Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Education and Information Technologies 2/2022

20-08-2021

Construction of proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus using dynamic mathematics software in the calculus classroom

Author: Yılmaz Zengin

Published in: Education and Information Technologies | Issue 2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The study focused on how university students constructed proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) starting from their argumentations with dynamic mathematics software in collaborative technology-enhanced learning environment. The participants of the study were 36 university students. The data consisted of participants’ written productions, dynamic materials, and the transcriptions of the participants’ argumentations for the selected groups. The analysis was based on the integration of cK¢ model and Toulmin’s model. The analysis showed that the collaborative technology-enhanced learning environment helped the participants to interpret the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) for definite integrals geometrically and use this interpretation for the proof of the FTC. They constructed proof the FTC using geometric, empirical, and symbolic conceptions involved in their argumentations supporting their conjecture about the evolution of the derivative, the MVT, and limit idea. The construction of the connections between algebraic and geometric representations regarding the FTC in a social interaction-communication process helped them to move from a geometric perspective to a theoretical perspective while constructing proof of the FTC. The mediation role of dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra provided them to construct multiple representations and verify conjectures in producing deductive argumentations about the proof of the FTC. The emergence of the social norms in classroom microculture with this integration method contributed to the evolution of participants’ representations and their reasoning on the FTC. Additionally, they made connections between the conclusions of the FTC and the differential equation, but they did not mention the continuity condition for proof of the FTC.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Balacheff, N. (2013). cK¢, a model to reason on learners' conceptions. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–15). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago. Balacheff, N. (2013). cK¢, a model to reason on learners' conceptions. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–15). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
go back to reference Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2010). Modeling students’ conceptions: The case of function. In F. Hitt, D. Holton, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Research in College Mathematics Education VII (pp. 207–234). American Mathematical Society. Balacheff, N., & Gaudin, N. (2010). Modeling students’ conceptions: The case of function. In F. Hitt, D. Holton, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Research in College Mathematics Education VII (pp. 207–234). American Mathematical Society.
go back to reference Boero, P., Garuti, R., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996). Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures. Proceedings of the 20th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education PME-XX, vol. 2, (pp. 121–128). Valencia. Boero, P., Garuti, R., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996). Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures. Proceedings of the 20th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education PME-XX, vol. 2, (pp. 121–128). Valencia.
go back to reference Bressoud, D. M. (2011). Historical reflections on teaching the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus. The American Mathematical Monthly, 118(2), 99–115.MathSciNetCrossRef Bressoud, D. M. (2011). Historical reflections on teaching the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus. The American Mathematical Monthly, 118(2), 99–115.MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Carlson, M. P., Persson, J., & Smith, N. (2003). Developing and connecting calculus students’ notions of rate-of-change and accumulation: The fundamental theorem of calculus. In N. Patemen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America (Vol 2, pp. 165–172). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii. Carlson, M. P., Persson, J., & Smith, N. (2003). Developing and connecting calculus students’ notions of rate-of-change and accumulation: The fundamental theorem of calculus. In N. Patemen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America (Vol 2, pp. 165–172). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
go back to reference Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.CrossRef Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.CrossRef
go back to reference Chazan, D. (1993). Instructional implications of students’ understanding of the differences between empirical verification and mathematical proof. In J. L. Schwartz, M. Yerushalmy, & B. Wilson (Eds.), The geometric supposer: What is it a case of?. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Chazan, D. (1993). Instructional implications of students’ understanding of the differences between empirical verification and mathematical proof. In J. L. Schwartz, M. Yerushalmy, & B. Wilson (Eds.), The geometric supposer: What is it a case of?. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Sinclair, N. (2014). The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (Vol. 2, Mathematics Education in the Digital Era). Dordrecht: Springer. Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Sinclair, N. (2014). The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development (Vol. 2, Mathematics Education in the Digital Era). Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while doing mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adam (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 117–148). Springer-Verlag.CrossRef Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while doing mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adam (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 117–148). Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
go back to reference Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429.CrossRef Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429.CrossRef
go back to reference Edwards, L. D. (1997). Exploring the territory before proof: Student’s generalizations in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2(3), 187–215.CrossRef Edwards, L. D. (1997). Exploring the territory before proof: Student’s generalizations in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2(3), 187–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Eggs, E. (1994). Grammaire du discours argumentatif. Le topique, le générique, le figuré. Ed. Kimé, Paris. Eggs, E. (1994). Grammaire du discours argumentatif. Le topique, le générique, le figuré. Ed. Kimé, Paris.
go back to reference Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2007). Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 317–333.CrossRef Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2007). Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 317–333.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiallo, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2017). Analysis of the cognitive unity or rupture between conjecture and proof when learning to prove on a grade 10 trigonometry course. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 145–167.CrossRef Fiallo, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2017). Analysis of the cognitive unity or rupture between conjecture and proof when learning to prove on a grade 10 trigonometry course. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 145–167.CrossRef
go back to reference García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2018). Intra-mathematical connections made by high school students in performing Calculus tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 227–252.CrossRef García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2018). Intra-mathematical connections made by high school students in performing Calculus tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 227–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell, & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Number Theory. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell, & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Number Theory. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation
go back to reference Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2002). Software tools for geometrical problem solving: Potentials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 235–256.CrossRef Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2002). Software tools for geometrical problem solving: Potentials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 235–256.CrossRef
go back to reference Hitt, F. (2011). Construction of mathematical knowledge using graphic calculators (CAS) in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(6), 723–735.CrossRef Hitt, F. (2011). Construction of mathematical knowledge using graphic calculators (CAS) in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(6), 723–735.CrossRef
go back to reference Hitt, F., & González-Martín, A. (2015). Covariation between variables in a modelling process: The ACODESA (collaborative learning, scientific debate and self-reflexion) method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 201–219.CrossRef Hitt, F., & González-Martín, A. (2015). Covariation between variables in a modelling process: The ACODESA (collaborative learning, scientific debate and self-reflexion) method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 201–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Hitt, F., Saboya, M., & Cortés-Zavala, C. (2017). Rupture or continuity: The arithmetico-algebraic thinking as an alternative in a modelling process in a paper and pencil and technology environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 97–116.CrossRef Hitt, F., Saboya, M., & Cortés-Zavala, C. (2017). Rupture or continuity: The arithmetico-algebraic thinking as an alternative in a modelling process in a paper and pencil and technology environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 97–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16.CrossRef Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, S. R. (2018). Prototype images in mathematics education: The case of the graphical representation of the definite integral. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 215–234.CrossRef Jones, S. R. (2018). Prototype images in mathematics education: The case of the graphical representation of the definite integral. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 215–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Kleiner, I. (2001). History of the infinitely small and the infinitely large in calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(2–3), 137–174.CrossRef Kleiner, I. (2001). History of the infinitely small and the infinitely large in calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(2–3), 137–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentation in classroom proving processes. ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 427–441.CrossRef Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentation in classroom proving processes. ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 427–441.CrossRef
go back to reference Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.CrossRef Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students in integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 201–211.CrossRef Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students in integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 201–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1/2), 87–125.CrossRef Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1/2), 87–125.CrossRef
go back to reference McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
go back to reference Pedemonte, B. (2002). Etude didactique et cognitive des rapports de l’argumentation et de la démonstration dans le apprentisage des mathématiques. (Doctoral dissertation). Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble I, Grenoble, France. Pedemonte, B. (2002). Etude didactique et cognitive des rapports de l’argumentation et de la démonstration dans le apprentisage des mathématiques. (Doctoral dissertation). Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble I, Grenoble, France.
go back to reference Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23–41.CrossRef Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Pedemonte, B., & Balacheff, N. (2016). Establishing links between conceptions, argumentation and proof through the ckȼ-enriched Toulmin model. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 104–122.CrossRef Pedemonte, B., & Balacheff, N. (2016). Establishing links between conceptions, argumentation and proof through the ckȼ-enriched Toulmin model. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 104–122.CrossRef
go back to reference Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 281–303.CrossRef Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 281–303.CrossRef
go back to reference Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 165–178.CrossRef Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM-the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 165–178.CrossRef
go back to reference Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.CrossRef Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Radford, L. (2013). Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7–44. Radford, L. (2013). Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7–44.
go back to reference Segadas Vianna, C. (1998). Students’ understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus: An exploration of definitions, theorems and visual imagery. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Institute of Education, University of London, UK. Segadas Vianna, C. (1998). Students’ understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus: An exploration of definitions, theorems and visual imagery. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Institute of Education, University of London, UK.
go back to reference Stephan, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2002). Classroom mathematical practices in differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 459–490.CrossRef Stephan, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2002). Classroom mathematical practices in differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 459–490.CrossRef
go back to reference Swidan, O. (2020). A learning trajectory for the fundamental theorem of calculus using digital tools. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 542–562.CrossRef Swidan, O. (2020). A learning trajectory for the fundamental theorem of calculus using digital tools. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 542–562.CrossRef
go back to reference Swidan, O., Sabena, C., & Arzarello, F. (2020). Disclosure of mathematical relationships with a digital tool: A three layer-model of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 83–101.CrossRef Swidan, O., Sabena, C., & Arzarello, F. (2020). Disclosure of mathematical relationships with a digital tool: A three layer-model of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 83–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomas, G. B., Weir, M. D., & Hass, J. R. (2010). Thomas Calculus (12th ed.). Pearson Education Inc. Thomas, G. B., Weir, M. D., & Hass, J. R. (2010). Thomas Calculus (12th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
go back to reference Thompson, P. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 229–274.CrossRef Thompson, P. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 229–274.CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson, P. W., & Silverman, J. (2008). The concept of accumulation in calculus. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.). Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 43–52). MAA, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. Thompson, P. W., & Silverman, J. (2008). The concept of accumulation in calculus. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.). Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 43–52). MAA, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
go back to reference Thompson, P. W., Byerley, C., & Hatfield, N. (2013). A Conceptual Approach to Calculus Made Possible by Technology. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 124–147.CrossRef Thompson, P. W., Byerley, C., & Hatfield, N. (2013). A Conceptual Approach to Calculus Made Possible by Technology. Computers in the Schools, 30(1–2), 124–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated edition of the 1958 book). Cambridge University Press. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated edition of the 1958 book). Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Verzosa, D., Guzon, A. F., & De laspeñas, Ma. L. A. N. . (2014). Using dynamic tools to develop an understanding of the fundamental ideas of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(2), 190–199.CrossRef Verzosa, D., Guzon, A. F., & De laspeñas, Ma. L. A. N. . (2014). Using dynamic tools to develop an understanding of the fundamental ideas of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(2), 190–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 9–24). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute. Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 9–24). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
go back to reference Zengin, Y. (2017). The effects of GeoGebra software on preservice mathematics teachers’ attitudes and views toward proof and proving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 1002–1022.CrossRef Zengin, Y. (2017). The effects of GeoGebra software on preservice mathematics teachers’ attitudes and views toward proof and proving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 1002–1022.CrossRef
go back to reference Zengin, Y. (2018). Examination of the constructed dynamic bridge between the concepts of differential and derivative with the integration of GeoGebra and the ACODESA method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 311–333.CrossRef Zengin, Y. (2018). Examination of the constructed dynamic bridge between the concepts of differential and derivative with the integration of GeoGebra and the ACODESA method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 311–333.CrossRef
go back to reference Zengin, Y. (2019). Development of mathematical connection skills in a dynamic learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2175–2194.CrossRef Zengin, Y. (2019). Development of mathematical connection skills in a dynamic learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2175–2194.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Construction of proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus using dynamic mathematics software in the calculus classroom
Author
Yılmaz Zengin
Publication date
20-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Education and Information Technologies / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10666-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Education and Information Technologies 2/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner