Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 4/2012

01-12-2012

Business model innovation in entrepreneurship

Authors: Silvana Trimi, Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent

Published in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Issue 4/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to advance the understanding of emerging developments in business model design within the field of entrepreneurship. It is widely known that during the start-up process, entrepreneurs need to set up the boundaries of the business and define the product/service to offer. This is a very complex task, especially for new technology-based companies which usually require large investments and have a limited time span (avoiding product obsolescence) to turn the idea into a full-time venture. Although business model design within the entrepreneurship field is a recent topic, it is gaining a growing attention in the literature. The usefulness and predictable power of business models are expected to help entrepreneurs make more informed decisions, thus increasing the chances of success. This article first tackles the specific problems faced by new technology-based firms, linking their needs with the advantages of having a flexible and well-designed business model. Second, different innovative practices aimed at improving business model design are discussed. The paper ends with some recommendations, stressing the need for future empirical work.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Afuah, A. (2004). Business models: A strategic management approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Afuah, A. (2004). Business models: A strategic management approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2001). Internet Business Models. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2001). Internet Business Models. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of new industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of new industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
go back to reference Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493–520.CrossRef Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493–520.CrossRef
go back to reference Andersén, J. (2011). Strategic resources and firm performance. Management Decision, 49(1), 87–98.CrossRef Andersén, J. (2011). Strategic resources and firm performance. Management Decision, 49(1), 87–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Andries, P., & Debackere, K. (2007). Adaptation and performance in new businesses: Understanding the moderating effects of independence and industry. Small Business Economics, 29(1/2), 81–99.CrossRef Andries, P., & Debackere, K. (2007). Adaptation and performance in new businesses: Understanding the moderating effects of independence and industry. Small Business Economics, 29(1/2), 81–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Anthony, S. (2012). The new corporate garage (pp. 44–53). September: Harvard Business Review. Anthony, S. (2012). The new corporate garage (pp. 44–53). September: Harvard Business Review.
go back to reference Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 156–171.CrossRef Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. S. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 156–171.CrossRef
go back to reference Blank, S. (2006). The four steps to the epiphany: Successful strategies for startups that win (2nd ed.). San Francisco: CafePress.com. Blank, S. (2006). The four steps to the epiphany: Successful strategies for startups that win (2nd ed.). San Francisco: CafePress.com.
go back to reference Brettel, M., Strese, S., & Flatten, T. C. (2012). Improving the performance of business models with relationship marketing efforts – An entrepreneurial perspective. European Management Journal, 30(2), 85–98.CrossRef Brettel, M., Strese, S., & Flatten, T. C. (2012). Improving the performance of business models with relationship marketing efforts – An entrepreneurial perspective. European Management Journal, 30(2), 85–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making things click—Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 397–419.CrossRef Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making things click—Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 397–419.CrossRef
go back to reference Cantarello, S., Nosella, A., Petroni, G., & Venturini, K. (2011). External technology sourcing: evidence from design-driven innovation. Management Decision, 49(6), 962–983.CrossRef Cantarello, S., Nosella, A., Petroni, G., & Venturini, K. (2011). External technology sourcing: evidence from design-driven innovation. Management Decision, 49(6), 962–983.CrossRef
go back to reference Casadesús-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 195–215.CrossRef Casadesús-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 195–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Castrogiovanni, G. J. (1991). Environmental munificence: a theoretical assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 542–565. Castrogiovanni, G. J. (1991). Environmental munificence: a theoretical assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 542–565.
go back to reference Cavalcante, S. A., Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2011). Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 49(8), 1327–1342.CrossRef Cavalcante, S. A., Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2011). Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 49(8), 1327–1342.CrossRef
go back to reference Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Sanchez-Vidal, M. E., & Cegarra-Leiva, D. (2011). Balancing exploration and exploitation of knowledge through an unlearning context: an empirical investigation in SMEs. Management Decision, 49(7), 1099–1119.CrossRef Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Sanchez-Vidal, M. E., & Cegarra-Leiva, D. (2011). Balancing exploration and exploitation of knowledge through an unlearning context: an empirical investigation in SMEs. Management Decision, 49(7), 1099–1119.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 354–363.CrossRef Chesbrough, H. W. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 354–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of business model in capturin value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology Spin-off Companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRef Chesbrough, H. W., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of business model in capturin value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology Spin-off Companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRef
go back to reference Chilton, M. A., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2010). Adaption-innovation theory and knowledge use in organizations. Management Decision, 48(8), 1159–1180.CrossRef Chilton, M. A., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2010). Adaption-innovation theory and knowledge use in organizations. Management Decision, 48(8), 1159–1180.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. USA: Harvard Business School Press. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. USA: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does planning facilitate product development in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165–1185.CrossRef Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does planning facilitate product development in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165–1185.CrossRef
go back to reference Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 227–246.CrossRef Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 227–246.CrossRef
go back to reference Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570.CrossRef Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiet, J. O., & Patel, P. C. (2008). Forgiving business models for new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 749–761.CrossRef Fiet, J. O., & Patel, P. C. (2008). Forgiving business models for new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 749–761.CrossRef
go back to reference Fleck, D. L. (2010). Why we should dare to manage growth responsibly. Management Decision, 48(10), 1529–1538.CrossRef Fleck, D. L. (2010). Why we should dare to manage growth responsibly. Management Decision, 48(10), 1529–1538.CrossRef
go back to reference Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2008). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 459–483.CrossRef Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2008). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 459–483.CrossRef
go back to reference Fuentes Fuentes, M. M., Ruiz Arroyo, M., Bojica, A. M., & Fernández Pérez, V. (2010). Prior knowledge and social networks in the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 481–501.CrossRef Fuentes Fuentes, M. M., Ruiz Arroyo, M., Bojica, A. M., & Fernández Pérez, V. (2010). Prior knowledge and social networks in the exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 481–501.CrossRef
go back to reference Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. M. (2010). Business model innovation: general purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 262–271.CrossRef Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. M. (2010). Business model innovation: general purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 262–271.CrossRef
go back to reference Garnsey, E., Lorenzoni, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). Speciation through entrepreneurial spin-off: the Acorn-ARM story. Research Policy, 37(2), 210–224.CrossRef Garnsey, E., Lorenzoni, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). Speciation through entrepreneurial spin-off: the Acorn-ARM story. Research Policy, 37(2), 210–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenona of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706. Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenona of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.
go back to reference Gehrich, G. (2012). Built it like a startup: Lean Product Innovation. Santa Fe, CA: RSF Publishing. Gehrich, G. (2012). Built it like a startup: Lean Product Innovation. Santa Fe, CA: RSF Publishing.
go back to reference George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111.CrossRef George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Goktan, A. B., & Miles, G. (2011). Innovation speed and radicalness: are they inversely related? Management Decision, 49(4), 533–547.CrossRef Goktan, A. B., & Miles, G. (2011). Innovation speed and radicalness: are they inversely related? Management Decision, 49(4), 533–547.CrossRef
go back to reference Harms, R., Kraus, S., & Reschke, C. H. (2007). Configurations of new ventures in entrepreneurship research: contributions and research gaps. Management Research News, 30(9), 661–673.CrossRef Harms, R., Kraus, S., & Reschke, C. H. (2007). Configurations of new ventures in entrepreneurship research: contributions and research gaps. Management Research News, 30(9), 661–673.CrossRef
go back to reference Heirman, A., & Clarysse, B. (2004). How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3), 247–268.CrossRef Heirman, A., & Clarysse, B. (2004). How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3), 247–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Hormiga, E., Batista-Canino, R. M., & Sánchez-Medina, A. (2011). The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 71–92.CrossRef Hormiga, E., Batista-Canino, R. M., & Sánchez-Medina, A. (2011). The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 71–92.CrossRef
go back to reference Huarng, K. H., & Yu, T. H. K. (2011). Entrepreneurship, process innovation and value creation by a non-profit SME. Management Decision, 49(2), 284–296.CrossRef Huarng, K. H., & Yu, T. H. K. (2011). Entrepreneurship, process innovation and value creation by a non-profit SME. Management Decision, 49(2), 284–296.CrossRef
go back to reference Iebra Aizpurúa, L., Zegarra Saldaña, P. E., & Zegarra Saldaña, A. (2011). Learning for sharing: an empirical analysis of organizational learning and knowledge sharing. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 509–518.CrossRef Iebra Aizpurúa, L., Zegarra Saldaña, P. E., & Zegarra Saldaña, A. (2011). Learning for sharing: an empirical analysis of organizational learning and knowledge sharing. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(4), 509–518.CrossRef
go back to reference Jagoda, K., Maheshwari, B., & Lonseth, R. (2010). Key issues in managing technology transfer projects: experiences from a Canadian SME. Management Decision, 48(3), 366–382.CrossRef Jagoda, K., Maheshwari, B., & Lonseth, R. (2010). Key issues in managing technology transfer projects: experiences from a Canadian SME. Management Decision, 48(3), 366–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. C., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. C., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
go back to reference Klofsten, M. (1994). Technology-based firms: Critical aspects of their early development. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2(1), 535–557.CrossRef Klofsten, M. (1994). Technology-based firms: Critical aspects of their early development. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2(1), 535–557.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, S., Olson, D., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co-innovation: convergence, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817–831.CrossRef Lee, S., Olson, D., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co-innovation: convergence, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817–831.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, E., Lin, T. M. Y., & Lin, B. W. (2010). New high-tech venturing as process of resource accumulation. Management Decision, 48(8), 1230–1246.CrossRef Lin, E., Lin, T. M. Y., & Lin, B. W. (2010). New high-tech venturing as process of resource accumulation. Management Decision, 48(8), 1230–1246.CrossRef
go back to reference Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.CrossRef Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.CrossRef
go back to reference Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–93. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–93.
go back to reference Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for internet-based ecommerce. An anatomy. California Management Review, 42(4), 55–69.CrossRef Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for internet-based ecommerce. An anatomy. California Management Review, 42(4), 55–69.CrossRef
go back to reference Markides, C. (2008). Game-changing strategies: How to create new market space in established industries by breaking the rules. New York: Jossey-Bass. Markides, C. (2008). Game-changing strategies: How to create new market space in established industries by breaking the rules. New York: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Maurya, A. (2012). Running Lean (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc. Maurya, A. (2012). Running Lean (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
go back to reference McGrath, R. G. (2010). Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 247–261.CrossRef McGrath, R. G. (2010). Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 247–261.CrossRef
go back to reference Miles, R. E., Miles, G., & Snow, C. C. (2006). Collaborative entrepreneurship: a business model for continuous innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1), 1–11.CrossRef Miles, R. E., Miles, G., & Snow, C. C. (2006). Collaborative entrepreneurship: a business model for continuous innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell, D., & Coles, C. (2003). The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 15–21.CrossRef Mitchell, D., & Coles, C. (2003). The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 15–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.CrossRef Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.CrossRef
go back to reference Mulders, M. A. W., & van den Broek, C. P. J. A. (2012). Entrepreneurial decision making and the effect on business models. Breda, The Netherlands: Avans University of Applied Sciences. Mulders, M. A. W., & van den Broek, C. P. J. A. (2012). Entrepreneurial decision making and the effect on business models. Breda, The Netherlands: Avans University of Applied Sciences.
go back to reference Nandakumar, M. K., Ghobadian, A., & O'Regan, N. (2010). Business-level strategy and performance: the moderating effects of environment and structure. Management Decision, 48(6), 907–939.CrossRef Nandakumar, M. K., Ghobadian, A., & O'Regan, N. (2010). Business-level strategy and performance: the moderating effects of environment and structure. Management Decision, 48(6), 907–939.CrossRef
go back to reference Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55–72.CrossRef Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1/2), 107–118.CrossRef Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1/2), 107–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, BA and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 1(33), 5–34.CrossRef Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, BA and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 1(33), 5–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Ordanini, A., Micelli, S., & Di Maria, E. (2004). Failure and succés of b-to-b exchange business models: a contingent analysis of their performance. European Management Journal, 22(3), 281–289.CrossRef Ordanini, A., Micelli, S., & Di Maria, E. (2004). Failure and succés of b-to-b exchange business models: a contingent analysis of their performance. European Management Journal, 22(3), 281–289.CrossRef
go back to reference Österwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Österwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
go back to reference Österwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifiying business models; origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 1–40. Österwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifiying business models; origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 1–40.
go back to reference Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., & Kotha, S. (2003). The value relevance of network advantages: the case of e-commerce firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 135–162.CrossRef Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., & Kotha, S. (2003). The value relevance of network advantages: the case of e-commerce firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 135–162.CrossRef
go back to reference Reed, R., & Storrud-Barnes, S. F. (2010). Uncertainty, risk, and real options: who wins, who loses? Management Decision, 48(7), 1080–1089.CrossRef Reed, R., & Storrud-Barnes, S. F. (2010). Uncertainty, risk, and real options: who wins, who loses? Management Decision, 48(7), 1080–1089.CrossRef
go back to reference Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Publishing Group. Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
go back to reference Rivette, K. G., & Kline, D. (2000). Discovering new value in intellectual property. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 54–66. Rivette, K. G., & Kline, D. (2000). Discovering new value in intellectual property. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 54–66.
go back to reference Rowley, J., Baregheh, A., & Sambrook, S. (2011). Towards an innovation-type mapping tool. Management Decision, 49(1), 73–86.CrossRef Rowley, J., Baregheh, A., & Sambrook, S. (2011). Towards an innovation-type mapping tool. Management Decision, 49(1), 73–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarasvathy, S. D., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L. B. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33(2), 207–226.CrossRef Sarasvathy, S. D., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L. B. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33(2), 207–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129–149.CrossRef Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Schiavone, F. (2011). Strategic reactions to technology competition: a decision-making model. Management Decision, 49(5), 801–809.CrossRef Schiavone, F. (2011). Strategic reactions to technology competition: a decision-making model. Management Decision, 49(5), 801–809.CrossRef
go back to reference Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin.
go back to reference Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business models innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 383–407.CrossRef Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business models innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 383–407.CrossRef
go back to reference Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
go back to reference Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172–194.CrossRef Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Timmons, J. A. (1977). New Venture Creation. Boston, MA: Irwin. Timmons, J. A. (1977). New Venture Creation. Boston, MA: Irwin.
go back to reference Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667–685.CrossRef Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007). Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667–685.CrossRef
go back to reference van Riel, A. C. R., Semeijn, J., Hammedi, W., & Henseler, J. (2011). Technology-based service proposal screening and decision-making effectiveness. Management Decision, 49(5), 762–783.CrossRef van Riel, A. C. R., Semeijn, J., Hammedi, W., & Henseler, J. (2011). Technology-based service proposal screening and decision-making effectiveness. Management Decision, 49(5), 762–783.CrossRef
go back to reference Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2005). Escaping the red queen effect in competitive strategy: sense-testing business models. European Management Journal, 23(1), 37–49.CrossRef Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2005). Escaping the red queen effect in competitive strategy: sense-testing business models. European Management Journal, 23(1), 37–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolpert, J. D. (2002). Breaking out of the innovation box. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 76–83. Wolpert, J. D. (2002). Breaking out of the innovation box. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 76–83.
go back to reference Yang, T. T., & Li, C. R. (2011). Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development: the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness. Management Decision, 49(9), 1444–1470.CrossRef Yang, T. T., & Li, C. R. (2011). Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development: the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness. Management Decision, 49(9), 1444–1470.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, J., & Duan, Y. (2010). The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Management Decision, 48(6), 849–867.CrossRef Zhang, J., & Duan, Y. (2010). The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Management Decision, 48(6), 849–867.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216–226.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRef Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Business model innovation in entrepreneurship
Authors
Silvana Trimi
Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Electronic ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0234-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 4/2012 Go to the issue