Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive
Business IT + Informatics
Construction + Real Estate
Electrical Engineering + Electronics
Energy + Sustainability
Insurance + Risk
Finance + Banking
Management + Leadership
Marketing + Sales
Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Start single access now
Request access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9/2018

13-11-2017 | REGIONAL TOPICS FROM EUROPE

Evaluating the environmental impact of debit card payments

Authors: Erik Roos Lindgreen, Milan van Schendel, Nicole Jonker, Jorieke Kloek, Lonneke de Graaff, Marc Davidson

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Consumers in the Netherlands made more than 3.2 billion debit card transactions at points-of-sale in 2015, corresponding to over half of all point-of-sale payments in that year. This study provides insights into the environmental impact of debit card transactions based on a life cycle assessment (LCA). In addition, it identifies several areas within the debit card payment chain where the environmental impact can be reduced.

Methods

The debit card payment system can be divided into three subsystems: debit cards, payment terminals, and data centers used for transaction processing. Input data for all elements within each subsystem (manufacturing, transport, energy use, and disposal) were retrieved from interviews and literature study. Seven key companies and authorities within the debit card system such as the Dutch Payments Association, two banks, two data centers, one payment terminal producer and a recycling company contributed data. The analysis is conducted using SimaPro, the Ecoinvent 3.0 database and the ReCiPe endpoint (H) impact assessment method.

Results and discussion

One Dutch debit card transaction in 2015 is estimated to have an absolute environmental impact of 470 μPt. Within the process chain of a debit card transaction, the relative environmental impact of payment terminals is dominant, contributing 75% of the total impact. Terminal materials (37%) and terminal energy use (27%) are the largest contributors to this share, while the remaining impact comprises data center (11%) and debit card (15%) subsystems. For data centers, this impact mainly stems from their energy use. Finally, scenario analyses show that a significant decrease (44%) in the environmental impact of the entire debit card payment system could be achieved by stimulating the use of renewable energy in payment terminals and data centers, reducing the standby time of payment terminals and increasing the lifetimes of debit cards.

Conclusions

For the first time, the environmental consequences of electronic card payment systems are evaluated. The total environmental impact of debit card transactions in the Netherlands is relatively modest compared to the impact of cash payments, which are the closest substitute of debit card payments at the point-of-sale. Scenario analysis indicates that the environmental impact can be reduced by 44%.
previous article On the boundary between economy and environment in life cycle assessment
next article Investigating fairness in global supply chains: applying an extension of the living wage to the Western European clothing supply chain

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
In SimaPro, the following databases were used: Ecoinvent 3.0, CE Generic data, USA Input Output Database, and Industry data 2.0.
 
2
According to Endres and Siebert-Raths (2009), both the electronic and gas incineration of PVC amount 19 MJ/kg. According to the CE Delft, the efficiency of electronic incineration amounts 17% and of gas incineration 19%. As each debit card contains 0.0044 kg on PVC, the energy generated through electronic incineration amounts 0.014 MJ and through gas incineration 0.016 MJ.
 
3
According to Endres and Siebert-Raths (2009), both the electronic and gas incineration of the polycarbonate casing of a terminal amounts 30 MJ/kg. According to the CE Delft, the efficiency of electronic incineration amounts 17% and of gas incineration 19%. As a terminal contains 0.152 kg on polycarbonate, the energy generated through electronic incineration amounts 0.775 MJ and through gas incineration 0.866 MJ, leading to a total energy recovery of 1.641 MJ.
 
4
As the total environmental impact of the Dutch economy is unknown, but its GWP is known, the GWP of the debit card system is compared with the GWP of the Dutch economy.
 
5
The economic importance of the of debit card payments in 2015 was proxied by their resource costs to society. Resource costs for debit card payments refer to the costs to society (i.e. banks, retailers, data centers, and clearing houses) reflecting the use of resources in the production of debit card payments. Cost figures for the year 2009 (Jonker 2013) have been extrapolated taking into account the share of the costs which vary with debit card usage, the growth in debit card usage between 2009 and 2015, and the development of the prices in the services sector.
 
Literature
Afman MR, Wielders LML (2014) Achtergrondgegevens stroometikettering 2013. Publicatienummer: 13.3C86.16 (in Dutch). CE Delft, Delft
Bolt W, Jonker N, Plooij M (2016) European payment systems: pricing, regulation and innovation. In: Beck T, Casu B (eds) The Palgrave handbook of European banking. Palgrave Macmillan
Brander M, Hutchison C, Sherrington C, Ballinger A, Beswick C, Baddeley A, Black M, Woods J, Murphy R (2009) Methodology and evidence base on the indirect greenhouse gas effects of using wastes, residues, and by-products for biofuels and bioenergy. Report PR-091007-A to the UK Renewable Fuels Agency and the Department for Energy and Climate Change. British Standards Institute, London
Ebner C (2008) Smart card production environment. In: Smart cards, tokens, security and applications. Springer, Boston, MA
Endres H, Siebert-Raths A (2009) Technische Biopolymere Rahmenbedingungen, Marktsitutation, Herstellung, Aufbau und Eigenschaften. Hanser, Munich CrossRef
European Central Bank (2005) LCA of euro banknotes 2003: final report. Confidential report by E2 Management Consulting AG, in cooperation with PRé Consultants. ECB, Frankfurt am Main
Fakhredin F, Bakker CA, Huisman J, Geraedts JMP (2013) Five perspectives on design for end of life: highlights of a literature review. In: Proceedings of the EcoDesign 2013 international symposium. s.n. (ed) s.l.: KITECH Korea National Cleaner Production Center (KNCPC), p 1–8
Fukushima Y, Hirao M (2002) A structured framework and language for scenario-based life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(6):317–329
Hanegraaf R (2017) Reducing the environmental impact of the Dutch physical payment system. MSc thesis (confidential). Utrecht University, Utrecht
Klöpffer W, Sudström G, Grießhammer R (1996) The peer reviewing process—a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(2):113–115 CrossRef
Larcin A (2017) Life cycle assessment of the Dutch physical payment system. MSc thesis, Utrecht University
Mayes DK, Markantonakis K (2008) Smart cards, tokens, security and applications. Springer, New York CrossRef
O’Dwyer KJ, Malone D (2013) Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In: Irish signals & systems conference 2014 and 2014 China-Ireland international conference on information and communications technologies (ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014). 25th IET. IET, pp 280–285
Oliveira FB (2012) Life cycle assessment of a high-density datacentre cooling system: TeliaSonera’s green room concept. KTH, Stockholm
Polizzi Di Sorrentino E, Woelbert E, Sala S (2016) Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(2):237–251 CrossRef
Pre Consultants (2015) SimaPro 8.0.5 LCA software. Amersfoort
Rankl W, Effing W (2010) Smart card handbook, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester
Wang R, Zheng S, Zheng Y (2011) Elementary mechanical properties of composite materials. In: Composites Science and Engineering. Polymer Matrix Composites and Technology. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, pp 1–25, 547–548
Whitehead B, Tozer R, Shah A, Kosik B, Maidment G, Andrews D, Dunn A (2012) The environmental burden of data centres—a screening LCA methodology. CIBSE ASHRAE Technical Symposium, Imperial College, London
Whitehead B, Andrews D, Shah A (2015) The life cycle assessment of a UK data centre. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(3):332–349 CrossRef
Williams E, Kahhat R, Bengtsson M, Hayashi S, Hotta Y, Totoki Y (2013) Linking informal and formal electronics recycling via an Interface organization. Challenges 4(2):136–153 CrossRef
Zink T, Maker F, Geyer R, Amirtharajah R, Akella V (2014) Comparative life cycle assessment of smartphone reuse: repurposing vs. refurbishment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(5):1099–1109
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the environmental impact of debit card payments
Authors
Erik Roos Lindgreen
Milan van Schendel
Nicole Jonker
Jorieke Kloek
Lonneke de Graaff
Marc Davidson
Publication date
13-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1408-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9/2018 Go to the issue

COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ARTICLE

Addressing crop interactions within cropping systems in LCA

LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Life cycle assessment of castor-based biorefinery: a well to wheel LCA

UNCERTAINTIES IN LCA

Assessing the individual and combined effects of uncertainty and variability sources in comparative LCA of pavements

LCA FOR AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES AND BIOBASED INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS

Vanillin derived from lignin liquefaction: a sustainability evaluation

LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

On the boundary between economy and environment in life cycle assessment

SOCIETAL LCA

Investigating fairness in global supply chains: applying an extension of the living wage to the Western European clothing supply chain