Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
The Ontology of Models Read chapter Read first chapter

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

30. Complex versus Complicated Models of Cognition

Authors : Ruud J.R. Den Hartigh, Ralf F.A. Cox, Paul L.C. Van Geert

Published in: Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As humans, we continuously adapt our behavior to changes in our environment, and our cognitive abilities continuously develop over time. A major question for scientists has been to discover the (cognitive) mechanism that underlies the control of human behavior in real time, as well as cognitive development in the long term. This chapter will discuss two kinds of general approaches, which we shall refer to as the reductionist approach and the complex dynamic systems (CDS) approach. Roughly speaking, the reductionist approach assumes that separate cognitive components, such as brain areas or processing mechanisms, are primarily responsible for behavior and development, by processing (and responding to) specific environmental cues. The CDS approach assumes that cognition and thereby the control of behavior and development are distributed over the brain, body, and environment, which continuously interact over time. The aim of this chapter is to compare the two approaches in terms of their assumptions, research strategies, and analyses. Furthermore, we will discuss the extent to which current research data in the cognitive domain can be explained by the two different approaches. Based on this review, we conclude that the CDS approach, which assumes a complex rather than a complicated model of cognition, provides the most plausible approach to cognition.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Dynamical Models of Cognition
next chapter From Neural Circuitry to Mechanistic Model-Based Reasoning
Literature
1.
M.J. Richardson, K.L. Marsh, R.C. Schmidt: Challenging the egocentric view of coordinated perceiving, acting, and knowing. In: The Mind in Context, ed. by L.F. Barrett, B. Mesquita, E. Smith (GuilFord, New York 2010), Chap. 15
2.
K.A. Ericsson, W. Kintsch: Long-term working memory, Psychol. Rev. 102, 211–245 (1995)CrossRef
3.
A.B. Markman, E. Dietrich: In defense of representation, Cogn. Psychol. 40, 138–171 (2000)CrossRef
4.
K. Yarrow, P. Brown, J.W. Krakauer: Inside the brain of an elite athlete: The neural processes that support high achievement in sports, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 585–596 (2009)CrossRef
5.
A. Chemero: Anti-representationalism and the dynamical stance, Philos. Sci. 67, 625–647 (2000)CrossRef
6.
A. Clark: An embodied cognitive science?, Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 345–351 (1999)CrossRef
7.
T. Van Gelder: What might cognition be, if not computation?, J. Philos. 92, 345–381 (1995)CrossRef
8.
H.A. Simon: A behavioral model of rational choice, Q. J. Econ. 69, 99–118 (1955)CrossRef
9.
R.F.A. Cox, W. Smitsman: Action planning in young children’s tool use, Dev. Sci. 9, 628–641 (2006)CrossRef
10.
P. Fitzpatrick, R. Diorio, M.J. Richardson, R.C. Schmidt: Dynamical methods for evaluating the time-dependent unfolding of social coordination in children with autism, Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7 (2013), doi:10.​3389/​fnint.​2013.​00021
11.
K.L. Marsh, R.W. Isenhower, M.J. Richardson, M. Helt, A.D. Verbalis, R.C. Schmidt, D. Fein: Autism and social disconnection in interpersonal rocking, Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7 (2013), doi:10.​3389/​fnint.​2013.​00004
12.
E. Thelen, G. Schöner, C. Scheier, L.B. Smith: The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching, Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 1–34 (2001)CrossRef
13.
M. Varlet, L. Marin, S. Raffard, R.C. Schmidt, D. Capdevielle: J.P., Boulenger, J. Del-Monte, B.G. Bardy: Impairments of social motor coordination in schizophrenia, PLoS ONE (2012), doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0029772
14.
M.L. Wijnants, F. Hasselman, R.F.A. Cox, A.M.T. Bosman, G. Van Orden: An interaction-dominant perspective on reading fluency and dyslexia, Ann. Dyslexia 62, 100–119 (2012)CrossRef
15.
R.F. Port, T. van Gelder: Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition (MIT Press, Cambridge 1995)
16.
G.C. Van Orden, J.G. Holden, M.T. Turvey: Human cognition and \(1/f\) scaling, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 117–123 (2005)CrossRef
17.
R.F.A. Cox, A.W. Smitsman: Special section: Towards an embodiment of goals, Theor. Psychol. 18, 317–339 (2008)CrossRef
18.
D. Araujo, K. Davids, R. Hristovski: The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport, Psychol. Sport Exerc. 7, 653–676 (2006)CrossRef
19.
R.J.R. Den Hartigh, S. Van Der Steen, M. De Meij, N. Van Yperen, C. Gernigon, P.L.C. Van Geert: Characterising expert representations during real-time action: A Skill Theory application to soccer, J. Cogn. Psychol. 26, 754–767 (2014)CrossRef
20.
A.M. Williams: Perceptual skill in soccer: Implications for talent identification and development, J. Sports Sci. 18, 737–750 (2000)CrossRef
21.
D. Bassano, P. Van Geert: Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: A quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intra-individual variability in early grammatical development, Dev. Sci. 10, 588–612 (2007)CrossRef
22.
M. Van Dijk, P. Van Geert: Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development, Infant Child Dev. 16, 7–33 (2007)CrossRef
23.
P. Van Geert: A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth, Psychol. Rev. 98, 3–53 (1991)CrossRef
24.
G. Park, D. Lubinski, C.P. Benbow: Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years, Psychol. Sci. 18, 948–952 (2007)CrossRef
25.
S. Van Der Steen, H. Steenbeek, M.W.G. Van Dijk, P. Van Geert: A process approach to children’s understanding of scientific concepts: A longitudinal case study, Learn. Indiv. Diff. 30, 84–91 (2014)CrossRef
26.
W.H. Dittrich: Seeing biological motion – Is there a role for cognitive strategies? In: Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1739, ed. by A. Braffort, R. Gherbi, S. Gibet, D. Teil, J. Richardson (Springer, Berlin 1999) pp. 3–22CrossRef
27.
B. Hommel: The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects, Psychol. Res. 59, 176–186 (1996)CrossRef
28.
T. Schack, H. Ritter: The cognitive nature of action – Functional links between cognitive psychology, movement science, and robotics, Prog. Brain Res. 174, 231–250 (2009)CrossRef
29.
P. Thagard: Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science (MIT Press, Cambridge 2005)
30.
A.M. Williams, N.J. Hodges, J.S. North, G. Barton: Perceiving patterns of play in dynamic sport tasks: Investigating the essential information underlying skilled performance, Perception 35, 317–332 (2006)CrossRef
31.
J.J. Gibson: The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston 1966)
32.
J.J. Gibson: The theory of affordances. In: Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, ed. by R. Shaw, J. Bransford (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York 1977) pp. 67–82
33.
J.J. Gibson: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston 1979)
34.
C.T. Kello, B.C. Beltz, J.G. Holden, G.C. Van Orden: The emergent coordination of cognitive function, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 551–568 (2007)CrossRef
35.
P.N. Kugler, M.T. Turvey: Information, Natural Law, and The Self-Assembly of Rhythmic Movement (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale 1987)
36.
E. Thelen, L.B. Smith: A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (MIT Press, Cambridge 1994)
37.
P.L.C. Van Geert, K.W. Fischer: Dynamic systems and the quest for individual-based models of change and development. In: Toward a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Reconsidered, ed. by J.P. Spencer, M.S.C. Thomas, J. McClelland (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2009), Chap. 16
38.
G.C. Van Orden, J.G. Holden, M.T. Turvey: Self-organization of cognitive performance, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 331–335 (2003)CrossRef
39.
M.L. Wijnants: A review of theoretical perspectives in cognitive science on the presence of scaling in coordinated physiological and cognitive processes, J. Nonlinear Dyn. (2014), doi:10.​1155/​2014/​962043
40.
K. Davids, D. Araújo: The concept of Organismic Asymmetry in sport science, J. Sci. Med. Sport 13, 633–640 (2010)CrossRef
41.
J.F. Grehaigne, D. Bouthier, B. David: Dynamic-system analysis of opponent relationships in collective actions in soccer, J. Sports Sci. 15, 137–149 (1997)CrossRef
42.
N. Hurtado, V.A. Marchman, A. Fernald: Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children, Dev. Sci. 11, F31–F39 (2008)CrossRef
43.
A. Weisleder, A. Fernald: Talking to children matters early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary, Psychol. Sci. 24, 2143–2152 (2013)CrossRef
44.
P.L.C. Van Geert: Nonlinear complex dynamic systems in developmental psychology. In: Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, ed. by S.J. Guastello, M. Koopmans, D. Pincus (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York 2009) pp. 242–281
45.
M. Van Dijk, P. Van Geert, K. Korecky-Kröll, I. Maillochon, S. Laaha, W.U. Dressler, D. Bassano: Dynamic adaptation in child–adult language interaction, Lang. Learn. 63, 243–270 (2013)CrossRef
46.
47.
C.T. Kello, G.D. Brown, R. Ferrer-i-Cancho, J.G. Holden, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, T. Rhodes, G.C. Van Orden: Scaling laws in cognitive sciences, Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 223–232 (2010)CrossRef
48.
J.A.S. Kelso: Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior (MIT Press, Cambridge 1995)
49.
R. Duarte, D. Araújo, L. Freire, H. Folgado, O. Fernandes, K. Davids: Intra- and inter-group coordination patterns reveal collective behaviors of football players near the scoring zone, Hum. Mov. Sci. 31, 1639–1651 (2012)CrossRef
50.
R. Duarte, D. Araújo, K. Davids, B. Travassos, V. Gazimba, J. Sampaio: Interpersonal coordination tendencies shape 1-vs-1 sub-phase performance outcomes in youth soccer, J. Sports Sci. 30, 871–877 (2012)CrossRef
51.
J. Headrick, K. Davids, I. Renshaw, D. Araújo, P. Passos, O. Fernandes: Proximity-to-goal as a constraint on patterns of behaviour in attacker–defender dyads in team games, J. Sports Sci. 30, 247–253 (2012)CrossRef
52.
W. Frencken, J. Van Der Plaats, C. Visscher, K. Lemmink: Size matters: Pitch dimensions constrain interactive team behaviour in soccer, J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 26, 85–93 (2013)CrossRef
53.
P. Van Geert: The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development, Child Dev. Perspect. 5, 273–278 (2011)CrossRef
54.
F. Hasselman, M.P. Seevinck, R.F.A. Cox: Caught in the Undertow: There is structure beneath the ontic stream, SSRN 2010)
55.
Z.O. Weizman, C.E. Snow: Lexical output as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning, Dev. Psychol. 37, 265–279 (2001)CrossRef
56.
P. Van Geert: Group versus individual data in a dynamic systems approach to development, Enfance 2014, 283–312 (2014)CrossRef
57.
P.C. Molenaar: A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever, Measurement 2, 201–218 (2004)
58.
P.C.M. Molenaar, C.G. Campbell: The new person-specific paradigm in psychology, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18, 112–117 (2009)CrossRef
59.
R.J.R. Den Hartigh, C. Gernigon, N.W. Van Yperen, L. Marin, P.L.C. Van Geert: How psychological and behavioral team states change during positive and negative momentum, PLoS ONE (2014), doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0097887
60.
P. van Geert, H. Steenbeek: Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development, Dev. Rev. 25, 408–442 (2005)CrossRef
61.
R. Ruhland, P. Van Geert: Jumping into syntax: Transitions in the development of closed class words, Brit. J. Dev. Psychol. 16, 65–95 (1998)CrossRef
62.
M. Van Dijk, P. Van Geert: Disentangling behavior in early child development: Interpretability of early child language and its effect on utterance length measures, Infant Behav. Dev. 28, 99–117 (2005)CrossRef
63.
P. Van Geert, M. Van Dijk: Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data, Infant. Behav. Dev. 25, 340–374 (2002)CrossRef
64.
W. Briki, R.J.R. Den Hartigh, K.D. Markman, C. Gernigon: How do supporters perceive positive and negative psychological momentum changes during a simulated cycling competition?, Psychol. Sport Exerc. 15, 216–221 (2014)CrossRef
65.
A. Nowak, R.R. Vallacher: Dynamical Social Psychology (Guilford, New York 1998)
66.
P. Van Geert: The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction, Mod. Lang. J. 92, 179–199 (2008)CrossRef
67.
B.R. Jansen, H.L. Van der Maas: Evidence for the phase transition from Rule I to Rule II on the balance scale task, Dev. Rev. 21, 450–494 (2001)CrossRef
68.
H.L. Van der Maas, P.C. Molenaar: Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory, Psychol. Rev. 99, 395–417 (1992)CrossRef
69.
H.S. Hock, J.A.S. Kelso, G. Schöner: Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19, 63–80 (1993)CrossRef
70.
B. Bardy, O. Oullier, R.J. Bootsma, T.A. Stoffregen: Dynamics of human postural transitions, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 499–514 (2002)CrossRef
71.
L. Batstra, M. Hadders-Algra, J. Neeleman: Effect of antenatal exposure to maternal smoking on behavioural problems and academic achievement in childhood: Prospective evidence from a Dutch birth cohort, Early Hum. Dev. 75, 21–33 (2003)CrossRef
72.
R.J.R. Den Hartigh, R.F.A. Cox, C. Gernigon, N.W. Van Yperen, P.L.C. Van Geert: Pink noise in rowing ergometer performance and the role of skill level, Motor Control 19, 355–369 (2015)CrossRef
73.
M.R. Dimitrijevic, Y. Gerasimenko, M.M. Pinter: Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 860, 360–376 (1998)CrossRef
74.
75.
C.T. Kello: Critical branching neural networks, Psychol. Rev. 120, 230–254 (2013)CrossRef
76.
N.M. De Ruiter, R.J.R. Den Hartigh, R.F.A. Cox, P.L.C. Van Geert, E.S. Kunnen: The temporal structure of state self-esteem variability during parent–adolescent interactions: More than random fluctuations, Self Identity 14, 314–333 (2015)CrossRef
77.
D.L. Gilden: Cognitive emissions of \(1/f\) noise, Psychol. Rev. 108, 33–56 (2001)CrossRef
78.
A.L. Goldberger, L.A. Amaral, J.M. Hausdorff, P.C. Ivanov, C.K. Peng, H.E. Stanley: Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 2466–2472 (2002)CrossRef
79.
J.M. Hausdorff, Y. Ashkenazy, C.K. Peng, P.C. Ivanov, H.E. Stanley, A.L. Goldberger: When human walking becomes random walking: Fractal analysis and modeling of gait rhythm fluctuations, Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 302, 138–147 (2001)CrossRefMATH
80.
M.L. Wijnants, A.M. Bosman, F. Hasselman, R.F.A. Cox, G. Van Orden: \(1/f\) scaling in movement time changes with practice in precision aiming, Nonlinear Dyn. Psychol. Life Sci. 13, 75–94 (2009)
81.
P. Van Geert: Dynamic Systems of Development: Change Between Complexity and Chaos (Harvester, New York 1994)
82.
P. Van Geert: Dynamic modeling for development and education: From concepts to numbers, Mind Brain Educ. 8, 57–73 (2014)CrossRef
83.
D. Lubinski: Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype, Behav. Genet. 39, 350–358 (2009)CrossRef
84.
D. Lubinski, C.P. Benbow: Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise, Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 316–345 (2006)CrossRef
85.
D.K. Simonton: Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 39–43 (2001)CrossRef
86.
R.J.R. Den Hartigh, M.W.G. Van Dijk, H.W. Steenbeek, P.L.C. Van Geert: A dynamic network model to explain the development of excellent human performance, Front. Psychol. 7 (2016), doi:10.​3389/​fpsyg.​2016.​00532
87.
J.C. Huber, R. Wagner-Dobler: Scientific production: A statistical analysis of authors in mathematical logic, Scientometrics 50, 323–337 (2001)CrossRef
88.
E. O’Boyle Jr, H. Aguinis: The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance, Pers. Psychol. 65, 79–119 (2012)CrossRef
89.
D.K. Simonton: Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model, Psychol. Rev. 106, 435–457 (1999)CrossRef
90.
J. Laherrere, D. Sornette: Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: ‘‘Fat tails’’ with characteristic scales, Eur. Phys. J. 2, 525–539 (1998)CrossRef
91.
S. Redner: How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution, Eur. Phys. J. B. 4, 131–134 (1998)CrossRef
92.
M. Sutter, M.G. Kocher: Power laws of research output, Scientometrics 51, 405–414 (2001)CrossRef
93.
J.C. Huber: A statistical analysis of special cases of creativity, J. Creat. Behav. 34, 203–225 (2000)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Complex versus Complicated Models of Cognition
Authors
Ruud J.R. Den Hartigh
Ralf F.A. Cox
Paul L.C. Van Geert
Copyright Year
2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Book
Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30525-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-30526-4

Copyright Year: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_30

Premium Partner

    Image Credits