Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 1/2014

01.10.2014

Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater: Evaluation of Domain Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measurements

verfasst von: Chang-ming Hsieh

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper examined major inconsistencies between claims made and the evidence presented in recent studies on evaluating the role of domain importance weighting in quality of life (QoL) measures. Three inconsistencies were discussed and they were: (1) treating the failure to support a particular importance weighting function as the evidence of uncovering no importance weighting necessary at all, (2) considering domain importance weighting and multiplicative scores synonymous, and (3) extending findings with a within-domain focus to an across-domain focus. Overlooking these inconsistencies may lead to an overgeneralization of study findings, which would likely result in premature or even erroneous conclusions. Caution must be given in interpreting study results in order to avoid overgeneralization which limits our understanding of the true role that domain importance weighting may play in QoL measures.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aberson, C. L. (2010). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press. Aberson, C. L. (2010). Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regressions: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge. Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regressions: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.CrossRef Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–74.CrossRef Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.CrossRef Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61, 227–240.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68, 163–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, C. M. (2012a). Importance is not unimportant: The role of importance weighting in QoL measures. Social Indicators Research, 109, 206–278.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2012a). Importance is not unimportant: The role of importance weighting in QoL measures. Social Indicators Research, 109, 206–278.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, C. M. (2012b). Should we give up domain importance weighting in QoL measures? Social Indicators Research, 108, 99–109.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2012b). Should we give up domain importance weighting in QoL measures? Social Indicators Research, 108, 99–109.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.CrossRef Hsieh, C. M. (2013). Issues in evaluating importance weighting in quality of life measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 681–693.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy G. P. Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9215-0. Hsieh, C. M., & Kenagy G. P. Measuring quality of life: A case for re-examining the assessment of domain importance weighting. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi:10.​1007/​s11482-013-9215-0.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan, R. M., Feeny, D., & Revicki, D. A. (1993). Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 2, 467–475.CrossRef Kaplan, R. M., Feeny, D., & Revicki, D. A. (1993). Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 2, 467–475.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lix, L. M., Sajobi, T. T., Sawatzky, R., Liu, J., Mayo, N. E., Huang, Y., et al. (2013). Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift. Quality of Life Research, 22, 695–703.CrossRef Lix, L. M., Sajobi, T. T., Sawatzky, R., Liu, J., Mayo, N. E., Huang, Y., et al. (2013). Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift. Quality of Life Research, 22, 695–703.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309–336.CrossRef Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309–336.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Locke, E. A. (1976). ‘The nature and causes of job satisfaction’ in handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, edited by M. D. Dunnette (Rand McNally, Chicago) pp. 1297–1349. Locke, E. A. (1976). ‘The nature and causes of job satisfaction’ in handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, edited by M. D. Dunnette (Rand McNally, Chicago) pp. 1297–1349.
Zurück zum Zitat Locke, E. A. (1984). ‘Job satisfaction’ in social psychology and organizational behavior, edited by M. Gruneberg and T. Wall (Wiley, London) pp. 93–117. Locke, E. A. (1984). ‘Job satisfaction’ in social psychology and organizational behavior, edited by M. Gruneberg and T. Wall (Wiley, London) pp. 93–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Luque, M., Miettinen, K., Eskelinen, P., Ruiz, F. (2009). ‘Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optmization’, OMEGA—International Journal of Management Science 37, pp. 450–462. Luque, M., Miettinen, K., Eskelinen, P., Ruiz, F. (2009). ‘Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optmization’, OMEGA—International Journal of Management Science 37, pp. 450–462.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcenaro, O. D., Luque, M., & Ruiz, F. (2010). An application of multiobjective programming to the study of workers’ satisfaction in the Spanish labour market. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 430–443.CrossRef Marcenaro, O. D., Luque, M., & Ruiz, F. (2010). An application of multiobjective programming to the study of workers’ satisfaction in the Spanish labour market. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 430–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14, 141–163.CrossRef Mastekaasa, A. (1984). Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 14, 141–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Philip, E. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Peterman, A., & Cronk, L. B. (2009). ‘Measurement accuracy in assessing patient’s quality of life: To weight or not to weight domains of quality of life’. Quality of Life Research, 18, 775–782. Philip, E. J., Merluzzi, T. V., Peterman, A., & Cronk, L. B. (2009). ‘Measurement accuracy in assessing patient’s quality of life: To weight or not to weight domains of quality of life’. Quality of Life Research, 18, 775–782.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.CrossRef Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.CrossRef Russell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2005). Importance ratings and weighting: Old concerns and new perspectives. International Journal of Testing, 5, 105–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). ‘Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure’. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.CrossRef Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). ‘Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure’. Social Indicators Research, 75, 146–167.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). ‘Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement’. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.CrossRef Trauer, T., & Mackinnon, A. (2001). ‘Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement’. Quality of Life Research, 10, 579–585.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. H. (2008a). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.CrossRef Wu, C. H. (2008a). Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis: Hierarchical linear modeling for within-subject data. Social Indicators Research, 86, 101–111.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. H. (2008b). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 468–480.CrossRef Wu, C. H. (2008b). Can we weight satisfaction score with importance ranks across life domains? Social Indicators Research, 86, 468–480.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. H., Yang, C. T., & Huang, L. N. On the predictive effect of multidimensional importance-weighted quality of life scores on overall subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0242-x. Wu, C. H., Yang, C. T., & Huang, L. N. On the predictive effect of multidimensional importance-weighted quality of life scores on overall subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.​1007/​s11205-013-0242-x.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.CrossRef Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79, 485–502.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.CrossRef Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings in measuring quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 78, 305–326.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: An experimental examination of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.CrossRef Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2007). Importance has been considered in satisfaction evaluation: An experimental examination of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 81, 521–541.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater: Evaluation of Domain Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measurements
verfasst von
Chang-ming Hsieh
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0500-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Social Indicators Research 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner