Top

Review of Managerial Science

Published in:

08-01-2021 | Review Paper

Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: a literature review and research agenda

Authors: Ana Joana Fernandes, Joao J. Ferreira

Published in: Review of Managerial Science | Issue 1/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Entrepreneurial ecosystems have recently emerged as a central topic on the agenda of both researchers and political leaders. As a consequence of the multiple studies published in recent times, this promising avenue of research is currently disjointed, lacking both a systematic structure and a theoretical framework. Intrinsic to entrepreneurial ecosystems, the networks established among the diverse stakeholders impact on the configuration, the evolution and the outcomes of entrepreneurial ecosystems. This study systematically analyzes 65 conceptual and empirical articles identified in the Web of Science database to explore, analyze and discussing the main trends in the literature on the topic of entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks (EEs&Ns). The analysis of bibliographic coupling of documents made possible to group the EEs&Ns literature into four clusters: (1) Context and Cooperation; (2) Established Networks; (3) Challenges to the Affirmation of Minorities; (4) Formal Structures. In turn, the analysis of keywords co-occurrence revealed the most important literature trends on this topic: (1) innovation and dynamics: actors and norms; (2) performance, knowledge, and entrepreneurship; (3) technology and firms. The systematization of these results allowed us to identify the institutional/contextual dimension, the relational dimension, and the organizational/structural dimension as the main approaches followed by the researchers on this topic. The conceptual framework advanced attests to the interdependencies among the research paths found on EEs&Ns. Finally, following the systematic literature review undertaken, we identify the promising paths and proposals for future research that may advance still further the academic understanding of EEs&Ns.

previous article Towards a network-based view of effective entrepreneurial ecosystems

next article Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aarikka-Stenroos L, Ritala P (2017) Network management in the era of ecosystems: systematic review and management framework. Ind Mark Manage 67:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Åstebro T, Audretsch DB, Robinson DT (2016a) Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: a call to arms. Small Bus Econ 47(1):35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9712-2CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE, Licht G (2016b) National systems of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 46(4):527–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9705-1CrossRef

Acs ZJ, Stam E, Audretsch DB, O’Connor A (2017) The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Econ, vol 49, no 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8

Acs ZJ, Szerb L, Lafuente E, Lloyd A (2018) The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65903-9

Adner R (2016) Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy. J Manage 43(1):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451CrossRef

Aldrich H, Zimmer C (1986) Entrepreneurship through social network. In: The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, pp 3–23

Alvedalen J, Boschma R (2017) A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda. Eur Plan Stud 25(6):887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694CrossRef

Andersson M, Braunerhjelm P, Thulin P (2012) Creative destruction and productivity: entrepreneurship by type, sector and sequence. J Entrepreneurship Public Policy 1(2):1. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2016-0047CrossRef

Apa R, Grandinetti R, Sedita R (2017) The social and business dimensions of a networked business incubator: the case of H-Farm. J Small Bus Enterprise Develop 24(2):198–221CrossRef

Audretsch DB (2009) Emergence of the entrepreneurial society. Bus Horiz 52(5):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.06.002CrossRef

Audretsch DB, Kuratko DF, Link AN (2015) Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 45(4):703–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9663-zCrossRef

Audretsch DB, Cunningham JA, Kuratko DF, Lehmann EE, Menter M (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. J Technol Transfer 44(2):313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4CrossRef

Autio E, Kenney M, Mustar P, Siegel D, Wright M (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Res Policy 43(7):1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015CrossRef

Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas LDW, Wright M (2018) Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 12(1):72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266CrossRef

Bakas FE, Duxbury N, Vinagre de Castro T (2019) Creative tourism: catalysing artisan entrepreneur networks in rural Portugal. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 25(4):731–752. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-0177CrossRef

Belitski M, Heron K (2017) Expanding entrepreneurship education ecosystems. J Manage Develop 36(2):163–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216CrossRef

Bouncken RB, Gast J, Kraus S, Bogers M (2015) Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. RMS 9(3):577–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0168-6CrossRef

Bouncken RB, Laudien SM, Fredrich V, Görmar L (2018) Coopetition in coworking-spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space. RMS 12(2):385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0267-7CrossRef

Boyack K, Klavans R (2010) Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61(12):2389–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiCrossRef

Brem A, Radziwon A (2017) Efficient triple helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects—a case from Denmark. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 123:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.002CrossRef

Brown R, Mawson S (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and public policy in action: a critique of the latest industrial policy blockbuster. Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz011CrossRef

Callon M, Courtial J-P, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Sci Inf 22(2):191–235CrossRef

Callon M, Courtial J-P, Laville F (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics 22(1):155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280CrossRef

Cannavacciuolo L, Iandoli L, Ponsiglione C, Zollo G (2017) Learning by failure vs learning by habits: entrepreneurial learning micro-strategies as determinants of the emergence of co-located entrepreneurial networks. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 23(3):524–546CrossRef

Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Campbell DFJ, Meissner D, Stamati D (2018) The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R and D Manage 48(1):148–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300CrossRef

Carlsson B, Braunerhjelm P, McKelvey M, Olofsson C, Persson L, Ylinenpää H (2013) The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Bus Econ 41(4):913–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-yCrossRef

Carter DR, DeChurch LA, Braun MT, Contractor NS (2015) Social network approaches to leadership: an integrative conceptual review. J Appl Psychol 100(3):597–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038922CrossRef

Carvalho LMC, Galina SV (2015) The role of business incubators for start-ups development in Brazil and Portugal. World J Entrepreneurship Manage Sustain Develop 11(4):256–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-05-2015-0023CrossRef

Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 62(7):1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiCrossRef

Colombelli A, Paolucci E, Ughetto E (2019) Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ 52(2):505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4CrossRef

Colombo MG, Dagnino GB, Lehmann EE, Salmador MP (2019) The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ 52(2):419–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9952-9CrossRef

Cornelius B, Landström H, Persson O (2006) Entrepreneurial studies: the dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(3):375–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00125.xCrossRef

Cowell M, Lyon-Hill S, Tate S (2018) It takes all kinds: understanding diverse entrepreneurial ecosystems. J Enterprising Commun People Places Global Econ 12(2):178–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200910999101CrossRef

Crick JM, Crick D (2018) Angel investors’ predictive and control funding criteria: the importance of evolving business models. J Res Market Entrepreneurship 20(1):34–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-11-2016-0043CrossRef

Cunningham JA, Menter M, Wirsching K (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: a principal investigator-centered governance framework. Small Bus Econ 52(2):545–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9959-2CrossRef

De Brito S, Leitão J (2020) Mapping and defining entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic literature review. Knowl Manage Res Practice 00(00):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1751571CrossRef

Di Fatta D, Caputo F, Dominici G (2018) A relational view of start-up firms inside an incubator: the case of the ARCA consortium. Europ J Innovat Manage 21(4):601–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2017-0110CrossRef

Doblinger C, Surana K, Anadon LD (2019) Governments as partners: the role of alliances in US cleantech startup innovation. Res Policy 48(6):1458–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.006CrossRef

Ferreira JJM, Fernandes CI, Kraus S (2019) Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends. RMS 13(1):181–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0242-3CrossRef

Frank H, Landström H (2016) What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap. Entrepreneurship Regional Develop 28(1–2):51–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1100687CrossRef

Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD (2013) Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases. J Korean Med Sci 28(9):1270–1275. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.9.1270CrossRef

Harrison R, Scheela W, Lai PC, Vivekarajah S (2018) Beyond institutional voids and the middle-income trap: the emerging business angel market in Malaysia. Asia Pacific J Manage 35(4):965–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9535-yCrossRef

Hébert RF, Link AN (1989) In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 1(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389915CrossRef

Isenberg D (2010) The big idea: how to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Bus Rev 88(6):40–50

Isenberg D (2011) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosyst Project 1(781):1–13

Isenberg D, Onyemah V (2016) Fostering scaleup ecosystems for regional economic growth (innovations case narrative: manizales-mas and scale up milwaukee). Innovat Technol Governance Global 11(1–2):60–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00248CrossRef

Jarneving B (2007) Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. J Inf 1(4):287–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004CrossRef

Johannisson B (1986) Network strategies: management technology for entrepreneurship and change. Int Small Bus J 5(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005CrossRef

Johannisson B (1988) Business formation—a network approach. Scand J Manag 4(3–4):83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(88)90002-4CrossRef

Kang Q, Li H, Cheng Y, Kraus S (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: analysing the status quo. Knowl Manage Res Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1701964CrossRef

Kenny B (2015) Meeting the entrepreneurial learning needs of professional athletes in career transition. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 21(2):175–196CrossRef

Kessler MM (1963a) An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 9(1):49–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1963.1057800CrossRef

Kessler MM (1963b) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am Doc 14(1):10–25CrossRef

Kraus S, Roig-Tierno N, Bouncken RB (2019) Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. RMS 13(3):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00333-8CrossRef

Kraus S, Breier M, Dasí-Rodríguez S (2020) The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. Int Entrepreneurship Manage J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4CrossRef

Kuratko DF, Fisher G, Bloodgood JM, Hornsby JS (2017) The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Bus Econ 49(1):119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9870-xCrossRef

Kuschel K, Lepeley MT, Espinosa F, Gutiérrez S (2017) Funding challenges of Latin American women start-up founders in the technology industry. Cross Cultural Strategic Manage 24(2):310–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2016-0072CrossRef

Landström H, Harirchi G, Åström F (2012) Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Res Policy 41(7):1154–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009CrossRef

Lawani SM (1981) Bibliometrics: its theoretical foundations. Methods Appl Libri 31(4):294–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294CrossRef

Malecki EJ (2018) Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass 12(3):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359CrossRef

Maroufkhani P, Wagner R, Wan Ismail WK (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review. J Enterpris Commun 12(4):545–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025CrossRef

Martin R, Sunley P (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? J Econ Geogr 3(1):5–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5CrossRef

McAdam M, Harrison RT, Leitch CM (2019) Stories from the field: women’s networking as gender capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ 53:459–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9995-6CrossRef

McKague K, Wong J, Siddiquee N (2017) Social franchising as rural entrepreneurial ecosystem development: the case of Krishi Utsho in Bangladesh. Int JEntrepreneurship Innovat 18(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750316686240CrossRef

Motoyama Y, Knowlton K (2016) From resource munificence to ecosystem integration: the case of government sponsorship in St. Louis Entrepreneurship Regional Develop 28(5–6):448–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1186749CrossRef

Motoyama Y, Knowlton K (2017) Examining the connections within the startup ecosystem: a case study of st. Louis Entrepreneurship Res J 7(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2016-0011CrossRef

Muldoon J, Bauman A, Lucy C (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: do you trust or distrust? J Enterprising Commun People Places Global Econ 12(2):158–177CrossRef

Neumeyer X, Santos SC, Caetano A, Kalbfleisch P (2019a) Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: a social capital and network approach. Small Bus Econ 53:475–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9996-5CrossRef

Neumeyer X, Santos SC, Morris MH (2019b) Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems. J Technol Transfer 44(2):462–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9694-0CrossRef

Nijkamp P (2003) Entrepreneurship in a Modern network economy. Reg Stud 37(4):395–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000074424CrossRef

Patrício LD, Ferreira JJ (2020) Blockchain security research: theorizing through bibliographic-coupling analysis. J Adv Manage Res. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-04-2020-0051CrossRef

Perianes-Rodriguez A, Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2016) Constructing bibliometric networks: a comparison between full and fractional counting. J Inf 10(4):1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006CrossRef

Pitelis C (2012) Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework. Ind Corp Change 21(6):1359–1388. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts008CrossRef

Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Compet Intell Rev 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880010112CrossRef

Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Develop Quart 14(1):15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105CrossRef

Roig-Tierno N, Kraus S, Cruz S (2018) The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship. RMS 12(2):379–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0266-8CrossRef

Roundy PT (2017) “Small town” entrepreneurial ecosystems: implications for developed and emerging economies. J Entrepreneurship Emerg Econ 9(3):238–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0040CrossRef

Schaeffer V, Matt M (2016) Development of academic entrepreneurship in a non-mature context: the role of the university as a hub-organisation. Entrepreneurship Regional Develop 28(9–10):724–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1247915CrossRef

Schäfer S, Mayer H (2019) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: founding figures and research frontiers in economic geography. Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschaftsgeographie. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2019-0008CrossRef

Sekliuckiene J, Sedziniauskiene R, Viburys V (2016) Adoption of open innovation in the internationalization of knowledge intensive firms. Inzinerine Ekonomika Eng Econ 27(5):607–617. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.5.15371CrossRef

Snyder H (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 104:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039CrossRef

Spigel B (2017) The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 41(1):49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167CrossRef

Spigel B, Harrison R (2018) Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 12(1):151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268CrossRef

Stam E (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. Eur Plan Stud 23(9):1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484CrossRef

Sternberg R, Von Bloh J, Coduras A (2019) A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschaftsgeographie. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0014CrossRef

Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2005) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Handbook Entrepreneurship Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23622-8_11CrossRef

Sunny SA, Shu C (2019) Investments, incentives, and innovation: geographical clustering dynamics as drivers of sustainable entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 52(4):905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9941-zCrossRef

Theodoraki C, Messeghem K, Rice MP (2018) A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study. Small Bus Econ 51(1):153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9924-0CrossRef

Torraco RJ (2005) Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev 4(3):356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283CrossRef

Torraco RJ (2016) Writing integrative literature reviews: using the past and present to explore the future. Hum Resour Dev Rev 15(4):404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606CrossRef

Tranfield D, Denyer D, Palminder S (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management Knowlege by means of systemic review. Br J Manage 14(4):207–222CrossRef

Urbano D, Aparicio S, Audretsch D (2019) Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? Small Bus Econ 53(1):21–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0CrossRef

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2009) How to normalize cooccurrence data? an analysis of some well-known similarity measures. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 60(8):1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiCrossRef

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3CrossRef

Van Praag M (1999) Some classic views on entrepreneurship. De Economist 147(3):311–335.CrossRef

Van Praag M, Versloot PH (2007) What is the value of entrepreneurship? a review of recent research. Small Bus Econ 29(4):351–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9074-xCrossRef

van Rijnsoever FJ (2020) Meeting, mating, and intermediating: how incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Res Policy 49(1):103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103884CrossRef

van Weele M, van Rijnsoever FJ, Eveleens CP, Steinz H, van Stijn N, Groen M (2018) Start-EU-up! Lessons from international incubation practices to address the challenges faced by Western European start-ups. J Technol Transfer 43(5):1161–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9538-8CrossRef

Wennekers S, Thurik R (1999) Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Bus Econ 13:27–55CrossRef

Title: Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: a literature review and research agenda
Authors: Ana Joana Fernandes
Joao J. Ferreira
Publication date: 08-01-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Review of Managerial Science / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-6683
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6691
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00437-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems: fintech in the financial services industry

Towards a network-based view of effective entrepreneurial ecosystems

Value configurations in sharing economy business models

Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems

The digital transformation of a traditional market into an entrepreneurial ecosystem

Digital innovation management for entrepreneurial ecosystems: services and functionalities as drivers of innovation management software adoption