Top

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Published in:

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Exergy-based comparison of indirect and direct biomass gasification technologies within the framework of bio-SNG production

Authors: Stefan Heyne, Henrik Thunman, Simon Harvey

Published in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Issue 4/2013

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Atmospheric indirect steam-blown and pressurised direct oxygen-blown gasification are the two major technologies discussed for large-scale production of synthetic natural gas from biomass (bio-SNG) by thermochemical conversion. Published system studies of bio-SNG production concepts draw different conclusions about which gasification technology performs best. In this paper, an exergy-based comparison of the two gasification technologies is performed using a simplified gasification reactor model. This approach aims at comparing the two technologies on a common basis without possible bias due to model regression on specific reactor data. The system boundaries include the gasification and gas cleaning step to generate a product gas ready for subsequent synthesis. The major parameter investigated is the delivery pressure of the product gas. Other model parameters include the air-to-fuel ratio for gasification as well as the H₂/CO ratio in the product gas. In order to illustrate the thermodynamic limits and sources of efficiency loss, an ideal modelling approach is contrasted with a model accounting for losses in, e.g. the heat recovery and compression operations. The resulting cold-gas efficiencies of the processes are in the range of 0.66–0.84 on a lower heating value basis. Exergy efficiencies for the ideal systems are from 0.79 to 0.84 and in the range of 0.7 to 0.79 for the systems including losses. Pressurised direct gasification benefits from higher delivery pressure of the finished gas product and results in the highest exergy efficiency values. Regarding bio-SNG synthesis however, a higher energetic and exergetic penalty for CO₂ removal results in direct gasification exergy efficiency values that are below values for indirect gasification. No significant difference in performance between the technologies can be observed based on the model results, but a challenge identified for process design is efficient heat recovery and cogeneration of electricity for both technologies. Furthermore, direct gasification performance is penalised by incomplete carbon conversion in contrast to performance of indirect gasification concepts.

previous article Production of biofuel and biochar by thermal pyrolysis of linseed seed

next article Enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of fibre sludge into reducing sugars

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Gunnarsson I (2011) The GoBiGas Project. In: International Seminar on Gasification 2011—Gas Quality, CHP and New Concepts, Malmö, Sweden, 6–7 October 2011

Fredriksson Möller B (2011) The E.ON Bio2G Project. In: International Seminar on Gasification 2011—Gas Quality, CHP and New Concepts, Malmö, Sweden, 6–7 October 2011

Adelt M, Vogel A (2010) Bio-SNG—prospective renewable energy carrier in the E.ON gas grid (in German: bio-SNG zukünftiger regenerativer Energiträger im E.ON Gasnetz). Erdöl Erdgas Kohle 126(10):338–341

Hennius M (2012) E.ON delays large-scale biogas project in Scania (In Swedish: E.ON avvaktar med storskaligt biogasprojekt i Skåne). Press release. E.ON Sverige AB, Malmö

Hamelinck CN, Faaij APC (2006) Outlook for advanced biofuels. Energy Policy 34(17):3268–3283. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.012 CrossRef

van der Meijden CM, Veringa HJ, Rabou LPLM (2010) The production of synthetic natural gas (SNG): a comparison of three wood gasification systems for energy balance and overall efficiency. Biomass Bioenergy 34(3):302–311. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.11.001 CrossRef

Gassner M, Maréchal F (2012) Thermo-economic optimisation of the polygeneration of synthetic natural gas (SNG), power and heat from lignocellulosic biomass by gasification and methanation. Energy and Environmental Science 5(2):5768–5789. doi:10.1039/c1ee02867g CrossRef

Gassner M, Maréchal F (2009) Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 33(11):1587–1604. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.08.004 CrossRef

Rönsch S, Kaltschmitt M (2012) Bio-SNG production—concepts and their assessment. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2(4):285–296. doi:10.1007/s13399-012-0048-0 CrossRef

10.

Karellas S, Panopoulos KD, Panousis G, Rigas A, Karl J, Kakaras E (2012) An evaluation of substitute natural gas production from different coal gasification processes based on modeling. Energy 45(1):183–194. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.075 CrossRef

11.

Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81(8):1051–1063. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4 CrossRef

12.

Szargut J, Morris DR, Steward FR (1988) Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical, and metallurgical processes. Hemisphere, New York

13.

Schuster G, Loffler G, Weigl K, Hofbauer H (2001) Biomass steam gasification—an extensive parametric modeling study. Bioresour Technol 77(1):71–79. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00115-2 CrossRef

14.

Kopyscinski J, Schildhauer TJ, Biollaz SMA (2010) Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass—a technology review from 1950 to 2009. Fuel 89(8):1763–1783. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.01.027 CrossRef

15.

Friedrichs G, Proplesch P, Lommerzheim W (1982) Comflux pilot plant for converting coal conversion gas into SNG. Gaswärme International 31(6):261–264

16.

Seemann M (2006) Methanation of biosyngas in a fluidized bed reactor. Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

17.

Hannula I, Kurkela E (2012) A parametric modelling study for pressurised steam/O₂-blown fluidised-bed gasification of wood with catalytic reforming. Biomass Bioenergy 38:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.045 CrossRef

18.

Siedlecki M, de Jong W (2011) Biomass gasification as the first hot step in clean syngas production process—gas quality optimization and primary tar reduction measures in a 100 kW thermal input steam-oxygen blown CFB gasifier. Biomass Bioenergy 35(suppl 1):S40–S62. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.033

19.

Kitzler H, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2011) Pressurized gasification of woody biomass—variation of parameter. Fuel Process Technol 92(5):908–914. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.12.009 CrossRef

20.

Puchner B, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2009) Bed material and parameter variation for a pressurized biomass fluidized bed process. In: Yue G, Zhang H, Zhao C, Luo Z (eds) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Xian, China, 18–21 May 2009. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, pp 700–705. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02682-9_108

21.

Valin S, Ravel S, Guillaudeau J, Thiery S (2010) Comprehensive study of the influence of total pressure on products yields in fluidized bed gasification of wood sawdust. Fuel Process Technol 91(10):1222–1228. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.04.001 CrossRef

22.

Lind F, Israelsson M, Seemann M, Thunman H (2012) Manganese oxide as catalyst for tar cleaning of biomass-derived gas. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2(2):133–140. doi:10.1007/s13399-012-0042-6 CrossRef

23.

Zwart RWR, Van Der Drift A, Bos A, Visser HJM, Cieplik MK, Könemann HWJ (2009) Oil-based gas washing-flexible tar removal for high-efficient production of clean heat and power as well as sustainable fuels and chemicals. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 28(3):324–335. doi:10.1002/ep.10383 CrossRef

24.

Pröll T, Aichernig C, Rauch R, Hofbauer H (2007) Fluidized bed steam gasification of solid biomass—performance characteristics of an 8 MWth combined heat and power plant. Int J Chem React Eng 5:54. doi:10.2202/1542-6580.1398

25.

Lind F, Seemann M, Thunman H (2011) Continuous catalytic tar reforming of biomass derived raw gas with simultaneous catalyst regeneration. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(20):11553–11562. doi:10.1021/ie200645s CrossRef

26.

Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2008) Development of catalytic tar decomposition downstream from a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier. Powder Technol 180(1–2):9–16. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2007.03.008 CrossRef

27.

Brodén H, Nyström O, Jönsson M (2012) Optimum power yield for bio fuel fired combined heat and power plants (In Swedish: optimal elverkningsgrad för biobränsleeldade kraftvärmeverk). Värmeforsk, Stockholm

28.

Dai J, Cui H, Grace JR (2012) Biomass feeding for thermochemical reactors. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38(5):716–736. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2012.04.002 CrossRef

29.

Cummer KR, Brown RC (2002) Ancillary equipment for biomass gasification. Biomass Bioenergy 23(2):113–128. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00038-7 CrossRef

30.

Swanson ML, Musich MA, Schmidt DD, Schultz JK (2003) Feed system innovation for gasification locally economical alternative fuels (FIGLEAF). U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, PittsburghCrossRef

31.

Jones D, Bhattacharyya D, Turton R, Zitney SE (2011) Optimal design and integration of an air separation unit (ASU) for an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant with CO₂ capture. Fuel Process Technol 92(9):1685–1695. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.04.018 CrossRef

32.

Beysel G (2009) Enhanced cryogenic air separation—a proven process applied to oxyfuel: future prospects. In: 1st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus, Germany, 8–11 September 2009

33.

Tranier J-P, Dubettier R, Perrin N (2009) Air separation unit for oxy-coal combustion systems. Paper presented at the 1st International Oxyfuel Combustion Conference, Cottbus, Germany

34.

Aspen Engineering Suite V7.2 (2010). Aspen Technology Inc.

35.

Edberg U, Engstrom L, Hartler N (1973) The influence of chip dimensions on chip bulk density. Svensk Papperstidning 14:529–533

36.

Plötze M, Niemz P (2011) Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types as determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 69(4):649–657. doi:10.1007/s00107-010-0504-0 CrossRef

37.

Screw conveyor speed calculation. (2013) Bulk Handling Global Pty Ltd. http://www.bulksolidsflow.com/free_programs/screw_conveyor_design/screw_conveyor_design.html. 28 Accessed February 2013

38.

Rautalin A, Wilén C (1992) Feeding biomass into pressure and related safety engineering. VTT Research Notes 1428. VTT—Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo

39.

Götz M, Köppel W, Reimert R, Graf F (2012) Potential to optimize scrubbers for biogas cleaning. Part 2. Chemical Scrubbers (in German; Optimierungspotenzial von Wäschen zur Biogasaufbereitung Teil 2. Chemische Wäschen). Chemie Ingenieur Technik 84(1–2):81–87. doi:10.1002/cite.201100129 CrossRef

40.

Stecco SS, Manfrida G (1986) Exergy analysis of compression and expansion processes. Energy 11 (6):573–577. doi:10.1016/0360-5442(86)90105-2

41.

Tock L, Gassner M, Maréchal F (2010) Thermochemical production of liquid fuels from biomass: thermo-economic modeling, process design and process integration analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 34(12):1838–1854CrossRef

42.

Gassner M, Maréchal F (2008) Thermo-economic optimisation of the integration of electrolysis in synthetic natural gas production from wood. Energy 33(2):189–198. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2007.09.010 CrossRef

43.

Heyne S, Thunman H, Harvey S (2012) Extending existing combined heat and power plants for synthetic natural gas production. International Journal of Energy Research 36(5):670–681. doi:10.1002/er.1828 CrossRef

44.

Panek JM, Grasser J (2006) Practical experience gained during the first twenty years of operation of the great plains gasification plant and implications for future projects. US Department of Energy-Office of Fossil Energy, Washington

45.

Heberlein J, Murphy AB (2008) Thermal plasma waste treatment. J Phys D-Appl Phys 41 (5). doi:10.1088/0022-3727/41/5/053001

46.

Hofbauer H, Rauch R, Loeffler G, Kaiser S, Fercher E, Tremmel H (2002) Six years experience with the FICFB-gasification process. In: 12th European Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 17–21 June 2002

47.

Dutta A, Talmadge M, Hensley J, Worley M, Dudgeon D, Barton D, Gronendijk P, Ferrari D, Stears B, Searcy EM, Wright CT, Hess JR (2011) Process design and economics for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

Title: Exergy-based comparison of indirect and direct biomass gasification technologies within the framework of bio-SNG production
Authors: Stefan Heyne
Henrik Thunman
Simon Harvey
Publication date: 01-12-2013
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Electronic ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-013-0079-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Microwave-assisted batch and continuous transesterification of karanja oil: process variables optimization and effectiveness of irradiation

Characterization of trace contaminants in syngas from the thermochemical conversion of biomass

Performance prediction of fluidised bed gasification of biomass using experimental data-based simulation models

Biodiesel production from high free fatty acids content Jatropha curcas L. oil using dual step process

Plastics production from biomass: assessing feedstock requirement

Enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of fibre sludge into reducing sugars