Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Argumentation 4/2018

27-06-2018

Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study

Authors: Chuanrui Zhang, Cihua Xu

Published in: Argumentation | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Drawing on insights from contemporary studies on conceptual metaphor and multimodal metaphor, the present study proposes a tentative analysis of multimodal metaphorical argument from the perspective of the extended theory of pragma-dialectics. A case, Liqun Commercial, is presented as an illustration. This commercial proves to use a conceptual metaphor, life is a journey, that underlies a multimodal metaphorical argument. The conceptual metaphor is highly acceptable in the cultural context of the Chinese target audience. Due to the restrictions imposed by the institutional context, the commercial tries to convince the audience by using implicit argumentative means. In this endeavor, multimodal metaphorical argument is used to enhance the commercial’s effectiveness by foregrounding through framing the aspects the protagonist desires to show and by using a strategy to evade sanctions for ignoring institutional constraints.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Garssen (2009) uses “figurative analogy” to refer to “metaphorical argument”.
 
2
The source text in Chinese is: “人生就像一场旅行,不必在乎目的地,在乎的是沿途的风景,以及看风景的心情”.
 
3
The source text in Chinese is: “让心灵去旅行”.
 
4
In this reconstruction, parentheses “( )” are used to indicate unexpressed elements and square brackets “[ ]” refer to multimodal elements, which means content is expressed via pictures, sound, gestures etc., instead of only via verbal expressions. Braces “{ }” mean that the element is expressed metaphorically.
 
Literature
go back to reference Alcolea-Banegas, Jesús. 2009. Visual arguments in film. Argumentation 23 (4): 259–275.CrossRef Alcolea-Banegas, Jesús. 2009. Visual arguments in film. Argumentation 23 (4): 259–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Aristotle. 1991. Rhetoric (trans: Lawson-Tancred, H.). London: Penguin. Aristotle. 1991. Rhetoric (trans: Lawson-Tancred, H.). London: Penguin.
go back to reference Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to An Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to An Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 2007. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation & Advocacy 43 (3–4): 103–113.CrossRef Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke. 2007. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation & Advocacy 43 (3–4): 103–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Blair, J.Anthony. 2015. Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation 29 (5): 217–233.CrossRef Blair, J.Anthony. 2015. Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation 29 (5): 217–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Boozer, Robert W., David C. Wyld, and James Grant. 1990. Using metaphor to create more effective sales messages. Journal of Services Marketing 4 (3): 63–71.CrossRef Boozer, Robert W., David C. Wyld, and James Grant. 1990. Using metaphor to create more effective sales messages. Journal of Services Marketing 4 (3): 63–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Cameron, Lynne, and Alice Deignan. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27 (4): 671–690.CrossRef Cameron, Lynne, and Alice Deignan. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27 (4): 671–690.CrossRef
go back to reference Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Dahl, John Magnus R. 2015. Visual argumentation in political advertising: A context-oriented perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (3): 286–298.CrossRef Dahl, John Magnus R. 2015. Visual argumentation in political advertising: A context-oriented perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (3): 286–298.CrossRef
go back to reference DARSAIC (Department of Advertising Regulation of State Administration for Industry & Commerce of the People’s Republic of China) [国家工商总局广告监督管理司]. 2016. Interpretation of Advertising Law of the People’s Republic of China [《中华人民共和国广告法释义》]. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House. DARSAIC (Department of Advertising Regulation of State Administration for Industry & Commerce of the People’s Republic of China) [国家工商总局广告监督管理司]. 2016. Interpretation of Advertising Law of the People’s Republic of China [《中华人民共和国广告法释义》]. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.
go back to reference Dove, Ian J. 2012. On images as evidence and arguments. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 223–238. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Dove, Ian J. 2012. On images as evidence and arguments. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 223–238. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Entman, Robert M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.CrossRef Entman, Robert M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Forceville, Charles. 1994. Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9 (1): 1–29.CrossRef Forceville, Charles. 1994. Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9 (1): 1–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Forceville, Charles. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.CrossRef Forceville, Charles. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Forceville, Charles J., and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Introduction. In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. C.J. Forceville, and E. Urios-Aparisi, 3–17. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Forceville, Charles J., and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Introduction. In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. C.J. Forceville, and E. Urios-Aparisi, 3–17. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef
go back to reference Gamson, William A. 1981. The political culture of Arab-Israeli conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 5 (2): 79–84.CrossRef Gamson, William A. 1981. The political culture of Arab-Israeli conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 5 (2): 79–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Garssen, Bart. 2009. Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 133–140. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Garssen, Bart. 2009. Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 133–140. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2006. Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language 21 (3): 434–458.CrossRef Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2006. Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language 21 (3): 434–458.CrossRef
go back to reference Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2008. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2008. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2017. Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2017. Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Goffman, Erving. 1974/1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press. Goffman, Erving. 1974/1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
go back to reference Hauser, David J., and Norbert Schwarz. 2014. The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (1): 66–77.CrossRef Hauser, David J., and Norbert Schwarz. 2014. The war on prevention: Bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (1): 66–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350.CrossRef Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2007. Visual argumentation in Scandinavian political advertising: A cognitive, contextual and reception oriented approach. Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–132.CrossRef Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2007. Visual argumentation in Scandinavian political advertising: A cognitive, contextual and reception oriented approach. Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3–4): 124–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2012. Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 239–255. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2012. Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 239–255. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2015. The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29 (2): 115–132.CrossRef Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2015. The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29 (2): 115–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lakoff, George. 1993. Metaphor and thought. In Metaphor and thought, 2nd, ed. A. Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lakoff, George. 1993. Metaphor and thought. In Metaphor and thought, 2nd, ed. A. Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lakoff, George. 1994. What is conceptual system? In The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning, ed. W. Overton, and D. Palermo, 41–90. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Lakoff, George. 1994. What is conceptual system? In The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning, ed. W. Overton, and D. Palermo, 41–90. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Liu, Xing. [刘星]. 2015. A Cognitive Study on Metaphor Clusters in Modern Chinese: From the Perspective of Access Semantics [《现代汉语隐喻簇的认知研究——接入语义学视角》]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Zhejiang University. Liu, Xing. [刘星]. 2015. A Cognitive Study on Metaphor Clusters in Modern Chinese: From the Perspective of Access Semantics [《现代汉语隐喻簇的认知研究——接入语义学视角》]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Zhejiang University.
go back to reference Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak, and James J. Lee. 2008. The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 833–838.CrossRef Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak, and James J. Lee. 2008. The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 833–838.CrossRef
go back to reference Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
go back to reference Ritchie, L.David. 2013. Metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ritchie, L.David. 2013. Metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Santibáñez, Cristián. 2010. Metaphors and argumentation: The case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (4): 973–989.CrossRef Santibáñez, Cristián. 2010. Metaphors and argumentation: The case of Chilean parliamentarian media participation. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (4): 973–989.CrossRef
go back to reference Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press. Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef
go back to reference van Eemeren, Frans H. 2017. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 7–30. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef van Eemeren, Frans H. 2017. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 7–30. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef
go back to reference van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht and Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht and Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter.
go back to reference van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference van den Hoven, Paul. 2015. Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation 28 (2): 157–176.CrossRef van den Hoven, Paul. 2015. Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation 28 (2): 157–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilson, Nicole, and Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (4): 721–731.CrossRef Wilson, Nicole, and Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (4): 721–731.CrossRef
go back to reference Xu, Cihua, and Yicheng Wu. 2014. Metaphors in the perspective of argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 62 (2): 68–76.CrossRef Xu, Cihua, and Yicheng Wu. 2014. Metaphors in the perspective of argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 62 (2): 68–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Yu, Ning. 2009. Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. C.J. Forceville, and E. Urios-Aparisi, 119–146. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Yu, Ning. 2009. Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphors and metonymies: A case study. In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. C.J. Forceville, and E. Urios-Aparisi, 119–146. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Metadata
Title
Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study
Authors
Chuanrui Zhang
Cihua Xu
Publication date
27-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Argumentation / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9455-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Argumentation 4/2018 Go to the issue