Top

Published in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Chemikalien und Gesellschaft

Authors : Nona Schulte-Römer, Friederike Gesing

Published in: Handbuch Umweltsoziologie

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Chemikalien und Gesellschaft umfassen die industrielle Entwicklung, Nutzung und Entsorgung chemischer Stoffe sowie den Umgang mit toxischen Überresten und Effekten. Dabei sind die Vor- und Nachteile moderner Chemie gesellschaftlich und geographisch höchst ungleich verteilt. Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung setzt an all diesen Punkten an, untersucht Chemikalien als Gegenstand von Wissenschaft, industrieller Produktion und Regulierung. Zentrale konzeptionelle Bezüge bilden Wissenschafts- und Technikstudien sowie die Umweltgerechtigkeitsforschung.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Rohstoffe im 21. Jahrhundert

next chapter Grüne Gentrifizierung

Allen, Barbara L. 2003. Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and experts in Louisiana’s chemical corridor disputes, Urban and industrial environments. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Balmer, Brian. 2016. Secrecy and science: A historical sociology of biological and chemical warfare. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315607986.CrossRef

Barca, Stefania. 2012. On working-class environmentalism: A historical and transnational overview. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements 4:61–80. https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/handle/10316/21263. Zugegriffen am 20.01.2023.

Barry, Andrew. 2005. Pharmaceutical matters: The invention of informed materials. Theory, Culture & Society 22(1): 51–69.CrossRef

———. 2017. „Manifesto for a Chemical Geography“. Inaugural lecture, Gustave Tuck Lecture Theatre, UCL, Januar 24. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropocene/sites/anthropocene/files/andrew_barry_manifesto_for_a_chemical_geography.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.01.2023.

Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, und Jonathan Simon. 2008. Chemistry: The impure science. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRef

Bleicher, Alena, und Matthias Gross. 2011. Response and recovery in the remediation of contaminated land in Eastern Germany. In Dynamics of disaster, Hrsg. Rachel A. von Dowty und Barbara L. Allen, 187–202. New York: Earthscan Routledge.

Böschen, Stefan. 2008. Technikfolgenabschätzung und Gesellschaftstheorie. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 1(17): 101–109.CrossRef

Böschen, Stefan, Kerstin Dressel, Monika Wastian, Michael Schneider, Willy Viehöver und Mario Hopp. 2010. „Chemie im Alltag. Eine repräsentative Befragung deutscher Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher“ (Hrsg. Astrid Epp, Rolf F. Hertel, Gaby-Fleur Böl). Berlin: Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. https://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/350/chemie_im_alltag.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.01.2023.

———. 2013. Risikogenese: Prozesse gesellschaftlicher Gefahrenwahrnehmung: FCKW, DDT, Dioxin und Ökologische Chemie. Wiesbaden: Springer.

———. 2016. Hybride Wissensregime. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845250441.CrossRef

Böschen, Stefan, Armin Reller, und Jens Soentgen. 2004. Stoffgeschichten – eine neue Perspektive für transdisziplinäre Umweltforschung. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 13(1): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.13.1.5.CrossRef

Boudia, Soraya, und Nathalie Jas. 2013. Toxicants, health and regulation since 1945. London: Routledge.

———. 2014. Powerless science?: Science and politics in a toxic world. New York: Berghahn Books.

Boudia, Soraya, Angela N. H. Creager, Scott Frickel, Emmanuel Henry, Nathalie Jas, Carsten Reinhardt, und Jody A. Roberts. 2021. Residues: Thinking through chemical environments. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.CrossRef

Breyman, Steve, und Edward J. Woodhouse. 2005. Green chemistry as social movement? Science, Technology, and Human Values 30(2): 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271726.CrossRef

Brickman, Ronald, Sheila Jasanoff, und Thomas Ilgen. 1985. Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Brown, Phil. 1995. Race, class, and environmental health: A review and systematization of the literature. Environmental Research 69(1): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1995.1021.CrossRef

———. 1997. Popular epidemiology revisited. Current Sociology 45(3): 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139297045003008.CrossRef

Brown, Phil, und Edwin J. Mikkelsen. 1997. No safe place: Toxic waste, leukemia, and community action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bullard, Robert D. 2019. Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality, 3. Aufl. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495274.CrossRef

Carson, Rachel. 1968. Der stumme Frühling. Übersetzt von M. Auer. München: dtv.

Casper, Monica J. 2003. Synthetic planet: Chemical politics and the hazards of modern life. New York: Psychology Press.

CEFIC. 2022. Facts and Figures of the European Chemical Industry. https://cefic.org/a-pillar-of-the-european-economy/facts-and-figures-of-the-european-chemical-industry/. Zugegriffen am 20.01.2023.

Centemeri, Laura. 2010. The Seveso disaster legacy. In Nature and history in modern italy, 251–273. Ohio University Press & Swallow Press. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01016045.

Cordner, Alissa. 2016. Toxic safety: Flame retardants, chemical controversies, and environmental health. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef

Davies, Thom, und Alice Mah, Hrsg. 2020. Toxic truths: Environmental justice and citizen science in a post-truth age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Demortain, David. 2020. The science of bureaucracy: Risk decision-making and the US environmental protection agency. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Douglas, Mary, und Aaron Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef

Edelstein, Michael R. 1988. Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure, Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder: Westview Press.

Fortun, Kim. 2001. Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, disaster, new global orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Frickel, Scott. 2004. Chemical consequences: Environmental mutagens, scientist activism, and the rise of genetic toxicology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Frickel, Scott, und Kelly Moore. 2006. The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Frickel, Scott, und M. Bess Vincent. 2007. Hurricane Katrina, contamination, and the unintended organization of ignorance. Technology in Society, Perspectives on Hurricane Katrina 29(2): 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.01.007.CrossRef

Frickel, Scott, Sahra Gibbon, Jeff Howard, Joanna Kempner, Gwen Ottinger, und David J. Hess. 2010. Undone science: Charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(4): 444–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345836.CrossRef

Gareau, Brian. 2013. From precaution to profit: Contemporary challenges to environmental protection in the montreal protocol. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Geiser, Ken. 2015. Chemicals without harm: Policies for a sustainable World/Ken Geiser, Urban and industrial environments. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Gesing, Friederike, Michi Knecht, Michael Flitner, und Katrin Amelang. 2018. NaturenKulturen: Denkräume und Werkzeuge für neue politische Ökologien. Bielfeld: transcript.CrossRef

Gramaglia, Christelle, und François Mélard. 2019. Looking for the cosmopolitical fish: Monitoring marine pollution with anglers and congers in the Gulf of Fos, Southern France. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44(5): 814–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919860197.CrossRef

Grundmann, Reiner. 1999. Transnationale Umweltpolitik zum Schutz der Ozonschicht: USA und Deutschland im Vergleich. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

Guthman, Julie. 2014. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Agrarian dreams. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520959132.CrossRef

Iles, Alastair. 2013. Greening chemistry: Emerging epistemic political tensions in California and the United States. Public Understanding of Science 22(4): 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511404306.CrossRef

Kinchy, Abby J., Roopali Phadke, und Jessica M. Smith. 2018. Engaging the underground: An STS field in formation. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4(März): 22–42. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.213.CrossRef

Knowles, Scott Gabriel. 2014. Learning from disaster? The history of technology and the future of disaster research. Technology and Culture 55(4): 773–784.CrossRef

Laser, Stefan, und Nicolas Schlitz. 2019. Discard studies: Doing science differently. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 35(2–3): 192–216.

Latour, Bruno. 2018. Wir sind nie modern gewesen: Versuch einer symmetrischen Anthropologie. Wir sind nie modern gewesen. Berlin: Akademie.

Lerner, Steve. 2012. Sacrifice zones: The front lines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Liboiron, Max. 2021. Pollution is colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef

Liboiron, Max, und Josh Lepawsky. 2022. Discard studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Liboiron, Max, Manuel Tironi, und Nerea Calvillo. 2018. Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world. Social Studies of Science 48(3): 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718783087.CrossRef

Maxim, Laura. 2018. More than a scientific movement: Socio-political influences on green chemistry research in the United States and France. Science & Technology Studies 31(3): 24–46. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60243.CrossRef

Meikle, Jeffrey L. 1997. American plastic: A cultural history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Morello, Frosch Rachel, und Bill M. Jesdale. 2006. Separate and unequal: Residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(3): 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8500.CrossRef

Murphy, Michelle. 2006. Sick building syndrome and the problem of uncertainty: Environmental politics, technoscience, and women workers. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef

———. 2017. Alterlife and decolonial chemical relations. Cultural Anthropology 32(4): 494–503. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.4.02.CrossRef

Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Oreskes, Naomi, und Erik M. Conway. 2012. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London: Bloomsbury Paperbacks.

Ottinger, Gwen, Julia Green Brody, Benjamin R. Cohen, Kim Fortun, Scott Frickel, Karen Hoffman, Jason Delborne, Wyatt Galusky, Rachel Morello-Frosch, und Phil Brown. 2011. Technoscience and environmental justice: Expert cultures in a grassroots movement. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Papadopoulos, Dimitris, María Puig, de la Bellacasa, und Natasha Myers. 2022. Reactivating elements: Chemistry, ecology, practice. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRef

Pearce, Frank, und Steve Tombs. 2019. Toxic capitalism: Corporate crime and the chemical industry: Corporate crime and the chemical industry. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Pellow, David Naguib, und Lisa Sun-Hee Park. 2002. The silicon valley of dreams environmental injustice, immigrant workers, and the high-tech global economy, Critical America. New York: University Press.

Perrow, Charles. 2000. Normal accidents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Richter, Lauren, Alissa Cordner, und Phil Brown. 2021. Producing ignorance through regulatory structure: The case of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Sociological Perspectives 64(4): 631–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420964827.CrossRef

Roberts, Jody Alan. 2005. Creating green chemistry: Discursive strategies of a scientific movement. Doctoral thesis. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/27529. Zugegriffen am 20.01.2023.

Romero, Adam M., Julie Guthman, Ryan E. Galt, Matt Huber, Becky Mansfield, und Suzana Sawyer. 2017. Chemical geographies. GeoHumanities 3(1): 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2017.1298972.CrossRef

Scheringer, Martin, Stefan Böschen, und Konrad Hungerbühler. 2006. Will we know more or less about chemical risks under REACH? CHIMIA 60(10): 699. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2006.699.CrossRef

Schulte-Römer, Nona, und Max Söding. 2019. Routine reporting of environmental risk: The first traces of micropollutants in the german press. Environmental Communication 13(8): 1108–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1592004.CrossRef

Shapiro, Nicholas. 2019. Persistent ephemeral pollutants. In Being material, Hrsg. Marie-Pier von Boucher, Stefan Helmreich, Leila W. Kinney, Skylar Tibbits, Rebecca Uchill, und Evan Ziporyn, 154–161. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Shapiro, Nicholas, und Eben Kirksey. 2017. Chemo-ethnography: An introduction. Cultural Anthropology 32(4): 481–493. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.4.01.CrossRef

Shapiro, Nicholas, Nasser Zakariya, und Jody Roberts. 2017. A wary alliance: From enumerating the environment to inviting apprehension. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3(September): 575–602. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.133.CrossRef

Slovic, Paul, C. K. Torbjörn Malmfors, Nancy Neil Mertz, und Iain F. H. Purchase. 1997. Evaluating chemical risks: Results of a survey of the british toxicology society. Human & Experimental Toxicology 16(6): 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032719701600601.CrossRef

Soentgen, Jens. 2020. Die „Mobilmachung der Materie“ Stoffströme und Stoffkreisläufe aus Sicht der stoffgeschichtlichen Forschung. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 12(23–2): 32–40. https://doi.org/10.14361/zfmw-2020-120205.CrossRef

Szasz, Andrew. 2007. Shopping our way to safety: How we changed from protecting the environment to protecting ourselves. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Tickner, Joel, Ken Geiser, und Melissa Coffin. 2005. The U.S. experience in promoting sustainable chemistry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 12(2): 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2005.02.235.CrossRef

Tironi, Manuel, und Israel Rodríguez-Giralt. 2017. Healing, knowing, enduring: Care and politics in damaged worlds. The Sociological Review 65(2_suppl): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917712874.CrossRef

Ureta, Sebastian. 2021. Ruination science: Producing knowledge from a toxic world. Science, Technology, & Human Values 46(1): 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919900957.CrossRef

Vogel, Sarah A. 2012. Is it safe?: BPA and the struggle to define the safety of chemicals. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef

Walker, Gordon. 2009. Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode 41(4): 614–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x.CrossRef

Title: Chemikalien und Gesellschaft
Authors: Nona Schulte-Römer
Friederike Gesing
Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Book: Handbuch Umweltsoziologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37217-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-37218-7

Copyright Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37218-7_55