Top

Measurement Techniques

Published in:

01-01-2015 | General Problems of Metrology and Measurement Technique

Development and Study of Algorithms for Processing Inconsistent Data in Key Comparisons of Standards

Author: N. A. Burmistrova

Published in: Measurement Techniques | Issue 10/2015

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

An algorithm is proposed for evaluating inconsistent measurement data obtained in key comparisons of national standards. It is based on the procedure of modifying the measurement uncertainty in a way so as to form a set of metrologically compatible measurement results. Application of this algorithm is illustrated for the example of the CCQM-K5 key comparisons. The algorithm is compared with other methods.

previous article Estimate of the Error Owing to Neglect of the Earth’s Triaxiality in the Transfer Function for Nutation Angle Calculations

next article Effect of Measurement Accuracy and Range of Variation of a Physical Quantity on the Correlation Coefficient

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data. An introduction,” Metrologia, 39, 587–588 (2002).ADSCrossRef

BIPM 1999, Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates Issued by National Metrology Institutes (MRA), www.bipm.org, accessed Jan. 20, 2014

M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data,” Metrologia, 39, 589–595 (2002).ADSCrossRef

A. G. Chunovkina et al., “Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases,” Metrologia, 45, 211–216 (2008).ADSCrossRef

I. Lira, “Combining inconsistent data from interlaboratory comparisons,” Metrologia, 44, 415–421 (2007).ADSCrossRef

C. Elster and B. Toman, “Analysis of key comparison data: critical assessment of elements of current practice with suggested improvements,” Metrologia, 50, 549–555 (2013).ADSCrossRef

K. Weise and W. Wöger, “Removing model and data non-conformity in measurement evaluation,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 11, 1649–1658 (2000).ADSCrossRef

R. Willink, “Statistical determination of a comparison reference value using hidden errors,” Metrologia, 39, 343–354 (2002).ADSCrossRef

M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset,” Metrologia, 44, 187–200 (2007).ADSCrossRef

10.

C. Elster and B. Toman, “Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories’ biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging,” Metrologia, 47, 113–119 (2010).ADSCrossRef

11.

D. R. White, “On the analysis of measurement comparisons,” Metrologia, 41, 122–131 (2004).ADSCrossRef

12.

C. M. Sutton, “Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons,” Metrologia, 41, 272–277 (2004).ADSCrossRef

13.

B. Toman and A. Possolo, “Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons,” Accred. Qual. Assur., 14, 553–563 (2009).CrossRef

14.

A. G. Chunovkina, N. A. Burmistrova, and N. D. Zvyagin, “An approach for evaluating the results of key comparisons of standards with inconsistent data,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 3–6 (2013); Measur. Techn., 56, No. 6, 577–583 (2013).CrossRef

15.

A. G. Chunovkina, N. A. Burmistrova, and N. D. Zvyagin, “Interlaboratory comparisons. Practical approach for data evaluation,” ACTA IMEKO, 2, No. 2, 28–33 (2013).

16.

N. A. Burmistrova and N. D. Zvyagin, “The algorithm for obtaining metrological compatibility of measurement results while analyzing key comparison data,” Abstr. 5th COOMET Competition for Young Metrologists, Braunschweig (2013), pp. 1–4.

17.

CCQM-K5, Key Comparison – Determination of pp’-DDE in Fish Oil. Final Report, March 2001, www.bipm.org, accessed Nov. 30, 2013

18.

JCGM 200:2008, International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), www.bipm.org, accessed Nov. 30, 2013

19.

W. Bremser, “Self-consistent reference value estimation,” Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing. IX, World Scientific Co. (2012), pp. 58–65.

Title: Development and Study of Algorithms for Processing Inconsistent Data in Key Comparisons of Standards
Author: N. A. Burmistrova
Publication date: 01-01-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Measurement Techniques / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0543-1972
Electronic ISSN: 1573-8906
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-015-0587-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Mathematical Modeling of the Errors of Measurements of the Thermal Properties of Insulating Material by the Plane “Instantaneous” Heat Source Method

Bioimpedance Research Instrumentation System for the BION-M1 Spacecraft

An Efficient Universal Algorithm for Identification and Weighing of Moving Wheeled Vehicles

A Superbroadband Electro-Optical Pulsed Electric Field Strength Converter

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of a Scene with the Use of Monocular Vision

Effect of Measurement Accuracy and Range of Variation of a Physical Quantity on the Correlation Coefficient