Top

Quality & Quantity

Published in:

02-01-2021

Evaluating intra-project knowledge growth and its effect on co-located software team output

Authors: Supriya Kumar Ghatak, Biswajit Mahanty

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 5/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Knowledge of the team members of a co-located software project grows with increasing interaction with the business client. It also grows with the subsequent intra-project knowledge transfer among the team members. The challenge lies in forming a project team in such a manner that it helps the team members to enhance their individual knowledge as well as improve the overall team output during the project execution. In this paper, a quantitative model is formulated to quantify the intra-project knowledge growth and the overall team output in a co-located software project team. The model is developed with the help of a set of focus group studies and previous literature. Six different policies or scenarios are then formulated with the help of the model to assess the impact of team composition on knowledge growth and team output by using case-data from 3 different real-world co-located software teams. The model is validated by comparing the model results with the estimated results in terms of team output. An insight obtained from the model results is that the initial project set up and the team composition act as key inputs towards the increased knowledge growth and improved team output. The team composition should stress upon the initial knowledge level and the knowledge processing ability of the team members. We recommend that the model may act as a decision support system to the software project managers during the initial project set up to improve the knowledge level and to reach the desired team output within the specified time.

previous article The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research

next article Investigation of information sharing via multiple social media platforms: a comparison of Facebook and WeChat adoption

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adelson, B., Soloway, E.: The role of domain experience in software design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 11, 1351–1360 (1985)CrossRef

Ahuja, G., Katila, R.: Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(3), 197–220 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157CrossRef

Bahargam, S., Golshan, B., Lappas, T., Terzi, E.: A team-formation algorithm for faultline minimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 119, 441–455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.046CrossRef

Bairi, J., Manohar, B.M.: Critical success factors in gaining user customer satisfaction in outsourced IT services. J. Enterprise Inf. Manag. 24(6), 475–493 (2011)CrossRef

Balle, A.R., Steffen, M.O., Curado, C., Oliviera, M.: Interorganizational knowledge sharing in a science and technology park: the use of knowledge sharing mechanisms. J. Knowl. Manag. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0328CrossRef

Bell, M., Albu, M.: Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Dev. 27(9), 1715–1734 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00073-XCrossRef

Bell, S.T., Outland, N.: Team Composition Over Time, Team Dynamics Over Time (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 18, pp.3 – 27 (2017)

Boh, F., Wai, S.S.A., Espinosa, J.A.: Learning from experience in software development: a multilevel analysis. Manag. Sci. 53(8), 1315–1331 (2007)CrossRef

Bosch-Sijtsema, P.M., Ruohomäki, V., Vartiainen, M.: Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. J. Knowl. Manag. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997178CrossRef

Cantwell, J., Mudambi, R.: MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strateg. Manag. J. 26(12), 1109–1128 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.497CrossRef

Carlos, F.P., Paulo, R.L., Paulo, N.L., Catia, B., Leonor, P.: Team development: definition, measurement, and relationships with team effectiveness. Hum. Perform. 31(2), 97–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2018.1455685CrossRef

Catherine, G., Van den Piet, B., Stephen, M.F., Mien, S., Wim, H.G.: Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective. Hum. Perform. 29(1), 33–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1120304CrossRef

Chang, Y.B., Gurbaxani, V.: Information technology outsourcing, Knowledge transfer and firm productivity: an empirical analysis. MIS Q. 36, 1043–1063 (2012)CrossRef

Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity_A new perspective on learning and innvation_CohenLevinthalASQ.pdf. Quarterly, Administrative Science Technology, Special Issue 35(1), 128–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01093.xCrossRef

Dahlqvist, M., Forsberg, J.: Inter-team knowledge sharing A case study on co-located teams’ drivers and barriers for KS, Umea University (2018)

Díaz-Fernández, M.C., González-Rodríguez, M.R., Simonetti, B.: Top Management Teams’ demographic characteristics and their influence on strategic change. Qual. Quant. 49, 1305–1322 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0053-4CrossRef

Díaz-Fernández, M.C., González-Rodríguez, M.R., Pawlak, M., Simonetti, B.: Family firm’s management composition: the role played by family members’ age in TMT and supervisor levels. Qual. Quant. 53, 2421–2438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0760-3CrossRef

Dmitriy, A.N., Tobin, E.P., Xiaolin, L.: Relationship conflict, conflict management, and performance of information technology teams. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 56(3), 194–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1153893CrossRef

Gajewar, A., Das Sarma, A.: Multi-skill collaborative teams based on densest subgraphs, pp. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972825.15 (2013)

Gupta, A.K., Govindarajan, V.: Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strateg. Manag. J. 21(4), 473–496 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4%3c473::AID-SMJ84%3e3.0.CO;2-ICrossRef

Gupta, A., Mattarelli, E., Seshasai, S., Broschak, J.: Use of collaborative technologies and knowledge sharing in co-located and distributed teams: towards the 24-h knowledge factory. J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 18(3), 147–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2009.07.001CrossRef

Ibsen, E., Parabaniuk, W.: Animal study management software, technology to improve the lives of researchers, technicians, and animal's, ALN^® Magazine, pp. 19–27 (2005)

Klein, C.: Research will evolve, but we must do a better job of translating what we already know. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 5(01), 52–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01405.xCrossRef

Lahiri, N.: Geographic distribution of R&D activity: how does it affect innovation quality? Acad. Manag. J. 53, 1194–1209 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533233CrossRef

Lam, A.: Tacit knowledge, organizational learning, and societal institutions: an integrated framework. Organ. Stud. 21(3), 487–513 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600213001CrossRef

Maznevski, M.L., Chudoba, K.M.: Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5), 473–492 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200CrossRef

Mehta, A., Mehta, N.: Knowledge integration and team effectiveness: a team goal orientation approach. Decision Sci. 49(3), 445–486 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12280CrossRef

Mishra, D., Mahanty, B.: The effect of onsite-offshore work division on project cost, schedule, and quality for re-engineering projects in Indian outsourcing software industry. Strateg. Outsourcing Int. J. 7(3), 198–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-06-2014-0010CrossRef

Mishra, D., Mahanty, B.: A study of software development project cost, schedule and quality by outsourcing to low cost destination. J. Enterprise Inf. Manag. 29(3), 454–478 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2014-0080CrossRef

Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14CrossRef

Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1995)

Nunes, V.T., Santoro, F.M., Borges, M.R.S.: A context-based model for knowledge management embodied in work processes. Inf. Sci. 179(15), 2538–2554 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.01.033CrossRef

Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C.J., Mukherjee, N.: The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9(1), 20–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860CrossRef

Pressman, R.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, New York (1997)

Putnam, L.H., Myers, W.: Executive Briefing. Controlling Software Development. IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD (1996)

Randeree, K., Ninan, M.: Leadership and teams in business: a study of IT projects in the United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Manag. Projects Bus. 4(1), 28–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111096872CrossRef

Reed, A.H., Knight, L.V.: Project risk differences between virtual and co-located teams. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 51(1), 19–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2010.11645446CrossRef

Robillard, P., Kerzazi, N., Tapp, M., Hmima, H.: Outsourcing software maintenance: processes, standards & critical practices. In: Proceedings of Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Enginee.ring, IEEE, pp. 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2007.175. (2007)

Rodríguez-Elias, O.M., Martínez-García, A.I., Vizcaíno, A., Favela, J., Piattini, M.: A framework to analyze information systems as knowledge flow facilitators. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(6), 481–498 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.07.002CrossRef

Stefan, K., Jens, K., Kai, H., Guido, H.: What does it take to be a virtual team player? The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required in virtual teams. Hum. Perform. 29(2), 123–142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1154061CrossRef

Strode, D.E., Huff, S.L., Hope, B., Link, S.: Coordination in co-located agile software development projects. J. Syst. Softw. 85(6), 1222–1238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.017CrossRef

Tsai, M., Chang, H., Cheng, N., Lien, C.: Understanding IT professionals’ knowledge sharing intention through KMS: a social exchange perspective. Qual. Quant. 47, 2739–2753 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9685-4CrossRef

Utku-İsmihan, F.M.: Knowledge, technological convergence and economic growth: a dynamic panel data analysis of Middle East and North Africa and Latin America. Qual. Quant. 53, 713–733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0785-7CrossRef

Wickramasinghe, V., Nandula, S.: Diversity in team composition, relationship conflict and team leader support on globally distributed virtual software development team performance. Strategic Outsourcing 8(2–3), 138–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-02-2015-0007CrossRef

Williams, C.: Client–vendor knowledge transfer in IS offshore outsourcing: insights from a survey of Indian software engineers. Inf. Syst. J. 21(4), 335–356 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00354.xCrossRef

Wu, I.C., Liu, D.R., Chang, P.C.: Learning dynamic information needs: a collaborative topic variation inspection approach. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 60(12), 2430–2451 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21201CrossRef

Xu, Y., Bernard, A.: A quantitative model on knowledge management for team cooperation. Knowl.-Based Syst. 45, 41–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.02.001CrossRef

Yang, M., Lim, J.: The CEO's decision-making process model on service offshore outsourcing: using theory of reasoned action (TRA). In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Decision Science Institute, Baltimore, USA (2008)

Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R., Clarke, P.: An examination of personality traits and how they impact on software development teams. Inf. Softw. Technol. 86, 101–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.005CrossRef

Zhang, X., Jiang, J.Y.: With whom shall I share my knowledge? A recipient perspective of knowledge sharing. J. Knowl. Manag. 19(2), 277–295 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2014-0184CrossRef

Title: Evaluating intra-project knowledge growth and its effect on co-located software team output
Authors: Supriya Kumar Ghatak
Biswajit Mahanty
Publication date: 02-01-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Quality & Quantity / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01076-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Using a choice experiment to explore the public willingness to pay for the impacts of improving energy efficiency of an apartment

Bibliometric maps and co-word analysis of the literature on international cooperation on migration

Life before COVID-19: how was the World actually performing?

Not just the facts: an index for measuring the information density of political communication

Reconceptualizing the interventions of open innovation systems between the nexus of quadruple organization cultural dynamics and performance

Investigation of information sharing via multiple social media platforms: a comparison of Facebook and WeChat adoption