Top

Small Business Economics

Published in:

27-03-2018

Business owners, employees, and firm performance

Authors: Mika Maliranta, Satu Nurmi

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 1/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The novel Finnish Longitudinal OWNer-Employer-Employee (FLOWN) database was used to analyze how the characteristics of owners and employees relate to firm performance as determined by labor productivity, survival, and employment growth. Focusing on the role of the employment history, the results show that previous experience in a high-productivity firm strongly predicts high productivity and probability of survival for the entrepreneur’s new firm. This can be interpreted as evidence of knowledge spillovers through labor mobility of both the owners and the employees. The results also show that the owner’s high education in a technical field is positively related to firm performance. Different findings for owner-entrepreneurs and pure owners suggest that the definition of entrepreneurship matters.

previous article Returns to balance in cognitive skills for the self-employed: evidence from 18 countries

next article Where is my partner? The role of gender in the formation of entrepreneurial businesses

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

The FLOWN database is available via Statistics Finland’s FIONA remote access system. The database links information on the owners of limited liability companies to their firms, with information on dividends by firm and by owner.

In other words, we measured the relative productivity level within industries classified at about two-digit industry level.

Note that productivity is estimated in log so that the percentage effect is 25.7% = exp(0.229)-1.

The estimate from the unweighted regression is 24.0% = exp(0.215)-1.

The estimate from the unweighted regression is 18.1% = exp(0.166)-1 but not statistically significant.

The estimate from the unweighted regression is 12.4% = exp(0.117)-1.

The estimate from the unweighted regression is 14.3% = exp(0.134)-1.

The estimate from the unweighted regression is 29.2% = exp(0.256)-1.

But the estimate from the unweighted regression is only 30.2% = exp(0.264)-1.

But the estimate from the unweighted regression is only 33.9% = exp(0.292)-1.

Using analytic weights is equivalent to estimating a model multiplied by the square root of w where w is the weight variable. Instead of using individual-level data, our data presents enterprise-level averages so the coefficients and covariance matrix from the transformed regression are obtained using this procedure. See more information: https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/analytical-weights-with-linear-regression/

We thank one of our anonymous referees for this suggestion.

Aghion, P., Akcigit, U. & Howitt, P. (2014). Chapter 1—What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? In A. Philippe & N. D. Steven (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. Volume 2, pp. 515–563): Elsevier.

Ali-Yrkkö, J., Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. & Ylä-Anttila, P. 2007. Family businesses and globalization in Finland. Available at SSRN 981129.

Andersson, M., Baltzopoulos, A., & Lööf, H. (2012). R&D strategies and entrepreneurial spawning. Research Policy, 41(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.005.CrossRef

Anyadike-Danes, M., Bjuggren, C.-M., Gottschalk, S., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., Maliranta, M., et al. (2015). An international cohort comparison of size effects on job growth. Small Business Economics, 44(4), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9622-0.CrossRef

Balsvik, R. (2011). Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00061.CrossRef

Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, https://doi.org/10.2307/2109594 551-559.

Berglann, H., Moen, E. R., Røed, K., & Skogstrøm, J. F. (2011). Entrepreneurship: origins and returns. Labour Economics, 18(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2010.10.002.CrossRef

Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). Management practices across firms and countries. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0077.CrossRef

Bloom, N., Sadun, R. & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Management as a technology? , Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 16–133.

Carree, M., & Klomp, L. (1996). Small business and job creation: a comment. Small Business Economics, 8(4), 317–322.CrossRef

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2.CrossRef

Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: a competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010.CrossRef

Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90013-2.CrossRef

Dahlqvist, J., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: a replication and extension of the Cooper et al. study. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/146324400363491.CrossRef

Davis, S. J. & Haltiwanger, J. 1999. Gross job flows. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Volume 3b: Elsevier.

Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J., & Schuh, S. (1996). Small business and job creation: dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts. Small Business Economics, 8(4), 297–315 http://www.jstor.org/stable/40228707.CrossRef

Davis, J. S., Haltiwanger, J., Handley, K., Jarmin, R., Lerner, J., & Miranda, J. (2014). Private equity, jobs, and productivity. American Economic Review, 104(12), 3956–3990. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.12.3956.CrossRef

Dumont, M., Rayp, G., Verschelde, M. & Merlevede, B. 2016. The contribution of start-ups and young firms to industry-level efficiency growth. Applied Economics, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1184381, 1–16.

Ehrl, P. (2014). High-wage workers and high-productivity firms—a regional view on matching in Germany. BGPE Discussion Paper, No. 149.

Elfenbein, D. W., Hamilton, B. H., & Zenger, T. R. (2010). The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Science, 56(4), 659–681. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1130.CrossRef

Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0.CrossRef

Goetz, C., Hyatt, H. R., McEntarfer, E. & Sandusky, K. 2017. The promise and potential of linked employer-employee data for entrepreneurship research. In J. Haltiwanger, E. Hurst, J. Miranda & A. Schoar (Eds.), Measuring entrepreneurial businesses: current knowledge and challenges (Vol. Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume 75, pp. 433–462): University of Chicago Press.

Haltiwanger, J. C., Lane, J. I., & Spletzer, J. R. (1999). Productivity differences across employers: the roles of employer size, age, and human capital. American Economic Review, 89(2), 94–98 http://www.jstor.org/stable/117087.CrossRef

Haltiwanger, J. C., Lane, J. I., & Spletzer, J. R. (2007). Wages, productivity, and the dynamic interaction of businesses and workers. Labour Economics, 14(3), 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.10.005.CrossRef

Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00288.CrossRef

Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., Kulick, R. & Miranda, J. 2017. High growth young firms: contribution to job, output, and productivity growth. In J. Haltiwanger, E. Hurst, J. Miranda & A. Schoar (Eds.), Measuring entrepreneurial businesses: current knowledge and challenges (pp. 11–62): University of Chicago Press (available at http://www.nber.org/chapters/c13492.pdf ).

Hyytinen, A., & Maliranta, M. (2008). When do employees leave their job for entrepreneurship? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l467-9442.2008.00522.x.CrossRef

Hyytinen, A., & Maliranta, M. (2013). Firm lifecycles and evolution of industry productivity. Research Policy, 42(5), 1080–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.008.CrossRef

Hyytinen, A., Lahtonen, J., & Pajarinen, M. (2014). Forecasting errors of new venture survival. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1187.CrossRef

Ilmakunnas, P., & Maliranta, M. (2005). Technology, labour characteristics and wage-productivity gaps. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(5), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00134.x.CrossRef

Ilmakunnas, P. & Maliranta, M. 2016. How does the age structure of worker flows affect firm performance? Journal of Productivity Analysis, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0471-5, 1–20.

Ilmakunnas, P., Maliranta, M. & Vainiomäki, J. 2001. Linked employer-employee data on Finnish plants for the analysis of productivity, wages and turnover. In T. Jensen & A. Holm (Eds.), Nordic labour market research on register data (pp. 205–246). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord 2001:593.

Kerr, W. R., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2014). Entrepreneurship as experimentation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.25.CrossRef

Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2010). Internationalization pathways of family Smes: psychic distance as a focal point. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068725.CrossRef

Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680. https://doi.org/10.1086/491605.CrossRef

Levine, R., & Rubinstein, Y. (2016). Smart and illicit: who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 963–1018. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw044.CrossRef

Lofstrom, M., Bates, T., & Parker, S. C. (2014). Why are some people more likely to become small-businesses owners than others: entrepreneurship entry and industry-specific barriers. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.004.CrossRef

Maliranta, M. & Hurri, P. (2018). Micro-level dynamics of output, employment and productivity growth: the role of high-growth firms. Unpublished manuscript, January 2018, Helsinki.

Maliranta, M. & Nurmi, S. (2004). Analyzing entrepreneurship with the Finnish linked employer-employee data Fleed. Matching and qualitative properties of the data. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), Discussion papers No. 920. Helsinki.

Maliranta, M., Mohnen, P., & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence form a linked employer-employee panel. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1161–1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp031.CrossRef

Murray, G., Hyytinen, A. & Maula, M. 2009. Growth entrepreneurship and finance. Chapters, 147–202.

Nanda, R., & Sørensen, J. B. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1179.CrossRef

Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2006). Uusyrittäjien Kasvuhakuisuus. ETLA discussion papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA).

Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P. & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2011). Omistajuuden Vaikutus Suomalaisen Työllisyyden Kasvuun Ja Pysyvyyteen. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussion Papers No. 1242.

Rocha, V., Van Praag, M., Folta, T. B. & Carneiro, A. J. M. (2016). Entrepreneurial choices of initial human capital endowments and new venture success. IZA, DP No. 9919.

Sahaym, A., Howard, M. D., Basu, S., & Boeker, W. (2016). The parent’s legacy: firm founders and technological choice. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2624–2633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.012.CrossRef

Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280.CrossRef

Stoyanov, A., & Zubanov, N. (2012). Productivity spillovers across firms through worker mobility. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.2.168.CrossRef

Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2013). Balanced skills among nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9423-2.CrossRef

Tourunen, K. & Laaksonen, S. (2009). The significance of business ownership and governance: contribution and profitability of family businesses in Finland. Unpublished manuscript, June 23 2009.

Van Biesebroeck, J. (2003). Productivity dynamics with technology choice: an application to automobile assembly. Review of Economic Studies, 70(1), 167–198 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3648615.CrossRef

Title: Business owners, employees, and firm performance
Authors: Mika Maliranta
Satu Nurmi
Publication date: 27-03-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Small Business Economics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0029-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

The financing of immigrant-owned firms in Canada

Self-employment effects on regional growth: a bigger bang for a buck?

Neither absent nor too present: the effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs

Renascence after post-mortem: the choice of accelerated repeat entrepreneurship

Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs

Geographical proximity and open innovation of SMEs in Cyprus