Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4/2013

01-05-2013 | LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (LCIA)

Comparison of two ICT solutions: desktop PC versus thin client computing

Authors: Daniel Maga, Markus Hiebel, Christian Knermann

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 4/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Information communication technology (ICT) offers the chance of enhancing the efficiency of public services and economic processes. The use of server-based computing is supposed to reduce the energy and material consumption in ICT services. This hypothesis will be investigated and quantified looking at the whole life cycle of the products. In this paper, server-based computing in combination with thin clients (SBCTC) is compared to a typical desktop PC (DPC) workplace over a time period of 5 years.

Materials and methods

The LCA method used in this paper is focused on the impact category of global warming potential. The calculations were performed using the Microsoft® Excel-based methodology for ecodesign of energy-related products tool. This tool includes the requirements of energy-related products (Directive 2009/125/EC). Moreover, an input-orientated method—material input per service unit (MIPS)—is applied which allows for an additional comparison between the two ICT solutions.

Results and discussion

Electricity consumption could be identified as a crucial environmental impact factor of DPC and SBCTC with both methods. Depending on the user behavior, more than 200 kg CO2e can be saved by switching from DPC to SBCTC. Over 80 kg CO2e can be saved in the material and extraction life cycle stage. The largest savings are achieved in the material category electronics (about 70 kg CO2e). A correlation analysis between the results of global warming potential (GWP) and the MIPS category “air” shows that both indicators GWP and air lead to the same conclusions when evaluating life cycle stages and ICT material categories.

Conclusions

Taking into account all assumptions made in this paper, SBCTC saves more than 65 % of greenhouse gas emissions compared to DPC during the entire life cycle. To ensure further profound comparisons of the ICT solutions, current data on the energy demand and detailed information on the composition of the IT products should be made available by industry.
previous article Comparison of different normalised LCIA results and their feasibility in communication
next article Rethinking a product and its function using LCA—experiences of New Zealand manufacturing companies

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Andrae ASG (2011) European LCA Standardisation of ICT: Equipment, Networks, and Services, Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, 2011, Part 8
Andrae ASG, Andersen O (2011) Life cycle assessment of integrated circuit packaging technologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):258–267CrossRef
Andrae ASG, Anderson O (2010) Life cycle assessments of consumer electronics—are they consistent? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:827–836CrossRef
Andrae ASG, Moller P, Anderson J, Liu J (2004) Uncertainty estimation by Monte Carlo simulation applied to life cycle inventory of cordless phones and microscale metallization processes. IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manuf 27(4):233–245CrossRef
BMU (2012) Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global, Schlussbericht BMU-FKZ 03MAP146, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU), Berlin
Directive 2009/125/EC of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (Ecodesign directive)
Ecoinvent database (2008) Name in db: desktop computer, without screen, at plant/GLO U
ETSI (2011) ETSI TS 103 199, V1.1.1 (2011–11) Environmental Engineering (EE); Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT equipment, networks and services; General methodology and common requirements, European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)
EU (2011) Methodology for ecodesign of energy-related products MEErP 2011: final report. Delft, Brussels
Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT (2011) Thin Clients 2011—ecological and economical aspects of virtual desktops, Oberhausen
Global Action Plan (2007) An inefficient truth—report December 2007, London
Hertwich EG, Roux C (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions from the consumption of electric and electronic equipment by Norwegian households. Environ Sci Technol 45(19):8190–8196CrossRef
IPCC (2007) Fourth assessment report: Climate Change 2007, Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC)
IVF, Industrial Research and Development Corporation (ed) (2007) Lot 3 Personal Computers (desktops and laptops) and computer monitors—final report (task 1–8)
Joint Research Centre (JRC) (2010) EU Commission, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD): analysis of existing environmental impact assessment methodologies for use in Life Cycle Assessment, Ispra
Kristof K, Hennicke P (2010) Endbericht des Projekts “Materialeffizienz und Ressourcenschonung“(MaRess). Wuppertal, Germany
Lüke D (2007) Energie effizient nutzen–Zentrales Power-Management für Client-Bestände« in: LANline Sonderveröffentlichung “Green IT”. November 2007, Konradin IT-Verlag GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
Murugesan S (2008) Harnessing green IT: principles and practices. IT Prof 10:1CrossRef
Ritthoff M, Rohn H, Liedke C (2003) Calculating MIPS—resource productivity of products and services. Wuppertal, Germany
Ruth S (2009) Green IT more than a three percent solution? Internet Comput 13(4):74–78CrossRef
Schmidt-Bleek F (1994) Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS—das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften. Berlin, pp 302
Schmidt-Bleek F (1998a) Das MIPS-Konzept: weniger Naturverbrauch—mehr Lebensqualitat durch Faktor 10. Droemersche Verlaganstaltm Munich, pp 320
Schmidt-Bleek F, Bringezu S, Hinterberger F, Liedtke C, Spannenberg J, Stiller H, Welfens MJ (1998) MAIA Einführung in die Material-Intensitäts-Analyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept, Berlin
Sinivuori P, Saari A (2006) MIPS analysis of natural resource consumption in two university buildings. Build Environ 41(5):657–668CrossRef
Stutz M (2011) Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) Assessment of a Dell OptiPlex 780 Desktop—results and recommendations. In: Finkbeiner M (2011) Towards life cycle sustainability management. Heidelberg, London, New York
Teehan P, Kandlikar M (2012) Sources of variation in life cycle assessments of desktop computers. J Ind Ecology 16:182–194CrossRef
The Climate Group (2008) SMART 2020: enabling the low carbon economy in the information age, paper presented at the Global Sustainability Initiative, Brussels
Volchkov A (2002) Server-based computing opportunities. IT Prof 4(2):18–23CrossRef
Weber CL (2012) Uncertainty and variability in product carbon footprinting. J Ind Ecology 16(2):203–211CrossRef
Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy (2003) Material intensity of materials, fuels, transport services, version 2
Metadata
Title
Comparison of two ICT solutions: desktop PC versus thin client computing
Authors
Daniel Maga
Markus Hiebel
Christian Knermann
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0499-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4/2013 Go to the issue

LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (LCIA)

Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods

LCA OF CHEMICALS

Comparative LCA of multi-product processes with non-common products: a systematic approach applied to chlorine electrolysis technologies

LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS

Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden

LAND USE IN LCA

Inclusion of soil erosion impacts in life cycle assessment on a global scale: application to energy crops in Spain

WATER USE IN LCA

Irrigation mix: how to include water sources when assessing freshwater consumption impacts associated to crops

WOOD AND OTHER RENEWABLE RESOURCES

Quantifying the greenhouse benefits of the use of wood products in two popular house designs in Sydney, Australia