection between conspiracy theories and political orientations. Employing 20 surveys of Americans from 2012 to 2021 (total n = 37,776), as well as surveys of 20 additional countries spanning six continents (total n = 26,416), we undertake an expansive investigation of the asymmetry thesis. First, we examine the relationship between beliefs in 52 conspiracy theories and both partisanship and ideology in the U.S.; this analysis is buttressed by an examination of beliefs in 11 conspiracy theories across 20 more countries. In our second test, we hold constant the content of the conspiracy theories investigated—manipulating only the partisanship of the theorized villains—to decipher whether those on the left or right are more likely to accuse political out-groups of conspiring. Finally, we inspect correlations between political orientations and the general predisposition to believe in conspiracy theories over the span of a decade. In no instance do we observe systematic evidence of a political asymmetry. Instead, the strength and direction of the relationship between political orientations and conspiricism is dependent on the characteristics of the specific conspiracy beliefs employed by researchers and the socio-political context in which those ideas are considered.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
These same mechanisms may also lead partisan subgroups (e.g., racial or religious groups comprising a party’s coalition) to adopt specific conspiracy theories (e.g., Bird and Bogart 2003); in such cases, the observed relationships are a spurious alignment of political orientations and the idiosyncratic characteristics of a given conspiracy theory in a particular context. Reported asymmetries in conspiracy theory beliefs can also be affected by measurement strategies, such as question wording (Krosnick et al., 2014; Sutton and Douglas 2020).
 
2
Data are from the following surveys: Qualtrics May 2021 (n = 2,021), Qualtrics October 2020 (n = 2,015), Qualtrics June 2020 (n = 1,040), Qualtrics March 2020 (n = 2,023), Qualtrics July 2019 (n = 2,000), CCES October 2018 (1, n = 1,000), CCES October 2018 (3, n = 1,000), CCES October 2016 (2, n = 1,000).
 
3
In Figure A1 of the appendix, we also present the proportion of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents who express belief in each conspiracy theory; this analysis demonstrates that it is proper to treat Independents as falling between Democrats and Republicans on a single left-right continuum, as the measure itself implies.
 
4
Categories (coding) are as follows: “very left-wing” (1), “fairly left-wing” (2), “slightly left-of-centre” (3), “centre” (4), “slightly right-of-centre” (5), “fairly right-wing” (6), “very right-wing” (7). “Left-wing” and “right-wing” are understood to mean the same thing––i.e., social equality and egalitarianism versus social hierarchies and order––across each of the countries we examine.
 
5
The Holocaust Denial question was not asked in Germany.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adorno, T. W. (2000). The psychological technique of Martin Luther Thomas’ radio addresses. Stanford University Press. Adorno, T. W. (2000). The psychological technique of Martin Luther Thomas’ radio addresses. Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Bump, Philip. 2021. Conspiracy theories are common on the right — but few Republicans adhere to all of them. Washington Post. Accessed July 23, 2021 Bump, Philip. 2021. Conspiracy theories are common on the right — but few Republicans adhere to all of them. Washington Post. Accessed July 23, 2021
go back to reference Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.CrossRef Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.CrossRef
go back to reference Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617746796CrossRef Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1745691617746796​CrossRef
go back to reference Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E., & Bendixen, M. (2021). Predictors of belief in conspiracy theory: The role of individual differences in schizotypal traits, paranormal beliefs, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110645CrossRef Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E., & Bendixen, M. (2021). Predictors of belief in conspiracy theory: The role of individual differences in schizotypal traits, paranormal beliefs, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110645. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​paid.​2021.​110645CrossRef
go back to reference Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 933–946.CrossRef Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 933–946.CrossRef
go back to reference Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C. A., Seelig, M. I., Wuchty, S., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Funchion, J. R. (2021). Do conspiracy beliefs form a belief system? Examining the structure and organization of conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5649CrossRef Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C. A., Seelig, M. I., Wuchty, S., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Funchion, J. R. (2021). Do conspiracy beliefs form a belief system? Examining the structure and organization of conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 255–271. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5964/​jspp.​5649CrossRef
go back to reference Farhart, C. E., Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., Suhay, E., & Barker, D. (2020). Conspiracy stress or relief? Learned helplessness and conspiratorial thinking. In D. Barker & E. Suhay (Eds.), The Politics of Truth in Polarized America (pp. 200–222). Oxford University Press. Farhart, C. E., Miller, J. M., Saunders, K. L., Suhay, E., & Barker, D. (2020). Conspiracy stress or relief? Learned helplessness and conspiratorial thinking. In D. Barker & E. Suhay (Eds.), The Politics of Truth in Polarized America (pp. 200–222). Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hofstadter, R. (1964). The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. Harvard University Press. Hofstadter, R. (1964). The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Jenson, Tom. 2013. Democrats and Republicans differ on conspiracy theory beliefs. Public Policy Polling. Accessed August 3, 2013 Jenson, Tom. 2013. Democrats and Republicans differ on conspiracy theory beliefs. Public Policy Polling. Accessed August 3, 2013
go back to reference Jolley, D., Mari, S., & Douglas, K. M. (2020a). Consequences of conspiracy theories. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (pp. 231–241). London: Routledge.CrossRef Jolley, D., Mari, S., & Douglas, K. M. (2020a). Consequences of conspiracy theories. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (pp. 231–241). London: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lowenthal, L., & Guterman, N. (1948). Prophets of deceit: A study of the techniques of the American agitator. Harper & Brothers. Lowenthal, L., & Guterman, N. (1948). Prophets of deceit: A study of the techniques of the American agitator. Harper & Brothers.
go back to reference Oliver, E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206.CrossRef Oliver, E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Uscinski, J. (2020). Conspiracy theories: A primer. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Uscinski, J. (2020). Conspiracy theories: A primer. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
go back to reference Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Funchion, J. R., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2021). American politics in two dimensions: partisan and ideological identities versus anti-establishment orientations. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12616CrossRef Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Funchion, J. R., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2021). American politics in two dimensions: partisan and ideological identities versus anti-establishment orientations. American Journal of Political Science. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ajps.​12616CrossRef
go back to reference Uscinski, J., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Uscinski, J., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Wittenberg, C., & Adam, J. B. (2020). Misinformation and its correction. In N. Persily & A. J. Berinsky (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform (p. 163). Cambridge.CrossRef Wittenberg, C., & Adam, J. B. (2020). Misinformation and its correction. In N. Persily & A. J. Berinsky (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform (p. 163). Cambridge.CrossRef
go back to reference Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Are Republicans and Conservatives More Likely to Believe Conspiracy Theories?
Authors
Adam Enders
Christina Farhart
Joanne Miller
Joseph Uscinski
Kyle Saunders
Hugo Drochon
Publication date
22-07-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Political Behavior 4/2023 Go to the issue