Top

Small Business Economics

Published in:

20-04-2021

Barriers to innovation and innovation performance: the mediating role of external knowledge search in emerging economies

Authors: Rui Torres de Oliveira, Simona Gentile-Lüdecke, Sandra Figueira

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 4/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Using survey data from companies located in the Wuxi (Taihu) international science park in China, we aim to analyze to what extent science park residents experience barriers to innovation and to what extent opening up the innovation process allows them to overcome constraints and increase innovation performance. Findings indicate that surveyed firms that mostly undertake incremental innovation perceive many constraints and that the depth of external knowledge search—that is, the intensity of the relationship with external sources of knowledge—significantly influences innovation performance, mediating the relationships between innovation barriers and innovation performance. Our results allow us to explain how open innovation practices can be used to mitigate existing barriers, and therefore permeate the knowledge filter, and to theorize on the importance of institutional factors for open innovation theory in emerging economies.

Plain English summary It is quality not quantity that matters! The intensity of relationships with external knowledge sources helps to mitigate innovation constraints, facilitate the flow of knowledge, and enhance innovation performance in emerging market firms. We surveyed high-tech SMEs located in the Wuxi (Taihu) international science park in China to find out to what extent external firm barriers to innovation have an impact on the innovation performance of science park residents, and how open innovation strategies affect this relationship. There are three key implications: First, for research, institutional factors need to be considered when studying open innovation, particularly in an emerging country context. Results emphasize the importance of deeper external knowledge sources as one mechanism to mitigate institutional barriers. Second, for management, we show human resource constraints are an important barrier for SMEs and managers should stimulate learning through reward systems and training that increase absorptive and innovative capacity ability. Third, for policy, we show that local officials responsible for the management of science parks in China should put more effort into providing financial support by creating specialized venture capital and a better knowledge of risk analysis from the financial system.

previous article Remittances, ethnic diversity, and entrepreneurship in developing countries

next article Are there wages from “sin”? Working conditions spillover from paying bribe in Vietnam

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

We followed Laursen and Salter (2006), who define external knowledge depth as the degree to which companies draw on different search channels as sources of knowledge that are intensively integrated into the firm’s innovation processes.

We thank one of the reviewers for pointing out this limitation.

We thank one of the reviewers for pointing out this future research avenue.

Abrami, R. M., Kirby, W. C., & McFarlan, F. W. (2014). Why China can’t innovate? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/03/why-china-cant-innovate.

Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: the knowledge filter entrepreneurship and endogenous growth. In Centre for Economic Policy Research (Ed.). London, UK.

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRef

Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of science and technology park characteristics on firms’ innovation results. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12253.CrossRef

Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905.CrossRef

Amoroso, S., & Hervás, S. F. (2019). An International Perspective on Science and Technology Parks. In S. Amoroso, A. Link, & M. Wright (Eds.), Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development. Palgrave Advances in the Economics of Innovation and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Apanasovich, N., Heras, H. A., & Parrilli, M. D. (2016). The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: the case of Belarus. Technovation, 57, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.05.001.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2013). The missing pillar: the creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9508-6.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2019). The limits to collaboration across four of the most innovative UK industries. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12353.

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity. European Economic Review, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103391.

Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86, 630–640 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216.

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37, 1697–1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.008.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Lehmann, E. E. (2020). Knowledge management and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–13.

Babbie, E. (2007). Experiments. The practice of social research (11th ed.pp. 221–242). Thomson Wadsworth.

Badawy, M. (2011). “Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?”: a perspective. Technovation, 31, 65–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.09.006.CrossRef

Balland, P. A., Rigby, D., & Boschma, R. (2015). The technological resilience of U.S. cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv007.CrossRef

Belitski, M. (2019). Innovation in Schumpeterian-type firms: knowledge collaboration or knowledge spillover? Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 15, 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000085-2.CrossRef

Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2016). What drives ICT clustering in European cities? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 430–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9422-y.CrossRef

Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Lehmann, E. E. (2019). Knowledge frontiers and boundaries in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 1–11.

Bellavista, J., & Sanz, L. (2009). Science and technology parks: habitats of innovation: introduction to special section. Science and Public Policy, 36, 499–510. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X465543.CrossRef

Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., & Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for open innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: an exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002.CrossRef

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887.CrossRef

Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34, 105–125.CrossRef

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.CrossRef

Carlsson, B., Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. B., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical view. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 1193–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp043.CrossRef

Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88.CrossRef

Cheng, F., van Oort, F., Geertman, S., & Hooimeijer, P. (2014). Science parks and the co-location of high-tech small- and medium-sized firms in China’s Shenzhen. Urban Studies, 51, 1073–1089. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013493020.CrossRef

Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560304500301.CrossRef

Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press.

Chiang, Y. H., & Hung, K. P. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40, 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00588.x.CrossRef

Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45, 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015.CrossRef

Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31, 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0.CrossRef

Colombo, M. G., Rabbiosi, L., & Reichstein, T. (2011). Organizing for external knowledge sourcing. European Management Review, 8, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01018.x.CrossRef

Cruz-González, J., López-Sáez, P., Navas-López, J. E., & Delgado-Verde, M. (2015). Open search strategies and firm performance: the different moderating role of technological environmental dynamism. Technovation, 35, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.001.CrossRef

D’Ambrosio, A., Gabriele, R., Schiavone, F., & Villasalero, M. (2017). The role of openness in explaining innovation performance in a regional context. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 389–408.CrossRef

D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy, 41, 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.008.CrossRef

Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013.CrossRef

Daily, C. (2016). Wuxi named in list of China’s top 10 smartest cities. China Daily.

Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. OUP Catalogue.

Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2016). Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition: absorptive capacity dynamics over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 57–65.CrossRef

Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2015). Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most? International Technology Transfer, 40, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9329-4.CrossRef

Ettlie, J. E., & Rosenthal, S. R. (2011). Service versus manufacturing innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00797.x.CrossRef

Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.038.CrossRef

Figlioli, A., & Porto, G. S. (2012). Financiamento de parques tecnológicos: um estudo comparativo de casos brasileiros, portugueses e espanhóis. Revista de Administração, 47, 290–306. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1040.CrossRef

Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69, 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006.CrossRef

Fu, X., Li, J., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation as a response to constraints and the moderating role of ownership. Asian Economic Papers, 13(3).

Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005.CrossRef

Gambardella, A., & Panico, C. (2014). On the management of open innovation. Research Policy, 43, 903–913.CrossRef

Gao, X., Liu, J., Chai, K. H., & Li, J. (2007). Overcoming’latecomer disadvantages’ in small and medium-sized firms: evidence from China. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 3, 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2007.015455.CrossRef

Gao, H., Hsu, P.-H., & Li, K. (2018). Innovation strategy of private firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001119.CrossRef

Garriga, H., Von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2013). How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1134–1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2049.CrossRef

Gentile-Lüdecke, S., Torres de Oliveira, R., & Paul, J. (2020). Does organizational structure facilitate inbound and outbound open innovation in SMEs? Small Business Economics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00175-4.

Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2489.CrossRef

Hadjimanolis, A. (2003). The barriers approach to innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50038-3.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25, 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.003.CrossRef

Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 716–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393655.

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.

Hölzl, W., & Janger, J. (2012). Innovation barriers across firms and countries. WIFO Working Papers.

Howells, J. R. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39, 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128354.CrossRef

Howells, J. R. (2006). Outsourcing for innovation: systems of innovation and the role of knowledge intermediaries. In M. Miozzo & D. Grimshaw (Eds.), Knowledge intensive business services: organizational forms and national institutions. Edward Elgar.

Hu, A. G. (2007). Technology parks and regional economic growth in China. Research Policy, 36(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.003.CrossRef

Huang, K. F., Yu, C. M. J., & Seetoo, D. H. (2012). Firm innovation in policy-driven parks and spontaneous clusters: the smaller firm the better? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 715–731.CrossRef

Jones, L., & Zou, Y. (2017). Rethinking the role of state-owned enterprises in China’s rise. New Political Economy, 22, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1321625.CrossRef

Kafouros, M. I., & Forsans, N. (2012). The role of open innovation in emerging economies: do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others? Journal of World Business, 47, 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.004.CrossRef

Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20.CrossRef

Ketels, C. H., & Memedovic, O. (2008). From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2008.019979.CrossRef

Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 30, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00563.x.CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), The Sage handbook of innovation in social research methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261.n31.

Larsen, P., & Lewis, A. (2007). How award-winning SMEs manage the barriers to innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00428.x.CrossRef

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507.CrossRef

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43, 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004.CrossRef

Lopez-Vega, H., Tell, F., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2016). Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation. Research Policy, 45, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.003.CrossRef

Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Vahter, P. (2014). Dynamic complementarities in innovation strategies. Research Policy, 43, 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.005.CrossRef

Macdonald, S., & Deng, Y. (2004). Science parks in china: a cautionary exploration. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2004.004923.CrossRef

Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x.CrossRef

Mahmood, I. P., & Mitchell, W. (2004). Two faces: effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Science, 50, 1348–1365 https://www.jstor.org/stable/30046179.CrossRef

Mina, A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E., & Hughes, A. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43, 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.004.CrossRef

Ng, W. K. B., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Cloodt, M., & Arentze, T. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: a typology study on science parks in Europe. Research Policy, 48(3), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004.CrossRef

Nicholls-Nixon, C. L., & Woo, C. Y. (2003). Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.329.CrossRef

OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). OECD.

Oriaifo, J., Torres de Oliveira, R., & Ellis, K. M. (2020). Going above and beyond: how intermediaries enhance change in emerging economy institutions to facilitate small to medium enterprise development. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1349.

Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 920–936 https://www.jstor.org/stable/25483310.CrossRef

Piatier, A. (1984). Barriers to innovation. London; Dover, NH: F. Pinter.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRef

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988.

Qian, H., & Jung, H. (2017). Solving the knowledge filter puzzle: absorptive capacity, entrepreneurship and regional development. Small Bus Econ, 48, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9769-y.CrossRef

Rammer, C., Kinne, J., & Blind, K. (2020). Knowledge proximity and firm innovation: a microgeographic analysis for Berlin. Urban Studies, 57, 996–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018820241.CrossRef

Redding, G., & Witt, M. A. (2009). China’s business system and its future trajectory. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9126-z.CrossRef

Roper, S., Love, J. H., & Bonner, K. (2017). Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.004.CrossRef

Salter, A., Ter Wal, A. L., Criscuolo, P., & Alexy, O. (2015). Open for ideation: individual-level openness and idea generation in R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 488–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12214.CrossRef

Sandberg, B., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2014). What makes it so difficult? A systematic review on barriers to radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.003.CrossRef

Sarkees, M., Hulland, J., & Prescott, J. (2010). Ambidextrous organizations and firm performance: the role of marketing function implementation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540903536982.CrossRef

Savitskaya, I., Salmi, P., & Torkkeli, M. (2010). Barriers to open innovation: Case China. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(4), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242010000400002.CrossRef

Scandura, A. (2016). University-industry collaboration and firm’s R&D effort. Research Policy, 45, 1907–1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.009.CrossRef

Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2018). External knowledge search for innovation: the role of firms’ innovation strategy and industry context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0090.CrossRef

Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00086-9.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: Simon and Schuster.

Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: a balanced replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00077-0.CrossRef

Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41, 537–562.CrossRef

Sutherland, D. (2005). China’s science parks: production base or a tool for institutional reform? Asia Pacific Business Review, 11, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360238052000298399.CrossRef

Thomä, J., & Bizer, K. (2013). To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector. Research Policy, 42(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.019.CrossRef

Tian, M. (2013). The birth, growth, and dynamics of innovation systems in less-favoured regions: a case study on the Optics Valley of China, Wuhan. University College London.

Torres de Oliveira, R., & Figueira, S. (2018). How China’s business system works. In G. Bonvillian (Ed.), The savvy investors guide to doing business in China (pp. 159–185). Marquette Books.

Torres de Oliveira, R., & Figueira, S. (2019). The specificities of interviewing in China. Qualitative Market Research, 21(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-11-2016-0117.CrossRef

Torres de Oliveira, R., Sahasranamam, S., Figueira, S., & Paul, J. (2019). Upgrading without formal integration in M&A: the role of social integration. Global Strategy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1358.

Torres de Oliveira, R., Verreynne, M., Figueira, S., Indulska, M., & Steen, J. (2020). How do institutional innovation systems affect open innovation? Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1775466.

Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2014). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: an international study. Small Business Economics, 42, 703–716.CrossRef

van de Vrande, V. (2013). Balancing your technology-sourcing portfolio: how sourcing mode diversity enhances innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 610–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2031.CrossRef

van de Vrande, V., & de Man, A.-P. (2011). A response to "Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?". Technovation, 31, 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.002.CrossRef

van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovations in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001.CrossRef

Vanhaverbeke, W., & Cloodt, M. (2014). Theories of the firm and open innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 256. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0014.

Vásquez-Urriago, A. R., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego Rico, A. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006.CrossRef

Verreynne, M.-L., Williams, A. M., Ritchie, B. W., Gronum, S., & Betts, K. S. (2019). Innovation diversity and uncertainty in small and medium sized tourism firms. Tourism Management, 72, 257–269 doi:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517718303005#bib35.CrossRef

Verreynne, M., Torres de Oliveira, R., Steen, J., et al. (2020). What motivates ‘free’ revealing? Measuring outbound non-pecuniary openness, innovation types and expectations of future profit growth. Scientometrics, 124, 271–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03434-4.CrossRef

Wang, C.-H., Chang, C.-H., & Shen, G. C. (2015). The effect of inbound open innovation on firm performance: evidence from high-tech industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.006.CrossRef

West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: the next decade. Elsevier.

Williams, C., Colovic, A., & Zhu, J. (2016). Foreign market knowledge, country sales breadth and innovative performance of emerging economy firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 1650059. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616500596.CrossRef

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 269–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393356.

Wright, M., Link, A. N., & Amoroso, S. (2019). Lessons learned and a future research and policy agenda on science parks. In S. Amoroso, A. Link, & M. Wright (Eds.), Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development. Palgrave Advances in the Economics of Innovation and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Yang, C.-H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J.-R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001.CrossRef

Zhang, H., & Sonobe, T. (2011). Development of science and technology parks in China, 1988–2008. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2011-6.CrossRef

Zhang, J., & Wu, F. (2006). China’s changing economic governance: administrative annexation and the reorganization of local governments in the Yangtze River Delta. Regional Studies, 40(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500449085.CrossRef

Zhang, S., Yang, D., Qiu, S., Bao, X., & Li, J. (2018). Open innovation and firm performance: evidence from the chinese mechanical manufacturing industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.004.CrossRef

Zhou, H., Yao, Y., & Chen, H. (2018). How does open innovation affect firms’ innovative performance : the roles of knowledge attributes and partner opportunism. Chinese Management Studies, 12(4), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-05-2017-0137.CrossRef

Title: Barriers to innovation and innovation performance: the mediating role of external knowledge search in emerging economies
Authors: Rui Torres de Oliveira
Simona Gentile-Lüdecke
Sandra Figueira
Publication date: 20-04-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Small Business Economics / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00491-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Soft and hard information in equity crowdfunding: network effects in the digitalization of entrepreneurial finance

Initial coin offerings, information disclosure, and fraud

Entrepreneur fund-seeking: toward a theory of funding fit in the era of equity crowdfunding

Stickiness of entrepreneurs: an exploratory study of migration in two mid-sized US cities

Who shuns entrepreneurship journals? Why? And what should we do about it?

Angel investors: the impact of regret from missed opportunities