Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 4/2017

04-02-2017 | Original Empirical Research

Can copycat private labels improve the consumer’s shopping experience? A fluency explanation

Authors: Katie Kelting, Adam Duhachek, Kimberly Whitler

Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Issue 4/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A top priority among retailers is enhancing the consumer’s shopping experience. With the number of private label products increasing at the same time retailers are shedding slower moving products, understanding how private labels impact the consumer’s experience at the retail shelf becomes critical. While one might think that private labels, in particular those that look similar to their national brand counterparts (i.e., copycat private labels), may hinder the shopping experience by making it more difficult for consumers to choose a product, we find the exact opposite. Adopting a fluency perspective, we show that when copycat private labels are included in a shelf set, consumers with high knowledge of the category experience greater choice ease, and as a result they subsequently evaluate their chosen product more favorably. Importantly, the choice ease and evaluations of novice consumers are found to be unaffected. Consequently, this research provides insights for retailers and manufacturers on how and why copycat private labels positively impact an important aspect of the consumer’s shopping experience (i.e., choice ease).

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Consumers’ choice was examined as a covariate in the model. We first coded choice as the individual product. This was a non-significant predictor of choice ease (β = 01, p = .85). We next coded choice as a national brand (vs. CCPL). This was also a non-significant predictor of choice ease (β = .10, p = .71). Importantly, neither covariate significantly changed the interactive effect of CCPLs and knowledge on choice ease (p ≤ .05).
 
2
Across a number of studies not included here, we used several alternative measures of evaluation of choice, including consumers’ attitude and satisfaction toward the product and willingness to pay (WTP). To maintain consistency across reported studies in the final manuscript, we include the more managerially-relevant WTP as the operationalization for evaluation of choice, consistent with Lembregts and Pandelaere (2013).
 
3
Similar to Study 1, consumers’ choice was examined as a covariate in the model. Both choice as an individual product and as a national brand (vs. private label) was once again a non-significant predictor of choice ease (β = .05, p = .17, β = 41, p = .67, respectively). Importantly, neither covariate significantly changed the interactive effect of CCPLs and knowledge on choice ease (p < .05).
 
4
Although not theorized, we checked to see if CCPLs and knowledge interact and affect WTP. Specifically, we ran model 1 from PROCESS with 5000 bootstrap samples. CCPLs served as the IV, subjective knowledge of condoms served as the moderator, and WTP served as the DV. Consistent with our theorizing that WTP should only be affected through choice ease, the interaction was non-significant (β = 1.16, p = .30). Thus, model 7 is most appropriate for testing H2 (Hayes 2013; Rucker et al. 2011; Zhao et al. 2010).
 
5
The gender of the participant was examined as a covariate in the model. It was a non-significant predictor of WTP (β = −.55, p = .61), and its inclusion in the model did not change the results. For simplicity, we report the model with no covariates.
 
6
Similar to the prior studies, consumers’ choice was examined as a covariate in the model. Both choice as an individual product and as a national brand (vs. private label) was a non-significant predictor of WTP (β = −.63, p = .22, β = −2.15, p = .28, respectively). Importantly, neither covariate significantly changed the interactive effect of choice ease and knowledge on WTP (p < .05).
 
7
The majority of participants (89%+) chose a national brand, regardless of knowledge or manipulated condition.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ailawadi, K. L., & Harlam, B. (2004). An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: the role of store-brand share. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 147–165.CrossRef Ailawadi, K. L., & Harlam, B. (2004). An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: the role of store-brand share. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 147–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Ailawadi, K., & Keller, K. (2004). Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 331–342.CrossRef Ailawadi, K., & Keller, K. (2004). Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 331–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S. A. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 71–89.CrossRef Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S. A. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 71–89.CrossRef
go back to reference Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., & Neslin, S. A. (2003). Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 67, 1–17.CrossRef Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., & Neslin, S. A. (2003). Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 67, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Ailawadi, K. L., Pauwels, K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2008). Private-label use and store loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72, 19–30.CrossRef Ailawadi, K. L., Pauwels, K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2008). Private-label use and store loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72, 19–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.CrossRef Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambrosini, B. A., van Riel, A. C. R., & Semeijn, J. (2004). Consumer evaluations of store brands: effects of store image and product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(4), 247–258.CrossRef Ambrosini, B. A., van Riel, A. C. R., & Semeijn, J. (2004). Consumer evaluations of store brands: effects of store image and product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(4), 247–258.CrossRef
go back to reference Aribarg, A., Arora, N., Henderson, T., & Kim, Y. (2014). Private label imitation of a national brand: implications for consumer choice and law. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 657–675.CrossRef Aribarg, A., Arora, N., Henderson, T., & Kim, Y. (2014). Private label imitation of a national brand: implications for consumer choice and law. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 657–675.CrossRef
go back to reference Bao, Y., Bao, Y., & Sheng, S. (2011). Motivating purchase of private brands: effects of store image, product signatureness, and quality variation. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 220–226.CrossRef Bao, Y., Bao, Y., & Sheng, S. (2011). Motivating purchase of private brands: effects of store image, product signatureness, and quality variation. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 220–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Batra, R., & Sinha, I. (2000). Consumer-level factors moderating the success of private label brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175–191.CrossRef Batra, R., & Sinha, I. (2000). Consumer-level factors moderating the success of private label brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effect of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processed: a protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234–248.CrossRef Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effect of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processed: a protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234–248.CrossRef
go back to reference Bodur, H. O., Grohmann, B., & Tofighi, M. (2016). When should private label brands endorse ethical attributes? Journal of Retailing, 92(2), 204–217.CrossRef Bodur, H. O., Grohmann, B., & Tofighi, M. (2016). When should private label brands endorse ethical attributes? Journal of Retailing, 92(2), 204–217.CrossRef
go back to reference Braak, A., Dekimpe, M. G., & Geyskens, I. (2013). Retailer private-label margins: the role of supplier and quality-tier differentiation. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 86–103.CrossRef Braak, A., Dekimpe, M. G., & Geyskens, I. (2013). Retailer private-label margins: the role of supplier and quality-tier differentiation. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 86–103.CrossRef
go back to reference Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D., & McAlister, L. (1998). Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: the impact of item reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 156–176.CrossRef Broniarczyk, S. M., Hoyer, W. D., & McAlister, L. (1998). Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: the impact of item reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 156–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Burke, R. (1997). Do you see what I see? The future of virtual shopping. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 352–360.CrossRef Burke, R. (1997). Do you see what I see? The future of virtual shopping. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 352–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Garretson, J. A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 293–306.CrossRef Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Garretson, J. A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 293–306.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlson, J. P., Vincent, L. H., Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2009). Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: a quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 864–876.CrossRef Carlson, J. P., Vincent, L. H., Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2009). Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: a quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 864–876.CrossRef
go back to reference Chae, B., & Hoegg, J. (2013). The future looks “right”: effects of the horizontal location of advertising images on product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 223–238.CrossRef Chae, B., & Hoegg, J. (2013). The future looks “right”: effects of the horizontal location of advertising images on product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 223–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Choi, S. C., & Coughlan, A. T. (2006). Private label positioning: quality versus feature differentiation from the national brand. Journal of Retailing, 82(2), 79–93.CrossRef Choi, S. C., & Coughlan, A. T. (2006). Private label positioning: quality versus feature differentiation from the national brand. Journal of Retailing, 82(2), 79–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Corstjens, M., & Lal, R. (2000). Building store loyalty through store brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 281–291.CrossRef Corstjens, M., & Lal, R. (2000). Building store loyalty through store brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 281–291.CrossRef
go back to reference Cuneo, A., Milberg, S. J., Benavente, J. M., & Palacios-Fenech, J. (2015). The growth of private label brands: a worldwide phenomenon? Journal of International Marketing, 23(1), 72–90.CrossRef Cuneo, A., Milberg, S. J., Benavente, J. M., & Palacios-Fenech, J. (2015). The growth of private label brands: a worldwide phenomenon? Journal of International Marketing, 23(1), 72–90.CrossRef
go back to reference De Keyser, A., Lemon, K. N., Klaus, P. & Keiningham, T. L. (2015). A framework for understanding and managing the customer experience, Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, 15–121. De Keyser, A., Lemon, K. N., Klaus, P. & Keiningham, T. L. (2015). A framework for understanding and managing the customer experience, Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, 15–121.
go back to reference Djavlonbek, K. (2015). Private labels ain’t bona fide! Perceived authenticity and willingness to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(17–18), 1773–1798. Djavlonbek, K. (2015). Private labels ain’t bona fide! Perceived authenticity and willingness to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(17–18), 1773–1798.
go back to reference Erdem, T., & Chang, S. R. (2012). A cross-category and cross-country analysis of umbrella branding for national and store brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 86–101.CrossRef Erdem, T., & Chang, S. R. (2012). A cross-category and cross-country analysis of umbrella branding for national and store brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 86–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Ganesh, J., Reynolds, K. E., & Luckett, M. G. (2007). Retail patronage behavior and shopper typologies: a replication and extension using a multi-format, multi-method approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 369–381.CrossRef Ganesh, J., Reynolds, K. E., & Luckett, M. G. (2007). Retail patronage behavior and shopper typologies: a replication and extension using a multi-format, multi-method approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 369–381.CrossRef
go back to reference Geyskens, I., Gielens, K. & and Gijsbrechts, E. (2010a). Proliferating private-label portfolios: how introducing economy and premium private labels influences brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 791–807. Geyskens, I., Gielens, K. & and Gijsbrechts, E. (2010a). Proliferating private-label portfolios: how introducing economy and premium private labels influences brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 791–807.
go back to reference Geyskens, I., Van Heerde, H. J., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2010b). What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011–1024.CrossRef Geyskens, I., Van Heerde, H. J., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2010b). What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011–1024.CrossRef
go back to reference Goodman, J. K., & Malkoc, S. A. (2012). Choosing here and now versus there and later: the moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 751–768.CrossRef Goodman, J. K., & Malkoc, S. A. (2012). Choosing here and now versus there and later: the moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 751–768.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Homburg, C., Jozic, D., & Kuehnl, C. (2015). Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–25. Homburg, C., Jozic, D., & Kuehnl, C. (2015). Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1–25.
go back to reference Hong, J., & Sternthal, B. (2010). The effects of consumer prior knowledge and processing strategies on judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 301–311.CrossRef Hong, J., & Sternthal, B. (2010). The effects of consumer prior knowledge and processing strategies on judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 301–311.CrossRef
go back to reference Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.CrossRef Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.CrossRef
go back to reference Keller, K. O., Dekimpe, M. G., & Geyskens, I. (2016). Let your banner wave? Antecedents and performance implications of retailers’ private-label branding strategies. Journal of Marketing, 80(4), 1–19.CrossRef Keller, K. O., Dekimpe, M. G., & Geyskens, I. (2016). Let your banner wave? Antecedents and performance implications of retailers’ private-label branding strategies. Journal of Marketing, 80(4), 1–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Koschate-Fischer, N., Cramer, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2014). Moderating effects of the relationship between private label share and store loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 78(2), 69–82.CrossRef Koschate-Fischer, N., Cramer, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2014). Moderating effects of the relationship between private label share and store loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 78(2), 69–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2007). Private label strategy: how to meet the store brand challenge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2007). Private label strategy: how to meet the store brand challenge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Labroo, A., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Between two brands: a goal fluency account for brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 374–385.CrossRef Labroo, A., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Between two brands: a goal fluency account for brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 374–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Labroo, A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 819–831.CrossRef Labroo, A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 819–831.CrossRef
go back to reference Lamberton, C. P., & Diehl, K. (2013). Retail choice architecture: the effects of benefit- and attribute-based assortment organization on consumer perceptions and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 393–411.CrossRef Lamberton, C. P., & Diehl, K. (2013). Retail choice architecture: the effects of benefit- and attribute-based assortment organization on consumer perceptions and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 393–411.CrossRef
go back to reference Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2007). How business cycles contribute to private-label success: evidence from the United States and Europe. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 1–15.CrossRef Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Dekimpe, M. G., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2007). How business cycles contribute to private-label success: evidence from the United States and Europe. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 151–165.CrossRef Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 151–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Lembregts, C., & Pandelaere, M. (2013). Are all units created equal? The effect of default units on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1275–1289.CrossRef Lembregts, C., & Pandelaere, M. (2013). Are all units created equal? The effect of default units on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1275–1289.CrossRef
go back to reference Lemke, F., Clark, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Customer experience quality: an exploration in business and consumer contexts using repertory grid technique. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 846–869.CrossRef Lemke, F., Clark, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Customer experience quality: an exploration in business and consumer contexts using repertory grid technique. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 846–869.CrossRef
go back to reference Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80, 69–96.CrossRef Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80, 69–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Martos-Partal, M. (2012). Innovation and the market share of private labels. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(5–6), 695–715.CrossRef Martos-Partal, M. (2012). Innovation and the market share of private labels. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(5–6), 695–715.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell, A. A., & Dacin, P. F. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 219–240.CrossRef Mitchell, A. A., & Dacin, P. F. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 219–240.CrossRef
go back to reference Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: how the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 202–215.CrossRef Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: how the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 202–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Motyka, S., Suri, R., Grewal, D., & Kohli, C. (2016). Disfluent vs. fluent price offers: paradoxical role of processing disfluency. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 627–638.CrossRef Motyka, S., Suri, R., Grewal, D., & Kohli, C. (2016). Disfluent vs. fluent price offers: paradoxical role of processing disfluency. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 627–638.CrossRef
go back to reference Nam, M., Wang, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2012). The difference between differences: how expertise affects diagnosticity of attribute alignability. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 736–750.CrossRef Nam, M., Wang, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2012). The difference between differences: how expertise affects diagnosticity of attribute alignability. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 736–750.CrossRef
go back to reference Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356.CrossRef Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356.CrossRef
go back to reference Olson, E. L. (2012). Supplier inferences to enhance private label perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 100–105.CrossRef Olson, E. L. (2012). Supplier inferences to enhance private label perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 100–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, (Sept), 223–230. Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, (Sept), 223–230.
go back to reference Pepe, M. S., Abratt, R., & Dion, P. (2012). Competitive advantage, private-label brands, and category profitability. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1–2), 154–172.CrossRef Pepe, M. S., Abratt, R., & Dion, P. (2012). Competitive advantage, private-label brands, and category profitability. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1–2), 154–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Quelch, J., & Harding, D. (1996). Brands versus private labels. Fighting to win. Harvard Business Review, (Jan-Feb), 99–111. Quelch, J., & Harding, D. (1996). Brands versus private labels. Fighting to win. Harvard Business Review, (Jan-Feb), 99–111.
go back to reference Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. J., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.CrossRef Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. J., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.CrossRef
go back to reference Satomura, T., Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2014). Copy alert: a method and metric to detect visual copycat brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(February), 1–13.CrossRef Satomura, T., Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. (2014). Copy alert: a method and metric to detect visual copycat brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(February), 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Sayman, S., Hoch, S. J., & Raju, J. S. (2002). Positioning of store brands. Marketing Science, 21, 378–397.CrossRef Sayman, S., Hoch, S. J., & Raju, J. S. (2002). Positioning of store brands. Marketing Science, 21, 378–397.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348.CrossRef Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Spence, M. T., & Brucks, M. (1997). The moderating effect of problem characteristics on experts’ and novices’ judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 233–247.CrossRef Spence, M. T., & Brucks, M. (1997). The moderating effect of problem characteristics on experts’ and novices’ judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 233–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Talukdar, D., & Lindsey, C. (2013). To buy or not to buy: consumers’ demand response patterns for healthy versus unhealthy food. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 124–138.CrossRef Talukdar, D., & Lindsey, C. (2013). To buy or not to buy: consumers’ demand response patterns for healthy versus unhealthy food. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 124–138.CrossRef
go back to reference Tanusondjaja, A., Trinh, G., & Romaniuk, J. (2015). Exploring the past behavior of new brand buyers. International Journal of Market Research, 58(5), 733–747.CrossRef Tanusondjaja, A., Trinh, G., & Romaniuk, J. (2015). Exploring the past behavior of new brand buyers. International Journal of Market Research, 58(5), 733–747.CrossRef
go back to reference Valenzuela, A., Raghubir, P., & Mitakakis, C. (2013). Shelf space schemas: myth or reality? Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 881–888.CrossRef Valenzuela, A., Raghubir, P., & Mitakakis, C. (2013). Shelf space schemas: myth or reality? Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 881–888.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Horen, F., & Pieters, R. (2012). When high-similarity copycats lose and moderate- similarity copycats gain: the impact of comparative evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 83–91.CrossRef Van Horen, F., & Pieters, R. (2012). When high-similarity copycats lose and moderate- similarity copycats gain: the impact of comparative evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 83–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2004). Sincere flattery: trade-dress imitation and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 21–27.CrossRef Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2004). Sincere flattery: trade-dress imitation and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 21–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Webster, F. E. (2000). Understanding the relationships among brands, consumers, and resellers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(10), 17–23.CrossRef Webster, F. E. (2000). Understanding the relationships among brands, consumers, and resellers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(10), 17–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Wedel, M., & Zhang, J. (2004). Analyzing brand competition across subcategories. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 448–456.CrossRef Wedel, M., & Zhang, J. (2004). Analyzing brand competition across subcategories. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 448–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and Kenny: myths and truths about meditation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(August), 197–206.CrossRef Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and Kenny: myths and truths about meditation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(August), 197–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Zielke, S., & Komor, M. (2015). Cross-national differences in price-role orientation and their impact on retail markets. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 159–180.CrossRef Zielke, S., & Komor, M. (2015). Cross-national differences in price-role orientation and their impact on retail markets. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 159–180.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can copycat private labels improve the consumer’s shopping experience? A fluency explanation
Authors
Katie Kelting
Adam Duhachek
Kimberly Whitler
Publication date
04-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Electronic ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0520-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 4/2017 Go to the issue