Top

TechTrends

Published in:

01-03-2016 | Original Paper

Design and Implementation of the Game-Design and Learning Program

Author: Mete Akcaoglu

Published in: TechTrends | Issue 2/2016

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Design involves solving complex, ill-structured problems. Design tasks are consequently, appropriate contexts for children to exercise higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills. Although creating engaging and authentic design contexts for young children is difficult within the confines of traditional schooling, recently, game-design has emerged as an alternative context to provide young children with opportunities to practice design and thinking skills. Despite the increasing interest from educators and researchers to use game-design as a platform to teach young students higher-order thinking skills, literature documenting design and development of such learning experiences has been scarce. This paper provides a detailed account of how a complex network of pedagogies, theories, and technologies were brought together to design and develop the Game Design and Learning (GDL) program, with the purpose of teaching students basics of computer programming, and to give them hands-on experiences in game-design, and teach them complex problem-solving skills. The GDL program can serve as an example for efforts aiming to create similar technology-rich environments.

previous article Conversations with Innovators in Learning and Technology: Jim Groom

next article The Use of Social Networks to Employ the Wisdom of Crowds for Teaching

Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference? Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 1–11.

Akcaoglu M. (2014) Learning problem-solving through making games at the game design and learning summer program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 583-600. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9347-4.

Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.003.

Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2010). A case study of educational game design by kids and for kids. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5242–5246. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.853.CrossRef

Bonnardel, N., & Zenasni, F. (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in design: an enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 180–191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x.CrossRef

Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, E. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education, 58(1), 240–249.CrossRef

Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2013). Towards innovation in complex problem solving research: an introduction to the special issue. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 359–363. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9299-0.CrossRef

Fowler, A., & Cusack, B. (2011). Enhancing introductory programming with Kodu Game Lab: An exploratory study. In M. Lopez & M. Verhaart (Eds.), Proceedings from 2nd Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand (CITRENZ2011) (pp. 69–79). New Zealand: Christchurch.

Fullerton, T. (2008). Game design workshop. Boston, MA: Elsevier.

Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133–142.CrossRef

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355.CrossRef

Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395–429.CrossRef

Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32.CrossRef

Hwang, G.-J., Hung, C.-M., & Chen, N.-S. (2013). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7.

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.

Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: a case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & Education, 73(1), 26–39. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.010.CrossRef

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRef

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. doi:10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV.CrossRef

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Kurland, D. M., Pea, R. D., Clement, C., & Mawby, R. (1986). A study of the development of programming ability and thinking skills in high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(4), 429–458.CrossRef

Li, Q. (2010). Digital game building: learning in a participatory culture. Educational Research, 52(4), 427–443. doi:10.1080/00131881.2010.524752.CrossRef

MacLaurin, M. B. (2011). The design of Kodu: a tiny visual programming language for children on the Xbox 360. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 46(1), 241–246.CrossRef

Mayer, R. E. (1977). Thinking and problem solving: An introduction to human cognition and learning. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26(1), 49–63.CrossRef

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.CrossRef

Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference.

Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 287–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Microsoft Kodu. (2012). Microsoft Research. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/kodu/.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.CrossRef

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (Vol. 36, pp. 1–11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.

Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=950596.

Resnick, L. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.

Robertson, J. (2012). Making games in the classroom: benefits and gender concerns. Computers & Education, 59(2), 385–398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.020.CrossRef

Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1987). Transfer of cognitive skills from programming: when and how? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 149–169.CrossRef

Scratch. (2012). Retrieved from http://scratch.mit.edu/.

Simon, H. A. (1995). Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving in design. In A. Collen & W. W. Gasparski (Eds.), Design and systems: General applications of methodology (Vol. 3)ems (Vol. 3, pp. 245–257). Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Smith, K., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17.

Stolee, K. T., & Fristoe, T. (2011). Expressing computer science concepts through Kodu Game Lab. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 99–104).

Touretzky, D. S., Marghitu, D., Ludi, S., Bernstein, D., & Ni, L. (2013). Accelerating K-12 computational thinking using scaffolding, staging, and abstraction. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 609–614). ACM.

Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2012). RoboBuilder: Video game program-to-play constructionist. In Constructionism 2012 (pp. 1–5). Athens, Greece.

Title: Design and Implementation of the Game-Design and Learning Program
Author: Mete Akcaoglu
Publication date: 01-03-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: TechTrends / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Electronic ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0022-y

Springer Professional

Design and Implementation of the Game-Design and Learning Program

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Teachers’ Attitudes to using iPads or Tablet Computers; Implications for Developing New Skills, Pedagogies and School-Provided Support

2015 AECT International Convention Summary

Professional Development Considerations for Makerspace Leaders, Part One: Addressing “What?” and “Why?”

Investigating Practices in Teacher Education that Promote and Inhibit Technology Integration Transfer in Early Career Teachers

Presence+Experience: A Framework for the Purposeful Design of Presence in Online Courses

2014 Strohbehn Intern: A Defining Experience, the ECT Internship as an Invitation to Organizational Leadership

Premium Partner