Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 2/2016

06-05-2015

Domain Importance in Subjective Well-Being Measures

Author: Chang-ming Hsieh

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In subjective well-being (SWB) studies, domain importance typically refers to the relative importance of various life domains. Although there appears to be a consensus that domain importance is an important topic, whether or not domain importance should be incorporated into measures of SWB remains contentious. Even though recent studies that examined the claims against incorporating domain importance, also known as domain importance weighting, into SWB measures found that both conceptual and empirical arguments have been far from sufficient, insufficient evidence against importance weighting does not mean there is evidence to support importance weighting. Conducting a secondary analysis, the current study investigates the role of domain importance in SWB measures without making any arbitrary assumptions regarding how domain importance weighting should function. Results of the study show that the relationship between global life satisfaction and the sum of domain satisfaction scores did not remain constant across groups of different domain importance rating patterns. The findings suggest that, when the research objective is to study variability of responses at the level of homogeneous subgroups, it is important to consider domain importance when using domain satisfaction to construct global SWB measures.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.CrossRef Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.CrossRef
go back to reference Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1971). Quality of American Life, 1971 (Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1992-02-16. doi:10.3886/ICPSR03508.v1). Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1971). Quality of American Life, 1971 (Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1992-02-16. doi:10.​3886/​ICPSR03508.​v1).
go back to reference Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American Life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American Life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage.
go back to reference Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the tale of gold standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRef Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the tale of gold standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRef
go back to reference Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRef Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRef
go back to reference Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 17(3), 15–19. Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 17(3), 15–19.
go back to reference Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 15–24.CrossRef Ferrans, C., & Powers, M. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 15–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92–101.CrossRef Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 92–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferris, A. L., Land, K. C., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRef Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferris, A. L., Land, K. C., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 455–496.CrossRef Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 455–496.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M. (2012a). Importance is not unimportant: The role of importance weighting in QoL measures. Social Indicators Research, 109, 206–278.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2012a). Importance is not unimportant: The role of importance weighting in QoL measures. Social Indicators Research, 109, 206–278.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M. (2012b). Should we give up domain importance weighting in QoL measures? Social Indicators Research, 108, 99–109.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2012b). Should we give up domain importance weighting in QoL measures? Social Indicators Research, 108, 99–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M. (2014). Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: Evaluation of domain importance weighting in quality of life measurements. Social Indicators Research, 119, 483–493.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2014). Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: Evaluation of domain importance weighting in quality of life measurements. Social Indicators Research, 119, 483–493.CrossRef
go back to reference Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy, G. P. (2014). Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 63–77.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy, G. P. (2014). Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 63–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Inglehart, R. (1978). Value priorities life satisfaction, and political dissatisfaction among western publics. Comparative Studies in Sociology, 1, 173–202. Inglehart, R. (1978). Value priorities life satisfaction, and political dissatisfaction among western publics. Comparative Studies in Sociology, 1, 173–202.
go back to reference Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309–336.CrossRef Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309–336.CrossRef
go back to reference Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
go back to reference Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002a). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002a). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002b). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 37–44. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002b). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 37–44.
go back to reference Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for social sciences (pp. 175–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for social sciences (pp. 175–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14, 141–163.CrossRef Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14, 141–163.CrossRef
go back to reference McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Basic concepts and procedures in single- and multiple-group latent class analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 56–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Basic concepts and procedures in single- and multiple-group latent class analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 56–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.CrossRef Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1987). Methodology review: Clustering methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 329–354.CrossRef Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1987). Methodology review: Clustering methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 329–354.CrossRef
go back to reference Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schuniaker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schuniaker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.CrossRef Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.CrossRef
go back to reference Philip, E. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Peterman, A., & Cronk, L. B. (2009). Measurement accuracy in assessing patient’s quality of life: To weight or not to weight domains of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 18, 775–782.CrossRef Philip, E. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Peterman, A., & Cronk, L. B. (2009). Measurement accuracy in assessing patient’s quality of life: To weight or not to weight domains of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 18, 775–782.CrossRef
go back to reference Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.CrossRef Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.CrossRef
go back to reference Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.CrossRef Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). ‘Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.CrossRef Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). ‘Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.CrossRef
go back to reference Ryff, C. D., & Essex, M. J. (1992). The interpretation of life experience and well-being: The sample case of relocation. Psychology and Aging, 7, 507–517.CrossRef Ryff, C. D., & Essex, M. J. (1992). The interpretation of life experience and well-being: The sample case of relocation. Psychology and Aging, 7, 507–517.CrossRef
go back to reference Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
go back to reference Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). ‘Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.CrossRef Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). ‘Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.CrossRef
go back to reference Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2013). Latent GOLD 5.0 upgrade manual. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2013). Latent GOLD 5.0 upgrade manual. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
go back to reference Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize and objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.CrossRef Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize and objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, C. H. (2008a). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.CrossRef Wu, C. H. (2008a). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, C. H. (2008b). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 468–480.CrossRef Wu, C. H. (2008b). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 468–480.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Investigating importance weighting of satisfaction scores from a formative model with partial least squares analysis. Social Indicators Research, 90, 351–363.CrossRef Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Investigating importance weighting of satisfaction scores from a formative model with partial least squares analysis. Social Indicators Research, 90, 351–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.CrossRef Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.CrossRef Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.CrossRef
go back to reference Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: An experimental examination of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.CrossRef Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: An experimental examination of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.CrossRef
go back to reference Zabinski, M. F., Norman, G. J., Sallis, J. F., & Calfas, K. J. (2007). Patterns of sedentary behavior among adolescents. Health Psychology, 26, 113–120.CrossRef Zabinski, M. F., Norman, G. J., Sallis, J. F., & Calfas, K. J. (2007). Patterns of sedentary behavior among adolescents. Health Psychology, 26, 113–120.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Domain Importance in Subjective Well-Being Measures
Author
Chang-ming Hsieh
Publication date
06-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0977-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Social Indicators Research 2/2016 Go to the issue