Top

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Published in:

25-10-2016 | Original Article

Comparison of rotational acetabular osteotomy performed with navigation by surgeons with different levels of experience of osteotomies

Authors: Masaki Takao, Takashi Nishii, Takashi Sakai, Nobuhiko Sugano

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 5/2017

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) is used to treat developmental hip dysplasia (DDH). It requires detailed anatomical knowledge of the pelvic anatomy and three-dimensional cognitive skills. We addressed whether a computer navigation system combined with a preoperative computed tomography-based plan enabled surgeons to perform RAO safely and reliably through a mini-incision regardless of their level of experience with performing osteotomies.

Methods

We enrolled 24 patients (25 hips) with DDH (radiographic grade 0 or 1 osteoarthritic changes: Tönnis classification). Using the navigation system, four surgeons performed RAO via a mini-incision transtrochanteric approach. Two experienced surgeons treated 15 patients (16 hips). Two surgeons with low-level RAO experience treated nine patients (9 hips). Operative data and clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. Average follow-up was 3.2 years.

Results

There were no significant differences in the (1) incision length, operation time, or intraoperative blood loss; (2) numerical pain rating scale score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scale score at 1, 2 years, and at the latest follow-up; (3) preoperative and postoperative acetabular coverage of the femoral head, postoperative joint congruency, postoperative medial and distal femoral head displacement, or acetabular thickness; and (4) positional accuracy of iliac, pubic, and ischial osteotomy and accuracy of acetabular coverage of the femoral head.

Conclusions

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of RAO with navigation were not influenced by the surgeons’ level of osteotomy experience.

previous article Erratum to: Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study

next article Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW (1988) A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:26–36

Ninomiya S, Tagawa H (1984) Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the dysplastic hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(3):430–436CrossRefPubMed

Albers CE, Steppacher SD, Ganz R, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA (2013) Impingement adversely affects 10-year survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy for DDH. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1602–1614. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-2799-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Klaue K, Wallin A, Ganz R (1988) CT evaluation of coverage and congruency of the hip prior to osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:15–25

Millis MB, Murphy SB (1992) Use of computed tomographic reconstruction in planning osteotomies of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:154–159

Dutoit M, Zambelli PY (1999) Simplified 3D-evaluation of periacetabular osteotomy. Acta Orthop Belg 65(3):288–294PubMed

Mechlenburg I, Nyengaard JR, Romer L, Soballe K (2004) Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology. Acta Orthop Scand 75(2):147–153. doi:10.1080/00016470412331294395 CrossRefPubMed

Armiger RS, Armand M, Lepisto J, Minhas D, Tallroth K, Mears SC, Waites MD, Taylor RH (2007) Evaluation of a computerized measurement technique for joint alignment before and during periacetabular osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 12(4):215–224. doi:10.3109/10929080701541855 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hipp JA, Sugano N, Millis MB, Murphy SB (1999) Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 364:134–143CrossRef

10.

Liu L, Ecker TM, Schumann S, Siebenrock KA, Zheng G (2016) Evaluation of constant thickness cartilage models versus patient specific cartilage models for an optimized computer-assisted planning of periacetabular osteotomy. PloS One 11(1):e0146452. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146452 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Langlotz F, Stucki M, Bachler R, Scheer C, Ganz R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP (1997) The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 2(6):317–326. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0150(1997)2:6<317::aid-igs1>3.0.co;2-2

12.

Mayman DJ, Rudan J, Yach J, Ellis R (2002) The Kingston periacetabular osteotomy utilizing computer enhancement: a new technique. Comput Aided Surg 7(3):179–186. doi:10.1002/igs.10041 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Nakahodo K, Sasama T, Sato Y, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Nishihara S, Yonenobu K, Ochi T, Tamura S (2000) Intraoperative update of 3D bone model during computer navigation of pelvic osteotomies using real-time 3D position data. In: Lemke H, Vannier M, Inamura K, Farman A, Doi K (eds) Computer assisted radiology and surgery. In: 14th International symposium and exhibition (CARS 2000), San Francisco, CA, 2000. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 252–256

14.

Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H (2016) Safety and accuracy of CT-based navigation for rotational acetabular osteotomy. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord 7(1):44–50. doi:10.6492/FJMD.20151007

15.

Pflugi S, Liu L, Ecker TM, Schumann S, Larissa Cullmann J, Siebenrock K, Zheng G (2016) A cost-effective surgical navigation solution for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(2):271–280. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1267-1

16.

Murphy RJ, Armiger RS, Lepisto J, Mears SC, Taylor RH, Armand M (2015) Development of a biomechanical guidance system for periacetabular osteotomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(4):497–508. doi:10.1007/s11548-014-1116-7 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, Zimolong A, Kaspers G, Rau G, Staudte HW (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:28–38CrossRef

18.

Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Kawanabe K, Awa Y, Akiyama H, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T, Matsuda S (2013) Developing a novel custom cutting guide for curved peri-acetabular osteotomy. Int Orthop 37(6):1033–1038. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1873-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Azuma H, Taneda H (1989) Rotational acetabular osteotomy in congenital dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthop 13(1):21–28CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kambe T, Naito M, Asayama I, Koga K, Fujisawa M, Yamaguchi T, Yatsunami M (2003) Vascular anatomy for rotational acetabular osteotomy: cadaveric study. J Orthop Sci 8(3):323–328. doi:10.1007/s10776-002-0630-7 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Matsui M, Masuhara K, Nakata K, Nishii T, Sugano N, Ochi T (1997) Early deterioration after modified rotational acetabular osteotomy for the dysplastic hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(2):220–224CrossRefPubMed

22.

Xu K, Li YM, Zhang HF, Wang CG, Xu YO, Li ZJ (2014) Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 12(5):528–533. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.014 CrossRef

23.

Akiyama H, Goto K, So K, Nakamura T (2010) Computed tomography-based navigation for curved periacetabular osteotomy. J Orthop Sci 15(6):829–833. doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1520-y CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hsieh PH, Chang YH, Shih CH (2006) Image-guided periacetabular osteotomy: computer-assisted navigation compared with the conventional technique: a randomized study of 36 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 77(4):591–597. doi:10.1080/17453670610012656 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tonnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(12):1747–1770CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, Nakajima Y, Nishii T, Yonenobu K, Tamura S, Ochi T (2001) Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 6(4):195–203. doi:10.1002/igs.10011 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37(4):378–381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Bellamy N (1989) Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 18(4 Suppl 2):14–17CrossRefPubMed

29.

Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplastic acetabular and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 58(suppl):5–135

30.

Massie W, Howorth M (1950) Congenital dislocation of the hip: part 1. Method of grading results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 31–A:519–531CrossRef

31.

Lequesne M, de Seze S (1961) The false-profile view of the hip: new radiographic method of the hip evaluation and the utility for the diagnosis of the dysplasia and different coxopathy [in French]. Rev Rhum 28:643–652PubMed

32.

Yasunaga Y, Ikuta Y, Kanazawa T, Takahashi K, Hisatome T (2001) The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery as an indication for rotational acetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(7):1001–1004CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hasegawa Y, Iwase T, Kitamura S, Kawasaki M, Yamaguchi J (2014) Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia and osteoarthritis: follow-up at a mean duration of twenty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(23):1975–1982. doi:10.2106/jbjs.m.01563

34.

Hartig-Andreasen C, Troelsen A, Thillemann TM, Soballe K (2012) What factors predict failure 4–12 years after periacetabular osteotomy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):2978–2987. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2386-4

35.

Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA (2015) What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and over-coverage? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(4):1234–1246. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Hamada H, Takao M, Nakahara I, Sakai T, Nishii T, Sugano N (2015) Hip range-of-motion (ROM) is less than normal after rotational acetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A simulated ROM analysis. J Orthop Res. doi:10.1002/jor.23024 PubMed

37.

Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Matsuo T, Ishikawa M, Adachi N, Ochi M (2010) Crossover sign after rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Sci 15(4):463–469. doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1489-6 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Comparison of rotational acetabular osteotomy performed with navigation by surgeons with different levels of experience of osteotomies
Authors: Masaki Takao
Takashi Nishii
Takashi Sakai
Nobuhiko Sugano
Publication date: 25-10-2016
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1494-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models

Guest editorial for the IJCARS special issue on JAMIT 2015 and 2016

Erratum to: Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study

Editorial for clinical investigations: toward the vision and spirit of CARS with innovative clinical investigations

Computer-aided evaluation of low-dose and low-contrast agent third-generation dual-source CT angiography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Evaluation of tongue squamous cell carcinoma resection margins using ex-vivo MR

Premium Partner