Skip to main content
Top

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Climate Engineering

Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf eine Emerging Technology

Author : Julia Schubert

Published in: Handbuch Umweltsoziologie

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Climate Engineering beschreibt die Idee, der globalen Erderwärmung durch gezielte technologische Eingriffe in das Klimasystem entgegenzuwirken. Dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie Climate Engineering zu einer klimapolitischen Option werden konnte, wie diese Option aktuell verhandelt wird und was das für die zukünftige Auseinandersetzung mit diesen umstrittenen Maßnahmen bedeutet. Im Zentrum steht dabei die Frage, wie sich im Fall von Climate Engineering wissenschaftliche mit gesellschaftspolitischen Interessen verknüpfen. Der Beitrag illustriert diese Verknüpfung in historischer, struktureller und epistemischer Hinsicht.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Die Wissenschaftler*innen präsentieren hier ein „peak shaving“ Szenario, bei dem relativ kurzfristig eine starke Erderwärmung verhindert werden muss.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anderson, K., und G. Peters. 2016. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354(6309): 182–183.CrossRef Anderson, K., und G. Peters. 2016. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354(6309): 182–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Baskin, J. 2019. Geoengineering, the anthropocene and the end of nature. London: Springer. Baskin, J. 2019. Geoengineering, the anthropocene and the end of nature. London: Springer.
go back to reference Beck, S., und M. Mahony. 2017. The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change 7(5): 311–313.CrossRef Beck, S., und M. Mahony. 2017. The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change 7(5): 311–313.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2018. The politics of anticipation: The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience. Global Sustainability 1:e8.CrossRef ———. 2018. The politics of anticipation: The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience. Global Sustainability 1:e8.CrossRef
go back to reference Bellamy, R., und J. Lezaun. 2017. Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science 26(4): 402–417.CrossRef Bellamy, R., und J. Lezaun. 2017. Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science 26(4): 402–417.CrossRef
go back to reference Bellamy, R., J. Chilvers, N. E. Vaughan, und T. M. Lenton. 2012. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Climate Change 3(6): 597–615.CrossRef Bellamy, R., J. Chilvers, N. E. Vaughan, und T. M. Lenton. 2012. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Climate Change 3(6): 597–615.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2013. ‚Opening up‘ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change 23(5): 926–937.CrossRef ———. 2013. ‚Opening up‘ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change 23(5): 926–937.CrossRef
go back to reference Blackstock, J., und S. Low, Hrsg. 2019. Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, politics, and governance. New York: Routledge. Blackstock, J., und S. Low, Hrsg. 2019. Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, politics, and governance. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Boettcher, M. 2020. Cracking the code: How discursive structures shape climate engineering research governance. Environmental Politics 29(5): 890–916. Boettcher, M. 2020. Cracking the code: How discursive structures shape climate engineering research governance. Environmental Politics 29(5): 890–916.
go back to reference Buck, H. J. 2013. Climate engineering: Spectacle, tragedy or solution? A content analysis of news media framing. In De-/Constructing the greenhouse: Interpretative approaches to global climate governance. London: Routledge. Buck, H. J. 2013. Climate engineering: Spectacle, tragedy or solution? A content analysis of news media framing. In De-/Constructing the greenhouse: Interpretative approaches to global climate governance. London: Routledge.
go back to reference ———. 2021. Ending fossil fuels: Why net zero is not enough. Verso Books. ———. 2021. Ending fossil fuels: Why net zero is not enough. Verso Books.
go back to reference Budyko, M. I. 1977. Climatic changes. Washington: American Geophysical Union. Budyko, M. I. 1977. Climatic changes. Washington: American Geophysical Union.
go back to reference Burns, E. T., J. A. Flegal, D. W. Keith, A. Mahajan, D. Tingley, und G. Wagner. 2016. What do people think when they think about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research. Earth’s Future 4(11): 536–542.CrossRef Burns, E. T., J. A. Flegal, D. W. Keith, A. Mahajan, D. Tingley, und G. Wagner. 2016. What do people think when they think about solar geoengineering? A review of empirical social science literature, and prospects for future research. Earth’s Future 4(11): 536–542.CrossRef
go back to reference Carton, W., A. Asiyanbi, S. Beck, H. J. Buck, und J. F. Lund. 2020. Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal. WIREs Climate Change 11(6): 1–25. Carton, W., A. Asiyanbi, S. Beck, H. J. Buck, und J. F. Lund. 2020. Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal. WIREs Climate Change 11(6): 1–25.
go back to reference Carton, W., I. Hougaard, N. Markusson, und J. F. Lund. 2023. Is carbon removal delaying emission reductions? WIREs Climate Change. online first: 1–18. Carton, W., I. Hougaard, N. Markusson, und J. F. Lund. 2023. Is carbon removal delaying emission reductions? WIREs Climate Change. online first: 1–18.
go back to reference Corner, A., K. A. Parkhill, und N. Pidgeon. 2011. ‚Experiment Earth?‘ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering: Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Cardiff University, Cardiff. Corner, A., K. A. Parkhill, und N. Pidgeon. 2011. ‚Experiment Earth?‘ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering: Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Cardiff University, Cardiff.
go back to reference Dooley, K., P. Christoff, und K. A. Nicholas. 2018. Co-producing climate policy and negative emissions: Trade-offs for sustainable land-use. Global Sustainability 1:e3.CrossRef Dooley, K., P. Christoff, und K. A. Nicholas. 2018. Co-producing climate policy and negative emissions: Trade-offs for sustainable land-use. Global Sustainability 1:e3.CrossRef
go back to reference Edwards, P. N. 1999. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Science as Culture 8(4): 437–472.CrossRef Edwards, P. N. 1999. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Science as Culture 8(4): 437–472.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2010. A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge/Massachusetts: MIT Press. ———. 2010. A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge/Massachusetts: MIT Press.
go back to reference Flegal, J. A. 2018. The evidentiary politics of the geoengineering imaginary. Berkeley: University of California. Flegal, J. A. 2018. The evidentiary politics of the geoengineering imaginary. Berkeley: University of California.
go back to reference Flegal, J. A., A.-M. Hubert, D. R. Morrow, und J. B. Moreno-Cruz. 2019. Solar geoengineering: Social science, legal, ethical, and economic frameworks. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 44:399–423.CrossRef Flegal, J. A., A.-M. Hubert, D. R. Morrow, und J. B. Moreno-Cruz. 2019. Solar geoengineering: Social science, legal, ethical, and economic frameworks. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 44:399–423.CrossRef
go back to reference Fleming, J. 1998. Historical perspectives on climate change. New York: Oxford University Press. Fleming, J. 1998. Historical perspectives on climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2006. The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37(1): 3–25.CrossRef ———. 2006. The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37(1): 3–25.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 2010. Fixing the sky: The checkered history of weather and climate control. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Columbia University Press. ———. 2010. Fixing the sky: The checkered history of weather and climate control. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Fragniere, A., und S. Gardiner. 2016. Why geoengineering is not ‚Plan B‘. In Justice and geoengineering. London: Rowman and Littlefield. Fragniere, A., und S. Gardiner. 2016. Why geoengineering is not ‚Plan B‘. In Justice and geoengineering. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
go back to reference Gramelsberger, G., und J. Feichter. 2011. Modelling the climate system: An overview. In Climate change and policy, 9–90. Heidelberg: Springer. Gramelsberger, G., und J. Feichter. 2011. Modelling the climate system: An overview. In Climate change and policy, 9–90. Heidelberg: Springer.
go back to reference Gupta, A., und I. Möller. 2019. De facto governance: How authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance. Environmental Politics 28(3): 480–501.CrossRef Gupta, A., und I. Möller. 2019. De facto governance: How authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance. Environmental Politics 28(3): 480–501.CrossRef
go back to reference Hamilton, Clive. 2013. Earthmasters: The dawn of the age of climate engineering. New Haven: Yale University Press. Hamilton, Clive. 2013. Earthmasters: The dawn of the age of climate engineering. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Harper, K. C. 2017. Make it rain: State control of the atmosphere in twentieth-century America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Harper, K. C. 2017. Make it rain: State control of the atmosphere in twentieth-century America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Huttunen, S., E. Skytén, und M. Hildén. 2015. Emerging policy perspectives on geoengineering: An international comparison. The Anthropocene Review 2(1): 14–32.CrossRef Huttunen, S., E. Skytén, und M. Hildén. 2015. Emerging policy perspectives on geoengineering: An international comparison. The Anthropocene Review 2(1): 14–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Irvine, P., K. Emanuel, J. He, L. W. Horowitz, G. Vecchi, und D. Keith. 2019. Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards. Nature Climate Change 9(4): 295–299.CrossRef Irvine, P., K. Emanuel, J. He, L. W. Horowitz, G. Vecchi, und D. Keith. 2019. Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards. Nature Climate Change 9(4): 295–299.CrossRef
go back to reference Irvine, P. J., B. Kravitz, M. G. Lawrence, und H. Muri. 2016. An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7(6): 815–833. Irvine, P. J., B. Kravitz, M. G. Lawrence, und H. Muri. 2016. An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7(6): 815–833.
go back to reference Jones, A. C., J. M. Haywood, und A. Jones. 2016. Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16(5): 2843–2862.CrossRef Jones, A. C., J. M. Haywood, und A. Jones. 2016. Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16(5): 2843–2862.CrossRef
go back to reference Keith, D. W. 2000. Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25(1): 245–284.CrossRef Keith, D. W. 2000. Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25(1): 245–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Kintisch, E. 2010. Hack the planet: Science’s best hope-or worst nightmare-for averting climate catastrophe. Hoboken/New Jersey: Wiley. Kintisch, E. 2010. Hack the planet: Science’s best hope-or worst nightmare-for averting climate catastrophe. Hoboken/New Jersey: Wiley.
go back to reference Kravitz, B., A. Robock, D. T. Shindell, und M. A. Miller. 2012. Sensitivity of stratospheric geoengineering with black carbon to aerosol size and altitude of injection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117(D9): 1–22. Kravitz, B., A. Robock, D. T. Shindell, und M. A. Miller. 2012. Sensitivity of stratospheric geoengineering with black carbon to aerosol size and altitude of injection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117(D9): 1–22.
go back to reference Low, S., und H. J. Buck. 2020. The practice of responsible research and innovation in „climate engineering“. WIREs Climate Change 11(3): 1–17. Low, S., und H. J. Buck. 2020. The practice of responsible research and innovation in „climate engineering“. WIREs Climate Change 11(3): 1–17.
go back to reference Low, S., und S. Schäfer. 2019. Tools of the trade: Practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering. Sustainability Science 14(4): 953–962.CrossRef Low, S., und S. Schäfer. 2019. Tools of the trade: Practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering. Sustainability Science 14(4): 953–962.CrossRef
go back to reference Low, S., C. M. Baum, und B. K. Sovacool. 2022. Undone science in climate interventions: Contrasting and contesting anticipatory assessments by expert networks. Environmental Science & Policy 137:249–270.CrossRef Low, S., C. M. Baum, und B. K. Sovacool. 2022. Undone science in climate interventions: Contrasting and contesting anticipatory assessments by expert networks. Environmental Science & Policy 137:249–270.CrossRef
go back to reference Marchetti, C. 1977. On geoengineering and the CO2 problem. Climatic Change 1(1): 59–68.CrossRef Marchetti, C. 1977. On geoengineering and the CO2 problem. Climatic Change 1(1): 59–68.CrossRef
go back to reference Markusson, N., M. D. Gjefsen, J. C. Stephens, und D. Tyfield. 2017. The political economy of technical fixes: The (mis) alignment of clean fossil and political regimes. Energy Research & Social Science 23:1–10.CrossRef Markusson, N., M. D. Gjefsen, J. C. Stephens, und D. Tyfield. 2017. The political economy of technical fixes: The (mis) alignment of clean fossil and political regimes. Energy Research & Social Science 23:1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference McLaren, D., und O. Corry. 2021. The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering. WIREs Climate Change 12(3): 1–20. McLaren, D., und O. Corry. 2021. The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering. WIREs Climate Change 12(3): 1–20.
go back to reference McLaren, D. P. 2018. Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling. Energy Research & Social Science 44:209–221.CrossRef McLaren, D. P. 2018. Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling. Energy Research & Social Science 44:209–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Minx, J. C., W. F. Lamb, M. W. Callaghan, L. Bornmann, und S. Fuss. 2017. Fast growing research on negative emissions. Environmental Research Letters 12(3): 035007.CrossRef Minx, J. C., W. F. Lamb, M. W. Callaghan, L. Bornmann, und S. Fuss. 2017. Fast growing research on negative emissions. Environmental Research Letters 12(3): 035007.CrossRef
go back to reference Möller, I. 2020. Political perspectives on geoengineering: Navigating problem definition and institutional fit. Global Environmental Politics 20(2): 57–82.CrossRef Möller, I. 2020. Political perspectives on geoengineering: Navigating problem definition and institutional fit. Global Environmental Politics 20(2): 57–82.CrossRef
go back to reference NAS, United States National Academies of Science. 2019. Negative emissions technologies and reliable sequestration: A research agenda. Washington: National Academies Press. NAS, United States National Academies of Science. 2019. Negative emissions technologies and reliable sequestration: A research agenda. Washington: National Academies Press.
go back to reference ———. 2020. Developing a research agenda and research governance approaches for climate intervention strategies that reflect sunlight to cool earth. Washington: National Academies Press. ———. 2020. Developing a research agenda and research governance approaches for climate intervention strategies that reflect sunlight to cool earth. Washington: National Academies Press.
go back to reference NRC, United States National Research Council. 2015a. Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool earth. Washington: The National Academy Press. NRC, United States National Research Council. 2015a. Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool earth. Washington: The National Academy Press.
go back to reference ———. 2015b. Climate intervention: Carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration. Washington: The National Academy Press. ———. 2015b. Climate intervention: Carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration. Washington: The National Academy Press.
go back to reference Oldfield, J. D., und M. Poberezhskaya. 2023. Soviet and Russian perspectives on geoengineering and climate management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, e829. Online first. 1–14. Oldfield, J. D., und M. Poberezhskaya. 2023. Soviet and Russian perspectives on geoengineering and climate management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, e829. Online first. 1–14.
go back to reference Oomen, J., und M. Meiske. 2021. Proactive and reactive geoengineering: Engineering the climate and the lithosphere. WIREs Climate Change 12(6): 1–15. Oomen, J., und M. Meiske. 2021. Proactive and reactive geoengineering: Engineering the climate and the lithosphere. WIREs Climate Change 12(6): 1–15.
go back to reference Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, und J. Stilgoe. 2012. Responsible research and innovation. From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751–760.CrossRef Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, und J. Stilgoe. 2012. Responsible research and innovation. From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 39(6): 751–760.CrossRef
go back to reference Parson, E. A. 2017. Climate policymakers and assessments must get serious about climate engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(35): 9227–9230.CrossRef Parson, E. A. 2017. Climate policymakers and assessments must get serious about climate engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(35): 9227–9230.CrossRef
go back to reference Pindyck, R. S. 2017. The use and misuse of models for climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11(1): 100–114. Pindyck, R. S. 2017. The use and misuse of models for climate policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11(1): 100–114.
go back to reference PWCM, Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, U.S. National Academies of Science (1966). Weather and climate modification: Problems and prospects. Washington: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. PWCM, Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, U.S. National Academies of Science (1966). Weather and climate modification: Problems and prospects. Washington: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.
go back to reference Rogelj, J., D. Huppmann, V. Krey, K. Riahi, L. Clarke, M. Gidden, Z. Nicholls, und M. Meinshausen. 2019. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573(7774): 357–363.CrossRef Rogelj, J., D. Huppmann, V. Krey, K. Riahi, L. Clarke, M. Gidden, Z. Nicholls, und M. Meinshausen. 2019. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573(7774): 357–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Royal Society. 2009. Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London: The Royal Society. Royal Society. 2009. Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London: The Royal Society.
go back to reference Sapinski, J., H. J. Buck, und A. Malm. 2020. Has it come to this? The promises and perils of geoengineering on the brink. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Sapinski, J., H. J. Buck, und A. Malm. 2020. Has it come to this? The promises and perils of geoengineering on the brink. New Brunswick/New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
go back to reference Schubert, J. 2019. Measuring, modeling, controlling the climate? Numerical expertise in US climate engineering politics. In Science, Numbers and Politics, 181–202. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Schubert, J. 2019. Measuring, modeling, controlling the climate? Numerical expertise in US climate engineering politics. In Science, Numbers and Politics, 181–202. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference ———. 2021. Engineering the climate: Science, politics, and visions of control. Manchester: Mattering Press. ———. 2021. Engineering the climate: Science, politics, and visions of control. Manchester: Mattering Press.
go back to reference ———. 2022. Science-state alliances and climate engineering: A „Longue-Durée“ picture. WIREs Climate Change. 13(6): 1–13. ———. 2022. Science-state alliances and climate engineering: A „Longue-Durée“ picture. WIREs Climate Change. 13(6): 1–13.
go back to reference SCWM, Special Commission on Weather Modification of the U.S. National Science Foundation. 1965. Weather and climate modification. Washington: National Science Foundation. SCWM, Special Commission on Weather Modification of the U.S. National Science Foundation. 1965. Weather and climate modification. Washington: National Science Foundation.
go back to reference Shukla, P. R., J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. Van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, und others. 2022. IPCC, 2022: Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press. Shukla, P. R., J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. Van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, und others. 2022. IPCC, 2022: Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Smith, H. B., N. E. Vaughan, und J. Forster. 2022. Long-term national climate strategies bet on forests and soils to reach net-zero. Communications Earth & Environment 3(1): 305.CrossRef Smith, H. B., N. E. Vaughan, und J. Forster. 2022. Long-term national climate strategies bet on forests and soils to reach net-zero. Communications Earth & Environment 3(1): 305.CrossRef
go back to reference Stephens, J. C., P. Kashwan, D. McLaren, und K. Surprise. 2023. The dangers of mainstreaming solar geoengineering: A critique of the national academies report. Environmental Politics 32(1): 135–144. Stephens, J. C., P. Kashwan, D. McLaren, und K. Surprise. 2023. The dangers of mainstreaming solar geoengineering: A critique of the national academies report. Environmental Politics 32(1): 135–144.
go back to reference Stilgoe, J. 2015. Experiment earth: Responsible innovation in geoengineering. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRef Stilgoe, J. 2015. Experiment earth: Responsible innovation in geoengineering. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRef
go back to reference Surprise, K. 2020. Stratospheric imperialism: Liberalism, (eco)modernization, and ideologies of solar geoengineering research. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3(1): 141–163. Surprise, K. 2020. Stratospheric imperialism: Liberalism, (eco)modernization, and ideologies of solar geoengineering research. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3(1): 141–163.
go back to reference Weisenstein, D. K., und D. W. Keith. 2015. Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 15(8): 11799–11851. Weisenstein, D. K., und D. W. Keith. 2015. Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 15(8): 11799–11851.
go back to reference Wiertz, T. 2016. Visions of climate control: Solar radiation management in climate simulations. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(3): 438–460.CrossRef Wiertz, T. 2016. Visions of climate control: Solar radiation management in climate simulations. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(3): 438–460.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Climate Engineering
Author
Julia Schubert
Copyright Year
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37218-7_35