Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Argumentation 4/2018

20-09-2018 | Book review

Frans H. van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, 2018, Volume 33 of the Argumentation Library, 193 pp, ISBN: 1566-7650

Author: Peng Wu

Published in: Argumentation | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

As one of the main approaches to argumentation, Pragma-Dialectics has always been adopted by scholars from various research domains for its solid, fully-fledged and—more important—consistent theoretical foundation. During the process of perfecting Pragma-Dialectics in the past four decades, pragma-dialecticians have developed a welcome routine of publishing monographs that systematically summarize the latest theoretical and methodological developments of their theory. To name a few: for a thorough knowledge of the whole research program of Pragma-Dialectics, Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1984) is indispensable; for a grip on the pragma-dialectical approach to fallacies, Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1992) can be helpful; for a full picture of the standard theory of Pragma-Dialectics, A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004) can be consulted; for an in-depth understanding of the extended theory of Pragma-Dialectics, Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation (van Eemeren 2010) is the best reference. However, until now there has not been a monograph that presents the general thrust of the development of Pragma-Dialectics since it was enunciated in the late 1970s to now, covering both its standard theory and its extended theory. It can easily be imagined that such a monograph would satisfy those readers who are eager to know what Pragma-Dialectics is and in what sense it is different from other approaches to argumentation. Fortunately, Argumentation Theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective, a monograph that takes on this mission, has timely come out in 2018. In the following I will first briefly introduce the content of each chapter of this monograph and then discuss its merits. …

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris & Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRef van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris & Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRef
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Argumentation in context 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Argumentation in context 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Frans H. van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, 2018, Volume 33 of the Argumentation Library, 193 pp, ISBN: 1566-7650
Author
Peng Wu
Publication date
20-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Argumentation / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9469-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Argumentation 4/2018 Go to the issue