Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Empirical Research

Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study

Authors: Per Skålén, Johanna Gummerus, Catharina von Koskull, Peter R. Magnusson

Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Issue 2/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents an eight-firm study, conducted from the service-dominant logic perspective, which makes a contribution regarding knowledge of the anatomy of value propositions and service innovation. The paper suggests that value propositions are configurations of several different practices and resources. The paper finds that ten common practices, organized in three main aggregates, constitute and fulfill value propositions: i.e. provision practices, representational practices, and management and organizational practices. Moreover, the paper suggests that service innovation can be equated with the creation of new value propositions by means of developing existing or creating new practices and/or resources, or by means of integrating practices and resources in new ways. It identifies four types of service innovation (adaptation, resource-based innovation, practice-based innovation, and combinative innovation) and three types of service innovation processes (practice-based, resource-based, and combinative). The key managerial insight provided by the paper is that service innovation must be conducted and value propositions must be evaluated from the perspective of the customers’ value creation, the service that the customer experiences. Successful service innovation is not only contingent on having the right resources, established methods and practices for integrating these resources into attractive value propositions are also needed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Habilitation is for patients that suffer from a disorder or disability, mental or physical, from which they can never fully recover–they cannot be rehabilitated. Habilitation activities aim to help the patient lead a good life despite his/her disorder or disability. The habilitation clinic we studied is an out-patient clinic, open during the daytime, which accepts patients with appointments.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2011). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26.CrossRef Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2011). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90–99. Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90–99.
go back to reference Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.CrossRef Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202–210.CrossRef Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Benner, M. J. (2009). Dynamic or static capabilities? Process management practices and response to technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 473–486.CrossRef Benner, M. J. (2009). Dynamic or static capabilities? Process management practices and response to technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 473–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Bititci, U. S., Martinez, V., Albores, P., & Parung, J. (2004). Creating and managing value in collaborative networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(3–4), 251–268.CrossRef Bititci, U. S., Martinez, V., Albores, P., & Parung, J. (2004). Creating and managing value in collaborative networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(3–4), 251–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Bitner, M. J., Faranda, W. T., Hubbert, A. R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 193–205.CrossRef Bitner, M. J., Faranda, W. T., Hubbert, A. R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 193–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Blazevic, V., & Lievens, A. (2008). Managing innovation through customer coproduced knowledge in electronic services: an exploratory study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 138–151.CrossRef Blazevic, V., & Lievens, A. (2008). Managing innovation through customer coproduced knowledge in electronic services: an exploratory study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 138–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowers, M. R. (1989). Developing new services: improving the process makes it better. Journal of Services Marketing, 3(1), 15–20.CrossRef Bowers, M. R. (1989). Developing new services: improving the process makes it better. Journal of Services Marketing, 3(1), 15–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Cadwaller, S., Jarvis, C. B., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom, A. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 219–239.CrossRef Cadwaller, S., Jarvis, C. B., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom, A. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 219–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Calonius, H. (2006). Contemporary research in marketing: a market behaviour framework. Marketing Theory, 6(4), 419–428.CrossRef Calonius, H. (2006). Contemporary research in marketing: a market behaviour framework. Marketing Theory, 6(4), 419–428.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, J. S., Tsou, H. T., & Ching, R. K. H. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1331–1346.CrossRef Chen, J. S., Tsou, H. T., & Ching, R. K. H. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1331–1346.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRef Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRef
go back to reference Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2000). New products management. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Crawford, C. M., & Di Benedetto, A. (2000). New products management. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference De Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169–187.CrossRef De Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Droege, H., Hildebrand, D., & Heras Forcada, M. A. (2009). Innovation in services: present findings, and future pathways. Journal of Service Management, 20(2), 131–155.CrossRef Droege, H., Hildebrand, D., & Heras Forcada, M. A. (2009). Innovation in services: present findings, and future pathways. Journal of Service Management, 20(2), 131–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Echeverri, P., & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: a practice theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.CrossRef Echeverri, P., & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: a practice theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.CrossRef Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
go back to reference Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2008). The value propositions concept: Evolution, development and application in marketing. Discipline of Marketing, University of Sydney, Sydney, working paper. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2008). The value propositions concept: Evolution, development and application in marketing. Discipline of Marketing, University of Sydney, Sydney, working paper.
go back to reference Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223–240.CrossRef Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223–240.CrossRef
go back to reference Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2010). The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–595.CrossRef Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2010). The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–595.CrossRef
go back to reference Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26, 537–556.CrossRef Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26, 537–556.CrossRef
go back to reference Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
go back to reference Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates. European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.CrossRef Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co-creates. European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Grönroos, C. (2009). Marketing as promise management: regaining customer management for marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 351–359.CrossRef Grönroos, C. (2009). Marketing as promise management: regaining customer management for marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 351–359.CrossRef
go back to reference Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.CrossRef Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.CrossRef
go back to reference Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.CrossRef Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Gummerus, J. (2013). Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory—strangers or siblings? Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19–46.CrossRef Gummerus, J. (2013). Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory—strangers or siblings? Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson, K.-J., Edvardsson, B., Sundström, E., & Andersson, P. (2010). A customer-dominant logic of service. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 531–548.CrossRef Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson, K.-J., Edvardsson, B., Sundström, E., & Andersson, P. (2010). A customer-dominant logic of service. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 531–548.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.CrossRef Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.CrossRef
go back to reference Karpen, I. O., Bove, L. L., & Lukas, B. A. (2012). Linking service-dominant logic and strategic business practice: a conceptual model of a service-dominant orientation. Journal of Service Research, 15(1), 21–38.CrossRef Karpen, I. O., Bove, L. L., & Lukas, B. A. (2012). Linking service-dominant logic and strategic business practice: a conceptual model of a service-dominant orientation. Journal of Service Research, 15(1), 21–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelly, D., & Storey, C. (2000). New service development: initiation strategies. International Journal of Services Industry Management, 11(1), 45–62.CrossRef Kelly, D., & Storey, C. (2000). New service development: initiation strategies. International Journal of Services Industry Management, 11(1), 45–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Korkman, O., Storbacka, K., & Harald, B. (2010). Practices as markets: value co-creation in e-invoicing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(4), 236–247.CrossRef Korkman, O., Storbacka, K., & Harald, B. (2010). Practices as markets: value co-creation in e-invoicing. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(4), 236–247.CrossRef
go back to reference Kowalkowski, C. (2011). Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 277–294.CrossRef Kowalkowski, C. (2011). Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 277–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Lanning, M. J., & Michaels, E. G. (1988). A business is a value delivery system. Staff paper, McKinsey & Company. Lanning, M. J., & Michaels, E. G. (1988). A business is a value delivery system. Staff paper, McKinsey & Company.
go back to reference Lindic, J., & Marques da Silva, C. (2011). Value proposition as a catalyst for a customer focused innovation. Management Decision, 49(10), 1694–1708.CrossRef Lindic, J., & Marques da Silva, C. (2011). Value proposition as a catalyst for a customer focused innovation. Management Decision, 49(10), 1694–1708.CrossRef
go back to reference Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.CrossRef Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67–82.CrossRef Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2010). Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411–425.CrossRef Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2010). Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411–425.CrossRef
go back to reference Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 135–157.CrossRef Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 135–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Michel, S., Brown, S., & Gallan, A. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 54–66.CrossRef Michel, S., Brown, S., & Gallan, A. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 54–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
go back to reference O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J., Jr. (1999). Knowledge transfer: discover your value proposition. Strategy & Leadership, 27(2), 10–15.CrossRef O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J., Jr. (1999). Knowledge transfer: discover your value proposition. Strategy & Leadership, 27(2), 10–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRef Ordanini, A., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Service innovation viewed through a service-dominant logic lens: a conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Journal of Service Research, 14(1), 3–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J., & Johnson, L. (2006). Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1068–1086.CrossRef Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J., & Johnson, L. (2006). Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1068–1086.CrossRef
go back to reference Papastathopoulou, P., & Hultink, E. J. (2012). New service development: an analysis of 27 years of research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 705–714.CrossRef Papastathopoulou, P., & Hultink, E. J. (2012). New service development: an analysis of 27 years of research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 705–714.CrossRef
go back to reference Payne, A., Ballantyne, D., & Christopher, M. (2005). A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: the development and use of the “six markets” model. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8), 855–871.CrossRef Payne, A., Ballantyne, D., & Christopher, M. (2005). A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: the development and use of the “six markets” model. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8), 855–871.CrossRef
go back to reference Perks, H., & Riihela, N. (2004). An exploration of inter-functional integration in the new service development process. Service Industries Journal, 24(6), 37–63.CrossRef Perks, H., & Riihela, N. (2004). An exploration of inter-functional integration in the new service development process. Service Industries Journal, 24(6), 37–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Promise. (1998). Collins English dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins. Promise. (1998). Collins English dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins.
go back to reference Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRef Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubalcaba, L., Michel, S., Sundbo, J., Brown, S. W., & Reynoso, J. (2012). Shaping, organizing, and rethinking service innovation: a multidimensional framework. Journal of Service Management, 23(5), 696–715.CrossRef Rubalcaba, L., Michel, S., Sundbo, J., Brown, S. W., & Reynoso, J. (2012). Shaping, organizing, and rethinking service innovation: a multidimensional framework. Journal of Service Management, 23(5), 696–715.CrossRef
go back to reference Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Scheuing, E. E., & Johnson, E. M. (1989). A proposed model for new service development. Journal of Services Marketing, 3(2), 25–34.CrossRef Scheuing, E. E., & Johnson, E. M. (1989). A proposed model for new service development. Journal of Services Marketing, 3(2), 25–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 49, 99–111.CrossRef Solomon, M. R., Surprenant, C., Czepiel, J. A., & Gutman, E. G. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: the service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 49, 99–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRef Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRef
go back to reference Strandvik, T., Holmlund, M., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Customer needing: a challenge for the seller offering. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(2), 132–141.CrossRef Strandvik, T., Holmlund, M., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Customer needing: a challenge for the seller offering. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(2), 132–141.CrossRef
go back to reference Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
go back to reference Sundbo, J. (1997). Management of innovation in services. Service Industries Journal, 3, 432–455.CrossRef Sundbo, J. (1997). Management of innovation in services. Service Industries Journal, 3, 432–455.CrossRef
go back to reference Terho, H., Haas, A., Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2012). ‘It’s almost like taking the sales out of selling’—towards a conceptualization of value-based selling in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 174–185.CrossRef Terho, H., Haas, A., Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2012). ‘It’s almost like taking the sales out of selling’—towards a conceptualization of value-based selling in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 174–185.CrossRef
go back to reference Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.CrossRef Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887–902.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004a). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRef Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004a). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004b). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 324–335.CrossRef Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004b). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 324–335.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What is it, what it is not, what it might be. In S. L. Vargo & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 43–56). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What is it, what it is not, what it might be. In S. L. Vargo & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions (pp. 43–56). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
go back to reference Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008a). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRef Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008a). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008b). Why “service”? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 25–38.CrossRef Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008b). Why “service”? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 25–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretative consumer research (pp. 69–84). Provo: Association for Consumer Research. Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Interpretative consumer research (pp. 69–84). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
go back to reference Zomerdijk, L. G., & Voss, C. A. (2011). NSD processes and practices in experiential services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 68–80.CrossRef Zomerdijk, L. G., & Voss, C. A. (2011). NSD processes and practices in experiential services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 68–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study
Authors
Per Skålén
Johanna Gummerus
Catharina von Koskull
Peter R. Magnusson
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Electronic ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0365-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2/2015 Go to the issue